Is Coach Tedford's Offense Too Complex? (Part 4)
With fall camp just around the corner, we wrap up our look at Coach Jeff Tedford's offense. In Part One, we looked at the number of pages in his playbook and examined the details of a play itself. In Part Two, we evaluated the rumor that his playbook is more complicated than some NFL offenses. And in Part Three, we asked whether he should switch from a pro-style offense to a "simpler" spread attack.
Question #5: Is Tedford's playbook too complex to teach to young players? Or put another way, does it really take 3-5 years to learn Tedford's playbook?
Let's take a closer look at the quarterbacks of the Tedford era: (Thanks to OhioBear for his help here)
2002: Starting QB - Kyle Boller(Sr)
Playbook experience: 1 spring and 1 fall camp
Backup QB - Reggie Robertson(Soph)
Playbook Experience: 1 spring and 1 fall camp
OC: George Cortez/Jeff Tedford
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: Transformed from a strong-armed, but inaccurate and poor-decision maker to a strong-armed, somewhat accurate, better decision-maker. With essentially the same players who had just gone 1-10, we went 7-5 and would have been bowl-eligible. Highlights include an upset win on the road at then-ranked Michigan State.
2003: Starting/Backup QB: Reggie Robertson(Jr)
Playbook Experience: 2 spring, 2 fall camps
Backup/Starting QB: Aaron Rodgers(Soph)
Playbook Experience: 1 fall camp
OC: George Cortez/Jeff Tedford
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: Robertson started the first four games and provided solid, if not spectacular play. He gave way to Rodgers by game 5 because it was clear that Aaron was too special to sit. With the exception of the OSU game, Rodgers was brilliant all year. Robertson kept his head in the game and remained well-prepared as evidenced by his clutch play to put 'sc away in triple OT.
2004: Starting QB: Aaron Rodgers(Jr)
Playbook Experience: 2 springs, 2 fall camps
Backup QB: Reggie Robertson(Sr)
Playbook Experience: 3 spring, 3 fall camps
OC: George Cortez/Jeff Tedford
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: Let's just take a moment and bask in the memories of incandescent QB-play. For some reason, I cannot recall how this season ended.
2005: Starting QB: Nate Longshore(rs Fr); 2 spring, 2 fall camps
Starting/Backup QB: Joe Ayoob(jc JR); 1 spring, 1 fall camp
Backup/Starting QB: Steve Levy(Jr); 3 spring, 3 fall camps (*played at least 1 year as a FB, not QB)
OC: George Cortez/Jeff Tedford
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: Longshore won the job in camp, but didn't make it through his first start before being lost for the season with a broken leg. Ayoob replaced him but his play was uneven at best. Levy finally got the call and led Cal to a Big Game victory and a Las Vegas Bowl win over BYU.
2006: Starting QB: Nate Longshore (rs Soph); 3 spring, 3 fall camps
Backup QB/Holder: Joe Ayoob(Sr); 2 spring, 2 fall camps
3rd String QB: Steve Levy(Sr); 4 spring, 4 fall camps
Kyle Reed(rs Fr); 1 spring, 2 fall camp
OC: Mike Dunbar
QB Coach: Mike Dunbar/Jeff Tedford
Results: A 10-win season including a share of the Pac-10 title. Highlights include a 45-24 upset over #11 Oregon, a Big Game victory, and a dismantling of #21 Texas A&M 45-10 in the Holiday Bowl. After the season, Longshore is named by many pundits as the #1 junior QB in the nation.
2007: Starting QB: Nate Longshore(rs Jr); 4 spring, 4 fall camps
Backup QB: Kevin Riley(rs Fr); 2 spring, 2 fall camps
3rd QB: Kyle Reed(rs Soph); 3 spring, 2 fall camps *transfers after fall camp*
OC: Jeff Tedford/Jim Michalchik
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: After a blazing 5-0 start, Longshore has his ankle fractured. Tedford goes w/ Riley over Reed as the backup...and Reed transfers to SJSU where he never is able to fulfill his potential. Longshore is never the same. We lose 5/6 of the next games, including the Axe....Before Riley replaces Longshore in the Armed Forces Bowl and leads a comeback win 42-36.
