KNOW YOUR ENEMY: Colorado Offense Preview
Greetings again fellow Cal fans, and happy almost-Saturday. After a mistake-laden yet satisfying win over the Fresno State Bulldogs at Candlestick, we're heading on the road this week to battle the Colorado Buffaloes up in Boulder. As a Californian living in Denver, I hold a special place in my heart for the failures and miseries of the Colorado sports teams. What can I say? Sports-talk radio out here is more entertaining when the local teams suck (thanks Broncos!), and the Buffs were pretty lousy the last couple years...under the now-unemployed Dan Hawkins.
Hawkins was shown the door last year before the season had even concluded, following an epic meltdown against a horrendous Kansas team. Enter Buff alum John Embree, bringing along a staff containing a couple fellow former CU footballers who want to help return the Buffs to their somewhat brief glory days; Eric Bienemy as offensive coordinator, and Kanavis McGhee as D-Line coach. But far more pertinent to Cal fans...Steve Marshall is now the O-line coach at Colorado! And in one of the most lopsided trades ever, Cal hired former Buffs coaches Eric Kiesau (WR's coach) and Ashley Ambrose (DB's Coach). If that seems like an even trade, then I've got a lovely mountain timeshare in Eastern Colorado that might interest you.
Embree and his staff are working hard to turn things around up in Boulder, instilling a new attitude and renewed work ethic that was lacking during the final days of Dan Hawkins' tenure. The Buffs had a tough opening game, losing to Hawaii in Oahu 34-17, but they're fired up for their home opener this weekend...and are likely looking to exact some revenge for the 52-7 pasting administered in the beautiful confines of Strawberry Canyon last year.
Who are the Buffs' key offensive players? What should we expect to see on Saturday? If you're looking for an arrogant writeup that goes heavy on snark and short on legitimate analysis, please read on.
2011 record: 0-1 (lost @ Hawaii 34-17)
Last Season: 5-7
2010 NATL RANKS-Offense:
Passing: 222.7 yards/game (58th)
Rushing: 136.83 yards/game (73rd)
Points: 24.2/game (77th)
QB:
STARTER
Tyler Hansen, Senior - 6'1", 215 lbs
For large portions of his first two seasons at CU, Hansen found himself backing up former QB Cody Hawkins, who was clearly better than Hansen...at being the head coach's son. Yeah, Dan Hawkins started his mediocre son as the Colorado QB. That kind of crap may fly in Pop Warner, but IT'S DIVISION ONE FOOTBALL! IT'S THE BIG-12! IT AIN'T INTRAMURALS! Sorry, low hanging fruit and all. Anyway, Hansen did garner some solid starting QB experience when Dan Hawkins received overwhelming pressure to actually, you know, play the best QB on the roster (Hansen started the last 7 games of the 2009 season and the first 7 games of the 2010 season before being injured). He has much better size than Cody Hawkins did, but so do most normal-sized men. He has good mobility (806 career rush yards), but in the Hawaii game he displayed a tendency to hold onto the ball WAY too long (7 sacks...SEVEN SACKS). Some unimaginative play-calling by newbie Offensive Coordinator Eric Bienemy didn't do him many favors either. I saw a Power I formation on damn near every first down, and a Shotgun set with 3 WR's split out wide on damn near every third down. Oh, and Steve Marshall is coaching the O-line charged with protecting him. STEVE! MARSHALL!
Don't get me wrong, Hansen has plenty of talent. He just suffered from a lot of inconsistency last week. He made some great throws, but also some errant ones. This is interesting because he displayed pretty good accuracy in his seven starts during the 2010 season (68.3% completions). His struggles in Week 1 could be chalked up to the following facts: he hadn't started a game since rupturing his spleen last October (rust?), and/or he was never able to get comfortable in the pocket because his O-line was on roller skates all game (also known as the STEVE MARSHALL EFFECT...ZING!). It is worth noting that depth may be a serious issue for CU if Hansen goes down: he's the only QB on the roster who has taken a snap in college.
