Cal Football: A Golden Spotlight on CJ Anderson vs. the UW Huskies
Nothing's sexier than than the backup QB...unless it's the backup RB. Many Cal fans have expressed a strong preference for Juco transfer CJ Anderson to see more carries and perhaps even supplant Isi Sofele as the starting tailback. Other fans have expressed the opinion that the run-blocking from the Oline, TEs, and FBs is more important than who actually totes the rock.
CJ's line for Cal vs. UW was:
7 carries, 9 yards, 1.3 yards per carry
1 catch, 1 yard.
But do the stats tell the whole story? Let's take a closer look at his carries:
Carry #1: Cal has 21 personnel.(two backs, 1 TE, 2 WR) UW has seven in the box with both safeties playing relatively deep.
It's an outside zone run to the weakside. (away from the side with the TE) LT Mitchell Schwartz pulls. FB Kapp goes out as a lead blocker. Jones tries to block the CB, but loses leverage.
Galas goes to the 2nd level. MSG and Cheadle are supposed to block down and seal the edge, but one of their men pushes through. Schwartz can't get in front of the play to engage the LB. The CB gets by Jones.
Penetration forces CJ to stop and try to break outside. Kapp is left to block two guys. Cheadle is supposed to block one of the LBs.
Both Kapp and Cheadle miss their blocks. Three UW defenders have a shot at CJ.
CJ tries to spin, but has nowhere to go. Despite a power-run formation against 7 in the box, the result is a 2 yard loss.
Carry#2: Cal has 22 personnel.(2 RB, 2 TE, 1 WR) UW has eight in the box, and looks to be playing Cover One Zone with one safety deep and one cheating up.
Hagan goes in motion and shifts the formation from strong left to balanced. (one tight end on both sides)
It's an outside zone run to the right. Both Schwartz and Schwenke pull. Hagan and MSG are supposed to seal the edge.
MSG can't quite get outside far enough and CJ decides to cut back inside instead of trying to outrun the UW defender towards the sideline. This might be a missed read by CJ - there was a lot of open space on the edge and it appears that's where the play was designed to go. Perhaps a faster back could have gotten outside. Hagan also misses his block.
CJ moves inside MSG and Kapp, but the UW defender has a shot at him.
CJ manages to elude the first defender, but Cheadle also loses leverage. Trapped between two Huskies, he goes down for no gain.
Carry #3: Cal has 21 personnel (two RB, 1 TE). UW looks to be in Cover 1. Seven in the box, one safety starting to move up, 5 man front.
It's an outside zone run to the weakside. (away from the TE) The line surges to the right. Miller is supposed to block down to the left.
Miller misses his block. Either the Cal interior linemen let guys through, or the UW defenders shoot the gap.
Kapp isn't able to get in front of the play. CJ puts his head down and manages to power forward for two yards.
Carry #4: Cal has an extra lineman lined up as a tight end, two standard tight ends, and a full back. UW has their goal line package in.
Hagan goes into motion looking like he's shifting the strength of the formation to the right.
But Hagan turns around and shifts back to his original stance.
It's a strong-side power run off-tackle.(Blast) Miller misses his block and allows penetration into the backfield. Tyndall has to help Miller.
Two UW defenders penetrate from the middle. Their OLB (#10, Timu) comes flying into the gap and smacks CJ.
CJ shrugs off the first tackle and pushes towards the goal line. But, there are enough defenders around to drag him down after a one yard gain.
Carry #5: Cal is still in their power formation with 3 TE, 2 RB. UW answers with their goal line package.
Hagan goes in motion again...
...and again, shifts back to his original position.
It's the same off-tackle power run.(Blast) But this time, Miller is able to seal his guy. Tyndall still blocks into the line instead of picking up the OLB (Timu).
CJ is left one on one with the UW linebacker. They both get low...
...And CJ runs him over. Touchdown Bears!
