Maynardiacs! A Closer Look At The Cal QBs in 2011
TwistNHook: This is always the question that the fans look forward to the most. Who is going to be the QB? We've had uneven QB play the last few years. What can we expect out of new QB Zach Maynard this season? If he suffers an injury, what can expect out of his back ups Allan Bridgford and Brock Mansion?
LeonPowe: I think its going to be tough for any of us to make a good prediction about Maynard until we've seen him actually throw some balls, get under center or take a hit or two. It's not like any other starter where we have at least last years play (even as a back up) to base a prediction off of. I do think if he can make the easy throws, protect the ball from turnovers and get it to Jones and Allen in space we'll have already won. Anything he can create with his legs (or arm) will be gravy. I think cal fans would now be happy with s game managing QB who didn't lose games - but put the defense in s position to win games.
HydroTech: I'm not really of the opinion that the Cal offense needs high level QB play to be great. Certainly, it helps. But if you have an offense that can run the ball pretty dominantly, and you have a QB who can complete as low as 60% of his passes, I think the offense will be fine. And I think Maynard can do that.
Kodiak: I'd love to see Mansion on the field a lot this year...holding for extra points. I think you could run a really nice fake with him on some type of read-option.
TwistNHook: How weird is it to not have Kevin Riley on this team? He always seemed to be part of some controversy. He seemed like an incredibly nice guy with very odd luck. Wherever he went, something crazy followed.
Berkelium97: Poor Kevin Riley. He started to blossom last season (while the O-line withered away) and would have had a respectable set of stats had he finished the season. He would not have been an Aaron Rodgers, but I am sure he would have been a better QB if Tedford were the full-time quarterbacks coach instead of Ludwig. Thankfully, we have a pair of promising, young, Tedford-coached QBs who will see playing time this season: Maynard and Bridgford (assuming Bridge takes the #2 spot, which sounds more and more likely).
We are in a fortunate position where we will be able to see Bridgford, Mansion, and maybe even Hinder get considerable playing time early on in the season against Presbyterian. Bridge and Mansion might each see about a quarter of playing time, assuming we put the game away by halftime.
Bridgford apparently has been putting considerable work into his mechanics after coming back from that shoulder surgery. I'm looking forward to seeing what he can do in a live game (even if it is against one of the worst teams in all of D-1A football. It will be interesting to see how Maynard performs down the stretch because Bridgford could conceivably win the starting role next season or even this season if Maynard flops (which seems highly unlikely following Tedford's comments).
Bridgford has since shortened his motion and his release has become notable quicker this fall than it was in the spring.
"I think that ever since the first day that I came back throwing, I've felt the same," Bridgford said. "I haven't really lost what I used to throw, but I feel like my mechanics are getting better. There's definitely, way back when, in May of last year, when I first came back, throwing, there was definitely a mental block, like, 'Is this one going to hurt?' It was a pretty traumatic thing I went through, when I hurt my shoulder first, but it feels great now. That's all in the past. I never think about it anymore. Everything about my game has gotten a lot quicker now that I've gone through spring ball and had reps under fire there. I feel like, in camp right now, I've been getting the ball out really quick, and I'm not taking any sacks, no turnovers, nothing like that. Everything's been a lot quicker, including my motion."
OhioBear: I liked Kevin Riley and appreciated his effort for the program. But I am excited that we are turning the page on the Kevin Riley era and moving forward with our next set of quarterbacks.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
sunshine, pure sunshine
…is all I can see…11 days my brothers and sisters…11 days…GO BEARS
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Aug 23, 2011 6:23 AM PDT reply actions
We have an embarrassment of riches at QB...
It could be a lot worse. Take UCLA as an example. We have Maynard who is tagged at our No. 1 who is coming in with experience. Bridgeford has all the tools, but just needs to get some experience. Mansion has some experience and probably just needs to put it together a little better than he did last year. Need I even go deeper into our QB roster? God, there have been so many complaints about our QBs over the past few years, but we still have a very good stable in waiting.
I still have memories of Longshore trying to run.
Seeing Maynard run is going to look like 4.6, even if he isn’t that fast.
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
by cldpc on Aug 23, 2011 8:24 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I tried to Google his 40 time... didn't find anything official,
but there was this quote in an article about some Buffalo DE:
“…but if matched up in a foot race with Zach Maynard, who runs in the 4.5 range…”
I’ll take it.
I remember Longshore trying to run. The entire Student Section went “wtf”.
In other words, Go Bears!
Although that 17 yard run against UCLA was glorious.
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
The other day, I came across Brock Mansion highlights on youtube. Link
Some of the comments on there include:
cal future = bright
The Bears quarterback issue seems to be resolved
dang hes hella good. go bears
Hopefully, Maynard hype wont turn out to be like Mansion’s.
It is a good thing that youtube comments do not = Tedford comments
in terms of credibility.
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
I’m not expecting big things, but I’m not completely pessimistic, either. I think we might actually get some stability and ok play from the position this year. Been a while since that’s happened. It’ll be interesting/fun to see how his mobility changes things, especially what he can create whenever the protection breaks down.
I’ve been on the Maynard train since Day 1. I’m not expecting Aaron Rodgers-level excellence, but I think he’s going to easily be our best QB since #8 was under center for the Bears. I am excite!
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
Yeah, but 2007 and 2008 Nate weren’t as good, and they unfortunately factor into the overall Nate quality level.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Aug 24, 2011 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions
Statistically, yes he was. And he had absolutely wonderful performances against Minnesota, Oregon State, Oregon, ASU, and Ucla. But he also had meh games against WSU, Arizona, USC, and in the Big Game.
Keeping January 2 open. You know, just in case.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
What has me the most optimistic is the reports that Maynard and Allen always seem to be on the same page…
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
I can only hope that the words "First Down" accompany "Family Tree" about 700 times.
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
Need a running game
If the backs can’t get decent yardage, even a very good QB will have a tough time – good thing Maynard is mobile, we’ll need that, unless Sofele becomes another Jacquizz or something in the next week. I think they’ll hold Bigelow back – any word on this yet? – to strengthen the knee…if he plays, I’ll cringe every time he gets tackled.
All I’m hoping for is they play well enough to get to a bowl game and upset the Furdsters.
I think for Cal this is backwards, we need a strong passing game so teams don’t sell out on stopping the run, and stack the box against us. That’s been our problem the past 2-3 years.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
Yeah. We’ve been wanting to establish the run, but really the last few years we need to establish the pass.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Aug 23, 2011 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course, an oline solves all this. Create holes for the RB’s and time for the QB, and both phases of the offense will work.
by Missing Barry on Aug 23, 2011 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions
the only thing i saw in that article was Aaron Rodgers 2.0. That sounds really really good right about now. If the NCAA allowed Cam Newton to play last year, is it really such a stretch to think that Rodgers could slip on a cal jersey on saturdays without anybody “noticing”?

by 



























