Upside: mobility, experience
Downside: awareness, depth
What to expect:
I'm not real sure. Hawaii isn't a team known for possessing an awesome defense, and they were pressuring Hansen all game. Was last week an anomaly? I'm inclined to think so. Hansen is historically an accurate passer who can run if need be. Whether his injury last year has made him a bit squeamish is certainly a possibility. It would make sense that he will be better playing back in Boulder. But this week? I happen to believe that our defense is better than Hawaii's. If they rattled Hansen, we should be able to as well. Tyler's spleen remains intact, but Trevor Guyton and Ernie Owusu entertain themselves by using Hansen's gall bladder as a hackey-sack. FLYING DUTCHMAN!
RB:
STARTER
Rodney Stewart, Senior - 5'6", 175 lbs
Want to hear (read) a fun fact I heard on the ESPN2 broadcast of Colorado's game against Hawaii? Rodney "Speedy" Stewart led CU in rushing his Freshman, Sophomore, and Junior years. Neat stat, huh? And let's not ignore the clever nickname. We're 2 for 2 on unoriginal nicknames for small running backs, and we've only done two offensive previews this year! Just wait till I get to Presbyterian and their 5'3" running back James "Munchkin" Bunchkin. Okay, I made that one up. Barring an injury, I don't see any way Speedy doesn't also lead the Buffs in rushing in his senior year too. Like Robbie "Mighty Mouse" Rouse (who we looked at last week vs. Fresno State), Stewart is the Buffs' most proven play-maker on offense (1316 yards rushing and 10 TD's in 2010). Also like Rouse, he's really small. But unlike Rouse, he's very durable and is fine running between the tackles. And as he showed last week against Hawaii, he's a pretty capable receiver out of the backfield (4 catches for 98 yards). That's good, because he didn't find a ton of space in the running game vs. the Rainbow Warriors (52 yards on 18 attempts). He was also the only Colorado running back to get a carry last week. Doesn't speak well to their depth in my opinion. They don't have a back on the roster who's over 200 pounds either.
Upside: speed, hands
Downside: size, depth
What to expect:
Look for Bienemy to try to find ways to get Stewart into space this Saturday. "Speedy" was most effective when he had room to make a play against Hawaii, whether that manifested itself through screen passes or outside runs. He can definitely make a defender miss in the open field, so sure tackling by our linebackers and secondary will be important. He struggled when he tried to run up the middle though, which can easily be explained by the fact that Steve Marshall is the Colorado O-line coach now. Sensing a theme here? I haven't even gotten to the O-line section of this post yet.
If he finds space, Stewart can hurt us. Expect Coach Pendergast to make bottling up the little running back the primary assignment for our front seven this Saturday. Regardless of whether this game goes Colorado's way or not, Stewart is going to get plenty of touches. He carried the ball 29 times last year against Cal, and we all remember how that game went.
WR:
STARTERS
Paul Richardson, Sophomore - 6'1", 165 lbs
Toney Clemons, Senior - 6'2", 210 lbs
Tyler McCullough, Freshman - 6'5", 205 lbs
Kyle Cefalo, Senior - 5'10", 170 lbs
With Colorado's all-time leading WR Scotty McKnight (50 receptions for 621 yards in 2010) moving on to bigger things (being cut by the Jets), the WR corps for CU has a lot to prove this year. What McKnight lacked in size, he made up for in productivity. Arguably the most dynamic and productive returning WR is Sophomore UCLA transfer Paul Richardson (34 recs for 514 yds, 6 TD's). Outside of Speedy Stewart, Richardson was the biggest weapon for the Buffs in Week 1...snagging three passes for 49 yards and two TD's. He's got good height and can make big plays, as indicated by his 15.12 ypc last year. Also returning with good experience is Michigan transfer Toney Clemons, who hauled in 43 catches for 482 yards and 3 TD's in 2010. Sadly for Toney, he had no catches against Hawaii last week. Clemons has really good size but hasn't been quite the big-play threat he was heralded to be upon arriving in Boulder. In addition to Richardson and Clemons, look out for rangy true freshman Tyler McCullough, who at 6'5" is drawing comparisons from Colorado faithful to former Bronco Ed McCaffrey...which is about as original as comparing every small, white wide receiver to Wes Welker. Sigh. Kyle Cefalo also should see time as the fourth WR in the slot when the Buffs choose to spread out. This is a pretty good group.