Carry #6: Cal has their 21 personnel (two RBs, one TE) in a modified pistol formation with the FB as a wing. UW looks to be in Cover One with 8 in the box, one safety deep, and a five man front.
It's a high snap, but Maynard catches it. He runs the zone-read to the right.
The line surges to the right, and Schwartz pulls. The UW DE(58) is "read" and left unblocked. He holds his position, so Maynard hands it to CJ.
Schwartz is not quite ble to get to his guy in time and CJ decides to cut back inside instead of stretching it to the outside. This might be another missed read by CJ. It is debatable whether a faster back would have made it to the edge.
The unblocked UW DE is waiting inside. CJ isn't able to juke him or run him over. It's a gain of one.
Not pictured: Carry #7 (because I couldn't find it during the re-watch) and Reception #1 (tackled immediately for a 1 yd gain).
Summary: CJ has a nice blend of power and agility. I like his ability to either make the first guy miss, or to manufacture yards after contact. But, he's not going to consistently make something out of nothing if there are no holes to run through. The blast play is clearly one of his strengths. He didn't have the same success running the outside zone for a variety of reasons. When I reviewed all of the negative yardage or no-gain runs for Sofele, it was always the same issue; at least one Cal player missed a block. The goal line issue has already been beaten to death. Before we start pointing fingers at the tailbacks, it's the big-picture execution of our run-blocking (Oline + TE + FB + WRs) that needs closer scrutiny.
Final Thoughts:
1) For those wondering why we didn't send more pressure at Price, we actually did blitz (rush at least 5) on 8/20 first plays. If you count the stunting and zone blitzing, we rushed the passer more than half the time. Here are the results for just those 5+ man blitzes:
28yd Pass complete.
2 yd rush.
44yd pass complete.
0 yd rush.
9 yard inside rush.
Incomplete pass.
14 yard outside rush. (blitz was inside)
2 yard weakside rush for TD. (blitz was strongside)
The one time we forced them to punt in the first quarter? We rushed just four and played coverage. Without a game-changer like Cam Jordan, we're forced to rely on scheme to get guys free runs at the QB. Sadly enough, we're still not getting there.
2) Whiteside and McCain played a significant number of snaps and flashed the ability to pressure the QB. They also had their growing pains...There was blown coverage on the pass to the UW TE where he rumbled/spun for a TD and a positioning error on the screen pass for a TD. Even so, I'm glad to see them getting playing time. I'd rather live with some mistakes if it means that we can see some of their potential sooner rather than later.
3) Our starting CBs actually had a decent game. In particular, Anthony bounced back and was very solid in run support. UW did most of their damage against our nickel back (Hill) and safeties. (Cattouse and Campbell) On many of those infuriating 3rd and long completions, it was a combination of an impotent pass rush combined with a breakdown in coverage by either Hill, Cattouse, or Campbell. Instead of playing an extra cornerback, Coach Pendergast has been sliding either Cattouse or Campbell over to cover the slot. From an experience standpoint, it makes sense to go with a senior instead of a true frosh, but our seniors just aren't getting it done. For an aggressive scheme like Coach P's to work, we really need to have outstanding safety play. Conte disguised a lot of breakdowns last year with a breakout campaign. So far, our safeties look confused, hesitant, and a step slow.
Unless our pass rush and safety play improve, expect our D to get lit up by...well, just about everyone.
4) For those grumbling about "why do we always run up in the middle on 1st down?" It's a bit misleading - Some of those runs looked to be deliberate to set up play-action or zone-reads. Some were off-tackle runs that were turned inside due to poor blocking/penetration. And some were dictated by field position. Because of poor returns, penalties, or both, we started several drives within our 20 and those runs were "get some breathing room" types of plays.
5) What happened to the tight end? It's unfortunate, but Anthony Miller really isn't moving very well. He misses more than his share of blocks and has struggled getting off the line into his patterns. Hagan might be more of a receiving threat, but he's often out-weighed and out-physical'd at the point of attack. I wonder if Clay were eligible if we might use more 4 WR sets for a true spread attack. UW was easily able to single-cover Miller and still have either an LB or a S free to double our WRs in the second half.
