Cal Football: A Golden Spotlight on the Defensive Schemes vs. the Colorado Buffaloes
So, what in the world just happened? Most of us thought that our front seven would be legally married to Tyler Hansen by the end of last Saturday's game. Did we really get stymied by a Marshall-coached Oline? Did we have a defensive gampelan at all? Did we bother making any adjustments? Let's take a closer look at CU's 1st two drives:
1st Drive:
1st Play: Cal shows a 5-man front, one safety deep. This is Cal's standard 3-4, but both OLBs are up on the line of scrimmage. We line up in this formation almost exclusively throughout the game. CU has 12 personnel - 1RB, 2 TE, 2WR.
Hansen fakes the hand-off and rolls right. Cal rushes 5 and their ILBs charge upfield.
Davis sticks with the TE, then leaves him to rush Hansen.
Hansen lofts a pass to the wide-open TE...fortunately, he overthrows him.
2nd Play: Cal - 5 man front. CU - 1 TE, 1 RB, 3 WR
Bears rush 5, Hansen drops back to pass.
The rush doesn't get there. Campbell is in the slot playing zone against Richardson.
Campbell can't drive on the ball quickly enough. Easy catch on the slant route for a 1st down.
3rd Play: Cal - 5 man front. CU offset I, 21 personnel, 2 RB, 1 TE, 2 WR.
It's a pitch to Stewart. Cal is rushing 5 and both ILBs charge upfield.
The Bears clog all the gaps.
Holt and Kendricks meet to have themselves a Stewart sandwich. No gain.
4th Play: Cal 5-man front, CU - 2TE, 1 RB, 2WR
Cal rushes 5, but switches it up by sending Kendricks up the middle while dropping Campo into coverage.
This leaves DJ Holt all alone in the middle trying to cover two Buffs. The rush doesn't get there in time.
Holt makes the right read, but can't get there in time. Hansen hits his TE for a long gain.
5th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 3WR, 2RB, I Formation
It's a hand-off to Stewart.
The CU center engages Payne initially, then releases to take on Holt at the next level.
Payne misses Stewart...
Holt tries to disengage, but also misses Stewart. Campbell and Cattouse have to stop him after a big gain.
6th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 2 TE, 2 RB power set.
Hansen fakes the hand-off...
...But rolls out instead. The fullback releases and no one covers him.
Davis is able to leap up and tip the ball...which is fortunate because the fullback was WIDE open in the flat.
7th Play: Cal - 5 man front. CU - 2 RB, 1 TE, 2WR, I formation
Cal rushes 5...but this time sends Holt up the middle while dropping Davis.
Does this make anyone else sick to their stomach?
The screen pass is the perfect call against a blitz. Davis should have coverage, but drops too far into the middle of the field.
Davis loses contain on the edge and then gets blocked. Kendricks fights off his block and does an incredible job running down Stewart and saving a touchdown.
8th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 2RB, 1 TE, 2 WR, offset I.
Their backup LT holds off two rushers while their LG pulls. Holt charges forward.
Holt fills the gap, but the guard has him measured.
Holt can't disengage and Stewart runs through the hole for 4 yds before being tackled by Anthony.(good run support)
9th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU, 1RB, 2TE, 2WR. *Cal starts subbing in on their Dline sending in Tipoti, Jalil, and Coleman.
This time, Cal rushes 4, and drops Campo into coverage. It's the first time Coach Pendergast doesn't blitz.
Hansen takes a quick 3-step drop and throws the quick out to Richardson.
Hill has good coverage, but is a split-second and inches away from breaking up the pass.
10th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 2RB, 1 TE, I formation.
Hansen fakes the hand-off and does a half-roll left. Campo drops into coverage and picks up the fullback. Also noteworthy, Cal's ILBs don't charge aggressively upfield and instead drop back into zone.
All of Hansen's outlets are covered. The 4 man rush finally starts to apply pressure.
Hansen has an open receiver, but has to throw it away.
11th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 2RB, 3WR.
Cal rushes 4, drops Campo into coverage. Hansen fakes the run, but Cal's defense doesn't bite.
Hansen rolls out right. His underneath receiver is well-covered.
Campo has Hansen's outlet covered.
Hansen overthrows his receiver who is well-covered in the end zone.