Upside: size
Downside: experience, depth
What to expect:
Is Hawaii that good on defense this year? Really? They typically give up a lot of points, so I'm scratching my head a little bit that the big WRs for Colorado didn't have bigger days. Especially when you consider that they were playing from behind for much of the game. The Cal secondary will see a very different group than the Red Smurfs that Fresno State lined up. Much more length here. Richardson concerns me the most. They certainly have an ability to make plays, it's just a question of whether the ball gets there or not. It didn't last week. Maybe if Steve Marshall could actually coach the O-line worth a damn then Tyler Hansen and his WRs would have time to stretch the field (almost there, don't worry). But the added motivation of a home opener, revenge for last year, and seeking redemption for a quiet previous week may see this group come out hungry to make plays. None of that stuff really adds up to anything tangible though. We should be able to control the Buff passing game by keeping Hansen scrambling or on his back. I like how our Nickel package matches up with this WR group. Like Fresno State last week, our pass rush should force Colorado into short routes and limit the big play.
TE:
STARTERS
Ryan Deehan, Senior - 6'5", 245 lbs
Matt Bahr, Senior - 6'4", 260 lbs
Senior Ryan Deehan is the primary TE, and is used more in the passing game. Fifth-year senior Matt Bahr is bigger, and is utilized more as a blocker and in double TE sets. After totaling 25 catches for 249 yards and 1 TD last season, Deehan caught three balls for 29 yards last week against Hawaii, so he certainly appears to be a favorite target for Hansen. Whether its fair or not, judging by the mediocre rushing stats and woeful pass protection in Week 1...Bahr didn't have a great game. It's critical that these two stay healthy this season, because there's a Sophomore and two Freshmen behind them on the depth chart.
Upside: experience, run blocking
Downside: depth
What to expect:
Double TE sets should be pretty common on Saturday, as Colorado will likely need to ensure Tyler Hansen has time to throw. Deehan could be dangerous in the passing game, especially off of play action or designed rollouts. Hansen will probably need a security blanket underneath, and that blanket is Deehan. Bahr's blocking assignments won't be any easier this week though against the Cal front seven.
OL:
STARTERS
LT- David Bakhtiari, Sophomore - 6'4", 295 lbs (injured week 1)
LG- Ethan Adkins, Senior - 6'4", 290 lbs
C- Daniel Munyer, RS Freshman - 6'2", 290 lbs
RG- Ryan Miller, Senior - 6'8", 295 lbs
RT- Jack Harris, Sophomore - 6'5", 295 lbs
The Buff O-Line unit suffered three huge blows since the end of last season. First, former Left Tackle Nate Solder was drafted in the first round of the NFL Draft. That's right, the same guy that Jarred Price molested at Memorial Stadium last year. He was a first rounder! Second, they hired Steve Marshall (POW!). And third, starting LT David Bakhtiari sprained his knee last week and is doubtful to play against Cal this Saturday. Replacing Bakhtiari is sophomore Ryan Dannewitz, who is not the player that Bakhtiari was. At the other tackle spot, Jack Harris saw his first collegiate snaps last week against Hawaii and the poor guy got abused most of the game. Serious issues at both tackle spots for CU. The interior of the line sees man-mountain Ryan Miller at Right Guard. Fun fact from the ESPN2 broadcast: Miller played every snap on offense for Colorado the last two years. He brings a lot of experience to this group that frankly, they need badly. At the other guard spot, Ethan Adkins also brings plenty of experience to the line (11 starts last year and 9 starts in 2009). Leaning on these two seasoned veterans is Redshirt Freshman Center Daniel Munyer. There were some issues with snaps between Munyer and Hansen last week against Hawaii that you can bet Steve Marshall will be addressing making worse this week (BAM!).
Upside: Steve Marshall has likely ruined any possible upside this group has already (BOOM!).