2008: Starting/Backup QB: Kevin Riley(rs Soph); 3 spring, 3 fall camps
Backup/Starting QB: Nate Longshore(rs Sr); 5 spring, 5 fall camps
OC: Frank Cignetti
QB Coach: Frank Cignetti
Results: Thinking that he needs to take a more big picture view, Tedford decides to go hands-off with the offense. After a prolonged QB competition, Tedford names Riley the starter. Due to inconsistency, Riley gets pulled for Longshore. With neither clearly able to distinguish themselves, they split time for the rest of the year. We limp into the Emerald Bowl where we manage to pull one out over Miami thanks to Follet's game-changing sack. Longshore starts, but is underwhelming.
2009: Starting QB: Kevin Riley(Jr); 4 spring, 4 fall camps
Backup QB: Brock Mansion (rs Soph); 3 spring, 3 fall camps
Backup QB: Beau Sweeney (rs Fr); 2 spring, 2 fall camps
OC: Andy Ludwig
QB Coach: Andy Ludwig
Results: Now the undisputed starter, Riley has an uneven year. Our offense is built around Jahvid Best and is arguably overly reliant on the big play. When teams are able to sell-out to stop him, Riley was unable to consistently make them pay. After Best was lost with a frightening injury, Vereen stepped up to almost single-handedly win the Big Game. The QB position and passing offense remain a work in progress all year. Even the backup position is unsettled with Beau Sweeney replacing Brock Mansion as QB#2 part-way during the season. All of our warts are exposed in a bowl game loss against Utah.
2010: Starting QB: Kevin Riley(Sr); 5 spring, 5 fall camps
Backup/Starting QB: Brock Mansion (rs Jr); 4 spring, 4 fall camps
Backup QB: Beau Sweeney (rs Soph); 3 spring, 3 fall camps
OC: Andy Ludwig
QB Coach: Andy Ludwig
Results: Facepalm City. Riley is better, but still inconsistent. When he goes down with a career-ending injury, it's clear that our backups are woefully unprepared to compete in the Pac-10. Beau Sweeney started the year as a backup, but was replaced by Brock Mansion. Although Mansion had his moments against WSU, it's charitable to say that he struggled in his remaining starts. You can point fingers at the Oline and deservedly so, but the fact remains that the offense sputtered all year and bore little semblance to a traditional Tedford attack.
2011: Starting(?) QB: Zach Maynard(Jr); 1 spring camp, 1 fall camp(upcoming)
Backup(?) QB: Allen Brigford (rs Soph); 2 spring, 2 fall camps(one upcoming)
Holder: Brock Mansion (rs Sr); 5 spring, 5 fall camps (one upcoming)
OC: Jeff Tedford
QB Coach: Jeff Tedford
Results: TBD. But, Maynard has been annointed the starter after only one spring camp.
Answer: The common thread? It's a gross over-simplification of a multi-factorial issue (Oline play, surrounding players, scheme, playcalling, player development, position coaching, talent assessment), but we've had our best QB play and our best offenses while Tedford was coaching the QBs and was heavily involved in the playcalling. To be sure, he's had his misses (Ayoob, Reed). However, every other quarterback he worked with personally was developed into at least a reasonable Division I player; Boller, Robertson, pre-injury Longshore, pre-bar-glass Levy, and pre-coaching-carousel Kevin Riley...oh, and that Rodgers guy. More specifically, Boller and Rodgers became credible players with only 1 spring and 1 fall camp under their belts. Robertson, Longshore, Levy, and Riley all were prepared to be competent starters after only 2 spring and 2 fall camps.
It could be argued that Boller, Rodgers were NFL-level talents. (and pre-injury Longshore) But, I think it's reasonable to speculate that Kyle Boller was not going to be drafted before Coach Tedford's tutelage. And let's face it - his nickname was Jesus-In-Cleats and not Jesus-In-The-Library for a reason; he wasn't exactly known for the mental part of his game and yet was still able to competently run the Tedford Offense after only one off-season.
