Replacing Shane Vereen - Cal Running Backs In 2011
TwistNHook: For the first time since I can remember, Cal has questions at RB. Normally, we have an embarrassment of riches with 2+ amazing RBs. Now, we don't have anybody who has been the starter before. We have Isi Sofele, who is agile and fast. We have Covaughn Deboskie-Johnson, who is powerful. What can we expect out of the RBs in 2011???
HydroTech: I think most of the concern regarding Cal's RB situation isn't so much the fact that we don't have a proven backup who can this year be the starter, but the fact that Sofele is 190 pounds (as of the latest Cal Football roster). It seems like whenever I read an article about how Cal has question marks at RB, it always mentions how Sofele is a smaller back who "may not be able to carry the ball 30 times a game" (or something to that effect). First of all, most Cal RBs don't run the rock 30 times a game anyways. In fact, Marshawn Lynch never ran the rock for more than 30 attempts in a game EVER. He ran the rock 25 times or more only THREE times ever. So all these concerns about Sofele being able to run rock 30 times a game are pretty baseless.
The real concern for Cal fans is that Sofele is small and light. There's this huge stereotype in football that RBs can't be small and light. Umm... Jacquizz Rodgers anyone? He turned out pretty well. Darren Sproles anyone? He turned out pretty well. Look, playing RB is sort of like playing WR. It helps to be bigger but if you're smaller and faster then it doesn't really matter how big or thick you are because you're going to be so fast and elusive that most defenders won't be able to catch you. Dun dun dun!!! Sort of like... DESEAN JACKSON! (GASP) Everyone was whining about his weight, and quite frankly his (lack) of weight was his biggest asset. The dude was bitchin' fast. It didn't matter that he was so light that if he got lit up that he'd probably die, because... nobody could catch him. Same principles apply here to small RBs.
Bottom line, no matter how big or small a RB may be, if the dude can play ... THEN LET HIM PLAY. Sofele was a serviceable #2 last year behind Vereen, and so far nobody has come close to challenging him this year for the #1 spot. I understand that the fact that he only got 23% of the rush attempts last year is somewhat of a concern for some Cal fans, but that's still a good amount. 23% is fairly normal. I think Cal fans are just used to seeing Cal have two RBs who are more of a 60/40 split like Best/Vereen in 2008, and Lynch/Forsett in 2006. But did you know that in 2007, Jahvid Best only got 8.7% of the rush attempts behind Forsett? So... Sofele gets more reps as a #2 than Best did, but yet somehow more people are concerned about Sofele? Oh I know... it's the talent level disparity between Best and Sofele, right? Well, if Sofele was that bad then why give him the rock 23% of the time last year? Clearly, the coaching staff has confidence in Sofele to give him that many rushes.
I think most Cal fans' concerns over RB is extremely unwarranted. And you know what? It's not so much the RB which matters for a successful ground attack, it's the offensive line. A RB can only be as good as his OL. Cal fans shouldn't be sweating over RB, they should be sweating over the OL.
Kodiak: With a serviceable Oline last year, I think we wouldn't have been so worried about Sofele this year. With semi-competent QB play, we might not have had to over-use Vereen as our workhorse.
Berkelium97: What is unusual about the argument that Sofele is too small or too short is that players on defense have repeatedly mentioned how difficult he is to take down. At last year's Pac-10 Media Day I asked Mike Mohamed about which players on offense give him and the rest of the defense trouble during practice. He singled out Sofele, likening him to a bowling ball.
Another reason I am not concerned about Sofele's small stature is his tremendous blocking ability. When he can hold his own against 240lb linebackers, it does not seem very farfetched that he can break tackles and muscle his way to a few more yards after contact.
TwistNHook: What I have always liked about Sofele is I felt like his legs never stopped moving. That was something I enjoyed with Marshawn and I think it is a key ingredient to any success.
Kodiak: The other key to the running game this year will be the health of our fullbacks. In previous years, we've had our best years running the ball when we've had a great fullback like Manderino, Ta'ufo'ou, or Holley.
NorCalNick: Is this the place to say that I want to see CDJ on the field, making a difference - just because he has Oski in his name? BOOM basketball and baseball writer insight'd!
OhioBear: I might be less worried about the Cal running back situation than most. I was impressed with Deboskie-Johnson's ability when he got some touches in 2009 and wondered a little bit why we didn't use him more after Jahvid Best was lost for the season. In both 2009 (post-Jahvid injury) and 2010, we gave Shane Vereen the bulk of the work and did not use the # 2 running back as much. Last year, Vereen had 77 percent of the carries as between him and Sofele. Not since 2007 when Justin Forsett did the yeoman's work as the # 1 back had we used the # 2 RB as little as we did in 2010. (In 2007, Forsett got 82 percent of the carries as between him and the Jahvid Best/James Montgomery combination as # 2.)
Was that due to a lack of confidence in Isi Sofele and/or CDJ's injury problems? Or was it just because Vereen was simply the workhorse back extraordinaire? Maybe a little of both. I spent a lot of last year thinking that Vereen was just head and shoulders above anyone we had. And perhaps with our offensive line woes, Vereen just gave us the best chance to move the ball on the ground consistently with his combinaton of speed and strong running ability inside the tackles.
