clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Inside The Numbers: IB Hoagies Edition

New, 55 comments

Look, I could sit here and write up stuff about the UW Huskies. I could look at the stats of their football team. Discuss what Cal needs to do to beat the UW Huskies. But let's be honest. People don't want to hear that. They'd rather hear about the stats on the IB Hoagies:

Ibs-01_medium

via www.telegraphshop.com

  • Price Range: $
  • Accepts Credit Cards: No
  • Parking: Street
  • Attire: Casual
  • Good for Groups: No
  • Good for Kids: Yes
  • Takes Reservations: No
  • Delivers: No
  • Take-out: Yes
  • Waiter Service: No
  • Wheelchair Accessible: Yes
  • Outdoor Seating: Yes
  • Good for: Lunch
  • Alcohol: None
Damn, those are some great stats. Doesn't accept credit card. Attire casual! I think I can handle this. Good for lunch? I don't know, it's also good for dinner and GREAT for breakfast. Nothing is better than waking up at 10 AM on a Saturday morning, rolling down to IB Hoagies grabbing a hoagie for the game. And then grabbing another hoagie after the game. And 4 more hoagies after that. And maybe one more hoagie. For your loved ones. A love hoagie is one of the greatest gifts you can give.

Ok, ok, no more hoagie talk. Let's actually discuss the Huskies stats in all their 0-11 glory.

All numbers are from here.

Overall Team Statistics


TEAM STATISTICS WASH OPP
SCORING 152 415
Points Per Game 13.8 37.7
FIRST DOWNS 188 248
Rushing 75 133
Passing 89 104
Penalty 24 11
RUSHING YARDAGE 1088 2456
Yards gained rushing 1449 2677
Yards lost rushing 361 221
Rushing Attempts 375 463
Average Per Rush 2.9 5.3
Average Per Game 98.9 223.3
TDs Rushing 12 28
PASSING YARDAGE 1870 2416
Att-Comp-Int 341-162-13 291-199-7
Average Per Pass 5.5 8.3
Average Per Catch 11.5 12.1
Average Per Game 170.0 219.6
TDs Passing 6 23
TOTAL OFFENSE 2958 4872
Total Plays 716 754
Average Per Play 4.1 6.5
Average Per Game 268.9 442.9
KICK RETURNS: #-Yards 59-1113 25-515
PUNT RETURNS: #-Yards 10-43 23-287
INT RETURNS: #-Yards 7-55 13-157
KICK RETURN AVERAGE 18.9 20.6
PUNT RETURN AVERAGE 4.3 12.5
INT RETURN AVERAGE 7.9 12.1
FUMBLES-LOST 19-10 15-3
PENALTIES-Yards 50-424 84-752
Average Per Game 38.5 68.4
PUNTS-Yards 59-2249 34-1301
Average Per Punt 38.1 38.3
Net punt average 31.9 34.1
TIME OF POSSESSION/Game 29:06 30:53
3RD-DOWN Conversions 69/162 71/141
3rd-Down Pct 43% 50%
4TH-DOWN Conversions 5/12 9/16
4th-Down Pct 42% 56%
SACKS BY-Yards 14-92 28-229
MISC YARDS 0 0
TOUCHDOWNS SCORED 18 53
FIELD GOALS-ATTEMPTS 9-17 15-16
ON-SIDE KICKS 0-0 0-0
RED-ZONE SCORES 21-30 70% 46-50 92%
RED-ZONE TOUCHDOWNS 15-30 50% 33-50 66%
PAT-ATTEMPTS 17-18 94% 50-53 94%
ATTENDANCE 445479 226829
Games/Avg Per Game 7/63640 4/56707
Neutral Site Games 0/0

This is not going to be pretty here. Outscored 152-415. Ouch. Given up 37.7 compared to 13.8. Given up many many more first downs. But hey give them credit, they are giving up pretty much the exact same amount of passing yards as rushing yards. So, that's gotta count for something, right? Of course, its about 1500 more rushing yards and 600 more passing yards. That's probably because UW got behind a lot and their opponents were rushing a lot while they were passing a lot.