12th Play: Finally, a 3rd and long! (yes, it's play #12) Cal goes with a 3-man front with McCain at one end, Payne in the middle, Guyton at the other end. Wilkerson is also in as the middle backer between Holt and Kendricks. Hill is in as a nickelback. This is Cal's 2-4-5, big Nickel look. We use it throughout the game on third and long situations. CU - 1RB, 1TE, 3WR, shotgun.
Cal rushes 3, Wilkerson comes on a delayed dog blitz. CU has a designed roll-out right.
Cal's pressure can't get there initially.
Hansen throws on the run and the refs claim he dragged a toe.
13th Play: Cal 5 man front. CU - 2 RB, 2TE, 1WR Power I.
The Dline holds, Davis comes free around the end. Both Holt and Kendricks look to be blocked.
But Holt fights off his block and makes a great play grabbing Stewart.
Davis and Kendricks help Holt finish Stewart off short of the 1st down line.
Did anyone else think the refs would get this wrong? (I'm not the only raising my hand right now...right?)
2nd Drive: Okay, it was clear that CU was going to use a West-Coast style of attack with plenty of short passes, misdirection, play-action, roll-outs, and some power running sprinkled in. How would Cal adjust? Unfortunately, the coaching staff didn't have a lot of time to talk it over thanks to Maynard's ill-advised INT. Already on their heels from CU's first long drive, the Cal defense had to step up again...
1st Play: Cal 5-man front. CU 1RB, 1 TE, 3 WR.
After ending the last series rushing just 4, Coach Pendergast tries to apply pressure again and sends 5.
But the pocket holds. Hansen takes a quick 3 step drop and releases before you can count to 3 Mississippi's...
Williams has tight coverage. But it's a perfect throw.
2nd Play: Cal 5-man front. CU - 1 RB, 2 TE, 2WR.
Cal switches back to just rushing 4, and drops Campo into coverage. No blitz, so the screen should fail...right?
But CU runs their screen to the side where the OLB is rushing the passer. Davis can't quite get to the ball.
Inexplicably, both Kendricks and Campbell shade to the right towards the TE, even though Holt already has him in coverage. Kendricks is late to read the screen.
Because both Campbell and Kendricks are out of position, the screen goes for big yardage even though we didn't have a blitz called. Kendricks does do a good job of fighting off blocks and runs down Stewart before he can score.
3rd Play: Cal 5-man front. CU - 1RB, 2TE, 2WR.
Cal rushes 4, Campo holds back initially. It looks like a run, but the Cal ILBs hesitate a moment before charging upfield.
For the first time all day, a Cal player beats a blocker. Owusu pushes past the CU LG and stops Stewart for little gain.
4th Play: Cal 5-man front. CU - 1 RB, 2TE, 2WR.
Hansen runs play-action. Cal rushes 4 and drops Campo into coverage.
Instead of rushing upfield, Davis reads play action and stays with the TE.
Hansen doesn't have anything underneath. He has to force a throw too high and out of bounds in the corner of the end zone to a well-covered receiver.
5th Play: Another 3rd and long. Cal goes with their 3 man front again. In an interesting wrinkle, they put Coleman at NT and Tipoti at end, possibly to see if Tipoti is a better match-up against their RT. McCain and Wilkerson are in again as rush backers. CU - 1RB, 1 TE, 3WR, Shotgun.
CU keeps their back and TE in for protection. Cal rushes Wilkerson on a delay up the middle.
Hansen has nowhere to go and has to check-down to a well-covered receiver short of the 1st down. They do ultimately convert the field go for the first score of the game.
Summary:
Gameplan: It looks like Coach Pendergast watched the game film of Hawaii vs. CU and thought that the Cal Dline and rush linebackers would be able to win their one on one match-ups against CU's patchwork Oline. He started the game with a 5-man front which forced the CU Oline to fend off rushers one on one. Not only did CU's Oline stand their ground, but Colorado's offensive gameplan involved plenty of rollouts, play-action, and quick passes specifically designed to take advantage of our aggressive defense. *This is probably the #1 issue which threw off our defense for the entire game - whether we rushed 4, 5, or 6, we simply could not get consistent pressure on their quarterback.
You also have to give credit to CU QB, Tyler Hansen. He was making quick reads, accurate throws, and when he wasn't rolling out, the ball was often out of his hand within 2 seconds. Because we couldn't get any push up front, we never disrupted his timing. Then, there were several plays where the Cal DB's had great coverage, but were still beaten by a perfect throw.
