Pac-12 TV Deal: Is Cal-Stanford Big Game Week Potentially Moving Even Earlier?
2008. 2009. 2010. What are the last three years Cal haven't finished their season facing Stanford?
The Golden Bears have been stuck not finishing their regular season with the Big Game the last few years. Some of the reasons are legit (the Notre Dame contract sticks them as their home finale for TV purposes), some are B.S. )(Stanford athletes have finals or something that they have to study for, lest they end up earning their dreaded B-minuses). In any case, for outside viewers, we're not trying to figure out a name for our annual end-of-season rivalry game with team as far away from Cal as possible (Washington the past three years, ASU this year).
With the advent of the Pac-12 championship game and more Thanksgiving weekend Pac-12 games on the way, there could be more shifting in the cards. For whatever reason, Cal and Stanford fans remain adamantly opposed to playing Big Games on Thanksgiving weekend, because heaven forbid they have to book earlier flights to return the Bay Area from their SoCal trips. So in all likelihood, our regular season will not be ending in the Big Game on a regular basis anytime soon.
And don't think the moving might be done.
Would you be ok with moving the Big Game from its traditional late November pre-Thanksgiving slot to earlier in the year?
Scott has already said the new Pac-12 TV network will be retaining a majority of the best possible matchups in the conference to give a reason for cable/satellite providers to add it to their packages. This could imply that a lot of the rivalry games might find their way to the network from 2012 onward.Additionally, to ensure each game gets plum viewing, you might see games move to their own exclusive slots to ensure guaranteed interest in Pac-12 matchups week-by-week. It wouldn't be the first early move of a rivalry game--a lot of the SEC rivalry games take place during October and early November, as does the Red River Shootout. So how about the Civil War on Halloween, the Apple Cup in November, and cap it all off with USC-UCLA on Thanksgiving?
So The Big Game could be moving, but not to the place we all want it to be. Personally, if the Big Game moves from the next-to-last game to game to some scrub date in October, I won't be too bummed. It would kind of suck for Cal fans that have made this a November tradition for ages, who want something to look forward to even at the end of a miserable season.
But I'd learn to live with it. College football tradition has been malleable for awhile, and I'm ready to mold it some more.
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fine by me
I don’t care when we play anyone.
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
Who needs tradition anyway?
Our fight song is played by someone else? Sure, why not.
We start wearing uni colors that have nothing to do with our school colors? Great idea!
We play our traditional end-of-season BIG GAME in September? Make it happen.
So, when do we change the team name from Golden Bears to something more TV and consumer friendly? How about just go with “Bay Area School Sports Team.”
Works for me.
I'm thinking of having a little party down in Newport.
when did we wear off color unis? or am i just dumb and that was just a rhetorical device?
by GoldenBear8933 on May 12, 2011 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m sorry, but some things need to stay the same to keep me sane
no stadium
short weeks
higher pricing to penalize alums who will actually show up when the Bears are down but don’t have the big money
no bench
if Larry Scott can realize the Big Game isn’t happening on a Thursday, he can realize its not leaving the end of the schedule
besides it felt weird having a game against Washington after Big Game pace——really weird. Didn’t help we lost a ton of people to Thanksgiving.
"Our hearts shall sing and our voices ring for the dear old Blue and Gold!"
Whatever
You know, I used to really love that it was the last game we played…until it wasn’t the last game we played anymore. If it’s not the last game. I really don’t give a crap when we play it.
Also it always lands on my birthday weekend which becomes a nightmare for my wife who can’t plan anything for me because the world stops on Big Game weekend. And if we lose….well….I’m just in a TERRIBLE mood. So go ahead change it Mr Scott!
Say it like Ron Burgandy signing off: "Stay Classy, Bears!"
by PlayClassyBears on May 12, 2011 12:40 PM PDT reply actions
So um
I know it’s Leiland Stanfurd Junior College and all, but it really looks like Marv Jones was playing against middle schoolers in that picture.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on May 12, 2011 12:40 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Biggest two issues with scheduling the Furd
1) The Championship game schedule means, last weekend of football is Thanksgiving. And since no one living in the Bay is from the Bay…no one is here that weekend.
2) That weekend now HAS to be played because of the extended schedule.
Sooooo, that means Furd Will NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER be the last game Cal plays again. And that is DOUBLY true with the Championship game.