Still, I have tempered optimism about the Sofele/CDJ combination. I love CDJ's slashing running style -- at least that's the way I remember his style from the runs he had against Arizona, Washington State, and Stanfurd in 2009. And a stronger, faster Isi Sofele could make him a very formidable weapon. Forsett and Joe Igber were "small" backs who gave Cal very good production when they were # 1 backs -- maybe Isi can follow in their footsteps and be that guy for Cal this year. If he does, we'll be all right. If not -- well, that'll be a lot of pressure on Zach Maynard.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I chose very confident. It’s not that I think Cal has a ton of talent at RB like they have in the past, but rather I think, in comparison to what we got last year, we’ll be in a similar place this year. Maybe no one on the current team is as good as Shane, but really, Shane only averaged 5.1 ypc last season. Last season was the Bears least effective running attack we’ve seen under Tedford (or at least as far back as 2006!), and I think there’s enough talent this year to at least put up similar numbers. Whether it’s because the passing attack keeps the defense honest better, the line plays better, or we have a breakout performance from a RB, overall, I see the running game this year being at least as effective, and maybe moreso, than last season.
Sofele v. Best Back-up Reps
While Sofele did get a greater percentage of carries behind Shane than Best did behind Forsett, I think the concern is more what he did with those carries:
Best: 28 carries, 231 yards, 7.61 per carry, 2 TD
Sofele: 69 carries, 338 yards, 4.90 per carry
Admittedly, Sofele’s 4.9 per/carry was only slightly lower than Vereen’s at 5.05 per/carry, but the difference in perception is HOLY SH&T look at Best ripping off huge gains, or HOLY SH&T Vereen =manimal (42 carries against ’Furd) type situation. Moreover, if you look at his per game carries, he struggled against the tougher run defense units Cal played while earning 53% of his total yards gained in three games against UC Davis, UCLA and WSU, not exactly bastions of the run defense.
Personally, I look forward to watching in a starting role – there are a lot of things he does very well and I think Tedford will play to those strengths. While he may not have the hype coming in that Lynch/Best/Vereen did, Gould is the man and he wouldn’t be in the starting role unless he earned it. And besides, no one ever said that you needed to have one dominant running back to take all the carries. Mike Shannahan has being proving the opposite of that for years now. THE COOL AID I AM DRINKING IT.
This.
As much as I respect Hydro’s thoughts, he kinda whiffed on the nature of the concern regarding Sofele. Sure, casual or uninformed fans may wonder at his size, but Cal fans who are a bit more savvy are more worried that, unlike with previous backups, there was very little in Sofele’s role as backup that made anyone sit up and take notice. The only Sofele play I can recall at all was a devastating special teams hit against Minnesota. That’s not what we’ve come to expect from our 2nd RBs.
Seriously, can anyone recall off the top of their head any run Sofele had last year that was noteworthy?
A lot of that has to do with the OL, so I think any concern Cal fans have regarding Sofele are tempered by recognizing that. However, all things being equal, it’s just that Sofele, unlike so many prior backups & heirs apparent, simply hasn’t shown that spectacular moment.
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
by SoCal Oski on Aug 22, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
To me 5’6 190 is in no way “small”. if i remember thats about what jones drew was at UCLA his first two years then gained another 10 pounds and went from being to small, to being a bowling ball. See at 5’6 190 sofele is more then likely going to have very strong legs, like crazy strong legs, and that will more then likely be his biggest advantage. Because he is so small and fast he will be able to to elude defenders and then he can still use his leverage to power through some people.
If you never watched his High school highlights i recommend you do so. They may be better then Bigelows’ and Best. It shows him running guys over, so obviously he’s a guy who’s not going to shy away from contact from the safeties and some linebackers, and that gives him a running style much like Quizz.
My prediction for safely 1250 Yards 8 TD’d, 20 catches 200 Rec. Yards 1TD
Covaugh- 450 yards 6 TD’s
http://www.youtube.com/user/HANDSOMElifeOFswing - Cal Football Highlights+ More Bay area sports
"Fire Hydrant With Legs"
..is what (I think it was) Manny Lawson called MJD. I was thinking about this comparison reading through the post and I’m very confident that we’ll have a good running attack. I’m not expecting any mind-boggling 60 yard runs but I’ll be fine with short, effective rushes that open up a passing game [that I’m ever so eager to see].
Fack Muck Brown!!
MJD
When I was in grad school, I passed MJD between classes every day and he is SHORT, but insanely muscular. We’ll be fine. The only things I want to know with running backs: are they fast? and do they run physically?
Lawrence Ross
MJD has 20+ pounds on Isi. He basically weighs as much as Marshawn does. Short isn’t a problem at all, and might even be a benefit for a RB (lower center of gravity, more compact, will be stronger at a given weight, etc.), but Isi is a bit on the small side.