Rodgers might well be considered an outlier to this analysis because of his incredible talent. The flipside here is that if he was such a can't-miss/sure-fire prospect, why exactly was he found by accident at Butte CC?
Perhaps Coach Tedford's most impressive work was with Reggie Robertson and Steve Levy. Neither quarterback had off-the-chart athleticism or arm strength. Yet, he was able to adapt his offense around their skillsets, and was also able to quickly teach them both to execute it well enough to win games. In particular, his work with Levy was noteworthy because of the limited snaps available to backups buried on the depth chart.
That's six different quarterbacks who were all able to learn and to execute the Tedford offense in two years or less. I think the course material is just fine - it's the instructor(s) we might need to re-evaluate.
Or put in picture form from Dr. Saturday, look what happened when Coach Tedford went hands off:
via l.yimg.com
Final Summary: Looking at everything, Tedford's offense puts a lot of responsibility on the players, but so do a lot of successful offenses. I think the position coaching of the skill players, line, and the quarterbacks themselves plays a huge role in their development. In no way do I feel that the college game has passed Tedford by, or that he doesn't understand how to put together a potent offense. He has too many years of proven success to believe otherwise. Even if his system might be complex, he's found a way to make it work for him. It could be argued that we've been somewhat prone to being a jack of all trades, masters of none attack in recent years. But as many of our astute readers have mentioned, a successful offense doesn't look like it has any complexity issues while an unsuccessful offense looks like the playbook was written in cuneiform.(HT carp, Cali49a) Or, when you look at it a different way, a successful trick play appears to be innovative, creative, and aggressive; but an unsuccessful trick play is "too complicated" or "trying to do too much."
*Update* Interestingly enough, Tedford himself was quoted in Berkelium97's excellent report from the Pac-12 Media Day luncheon as saying:
"He did emphasize that he needs to change some aspects of his own offense: "we do need to cut back: less volume, more creativity." He has to take the size of the playbook and "cut it back so everyone understands what they're doing." He described his ideal offense as "diverse and efficient." Modifying the playbook is a challenge for Tedford, as he is the primary play caller this season. For every play he adds into the book, he has to take something out. His goal is to keep it around 100 plays. "
I'm glad that he's gone back to doing what he does best. With Coach Tedford back in a more hands-on role, I hope we'll tighten up our execution and return to the offensive production we're used to seeing. Go Bears!
34 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The common thread? […] but we’ve had our best QB play and our best offenses while Tedford was coaching the QBs and was heavily involved in the playcalling.
Yup. I see a couple of QBs having only one year’s experience with the playbook becoming quite impressive (Boller, Rodgers), while other situations where qbs have been inconsistent (to put it politely) regardless of time.
The difference really does seem to be Tedford’s involvement. And the graph is a nice visual representation of that.
As you go on to say, having Tedford work with the qb’s is not a guarantee that they’ll develop into Hall of Famers, but it does seem that not having him work with them does result in underperforming.
"Thanks. Go Bears!" - Ernest Owusu: the next great Cal DE
Aaron Rodgers
The article says Rodgers had a spring camp in 2003, not true. He enrolled at CAL in the fall of 2003.
Another Great Series, Kodiak.
Another thing that flies under the radar is watching film. Amongst everything else to do, watching film is important and lots of players don’t understand that until later.
Tedford is going to be really busy this year with the role of HC, OC, and QB coach. Yeah, he’s done that in the past, and he’s been successful, so Im glad it’s happening. But if that ever is too much work, I think can drop the OC part of it. As long as he is coaching the QB, I think we will have success with Coach K & Coach M managing the offense.
Spring camps are not all the same
As far as studying the playbook, sure. But as far as getting reps goes, some QBs have missed out on spring practices due to injury. I believe AR never had a spring practice (he was not enrolled yet in 2003 and missed 2004 due to off-season surgery). Bridgford had his first spring camp this year, he missed the first due to his injured shoulder.
Maynard, conversely, had a lot of time to study the playbook, reportedly studying it while sitting out his transfer year. I don’t know how to compare that to missing spring practice due to injury but being able to study.