Downside: Steve Marshall, starting experience at Center and both Tackle spots
What to expect:
The experience inside did little to help the Buffs last week, as the Hawaiian defensive line spent enough time in the CU backfield that they could have dug a hole back there and roasted a pig if they wanted to. Miller and Adkins appeared just as guilty to me as their less seasoned counterparts too. The group, as a whole, got pushed around and generated very little room for Rodney Stewart to run inside. They also could not handle a four-man rush from Hawaii, which generated enough pressure to either force Hansen into a bad throw or see him take a sack on several occasions. Is any of this sounding familiar, Cal folks? Hmm?
"OH MY GOD! THAT'S STEVE MARSHALL'S MUSIC!!!!"
The Buffs want revenge for last year, huh? Well, I think it's safe to say Cal fans want revenge for last year too, and 2009 as well. Expectation? Sacks, hurries, and TFLs. OH MY.
IN SUMMARY:
In watching and then re-watching the Colorado-Hawaii game, I tried to remind myself of several things:
1. Playing on Oahu is tough. The same Nevada team that did Cal in Reno last year traveled to Hawaii and lost.
2. This Hawaii team might be really good, and their defense could be far better than years' past.
3. It's not fair to judge this Colorado team by this one single game.
I think point #1 is a big one. The difference for Colorado between playing in Hawaii and playing in Boulder will be big; psychologically that should be a serious boost. Point #2? Remains to be seen, but I doubt Hawaii just magically found a defense that is better than the one Cal possesses. With regard to point #3, I've tried not to base too much of my analysis on last week, but what else am I supposed to do with several new faces and a brand new coaching staff? Take a look again at the numbers and national rankings of the 2010 Colorado offense (top of the article). Since then, they've lost a first round Left Tackle and the most productive Wide Receiver in school history. Is it really reasonable to expect so much more from the Buffs this year when those things are taken into account? Does a new coaching staff make you that much better that fast? Um, not when you just hired Steve Marshall as your O-line coach (KABLOOEY!) Plus, there certainly appeared to be some telling issues last week. Will the Buffs be able to effectively run on the Cal defense? Doubt it. Will they be able to pass effectively? Not if Hansen is hearing footsteps all game and worrying about his spleen.
The way I see it, any advantage the Buffs have in the match-up between their offense and Cal's defense comes in the form of the same tired, mildly worthless intangible/nebulous cliches: playing their home opener, new coaching staff=new attitude, letdown game for Cal, blah blah blah. I don't see it; not with this year's Cal team. 5-7 in 2010 doesn't afford you a letdown in the second game of the 2011 season...let alone your first real road game. And Fresno State was pretty fired up last week. Hell, we even spotted them 7 points right off the bat. But several three and outs and a whole lot of punishment later, you take the fight right out of a team. My main concern? Altitude. Can we maintain a high tempo? I think with the depth we have on the D-line our big uglies will stay fresh. If they can't, we'll probably see a game similar to when Cal visited Fort Collins to play Colorado State in 2007. Get up big early, fade down the stretch...but win. I don't even see the altitude playing enough of a factor to save the Buffs on Saturday though. My prediction? 27-13 BEARS.
Got some thoughts? Let's hear them.
LINKS:
Football - Football Home - CUBuffs.com - Official Athletics Web site of the University of Colorado
74 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have a very bad feeling about this game.
In that I always have a bad feeling about one out of conference game, and this one is it.
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
My bad feeling comes from.....
……the altitude. Cal doesn’t seem to play well at elevation (See Nevada, 2010). Hell, our basketball team played a tournament game against an overmatched UWisconsin, Green Bay in the mid 1990s at altitude and were embarrassed so it crosses over sports. Good thing our surfing team NEVER plays at altitude…….
Take thin air out of the equation and I’m much more comfortable if, for nothing else, our depth in defensive front 7.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
Yes on this. Altitude is just about my only worry. I read somewhere that altitude has to do with red blood cells not getting oxygen, etc. etc. No way to acclimate in a day. Effects everyone the same way, regardless of fitness. . . It sounded like dooooom.
yep
it takes 4-6 weeks to properly and fully acclimate your body to higher altitude. since that’s not exactly feasible when playing a college football season, the next best thing to do is to arrive as close to game time as possible and not give your body as much of a chance to feel/absorb the difference. there will still be some impact though.
sounds like the team is leaving tomorrow morning for Boulder, which I think is better than leaving getting in today for the above reason.
still think our depth on the d-line will help us stay fresh though. O-line…not as sure.