Also, how is that the only things you want to know about RB’s? How about vision, patience, quickness, shiftiness/agility, ability to break tackles, pass blocking, reading their blockers and holes, pad level….?
by Missing Barry on Aug 23, 2011 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions
I chose “Somewhat confident” only because of the other major factor that is key to a working running game which is the O-line (which the verdict is out on as well).
We have the necessary talent (Isi’s speed, Deboskie’s Marshawn-ness), it’s just a matter of whether or not we can get that talent past the line of scrimmage.
"Today's weather, excessively violent with a chance of dismemberment. Tune in later for our 5-day forecast!"
~ Three Dog - Fallout 3
any highlight tape of sofele from last year?
I know he didn’t have any breakout runs, but it would be nice to see what he did with his carries. I remember a lot of wildcat for short or no gain.
But his high school tape, oh my. It seems like he has the potential to be really shifty in open space, and can absolutely run through (high school) arm tackles.
I think the difference
is the arms in college are THAT much stronger. I am heartened, though, if he’s up to 190 (if he’s still fast). That should help him along with the low center o’ gravity.
I do NOT compare him to Quizz, though. I’ve seen Quizz at basketball games and he’s and absolute rock of a man in a 5’8" frame.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
I think the Igber comparison is a good one. In his 1st couple of years (pre-Tedford), he was a lot like Barry Sanders without the huge gains – some good runs, followed by 3 yard losses. With coach M. and Tedford, he was able to eliminate the loses and, just ask ’furd about the results. In short, the answer lies with the O line. With a back like Isi, the quality (or lack thereof) of the O lne will exacerbate his speed/skills or lack of size, for better or worse.
I think we will be OK, just not Great
The problem that we have is, we have been too spoiled, and measure the success of RBs based on previous guys like JJ, Marshawn, Best, Forsett, Vereen. They were all GREAT RBs. We just expect all RBs to be like them.
I dont think Sofele will be that kind of a back. But he will be an OK college back. That said, I hope he eclipses 1000 yards this season, or I dont mind if CDJ steps up and gets 1000 yards instead of Sofele.
It also helps that we have a good runner of a QB. So between #1 RB & #2 RB and Maynard, they should be able to gain 1500 yards, and that will be a success.
semi-solid
In the past, we could see sparks of potential from the freshman RB’s. Vereen and Best both had the track speed, while Best showing more elusiveness, Vereen had issues with holding onto the ball (which he later corrected). Forsett had the vision in the trenches to get out of a jam. Marshawn couldn’t go down after the first hit…
Unfortunately, I haven’t seen any sparks with Sofele. He’ll need a healthy O-line to be productive. He hasn’t shown the Jacquizz X factor as mentioned above. Sofele will usually go down after someone grabs his jersey. The bulk of his carries relies on going outside in order to be productive, and defenses will key in on that.
I hope he proves me wrong, but I just don’t see him getting past 800 yards this year.
by rollonyoubears111 on Aug 22, 2011 12:29 PM PDT reply actions
Isi doesn’t look great, CDJ, and brendan bigelow don’t look fantastic either. I hear dasarte is looking strong though
by ATO Golden Bear on Aug 22, 2011 2:49 PM PDT reply actions
I'm not concerned about our running game...
…I’m just not as excited about it as I have been in prior years. With Best, I’d get excited about the breakaway / big play potential on every snap. With Vereen, I was excited about how many hits he would take or how many stutter steps he would make before barreling forward for good yardage. With Sofele, as So Cal Oski mentioned above, he hasn’t yet shown us a distinguishing element in his game that sparks excitement in me. And there’s nothing wrong with that. I really think we’re gonna be impressed by his tenacity and endurance. Dude is built like a rock and he hits the holes hard. He’ll get his yards, keep the defense honest, and I’m sure once he gets rhythm going in a game, will find his own way to knock our socks off.
I’m not concerned one iota about our running game.
I like Sofele, but he feels fairly easy “tacklable” and not so much “track star.” I do agree if he had Quizz’s line he’d be doin’ just fine. I will be surprised if he hits 1000 yards in 10 games against FBS foes (I’m not counting the presby game) with the current OL.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
The thing I don’t like about comparisons to Quizz….is that, well, Quizz really wasn’t all that good…
by Missing Barry on Aug 22, 2011 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions
He slashed us pretty good.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Aug 22, 2011 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions
He was the Pac-10 offensive player of the year over Jahvid Best in 2008!
Keeping January 2 open. You know, just in case.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Yeah, I get it, he got a lot of carries. I respect Quizz a lot for the workhorse he was. That said, as far as I can tell, that’s pretty much the driving force behind people thinking he was so good – the fact that he was a workhorse. He averaged 4.8, 5.3 and 4.6 ypc in his 3 seasons. In 2008, Jahvid was a much more effective runner – 1580 yards compared to 1253, and more importantly, 8.1 ypc to 4.8. That’s an enormous difference. Quizz did have 1 more receiving yard, though (on a lower ypr, of course)….
by Missing Barry on Aug 23, 2011 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions

by 























