Nothing like recovering from a tough loss with prime-time match-ups against Oregon and 'sc. I suspect our guys will be quite busy during the bye week. Here's hoping the coaches have some answers. Go Bears!
46 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
CJ […] not going to consistently make something out of nothing if there are no holes to run through. […] viewed all of the negative yardage or no-gain runs for Sofele, it was always the same issue; at least one Cal player missed a block. The goal line issue has already been beaten to death. Before we start pointing fingers at the tailbacks, it’s the big-picture execution of our run-blocking (Oline + TE + FB + WRs) that needs closer scrutiny.
This.
I think many fans underestimate the importance of blocking in the run game and can’t get it through their heads that not everybody is as naturally gifted and talented as Marshawn Lynch who was the total package with his skillset (can carry the rock, pass protect, and catch the ball). What really makes Marshawn special is his uncanny ability to knock people over, carry defenders with him, and make the first man miss practically every time. Very few backs are like that.
On the “nuts and bolts” end of things, I like this 3 star H-back/FB we picked up recently. With Morrah, Miller, and the light Hagan, it seems as if it’s been some time since we’ve had a good blocking TE. With unspectacular fullback play and hit/miss OL, it seems as if we’re many parts away from figuring this out.
Maybe Wark and Rodgers will help us out at TE next year? I like Hagan’s pass catching abilities, but this offense can’t have an all pass catch, no block TE.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
It’ll be an interesting competition at TE next year. Ladner might get healthy. If so, he could be the combo of size/hands we need. Wark was supposedly catching everything as a frosh…not sure why he’s having trouble now.
Lock Hagan and Rodgers in a building with Blasquez all off-season and one of them might get strong enough to be a dual-threat TE.
Old Toothwrangler
For those wondering why we didn’t send more pressure at Price, we actually did blitz (rush at least 5) on 8/20 first plays. If you count the stunting and zone blitzing, we rushed the passer more than half the time.
Not too much of a surprise. Both being unable to get pressure despite sending pressure and people commenting about needing more pressure.
Sometimes I wonder if some fans are thinking, “do we deliberately try NOT to pressure the QB on passing downs?”
And sometimes...
……they got through the line and did pressure the QB, but then the blitzers failed to contain the QB and then wrap him up. It was as if they didn’t expect the QB to try and elude them, so they just ran for the spot he was standing in, rather than anticipating a move. The move would then occur, and not only did the QB get out of the pocket to throw, he had time to set his feet and throw.
Great work. I’ll add to the tight end malaise and wonder what happened to Anthony Miller, who showed so much promise a year or two ago but just hasn’t put it all together.
n.b. -- This comment does not constitute official chemistry advice.
I know that I could get some flak from this...
but is it too early to say that I miss Alamar? He was able to produce some pretty good TEs, even if special teams were atrocious. Besides, seeing how STs have been playing the past few years, it is more likely that our ST woes are due more to Tedford’s coaching philosophy, than the ST coaching. If we really want our STs to improve, I think that more time just needs to spent practicing. Of course, this would come at the expense of offense/defense improvement, so I don’t know where the balance point is. I’m not sure how other schools do it, but maybe we just need to use 2nd/3rd stringers, and have a majority of their practice time dedicated to special team play.
No flak, I think we’re all wondering if the ST issues are due to the position coach, the personnel, or the amount of practice time.
I think it could be some of all three. Hard to blame Tedford for past or present kicking woes. That’s on the position coach. What else are the kickers and punters going to do all practice long? The coverage team issues is more multi-factorial. I don’t have an answer there.
With the better recruiting classes, I wonder if we’ll start moving to where we’re able to use more backups as ST specialists. Right now, I’ve seen a pretty decent mix of starters (Kendricks, Miller), 2nd stringers (Coley, Hurrell), and a few of the youngsters (Rodgers, McClure, Walls).