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
we didn’t seem to have any problem at Colorado State or at Air Force… so maybe the state of Colorado is a safe high altitude zone for us.
That's because you were playing CSU and the AFA
by BuffulanceMan on Sep 8, 2011 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I’d take that comment more seriously if CU weren’t an even more lame version of Ucla over the last few years.
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
To be fair, CU is not even within an order of magnitude of UCLA on the whininess scale.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 8, 2011 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Nah, we beat them in all the 1 on 1 match-up, the D was just not well prepared for their scheme. That, and Riley’s pick-6 did us in.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
^this
UCSD Triton Football: Still Undefeated!
by CaliGolden Triton on Sep 8, 2011 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions
ya good point. People dont seem to realize but your body cant adjust that fast. It should be a slight advantage for the Buffs but I think Cal will prevail
by WWW.REPMYCOLLEGE.COM on Sep 8, 2011 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Valid.
Any concern I have would stem from our offense effectively moving the ball though. I don’t see us having many issues with this CU offensive group.
plus, it’s an unfortunate reality that Cal teams of the past have been known to crap the bed in games like this. I’m banking that this year’s team is different. Hope they prove me right
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
invalid - not the reality
we’ve crapped one game like this. Maryland.
Otherwise road games against inferior OOC opponents are exactly the kinds of games we take care of.
@Minnesota
@Colorado State
@ Air Force
@Southern Miss
@New Mexico State
This is only technically an OOC game.
The internet's most successful troll!
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
touche
but i’d say we considered Nevada an inferior OOC opponent before playing the game.
not saying that Colorado is anything like 2010 Nevada (they most definitely are not), but i understand why any Cal fan would be nervous going into a road game.
as you hopefully gleaned from my post though, i’m not nervous.
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
I will buy a Buffs hat and eat it if they go 11-1 like Nevada did last year.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 8, 2011 10:45 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I'll remember this
So I’ll eat my UCLA shirt if they go over 7 wins and you’ll eat a Colorado hat if they go 11-1. We mods are not afraid to put our money (or stomachs?) behind our predictions!
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
Haha, I think both are fairly safe bets, though mine is hardly a bet at all :) hopefully I’ll be able to escape my obligation as soon as Saturday
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 8, 2011 5:27 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
My bad feeling ...
Is that this is a road game. Do I need any other reason?
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
In my book, no. Road games scare the heck out of me.
The internet's most successful troll!
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
Anyone else think . ..
That Pendergast is going to pull out all the stops for this one? I mean, if the fans are all salivating over getting to be on the other side of Marshall’s O-line, certainly some of that carries over to the d-coordinator who pitched near shut-outs only to lose games because our O-line blocked air.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see stunts, zone blitzes, and all kinds of defensive freshness on Saturday. I also wouldn’t be surprised if our players started puking on the field from lack of oxygen.
red zone D
Just an observation from watching the Fresno State game- the td’s inside the 20 need to stop! the 1st td was on a 10 yard run where the rb was barely touched, and the 2nd was when the wr towered over our smaller DB. Oh man, I’m nervous about this game- shMarshall run-or not.
Luckily, or unluckily, I have to attend a wedding in Napa, so I will be trying hard not to scream during the ceremony whilst I follow the score.
by rollonyoubears111 on Sep 8, 2011 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
There was some obscene holding on that first TD.
I wouldn’t worry too much about the second TD. They drove down the field against our 2nd/3rd units and couldn’t convert on the goal line against the 1st unit until 4th down.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
Personally, after seeing the defense ftom last week, as long as we don’t turn the vall over inside our own 20, I see a good chance of us pitching a shut-out in this game. Too much speed + excellent tackling technique + better strength/conditioning + unprecedented D-Line depth + overall nasty attitude = dominant Cal defense. I don’t give the Buffs much of a chance to put together a long, sustained drive in this game. Their punter better be ready for a long day.
by daveman on Sep 8, 2011 8:08 AM PDT via iPhone app reply actions
i screwed up my vote… i thought we were voting on how many points CAL would score…
need…. more…. coffee….