Because of the assumption that our front 7 would be able to apply pressure, it looks like we played a lot of Cover 1 (one deep safety) with both zone and man looks on the outside. Our veteran secondary was often left to handle their WRs one-on-one, including having one of our safeties in solo coverage on their slot receiver or TE. Mr. Richardson appears to have taken that game plan, rolled it, and smoked it along with our entire secondary. Why didn't we double team him? Well, we did. In post-game interviews, Coach Pendergast mentioned that they started doubling by putting a safety over the top and Richardson was still able to beat them.
Adjustments: It's pretty clear from watching the tape that we did try to make adjustments throughout the game. After blitzing the first eight plays of the game without a finger laid on Hansen, Coach Pendergast switched to a base look (only rushed four) which emphasized covering their outlet receivers.(TE/FBs)
Coming out of halftime, you could tell that the Cal defenders were much more aggressive covering the quick passes underneath and in the flats. We used more zone blitz looks dropping different guys into coverage on their tight ends and backs, including our defensive ends. They also switched Cattouse to play more shallow and didn't drop Campbell back as far. However, this emphasis on stopping Colorado's short game made us more vulnerable down the field.
On the long TD to their TE, we ran a stunt with Wilkerson and McCain as well as a corner blitz with Hill - They didn't get there in time and a blown coverage between Holt and Campbell allowed the score. Leaving a TE wide open down the middle is exactly what can happen when you skew your defensive alignment by doubling a receiver...or if you're Cal.
On the first long TD, Hill went for the INT and missed...and his safety help (Campbell) took a bad angle and missed the tackle. On the 2nd, Anthony was in trail position expecting safety help, but Cattouse got caught peeking into the backfield, moved too far forward, then couldn't retreat quickly enough and Richardson was able to out-run them both.
Ironically, you could also make the argument that neither of these long TDs would have happened if we had kept our safety deep instead of trying to double Richardson.
It was nerve-wracking. But in some ways, the early wake-up call to defensive coaching staff with regards to what our current personnel can and cannot do might actually be more helpful than dominating three games before facing UW.
Live by the blitz...:
Why didn't we send more all-out blitzes? First of all, that's exactly what Colorado _wanted_ us to do and specifically designed their offense to exploit. And more importantly, our guys just weren't getting there consistently, whether we zone-blitzed, sent a corner, sent an inside backer, stunted, or really gambled and sent 6. To keep CU guessing, Coach Pendergast continued to mix up a variety of pressure versus coverage looks throughout the game, but the sad, surprising fact is that their Oline was up to the challenge. On the rare occasion where we had a chance to put Hansen in the turf (Campo, Guyton), our guys came up empty.
Oddly enough, our most effective defensive scheme was when Coach Pendergast switched it up to rushing four and dropping the 5th man into coverage; we did a much better job of forcing Hansen to throw it into tight coverage or to throw it away. Too "vanilla?" Hardly. Sometimes we dropped the strongside OLB, sometimes the weakside OLB, and sometimes it was one of the defensive ends. Bob Gregory would have loved it...but four trips in the red zone for only 9 points isn't too bad, all things considered.
One adjustment that did pay off: in overtime, we gave safety help to Anthony and Hill, but left Williams on an island. (HT Avinash) This forced Colorado to decide whether to throw at Richardson into double coverage in a tight area (not a lot of field left in the red zone), or to test Williams in single coverage. They decided to go at Williams...and big props to him for holding the rope.
Final Thoughts:
1) I can see why coaches like Campo. He's very disciplined and does a good job dropping into coverage. However, he doesn't have the speed or athleticism to be as effective when rushing the passer.
