Harper Kamp, Defense Allow Cal To Escape With Win Over Colorado
I'm not sure if the cliché "Good teams find ways to win when they aren't playing well" applies to this game, but two facts are indisputable: Cal did not play well, and Cal won the game. They won because of defense, they won because Colorado played down with them, but mostly they won because Harper Kamp made plays when they had to have them.
Harper's rough game last Sunday in Oregon was enough to cause concern, but I think the general consensus was not to worry because a) he's the 4th option in the offense and b) he's clearly playing through pain. The pain was pretty obvious today. Perhaps my favorite play of the night was when Harper turned the ball over, but atoned by chasing down Andre Roberson and somehow getting set enough to draw a charge. His hustle was rewarded with some back pain, and as he writhed on the court I wondered how he was so effective. I feel like you can see the impact of his back problems when he takes free throws - he doesn't look as smooth and comfortable as last year, when he shot 81.6% from the line. Maybe it's just the power of suggestion and I'm imagining things?
The other memorable play from this game was his clutch bucket to give Cal a 3 point lead with 50 seconds left. The possession was a near disaster the entire way. Jorge drove wildly into the paint with no escape valve, and two passes nearly stolen before the ball got to Kamp on the right wing. With the shot clock running down, he just drove, ended up getting twisted so that he was more or less facing away from the basket, and still flipped it in.
Harper may not score 20 points in a game again this year, and I sincerely hope he doesn't need to carry the offense again. But it's comforting to know that he'll be there, as an interior defender and cog in the offense. His contributions are perhaps the least obvious on the team, but we all know it would be disastrous to lose him.
The other key was the defensive effort. Cal held Colorado to their lowest offensive efficiency of the season, which isn't a huge surprise considering Colorado's mediocre schedule, but still. Cal didn't allow Roberson to dominate the offensive glass and they didn't allow any open shots unless it was Austin Dufault from three. Argh.
Cal had some of the best hedging I've seen in a while from every big that entered the game, and it seemed to really slow down Colorado's offense. Cal's traps off of hedges weren't ultra aggressive, turnover creating machines, but they broke up the rhythm of the offense and led to situations where the Buffs took lower percentage shots towards the end of the shot clock. It helped that none of Colorado's guards seemed willing or able to split the hedge or otherwise penetrate.
The bad from this game is pretty obvious. 2-17, 2-9, 3-9. The field goal lines from Jorge, Allen Crabbe and Justin Cobbs. I will say this: I thought Colorado put on a pretty good defensive effort - certainly much better than what Cal faced against Oregon, UCLA and (presumable, since we didn't see it) Oregon State. Carlon Brown, Nate Tomlinson and Askia Booker were all able to stay tight on our guards, and on the rare occasions that they got in the paint Roberson was waiting to contest and block shots. That said, the Bears missed shots that they would typically make, especially Jorge. Runners, pull up jumpers, base line spot-up shots, open threes . . . at least half of Jorge's shots were reasonable looks. Crabbe and Cobbs missed decent looks too.
Other thoughts:
-Cal won this game because of turnovers. Specifically, because Colorado is just inherently a turnover prone team. The only Pac-12 team that turns the ball over more than Colorado is point-guard-less U (otherwise known as Arizona St.), and that was the difference in a game that was slightly leaning towards the Buffs in most other aspects. See below:
-David Kravish impresses more and more every game. I personally would like to see more minutes for Richard Solomon (just 12), but Kravish more or less held his own against Roberson, picked up a few key offensive rebounds, and made some really impressive blocks. As long as he's not matched up on somehow who can exploit his slim frame, he's a spectacular defender for a freshman.
-The blowouts in the non-conference schedule were fun, but now we're into competitive conference play, which means heavy minutes for the starters. Cobbs: 39, Crabbe and Gutierrez: 38, Kamp: 33. It'll be nice to have Brandon Smith back.
So. Huge win. We're tied for first place in the conference and get the presumed bottom-dweller of the conference at home next. A win would set us up nicely for the defining middle stretch of conference play. Style points be damned, the Bears are exactly where we want them to be.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’ll take partial credit. It was midnight back here at halftime so I went to bed. My not watching the second half must have been what made the difference.
Ohio Bear told me the same thing. Maybe you two are the perfect storm. Whenever we are losing any game at halftime, you need to go to bed. Even if it is a football game at a 3 pm kickoff.
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Jan 13, 2012 6:43 AM PST up reply actions
My credit
I started watching the game about midway through the first half with CU leading 13-11. Cal proceeded to go 5+ minutes without scoring and 7 minutes without a FG. We trailed 29-22 at halftime and I went to bed. I woke up this morning and was happy to see we came back to win in the 2nd half.