Given that this is a road game I am concerned, but believe Cal will take care of business through better talent, and better coaching. Having said that, I’ve rewatched the Cal/Bulldog game several times in slow-mo now and have drawn the conclusion that our offense is only barely OK with Maynard being bold but inaccurate and the OL/Isi, combination is only OK too, and our defense is f***ing unbelievable.
Combining these things should result in a Cal win of 24-13.
This team seems to have great espirit de corps and that counts for something, but our offense has to show it can run and pass better for me to have high hopes against the better teams in our conference.
Maynard can run
Not sure about the rest of the team ;-)
Was actually kind of hoping Maynard would be the leading rusher last week.
by HelloBowlesHall on Sep 8, 2011 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Very optimistic bear here
Just by going off last year, colorado is simply not that great of a football team. I didn’t get a chance to watch the Hawaii game, however, so I know this is a very unfair opinion. But honestly, everything falls on Maynard. Maynard is THE pulse of the team. If he exudes enough confidence to remind our other players that they’re, you know, actually incredibly talented, much more talented as a group as a whole compared to Colorado, then this should be a simple game.
And from what I saw last game, Maynard seems like the type of kid who doesn’t give a shit if this is in high altitude, whether Colorado is out for revenge, whether Colorado wants to make a statement to the Pac-10. He’s going to sling it to our talented wideouts and keep chucking the ball whether he’s a victim of a pick or bad throw.
The altitude would be a concern for our D if we weren’t deep, but our problem on D is we might be too deep. Guys will be fighting just to be on the field.
One big concern is our oline and our depth there. But again, this goes back to Maynard, who has the legs to roll out of the pocket easily. If CU is aggresive at the line, Maynard can hurt them with his legs and use their aggressiveness to their disadvantage.
Just my humble and quite possible completely wrong opinions.
watch it again, because it’s early and it’s almost the weekend and you know it was funny the first time. But this time, insert “Zach Maynard” for “Honey Badger.”
by slaphancock on Sep 8, 2011 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yes, Zach Maynard can run backwards, eat snakes, and just doesn’t give a shit.
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
by SoCal Oski on Sep 8, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Honey badger don't give a shit

Alright, and after it's all over, you say "Ooh, what a lovely tea party"
by Redonkulous Bear on Sep 8, 2011 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
I put the meme up here: http://www.quickmeme.com/calhoneybadger/
Alright, and after it's all over, you say "Ooh, what a lovely tea party"
by Redonkulous Bear on Sep 8, 2011 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Just watched Hawaii/Colorado highlights
As we’ve heard, the Colorado Oline got destroyed by Hawaii and so I expect Cal will do more of the same. And their quarterback had no time to throw, cannot run, and seemed to lose his poise. So Cal defense should crush Colorado again. Question is, can we score enough to win? Moniz was a great runner, in the Masoli mold of a small thick guy. Maynard is a long strider, and no more accurate as a passer. Having watched this video, I revise my earlier estimate to say Cal wins 27-10.
Great writeup
I laughed, I cried, I hurled
Holy hand grenades, MCB!
Another great write-up.
I’m trying really hard not to feel good about our D against a Marshall-coached Oline…but I may need to turn in my Old Blue badge this week.
If CU can’t run on us effectively, I think it’s game over.
Forgive me, Juju!
Old Toothwrangler
I can't fathom us losing to a team with Marshall on its coaching staff
Now I am not saying I am not concerned because I am. I will just be so embarrassed if we lose to a team that has Marshall coaching its OL.
Now if we lose because the offense turns over the ball six times and the CU defense returns three of those for a TD, I can accept that. However, I can’t accept us losing because the CU offense is able to move the ball at will and rack up 500 yards of offense on our defense.