So now that we are all up to speed from three years ago when this first became the case…we can move on. Does it really matter if happens weekend before Thanksgiving? I can’t see why it should matter that much. Sure I see why not September or first week in October, but what’s the big deal about playing two teams after Furd instead of one? You can never get Big Game to be the last game ever again.
Also the one big advantage is that there is less potential for Big Game hangover—which let’s face it, has killed us the last few years (and will undoubtedly again this year). When it’s not the “second to last” game it becomes a little easier to recognize that there is a whole rest of a season to be played. That’s harder to do when you have one game left (win or lose). With a two or three game buffer….perhaps not so much. I think this is especially advantageous for the Cal side…since we tend to be a little more “emotionally labile.”
Say it like Ron Burgandy signing off: "Stay Classy, Bears!"
by PlayClassyBears on May 12, 2011 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
I'm a traditionalist with regards to scheduling The Big Game.
Maybe in time I might get accustomed to having the game scheduled for sometime in October (retch), but it would be very upsetting. My earliest memories of Big Game include crisp November air, occasional rain, and a certain excitement that seemed to be the culmination of the regular season.
All of that is part and parcel to The Big Game.
Avi, using Texas-Oklahoma as an example of a big rivalry game scheduled for October is just wrong. I might accuse you of intellectual dishonesty if I thought you really understood the history of the Red River Shootout. Texas-Oklahoma hasn’t been played in any month other than October since 1923, which was also the last year in which the series was played on either school’s campus (Nov. 17, 1923; Texas 26, Oklahoma 14 in Austin, TX).
The only longstanding rivalry games that I can think of that are consistently played early in the season are Iowa-Iowa State and Colorado-Colorado State. When you say that SEC rivalry games take place in October and early November, which rivalry games are you talking about?
Florida-Georgia has always been played in either October or early November; only one time as late as November 13 (in 1920). Otherwise, never later than November 11.
Georgia’s rivalry with Georgia Tech has typically been played on or after Thanksgiving Day; this is the Bulldog’s traditional end of regular season rivalry.
Alabama-Auburn has had a similar history. The Iron Bowl is typically played the Saturday before Thanksgiving.
The Egg Bowl (Ole Miss-Mississippi State) is always played around Thanksgiving Weekend.
Florida-Florida State hasn’t been played as early as October since 1976, and it’s either the Saturday before Thanksgiving or Thanksgiving Weekend.
Tennessee-Vanderbilt is always played late November.
What SEC rivalries do you see being played in October or early November?
Alabama-Tennessee
Historically even known as The Third Saturday In October, even though it’s usually fourth now (and wasn’t there hell to pay over THAT). This is absolutely Alabama’s number-one-A rivalry, especially as it was played through the 40-year stretch where Bama and Auburn wouldn’t even play each other. And to be honest, growing up in an Alabama-Tennessee divided household, I’d rather the Tide beat the Vols ten times out of ten.
Florida-Georgia (aka The World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party when their administrations aren’t being all Baptist about it) is also the last weekend in October, usually. Not the primary rivalry for either school but definitely a big deal (I think Georgia may lead the league in big-time rivalry games with three).
That’s pretty much it for non-November big-time rivalry games – although on a lesser scale, Vandy-Ole Miss is usually early October or late September, and is at least as big a deal as the synthetic Vandy-Wake Forest “rivalry” they tried to concoct earlier in the decade…
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
At the same time, VandyImport...
your narrative acknowledges that these rivalries have traditionally been played in October. It’s not like they’re being moved from late November dates to October, right? Which goes to my point that there aren’t SEC rivalry games changing their scheduling traditions to satisfy the addition of a Championship Game or a conference-wide TV contract.
In the end, I’m saying that this hypothetical was posed using examples that just weren’t indicative of the hypothetical.
Sorry to post OT, but can we
vote Mychal Kendricks up on this espn defensive poy poll:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/21680/poll-pac-12-defensive-player-of-the-year
by C98 on May 12, 2011 12:49 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Wow, the Oregon homerism is very high on this poll.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on May 12, 2011 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
7%?
Maybe this needs to go on the front page…
by Mallrat92204 on May 12, 2011 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions
It should be the final game of the (regular) season. Period.