2) Missing Mohammed? Kendricks is a great athlete, but he's still adjusting to his reads as an inside linebacker. He looks less comfortable when dropping back into coverage. On the first two CU screens, he was slow to read the play. On the 3rd, he read screen, but missed the tackle. (I didn't review the 4th screen because I was already twitching uncontrollably in a fetal position.) To be fair, it did take MikeyMo and DJ Holt several games when they were new starters inside before they became more adept at coverage. It's also unknown whether Kendricks/Holt are coached to "spot-drop" (retreat to a set spot) or "pattern-drop." (read the WR pattern and match-up with receivers that enter their zones)
3) Missing Conte? After a good game against FSU, Cal's safeties had a rougher outing. Some of this was scheme - Cattouse was playing deep centerfield by himself most of the game. But, to put mildly, both Cattouse and Campbell had their issues in coverage. Maybe Paul Richardson will buy them a burger after drinking their collective milkshakes all game long. As one of our astute readers pointed out, this defense will not and cannot be truly dominant without elite safety play. (HT Cali49a)
4) Missing Jordan and Hill? Our D line may not be as dominant as we had hoped. Payne/Tipoti are solid, but neither are making me forget Derrick Hill. Similarly, neither Owusu or Guyton are in Cam Jordan's league as game-changers or someone the offense has to account for. Although the youngsters are highly touted, Coleman and Jalil didn't make much of an impact in their snaps. Right now, it looks like our line does a capable job stopping the run, but lacks the ability to consistently pressure the passer. In the front 7, our best pass rushers are the young LBs Whiteside, McCain, Wilkerson, and Scarlett - but they're also more prone to get drawn out of position. Our starters (Davis/Campo) are more suited for run support and coverage than rushing the QB. If the young players can't grow up in a hurry, we may have to rely on blitzes or stunts to get pressure and that means rolling the dice.
5) Pistolero? It looks like we only ran the zone-read twice. Once, Galas had a bad snap, then missed his block, and Isi got dropped in the backfield. On the second play, Maynard kept it but there was little running room and he was dropped for a short gain. I'm not certain why we didn't try it more often considering Hawaii's success the previous week.
6) I never thought I'd say this...but Colorado's Oline out-performed ours all game long. They consistently held up against our various blitz and pressure packages. It was very rare that a Cal defender was able to beat a CU blocker one on one. If not for the penalties (MARSHALLLLL!), this would have been ugly. On the other hand, Cal's Oline was inconsistent in both the run and pass game. Maynard's INT was a horrible decision, but he was pressured because Cheadle whiffed on his block. Both Galas and Schwenke also took turns missing their blocks. After the re-watch, there may be a difference in running style/ability between CJ and Isi, but the biggest factor in the results of the running plays was the execution of the blocking assignments.
7) For all the worry with regards to special teams, you have to tip your hat to the coverage units. Richardson proved how dangerous he can be with the ball in his hands, yet was never a factor in the return game.
8) We're still allowed to throw to the tight end? Who knew? Miller had some drops and penalties, but his one-handed TD grab and his Beast Mode run after the catch while carrying a linebacker were outstanding.
9) I'd give my players' game ball to......Michael Calvin. Jones and Allen get all the accolades, but Calvin has quietly emerged as clutch performer, particularly as a big third down target. It's nice to see him becoming the player that we've been waiting for the past several years. For the coaches, it's all about Coach Blasquez. The guys didn't break down, didn't give up, and showed a winner's mentality. Well done.
10) Although the historical Cal MO seems to be finding a way to snatch defeat from the jaw's of victory...give credit to the guys for finding a way. Taking a step back...we're on the road into a hostile environment...throw an INT early...give up 3 long TDs and blow the lead...turn a journeyman QB into a record-holder...put a purse-snatcher on SportsCenter...and because OT is too easy, why not 1st and 30? No big. We'll just beat double coverage for 1st and goal and then huck it up there for a walk-off TD. Seriously? Didn't anyone tell these kids what it means to be a Golden Bear? I love the grit and resilience. Make no mistake - Colorado was absolutely fired up for their home opener with a new coach and would have sold their collective souls to get revenge for last year's curb-stomp. But our guys stood tall through adversity and prevailed. So, remember this game. We might point to it later on as the start of something very interesting...
Bonus Coverage! Let's forget about how the Blue Hose will shred our defense for a second and focus on Maynard to Allen to Maynard:
11 Personnel: 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 TB. CU has six in the box, the deep linebacker suggests Cover 2. (?)
Sofele goes in motion and lines up as a wide receiver. Slip screen! Quick pass! We always do this!
Maynard throws the quick hitch to KA. See! We always throw the quick pass to the WR!
But, it's actually a lateral. And KA drops back to pass!
Maynard gets the ball with a convoy of blockers.
Maynard runs it to the 10, fumbles the ball, and is fortunate to recover. Although Cal's Oline gets down field, some of them are...less proficient than others with getting a hat on a defender. 1st and goal, Bears! And a big shout-out to Nico Dumont for his 1st career catch and TD moments later!
That's all for this week. For all the hand-wringing, let's be glad that Colorado is still Bear Territory. Time to rest up and get ready for our AT&T home opener against the Mighty Blue Hose! Go Bears!