You’re welcome.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
I’ll take full credit. Our cat died an hour before we got to campus, and I knew the team wouldn’t let me end the night on a down note.
You get 50%.....
…..I watched the (horrible) first half at a family-friendly sports bar with my daughter, but had to pick up my son with ~3 mins left before the half (game not on regular TV here in the chilly NW). So ME not watching was a contributing factor. You’re all very welcome.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
They played good defense throughout for the most part. Their offense just took a while to get going.
I want to see the Richard Solomon of the last 2 minutes of that game for the rest of the season. He was beasting.
by LouisMurphy'sLaw on Jan 13, 2012 7:22 AM PST reply actions
While we not be an elite or great team
we are a “good” team. When our top players have as bad a night as they did and we still win, most people would say that is a sign of a good team. So I think, in fact, last night the cliche “Good teams find ways to win when they aren’t playing well” was true.
I agree...
…..and is it “playing badly” to get open looks and simply miss them? In a way, I guess, but I’d rather the team suffer a poor shooting night because they were off rather than that they suffer a poor shooting night because open shots couldn’t be found. Especially considering that they were working so hard on defense. And especially because the other team also played exceptionally good defense. At least as well as our team did.
Strange team because not only are both teams well coached, they employ remarkably similar strategies. The difference is probably that Colorado has much less experience. Monty and the CU coach spoke for longer than a handshake after the game, and I think they were telling each other how pleased they are with themselves and each other!
My favorite play of the game was actually Cobb realizing he could really tattoo Tattoo on the fast break if he wanted so went ahead and ran him over hard for the blocking foul.
Cobbs
Of course as a point guard he holds the ball much mote often than Harper, but he’s also taking more shots.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
by norcalnick on Jan 13, 2012 8:56 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
First half Colorado D
I didn’t find it that heavy; I just thought Jorge had been jinxed and there was a force-field around the rim he couldn’t penetrate. MY perception is that Oregon State played better perimeter D than Colorado did in the first half. Last night I kept thinking “Why didn’t you take that shot (fill in the blank, or just go with Alan Crabbe…..); you were open!!!!!” At OSU they didn’t get the same looks.
2nd half last night maybe the Buffs kicked it up a notch……
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
Well that was ugly, but we won as a team. After praising Monty Ball this week, it is a bit sad to see such ugly play, but I came away impressed by Colorado. They play much better team defense and offense than anyone else in the Pac 12 I’ve seen this year. Sort of a version of us, but not quite. We have better players, who in the end executed better, but Colorado has my respect for their play.
Harper was a hero of this game, and Crabbe did not score, but was a ferocious defender and ball hawk. I’m happy with the win.
Go Bears!
by Calbear91 on Jan 13, 2012 8:46 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Boyle
A bit rash to judge him from one game that I have seen and from scores of their first 3 wins, but it looks to me that Boyle may be better than any of the other Pac-12 coaches, all of whom I have seen except for Utah’s Krystkowiak.
I have read where CU has the conference’s second best recruiting class for next year, after U of A, so I expect CU to be a force in the conference going forward. And am worried about the Bears playing in Boulder, where the altitude gives CU an extra home court advantage. See last year’s NIT blowout of our Bears, for example.
I was also impressed by how well-coached CU appeared. Their defense was tough and the big win over UW was no fluke.
Old Toothwrangler
by Kodiak on Jan 13, 2012 12:59 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
seriously. They had that play where Cobbs was driving against two defenders, and one of them just funnels him into the other guy, who was already set up for the screen. Crazy.
And they totally knew how to clog our passing lane during our most common set play.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Jan 13, 2012 2:14 PM PST up reply actions
Not to take anything away from the Bears,
but we really did benefit from how Colorado didn’t really execute down the stretch. They obviously missed the chance to jump to a bigger lead earlier in the game, then they turned the ball over on some key possessions (including with the chance to tie down 3 with about a minute left) that sealed their fate. Like mentioned in norcalnick’s post about Monty ball, we don’t really force turnovers by design. That was pretty much an unforced error on Colorado’s part.
by LEastCoastBears on Jan 13, 2012 11:40 AM PST reply actions
After the game I saw that we had like 8 steals, and it made me wonder if it counts as a steal when the other team throws the ball into your hands
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
by norcalnick on Jan 13, 2012 12:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions



























