Old Toothwrangler
It’s true that kicking is on the position coach, but I think we’ve just been unlucky with Giorgio in the past. This year he seems to be improved, and I have no doubt in Anger’s ability. I’m more concerned about the protection during kicks/punts, and coverage on the return. I’m not sure how much of this is on the coaching, and how much is just lack of practice though.
Coverage has looked pretty good this year, IMO. Protection was a major issue early in the season, but seems to be improving.
I am giving Anger the benefit of the doubt here, but in my mind, if the protection were better, I see him averaging closer to 50 ypp instead of 45. I am not sure how comfortable with the rugby style kicks we’ve seen on occasion, which I think he’s forced to do because the protection breaks down.
I agree that the coverage has been generally good, with just the occasional breakdown. Our opponents seem to be starting between their 20-30 more often this year, as opposed to their 30-40.
The rugby punts were actually pretty effective in terms of field position, if you look at the stats, but yes I think it’s clear we were doing them because protection was an issue. I don’t remember any punts coming close to being blocked against Washington (though maybe that’s because there weren’t many of them).
fullback formations
It seemed to me that whenever we had the fullback in the formation, it was a running play. Looking at the recap, 5 of CJ’s 6 carries came out of this formation. Did we ever pass out of that formation?
We ran play-action out of this formation at least a couple of times with CJ.
I don’t recall how many times we did with Sofele. (wasn’t looking for it specifically)
I think Hydro noted that we were also trying to fool UW by using motion or formation to set up a strong side, but went counter-tendency to run the opposite way.
If not for the fail at the goal line, I think most people would have been pretty satisfied with the running game, actually.
Old Toothwrangler
I have no issues with the run game in general
It just seemed to me that this formation was a dead giveaway for the run. I’m glad to see that I was wrong.
Unless our pass rush and safety play improve, expect our D to get lit up by…well, just about everyone.
A great pass rush can make an average secondary look good and great coverage in the secondary can make an average pass rush look good. If you have both, you see results like Cal in 2008 and 2010. One of those units needs to step up soon.
Is it truly an either/or proposition?
I for one don’t think Sofele should be supplanted as the starter, but do think perhaps the carries could be split a little more evenly, both to get another back going, and to get Sofele the optimal amount of reps so that he can be maximally effective without being too beat up.
But isn’t it possible to believe that the O-line needs to block better, AND that Cal would be more successful with say, CJ Anderson? They’re not mutually exclusive notions.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 27, 2011 10:01 AM PDT reply actions
I haven’t read all the comments here so I might be restating a point somebody else made, but there seems to have been a number of comments where people say IT’S OBVIOUS IT’S A RUN PLAY WHEN ANDERSON IS IN!!!!! If teams know Cal is running it every time with Anderson in, then defenses will just stack the box. In order to be an every down back, you also need to know the blocking schemes on pass plays. Sofele has shown that he is more than competent and capable of that. Anderson has not. Bigelow has not. Debo has shown that he knows who to block but is not very good at blocking. That’s why Sofele gets the snaps. Unfortunately, until Anderson gets up to speed on this, the carries will be uneven.
Honest question here:
How hard is it to learn blocking schemes? I mean, even if he doesn’t have the whole playbook down, can’t he start with a handful of pass plays where he has the blocking schemes down cold? That would at least show the defense that we can run a pass play with him in there, and they will have no idea how many pass plays he can run.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 27, 2011 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
He was in on some passing plays against UW, so presumably the coaches are getting him more involved with pass-blocking.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
by Berkelium97 on Sep 27, 2011 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions
So… the people who are saying that “CJ can’t pass block” or that “if he’s in there, the defense knows 100% that it’s a run play” are wrong?
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 27, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
From what I recall, we ran at least three plays where CJ released as a pass receiver. On one of them, he was the check-down receiver on third down and was hit immediately upon making the catch. I did not see him have to pick up any blitzers in protection.