53 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post. Helped me comprehend what the hell happened.
If we’re trotting out Tipoti/Payne, Owusu, Campo, and Davis for big-time minutes, then I don’t expect the D to be that good. I understand the youngsters are…young, but Whiteside, McCain, Wilkerson, Scarlett, King, Jalil, Tiny, and Coleman are extremely exciting and athletic players. The downside is they don’t know the intricacies of the defense the way a Campo does. However, they also wouldn’t whiff on the sack (Campo) or ask a guy like Davis to drop into coverage.
These less talented but more experienced upperclassmen will ask guys like Marc Anthony, DJ Campbell, and Sean Cattouse to play above a level they’ve shown they’re capable of playing consistently.
Personally, I’d rather see these young guys worked in a lot more so they can get that experience, have a few rough patches, but be able to get out there and dominate.
Way early in the offseason, Wilner said something like “Cal’s got a talented and deep front 7, but will the best players be on the field?” He was right – and I hate when that happens.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Doooooooommmmmmmmeeeedddd
Thank you for the insightful article.
by OaktownAggie on Sep 13, 2011 8:04 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Thanks
This was a well done article, it was hard to see all these details live. My main take away is that one on one Colorado’s O-line played well, and kept our guys off of Hansen.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
Chargest were never filed, but
…Richardson didn’t just suddenly decide after two days on campus that he’d rather be at CU. That was some serious spin by the announcers.
One More Thing
Totally unrelated — but on the game torrents I’m playing on VLC player, the video is constantly freezing up while the audio runs perfectly. Anyone else having this problem or knows how to fix it?
Thanks!
Nevermind
Turns out my version of VLC was over three years old. Just downloaded the new player and is seems to run just fine.
Your thoughts and prayers were appreciated.
by KikiRevenge on Sep 13, 2011 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Great, great work
I can’t say enough good things about this thread.
During the game I was screaming (okay, mentally; did not want to piss off the wife and kid) that we were being held on multiple occasions. A single still photo isn’t proof, no, but this gives me a lot more confidence in saying that holding should have been called on more than the one occasion they did call it late in the game (I was so dumbfounded that they decided to finally call a hold I was stunned silent).
Don’t get me wrong, CU’s OL did a masterful job. But there were some occasions that they just hung on and those should have been flagged, and I think would have been flagged by a more experienced crew. Those holds turned a very good performance by the CU OL into a great performance.
Anyway, that gripe aside, I must say the CU offense performed masterfully. It will be really interesting to see if they can keep that kind of performance up as the year progresses.
speaking of refs
I still don’t really understand why Edmond’s one-handed catch was ruled incomplete. They used the phrase, “complete the catch”, but I couldn’t see what else he could have done to make this a completion.
From the official rule book
The official rule is that:
Article 3. Completed or Intercepted Pass. A player who makes a catch may advance
the ball. A forward pass is complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) if
a player, who is inbounds:
(a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground;
and
(b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than
his hands.
. . .
If the player loses the ball while simultaneously touching both feet or any part of his body
other than his hands to the ground, or if there is any doubt that the acts were simultaneous,
it is not a catch.
That is followed by Item 1:
Item 1: Player Going to the Ground. If a player goes to the ground in the act of
catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control
of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If
he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control,
the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground,
the pass is complete.
So, they ruled that Edmond lost control of the ball upon hitting the ground, and because the ball then hit the ground prior to him regaining control, it was incomplete.
Raw deal, but seems legit per the rules.
Old Toothwrangler
Even with those rules, he pulls the ball in to establish control while coming down, I think it was a missed call, but se la vie
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
by CruzinBears on Sep 13, 2011 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
*c’est la vie
"We do not seek men who will bravely lie down to die, but men who will fight valiantly to live."
"Winning is not everything. It is far better to play the game squarely and lose than to win at the sacrifice of an ideal."
-- Andrew Latham Smith
Item 1: Player Going to the Ground. If a player goes to the ground in the act of
catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control
of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If
he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control,
the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground,
the pass is complete.
I bet over the season there are going to be some serious misapplications and shitty calls thanks to this rule. Thank goodness it’s challengable.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 13, 2011 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I say that Edmond DID have control of the ball when he hit the ground, if indeed the definition is meant to be in the football sense of “being down.” When his knee hits the ground, he has both hands on the ball and it has not touched the ground yet. It’s only after he rolls forward and tucked the ball under his arm that it touches the ground (and even then, it’s still pinned between his arm and his body).