CALIFORNIA ANGELS . . . ANAHEIM DUCKS . . . CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
by AndyHogan14 on May 12, 2011 1:05 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
Rec’d, although you appear to have no concern for money or television ratings. Shame on you!
May 29, 2010: Steven Revetria becomes Giants General Manager. The rest is history.
"118 elements, and still no stanfurdium"- carp, paraphrased
Bandwagons are fun- that's why people get on them in the first place.
by natteringnabob on May 12, 2011 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions
go to the game
its Big Game, of all games you should be going to it
and so television ratings are unnecessary for it
"Our hearts shall sing and our voices ring for the dear old Blue and Gold!"
by Joe Bandsmen on May 12, 2011 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
That’s great, let the Pac-120 know so they can close their bank accounts.
May 29, 2010: Steven Revetria becomes Giants General Manager. The rest is history.
"118 elements, and still no stanfurdium"- carp, paraphrased
Bandwagons are fun- that's why people get on them in the first place.
by natteringnabob on May 12, 2011 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
For whatever reason, Cal and Stanford fans remain adamantly opposed to playing Big Games on Thanksgiving weekend, because heaven forbid they have to book earlier flights to return the Bay Area from their SoCal trips. So in all likelihood, our regular season will not be ending in the Big Game on a regular basis anytime soon.
You seem sarcastically confused as to this. It seems pretty straight forward to me. It’d ruin the Big Game Week tradition (its not just 1 game, its a whole week of stuff). Itd prolly mean a less than packed house. We had 44K people at Cal-UW this last year. Im sure if it was Big Game, wed have more, but 20K more?
I don’t see any reason to put the Big Game right after Thanksgiving besides kowtowing to some sort of “tradition” that hasn’t existed for a while. I see a lot of reasons why it’d be terrible.
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
PS That was announced 44K, I bet it was less than that. I was there and I dont think it was 44K total.
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I would also be very surprised if it was actually 44,000. Closer to 35,000 would be my guess.
Official Acceptor of TwistNHook's Unconditional Surrender Person of CGB and Queen of Spite Recs
It was kinda sad to be honest. Then, with the rain and the genuine end of that game, it was just downright mean by Yahweh!
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
That was one depressing day...
My season ticket mate bailed on me… It was Thanksgiving weekend so most people had plans already… so I went to the game by myself… Instead of sitting in my seats in section H, I roamed around the Stadium for most of the game, finally settling high up in the North End Zone (unintentionally) as far away from the final outcome as possible…
The game was as gloomy as the day. It poured throughout the game, the sound of the rain beating on empty aluminum bleachers reminding me of rain games from the 80s. We had no offense. It felt like we were just hanging on hoping we could clutch on to a win long enough to escape at the final gun… didn’t happen.
And the crowd was, understandably, anemic. Thanksgiving weekend. Disappointing season. Getting absolutely blown out in the Big Game the week before while – easily – hundreds of Stanford fans celebrated in Memorial… Pouring rain. And CAL’s crack marketing team apparently having done nothing to actually get people to the game… even though every single CAL fan with a pulse could see when the schedule came out this game was going to be a challenge no matter what…
The ceremony to remove the Andy Smith bench while the Chancellor droned on about something that no one could hear or was particularly interested in…
Walking by Bowles and up to my Jeep in Foothill lot being taunted by Washington fans – who were only 5-6 at the time…
Yep, that was one depressing day…
without getting anyone I know in trouble…. let me just say that there was not 44k
by GoldenBear8933 on May 12, 2011 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions
You are right that all the luncheons and rallies and such during Big Game week would be ruined. Also, students would have to choose between missing Big Game and pissing off their parents by going home for only two days for Thanksgiving. The same is true for lots of alumni season ticket holders. Trips home to visit the family, whether to southern California, the east coast, or wherever, are a big part of many people’s traditions, and it would be a very bad thing for Cal to force its fans to chose between their families and Big Game.
Official Acceptor of TwistNHook's Unconditional Surrender Person of CGB and Queen of Spite Recs
Hmmm.
I hate not having it be the last game, but it never will be again. Thanksgiving would suck.