The altitude does worry me, as does our history of not playing well on the road.
wholeheartedly agree
I had the easy assignment this week, because the CU offense vs. Cal defense matchup is HEAVILY in our favor. Steve Marshall will do that to an offense.
The matchup between our offense and CU’s defense is the one that will determine if we carry the day. If we don’t turn the ball over and basically give point to the Buffs, i don’t really see how we lose. if we score 20+ points, that should be enough.
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
I agree as well
Limit our turnovers and hopefully our defense can stop their ground game and force a few turnovers of our own should equal Cal getting away with its first road win of the season.
I am also a bit concerned about this being Maynards first road game in a year and half. Hopefully Maynard will make some improvements from last week. However, I suppose last weeks game may have prepared him a little bit as Fresno State seemed to have more fans than Cal and they were loud at times.
Looks like Miller picked us to lose
Colorado 24, California 21: This week’s upset special! The Bears look better on paper, and they whipped the Buffs 52-7 in Berkeley last year. But think about it: This is EXACTLY the type of game in which Cal throws up on itself.
In other words, Go Bears!
I can't say I blame him. He has picked us to win plenty of times and we ended up losing
He is right that on paper we are a better team but this is a road game and we haven’t been a very good road team over the years.
I think our road woes are the reason why we opened as only a 5 point favorite in Vegas.
Really though, this whole Cal is a bad road team business is overblown. Aside from say, Maryland, which had weather and game time as contributing factors, how often have we truly shit the bed against an inferior team? We beat Minnesota handily, we’ve beaten Wazzu in Pullman, ASU in Tempe, last year we played Arizona tight, we beat UCLA in Pasadena in 2009. USC and Oregon State have owned us even at home, but those are solid teams. Last time in Autzen was ugly but I believe we won the time before, and Oregon is very good. Anyway, we’re not yet a great road team, but not as bad as people seem to think.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 8, 2011 11:26 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It's overblown but...
We’re not a great road team (to win games), but not as bad as people seem to think (but bad enough to lose games).
Wins and losses. Basically the only thing that matters.
Perhaps it is slighly overblown and we have been competitive for the most part
but we are far from a good road team, I would say we are more an average road team that struggles to put even bad opponents away early.
We tend to beat bad teams on the road, although those games are often close, such as Minnesota in 09. Stuggle with average teams, such as Washington on the road. We get blown out by good teams.
I think the scars of ‘05-’08 will be a long time in healing.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 8, 2011 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
uh
it would have to be VERY sudden, because he was awful last week against Hawaii, and their starting LT is likely out this week.
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
and by sudden you probably mean it's too late
Here’s to hoping Marshall was a true golden bear after all.
This is also an irrational but totally rational fear of mine as well
Like Marshall is reading this post right now for inspiration and just plotting his greatest coaching game ever.
Cal can't afford to lose and won't lose.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
I'm concerned about Cal's run D
Rouse was able to get some space up the middle and we had some trouble on the edges (our OLBs weren’t exactly perfect).
In other words, Go Bears!
Great Article
Just saw your article being reposted by a Colorado fan on our website and it forwarded me here, kinda cool :) Looks like it should be a good battle. Hopefully Maynard can be a little more accurate and it could easily be a blowout. Go Bears!
by WWW.REPMYCOLLEGE.COM on Sep 8, 2011 12:02 PM PDT reply actions
The real pit of my concern isn’t whether our Defense will be able to handle Colorado (because I think we will), but whether our offense will be able to make plays.
Marshall aside, I just keep wondering whether the Colorady defense will be able to create turnovers, short fields, and timely stops. Another mistake-prone performance by our OL will be really hard to overcome, and unless our running game shows some marked improvement, it will just make things too close.
Ugh.
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
Eating the enemy
I just ate a buffalo burger. Take that, CU! I’m feeling good about this. I can’t wait to go to the game on Saturday. Go Bears!
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 8, 2011 2:41 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Paul Richardson is not a UCLA transfer
He had committed to UCLA but changed his committment during fall 2010.



























