Bad rule, bad application on this call.
Rec'd Great Post, Great Analysis
Can you do something similar for our Offense? It seemed so different from the FSU game…
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Sep 13, 2011 9:46 AM PDT reply actions
I’d like to, but probably won’t have the time. (leaving on vacation in a couple of days – sorry!)
One thing I did notice is that it looked like we were really trying to set up their LBs. CU was really aggressive sending their LBs against Hawaii.
So, we started with an emphasis on power running to set up our play-action to the TE. I think that’s how Miller kept getting open. So, even though a lot of those runs looked like they were just getting stuffed, they were useful for opening up the passing game.
Old Toothwrangler
Re: the late reads and the semi-slow responses – altitude must have had an effect. Although we’re not talking Death Zone altitudes, blood inefficiency and lack of oxygen to the brain could have caused some of these brain farts. Just saying. I don’t think we can really judge some of the mishaps in this game to pure lack of talent.
that was terrific
i actually feel a little better about the defensive gameplanning at least. definite hat tip to Bienemy and the CU offense too. they called a good game and made some great plays.
BUT…the lack of execution on our side is inexcusable. that has to get better. thankfully these lessons can come from a win rather than a gutwrenching road loss.
great opportunity this weekend to get our deep and talented youngsters some defensive snaps. that’s a good thing ahead of the UW game in Seattle.
I am a Bear. We Are Cal.
hehe
" Leaving a TE wide open down the middle is exactly what can happen when you skew your defensive alignment by doubling a receiver…or if you’re Cal."
….or Colorado, for that matter.
we're gonna give up some huge points
We are going to lose to teams that throw the ball well (Washington, WSU, SC, Stanfurd, and ASU). Unless our pass defense improves we’ll have to heavily rely on Maynard and crew to win games. BTW I voted that Colorado would put up 30 points…
At this rate, if we play the Furd, Luck’ll get 40+ points. I’m just sayin…
by rollonyoubears111 on Sep 13, 2011 12:01 PM PDT reply actions
Great post, thanks!
I’m wondering if our lack of movement up front before the snap meant the Oline could really T up their blocks. In our Marshall years, it always seemed like it took forever for our linemen to figure out WHO to block. That didn’t seem to be a problem for Colorado.
Also, did anyone see Moala at all in the game? I have trouble seeing numbers/names on the streaming video.
Excellent post!
HydroTech has set the standard here for thoroughly dissecting a single play, but this is a great example of picking apart an entire series. Thanks!
Here is what I’m left with as an overall assessment:
Cal had an excellent game plan based on what we had seen prior to Saturday. Colorado had an even better game plan, though, anticipating the blitzing pressure Cal would try to bring. Cal adjusted by backing off the blitz, but Colorado was nonetheless able to keep racking up the yards (and eventually the points) because of consistently solid O-line play and a career day by both the QB and his primary receiver. Maybe Clancy and crew could have drawn things up differently, but the Bears’ D-linemen just weren’t as disruptive as they needed to be, the linebackers were often a step or two out of position, and the Bears really miss Chris Conte.
I’m confident that the Bears’ D-line will respond and get much better pressure in future games. But I think the key to this becoming a very good defense (or even a great defense if they can start forcing turnovers), rather than just another middle-of-the-Pac defense, will be finding a game changer at safety. A Kenny Easley, Ronnie Lott, Chuck Cecil, Ed Reed, John Lynch, or Taylor Mays, would be nice, but I’d settle for less, too.
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Sep 13, 2011 1:15 PM PDT reply actions
Great work, Kodiak.
I think most Cal fans were wondering after this game whether our defense errors were mostly due to scheme or execution. And I think most people sort of jumped to the conclusion that it was scheme (or lack thereof). But I think it was more execution. As you seem to suggest in the post, there were a few errors by players in the secondary which led Richardson to break off some big runs after the catch. The Colorado offensive line was also playing pretty well against our defensive line and rushing linebackers. For the most part, our defense was just getting flat out beat by their offense.
Nevertheless, does anyone else wonder why fans are so quick to jump to the scheme explanation? I think it’s because fans don’t often go back and watch the game looking for execution errors. They just see a pass being completed against our defense and assume it’s because the defensive coordinator made a mistake in either not planning to defend a player or calling up the wrong play. Furthermore, execution errors can also occur well away from the ball where fans aren’t always looking. It’s always a lot easier to say problems are due to scheme when you’re not looking for (and hence not seeing) execution errors.