Lordy lord lord, this is sad to look at. I bet these were our stats in 2001. We've been there. Note, btw, that they are giving up 50% of their 3rd downs. That is NOT good at all!

RUSHING GP Att Gain Loss Net Avg TD Long Avg/G
Dailey, T. 7 74 350 15 335 4.5 1 59 47.9
Johnson, B. 9 76 226 32 194 2.6 3 16 21.6
Locker, Jake 4 56 275 95 180 3.2 3 20 45.0
Griffin, Willie 7 39 163 4 159 4.1 1 17 22.7
Freeman, David 4 27 161 9 152 5.6 0 24 38.0

This....is not good. Locker is their 3rd best RB and he hasn't played in a long time. Terrence Dailey appears to be their #1 guy now, averaging 4.5 yards a carry. Brandon Johnson is getting an equal amount of carries, but only averages 2.6 a carry. So, Dailey is the guy to focus on here. He might average more a game if UW didn't get behind so much so quickly. 4.5 yards a carry is not that bad.

1707849_medium

Terrence Dailey via grfx.cstv.com

1095767_medium

Brandon Johnson via graphics.fansonly.com

PASSING GP Effic Cmp-Att-Int Pct Yards TD Long Avg/G
Fouch, Ronnie 10 86.6 110-243-12 45.3 1323 4 62 132.3
Locker, Jake 4 103.6 50-93-0 53.8 512 1 48 128.0
Bruns, Cody 6 412.0 2-2-0 100.0 35 1 29 5.8
Bean, Taylor 1 -100.0 0-2-1 0.0 0 0 0 0.0

Well, Locker was the superstud. And he's been injured for a while now. It appears Ronnie Fouch is their main man now. 86 efficiency rating would be great in the pros. At the college level, its well below standard. Only throwing for 132 yards a game. TERRIBLE completion percentage. Locker wasn't much better.

I put Taylor Bean in, just because I like that -100 QB rating. Ouch!

571470_medium

Jake Locker via graphics.fansonly.com

1209728_medium

Ronnie Fouch via graphics.fansonly.com

1267094_medium

Taylor Bean via graphics.fansonly.com

RECEIVING GP No. Yards Avg TD Long Avg/G
Goodwin, D. 11 58 685 11.8 1 53 62.3
Kearse, J. 11 20 301 15.1 2 62 27.4
Aguilar, Devin 11 19 234 12.3 0 32 21.3
Gottlieb, M. 9 13 184 14.2 1 32 20.4
Middleton, K. 11 11 75 6.8 0 16 6.8

Well, if you have poor QB play, you are going to have less than stellar WR numbers. And here they are. D'Andre Goodwin is the main man. 58 receptions on the year. But only 11.8 average. Jermaine Kearse is averaging quite a bit more per catch, but only has 20 receptions on the year. Only Goodwin has more than 20 receptions on the year.

2080816_medium

Jermaine Kearse via grfx.cstv.com

571461_medium

D'Andre Goodwin via graphics.fansonly.com

Of course, the Defensive table was screwing up the site. So, I had to delete it. But let's be honest for a second here. This is a bad team. Coming to our house. Good combination for us. Their #1 player is out. They just lost to WSU, a team we beat 66-3. You generally can't really use the transitive theory, but still, 66-3. We should be able to handle this team. So, I pose a few questions:

1. Should Nate Longshore start? Riley is the undisputed QB of this team. And he needs all the reps he can get. Notwithstanding some sort of fake PAT play call, which he may or may not have done, he's put his heart and sole into this team. Does he deserve to start the game bc its his last home game? We'll prolly see him in garbage time, as it is.

2. Should Cal agreed to move this game to this spot? I generally like the Big Game to be last. Am I alone in this?

Final Thought: I hope the team is staying more focused than I am, because I've already looked ahead to Maryland '09! Man, do I hope we get revenge. I hate those Terps!!!!