Having not seen him in practice, I don’t know what type of hands he has as a receiver or whether he’s good at route-running. He looked just fine in his one reception. It may be that there are certain packages/formations where he’s comfortable and others where he’s still picking them up.
I don’t think that his presence in the lineup is automatic tip that it’s a run, nor has he proven that he can’t protect. In fact, I suspect that his blocking is better than Debo’s which is why CJ may have leap-frogged him in the depth chart.
Old Toothwrangler
I mean, even if he doesn’t have the whole playbook down, can’t he start with a handful of pass plays where he has the blocking schemes down cold?
It’s not excruciatingly difficult learning them but knowing who to block is one thing and properly blocking that defender is another. I should have added proper pass protection technique as well to my comment above. Putting him in for a few pass plays is reasonable. So what happens if the defense shows a different look not on film or they use a new blitz? As a coach, you don’t want your RB to have to think, think, think when he’s in there. What he does has to be second nature to him.
Gould and Tedford have shown that they prefer a 2 back rotation. When they have 2 capable backs, they use them a la Arrington/Lynch, Lynch/Forsett, Best/Vereen, and Ech/Arrington. When Cal does not have 2 capable backs, the amount of snaps are uneven a la post-Best injury in 2009 with Vereen and 2007 when Forsett was the iron man and took over 80% of the snaps.
When the player and coaches are comfortable with Anderson’s abilities, his role will increase and I believe it will over the rest of the season.
by Cali49a on Sep 27, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
can’t be easy for a tailback to try and chip in on a Dlinemen or a LB with a full head of steam.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Especially when your assignment changes depending on how many the D rushes, meaning you have less time to get into proper position….
by Missing Barry on Sep 28, 2011 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Where is Wark at this season? I thought he was our best
Blocking TE but unless I’m mistaken I haven’t seen him on the field much, if at all. Is he injured?
by SDBear on Sep 27, 2011 10:18 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
He played a little against Presby and promptly dropped a wide-open pass.
He was hurt last year, and may still be working his way back. Although there were camp rumors that he was our best blocking TE last year, this year there was some talk that he was inconsistent catching the ball.
The coaches have an interesting decision. I think the decision to elevate Hagan was made on the assumption that his technique would be sufficient as a blocker to make up for his relative lack of bulk, and also that our Oline would be improved enough to not be as dependent on the TEs as blockers.
If we’re going to continue to depend on 22 personnel to run power, we might need to re-evaluate which TE is used. Or, we need to acknowledge that we don’t have the horses and switch to a different personnel package. Considering the lack of performance from the TE spot, maybe we need to go more with a true spread look.
Old Toothwrangler
GENYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYKKK!!!
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Sep 27, 2011 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions
I think it’s the player moreso than Genyk or the strength coach. His athleticism is “meh” and his hands are fairly good. Either he’s not that athletic, or he’s not making the most out of a pretty freakin awesome opportunity.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
It’s really hard to explain given how good Miller was in the passing game two seasons ago. I really don’t know what to make of it.
by Missing Barry on Sep 28, 2011 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions
and, if it is on Genyk, then I blame the program for asking someone with no TE coaching experience to coach TE’s. It’s not everyday your TE/ST coach has two masters degrees, has HC experience and an interesting offensive philosophy, and was the ST/recruiting coordinator for a Northwestern program that one 3 Big Ten titles. That means he’s been to the Rose Bowl. Sounds like nice experience for a program that’s trying to turn the corner.
He later earned a MBA from Western Michigan University in 1989, and a master’s in education from Northwestern University in 1994. During the interim, Genyk served as an assistant football coach at Grand Rapids Community College from 1990–1992. From 1994 to 2003, Genyk served as an assistant coach at Northwestern, and at different times coaching linebackers, running backs, and the secondary. From 1998–2003 he served as Special Teams Coordinator and Recruiting Coordinator. During his time at Northwestern, the Wildcats won 3 Big Ten titles and participated in 4 bowl games.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Genyk
Maybe he sucks, but who will Cal find to replace him on their (seemingly) tight budget?