On the KA pass to ZM play, it appears as if Colorado might be playing a Cover-1 (Man free) defense out of their 4-2 nickel. Their cornerbacks are showing man coverage by lining up across from our WRs and within 10 yards of the LOS. Plus, the Colorado SS drops down into coverage pre-snap seemingly to cover the TE until Sofele goes into the near slot, in which case the Colorado SS then moves over to cover Sofele in man. Colorado only looks to have one deep defender (the FS).
Thanks for the extra insight here – that makes sense.
I noticed the Cal players all looking to the sideline pre-snap to confirm the play.
Do you think that Tedford was specifically waiting for a Cover-1 look so that CU would only have one deep defender?
Old Toothwrangler
Yes, it would seem like that play would work better against a defense with only one or no deep defenders (as opposed to two deep defenders). Likewise, it would seem like that play would also work better with a defense playing man coverage, because then they would have defenders on all the receivers on the offense’s left (lined up against Allen, Sofele, and whoever else was to that side) which would essentially be taking defenders away from the other side of the field where the ball was going.
Did anyone else think the refs would get this wrong? (I’m not the only raising my hand right now…right?)
The tard TV announcers kept saying CO got jobbed on the spot. We were screaming at the TV that the spot was right on. The announcers were so full of shit…it was not even close.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
The announcers were too damn excited about Colorado maybe not sucking. I felt that they were very pro-Colorado all game long.
Paws was trying to be objective, but the other guy was a total Colorado homer
In other words, Go Bears!
Barry Tompkins?
PS Why did they keep promoting Buffs social media all game?
The internet's most successful troll!
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
6) I never thought I’d say this…but Colorado’s Oline out-performed ours all game long. They consistently held up against our various blitz and pressure packages. It was very rare that a Cal defender was able to beat a CU blocker one on one. If not for the penalties (MARSHALLLLL!), this would have been ugly. On the other hand, Cal’s Oline was inconsistent in both the run and pass game. Maynard’s INT was a horrible decision, but he was pressured because Cheadle whiffed on his block. Both Galas and Schwenke also took turns missing their blocks. After the re-watch, there may be a difference in running style/ability between CJ and Isi, but the biggest factor in the results of the running plays was the execution of the blocking assignments.
Given the nine months of testing juju by knocking Marshall, boy did we get ours!!
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
…and we still one! Has juju finally been tamed or even beaten by the Honeybadger??
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 13, 2011 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
bah
*we still won
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 13, 2011 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
"We're fine! They just made a few GREAT plays."
I wish the first option was changed from lucky to the word great.
Hansen is a good qb who got the ball to his playmakers. Richardson is an incredible player. Got to give credit where it’s due.
I think our defense is fine. You can’t expect even good defenses to hold every single opponent to single digits. We still need to get better for conference play though.
I'm sort of impressed
I feel so powerful. You guys listen to us minions?
Oh wait a sec…You’re a minion? We’re only supposed to listen to peons. Mistakes were made!
[Heh – Of course we try to listen. Helpful feedback is always appreciated. The CGB community is pretty damn smart and highly educated, after all.]
Old Toothwrangler
I am?
The internet's most successful troll!
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
Logical defensive plan, but good?
Isn’t part of game planning anticipating what the opposition thinks you will do, and faking them out? In this case, that would mean expecting them to dial up the screens to counter the blitz, and instead keeping the LBs at home until blitzing would catch them off guard.
Hindsight, of course, and maybe Clancy figured they couldn’t stop us even if they tried, like last year and against Hawaii. But Bienemy guessed what we would do, and we obliged him.
He knew that we knew, but we should have known that he knew that we knew, but then maybe he’d know that we knew that he knew that we knew?
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Sep 13, 2011 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions
precisely...
… and at that point his thoughts begin spiraling inward uncontrollably until they form a singularity at the center of his brain, whereupon Bieniemy’s eyes roll up into his head and he begins drooling on his mic. That’s the game plan I would have gone with.













































































































