Anyway, I agree with the end conclusion, just trying to pick a few nits.
Maynard, conversely, had a lot of time to study the playbook, reportedly studying it while sitting out his transfer year.
I had always wondered about that. Is that legal? He wasn’t enrolled at Cal yet last fall. But I know he was here, and he has a brother who has the playbook and can study off from. But rule wise, is Tedford allowed to give a copy of playbook to someone who is not yet enrolled in school?
Im not saying its illegal. I was just wondering cuz I have no clue about it.
“Oh look, Zach, I accidentally dropped this book, with post-its and dog-ears, right on the ground here, right in front of you. OOPS. My mistake….wouldn’t it be a shame if someone were to, you know, pick it up and read it. A lot….”
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 10, 2011 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions
zone read

not your traditional hand off that’s for sure*
*let’s not go making a big deal out of one play, but mixing in the zone read with Maynard’s 1 or 2 reads n run sounds more exciting than the flavors of offense that we’ve seen since ’08.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Aug 10, 2011 12:26 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I like this alot
The downside of a read option play like this is, it is extremely disappointing when the opponents stop us for a loss of yards.
Maybe it’s just me, but it disappoints me more if we are stopped behind line of scrimmage in an option play than the same failure in a regular handoff to RB.
Kinda like how Darron Thomas was when we stopped LMJ in the highlight video.
Nice picture. Although, Cal has been running the zone read for years. So it’s not like this is anything new…
But now we can run it well! The only other time it’s been plausible as an option has been when we’ve done it out of the wildcat (since when we did it with a QB, our QB wasn’t much of a threat to actually run), but even in the wildcat it seems more like it’s predesigned to go a certain way than an actual option.
by Missing Barry on Aug 10, 2011 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions
I remember one where Mansion ran for about 25 yards vs. WSU.
That was well executed. Or perhaps, it was just so unexpected it was successful.
Ayoob zone read for the TD vs. Tennessee to pull us within 35-18!
Keeping January 2 open. You know, just in case.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Was that zone read or just a busted/improvised play?
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Aug 10, 2011 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions
that was read
I remember Shane Vereen’s comment postgame.
Shane said he was hoping Brock would pull the ball and keep himself because a DE was coming his way, and he did.
too many "he"s
Shane said he was hoping Brock would pull the ball and keep it because a DE was coming in Shane’s way, and Brock did just that.
Interesting, thanks!
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Aug 10, 2011 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions
May have been in the playbook, and with Dunbar and Booya we kinda had the OC/QB for this, but I don’t think we’ve really utilized the zone read more than than a few times a season of late. Running the zone read with Riley or Longshore didn’t really make much sense.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
they still did it with Riley once or twice a game.
Then, I’ll make a big ruckus, because I am a hypocritical asshole.
-TwistNHook
did Riley ever a) keep it and b) run for more than 5 yards with the rock?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
we may have used that around the goal line a few times, no?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
we had that few times, Riley ran/walked into the endzone.
but it looked more like a qb keeper from beginning than a read.
Yes, they were mostly QB keepers. I don’t think Riley or Mansion ever read anyone the last two years—I don’t recall defenders being left unblocked on too many plays.
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 10, 2011 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions
The one I remember
Was the Armed Forces bowl TD run.
Keeping January 2 open. You know, just in case.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Thanks Kod-man
Good series, I think you could take away two things, 1) Tedford’s offense is not too complex for players to excel after a short time studying it, and 2) we were better with Tedford working closely with the QB and the offense.
A sadly, there’s #3 (which I hate to mention, since I’m not that kind of guy): Riley was not that good. Sure I know there were other issues, but for whatever reason, Riley never was consistent. Riley, if you’re reading this I feel bad saying this, I never booed you, and glared at anyone who did; you weren’t the problem, but you weren’t the solution either.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?





























