Might be nice to have Coach M (who has enough to do already) teach the TE’s how to run block and teach Coack Kiesau (who has enough to do already) teach the TE’s how to excel in the passing game. I dunno.
As I’ve said before, I don’t care for his punt formations.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
nice article
i enjoyed the picture show and appreciated the Final Thoughts #1 comment about pressure on QB Price.
Point made on CJ ‘not’ necessarily being the answer on those final goal line plays was made clear!!!
Maybe it would have been easier to do a YouTube explanation of the plays, however. Though, I know you probably don’t have the best equipment to do so. But, I picture you standing in front of the replay screen, or using a red laser pointer.
Worked well, as done.
Thanks.
Heh. Yeah, my “hi-tech” set-up involves taking pics of the game replay on my iPhone, uploading to the laptop, adding notes with Paintbrush, then uploading to SBN.
If I were going to do a video analysis, I’d have to save the game as a large video file to my computer so that I have the actual footage. The torrent usually doesn’t come out in time for my Tues am deadline.
I haven’t played with iMovie too much…but I’ll bet there’s a way to add captions, arrows, etc. I know Avi did some cool stuff with creating youtube vids played at 1/3 speed.
It’s a cool idea, though. I’ll look into it, time permitting. Thanks!
Old Toothwrangler
Considering...
….for a moment that the offensive line is going to make critical mistakes on just about every play (in fact they didn’t, they opened up some nice holes for Isi on several occasions), then don’t you want to have the player in there who is the most likely to get 1-2 yards when that happens? Let’s look at the reverse side: I haven’t seen Isi get to the corner much either, and in fact failed to do so on several attempts against Presbyterian. Isi is good for blocking and pass catching (primarily not on critical downs when we have the WRs we have), and really does off-tackle stuff well when the box isn’t stacked. Pitching to him is a good idea as well, since he’ll already be outside when he gets the ball.
I've come to the conclusion...
…that I don’t like outside zone runs. It doesn’t seem like our personnel is capable of blocking for it.
We were running them all day with Sofele. That’s how he got over 100 yards and a >5ypc average.
I do wish that Wark was getting more reps. I’d like to see if he does a better job than Hagan as a blocker.
Old Toothwrangler
Where is Wark? I thought he would be getting more PT
By now, especially since Miller and Hagan aren’t the best blockers.
Miller, along with our entire OL have been a major disappointment these last two seasons.
by SDBear on Sep 27, 2011 1:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Let me rephrase my comment. I don’t like outside zone runs at their goal line. It’s a lot easier to block for it when you don’t have 8 guys barreling down on you instead of 4 or 5. Between the 20’s, there’s just so much more space for Sofele to make something happen, and there’s just less guys the line and tight ends have to worry about, leaving them a slight buffer room for error. It seems that as soon as perfection is required of everyone, someone screws up.
No, I agree with that. About all I can guess is that we had been generally more successful running outside on UW all day, so the coaches felt better about trying that instead of going back with an off-tackle blast play.
I wouldn’t have been opposed to just saying “forget deception, stop us if you can.” Replace the TEs with additional linemen and just pound it for four downs.
Old Toothwrangler
Exactly. Our o-line should be able to pound it down their throats enough to get TWO YARDS on FOUR ATTEMPTS. If they can’t do that, we have some issues.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 28, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
The first couple of plays are very similar to the ones we ran on that last series with Isi. CJ doesn’t show he’s any more effective at getting those 1-2 yards when the play breaks down. Interesting. Looks like it’s at least some evidence Isi really is the better choice as a runner for those particular playcalls. Now, whether that’s the right call is a different subject…but for the call, I think Isi might have been a reasonable choice. CJ gets the blast kind of runs.



























































