I think I’d like to make it the first game of the season as my next choice. I don’t give a damn if the team wants to get some kinks out before league season. Let’s have Big Game on Labor Day weekend!!!! Who’s with me.
by ososdeoro on May 12, 2011 1:42 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
To take a contrary view, there should be more tradition in scheduling Pac-12 games
Take a cue from some of the SEC rivalries and schedule certain Pac-12 intra-division rivalries at a certain time in the schedule.
For instance, Cal vs. Oregon State could be scheduled within 3 days of Halloween every year (between Oct. 28 and Nov. 3). Stanf*rd vs. Washington could be scheduled at the same time. Or maybe, just maybe, there might be a whole slew of intra-divisional games that would fit into a scheduling model we haven’t even considered.
Maybe that’s one of the purposes for fitting all of the Pac-12 non-conference games into September (exc. Notre Dame vs. USC and Notre Dame vs. Stanf*rd). Maybe Larry Scott knows that you don’t devalue the product by moving rivalry games around.
Fourth of July would be better
Kids are out of school and all, so there will be plenty of time for weekday activities.
May 29, 2010: Steven Revetria becomes Giants General Manager. The rest is history.
"118 elements, and still no stanfurdium"- carp, paraphrased
Bandwagons are fun- that's why people get on them in the first place.
I wonder ...
Is there similar talk about moving the other rivalry games into Oct or Sep? I mean, are Scott and the league considering playung UW – WSU in the 2nd week of Oct, and SC – Ucla in the 3rd? Will UA-ASU be the last game in Sep, while Oregon & OSU get to line up to start October?
Or is it just that for some reason the league seems to sense a level of apathy and nonchalance regarding tradition among the furd & Cal fanbase that doesn’t exist among real college football fans?
I'm thinking of having a little party down in Newport.
Where is there any talk within the Pac-10/12 Offices to move any archrivalry game
…to some other date than late November?
I think Avi has conflated the idea of Thanksgiving Weekend games to mean that archrivalry games will be scattered to the four corners of the schedule (to coin a phrase).
Even as an intellectual exercise, this is less than comfortable.
I believe Scott floated the idea out there months ago as a way of attracting more attention to the conference on a week-by-week basis. I have no idea whether it’ll actually happen, but I do remember that idea coming down the pipeline last fall,s o it is being considered.
It’s a possibility, not an inevitability.
Contact info
Twitter: @avinashkunnath
Email: bearsnecessities at gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on May 12, 2011 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
At the same time, I would be surprised if a majority of ADs, Presidents/Chancellors support this move
It’s achieved its first goal of drawing attention to the conference just by the mere mention of it.
But it would devalue the conference overall if it were ever implemented.
College football is nothing if it drives customers away. And who are the customers? They’re primarily alumni of the various colleges. Scheduling plays into that tradition. Not only who you play, but also when you play.
To cite one of your examples, Texas and Oklahoma fans would be upset if the Red River Shootout were scheduled some other time than the 1st or 2nd Saturday in October. It’s just not right. And this is a rivalry that pre-dates the formation of the Big XII in 1996 which made the Longhorns and the Sooners members of the same conference.
Similarly, moving The Big Game to some other point on the calendar other than late November smacks of unnecessary meddling with tradition. I like the idea of the Big Game being the last game, but that goes out the window if the intent is to move it to October or early November. The traditional spot on the calendar is the Saturday before Thanksgiving. And there it should stay.
I may be totally wrong but I think that idea was floated out there if we had divided up the conference with the zipper method since it wouldn’t work otherwise… either way, I was not a fan of playing the Furd on Halloween….LOL
I think you're right...
It’s coming back to me now that the only way the Zipper method of aligning the conference would work is if archrivalry games were no longer tied to any point on the calendar. It was a huge point against the Zipper method; another strike against it was that the ACC was using it without any measurable success in promoting the conference as a football conference. The ACC is still known as a basketball conference.
I would not have chosen the Zipper Method (and argued vigorously against it), but the current alignment is acceptable if only because it preserves the Bay Area-Los Angeles rivalries as annual games.
The ACC’s zipper alignment isn’t why it isn’t known for football. They aren’t known for football because most of their teams suck.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 12, 2011 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
That's not what I said
What I said was:
…another strike against it was that the ACC was using it without any measurable success in promoting the conference as a football conference.
Just because the ACC sucks doesn’t mean that the Zipper doesn’t also suck.
The ACC employed the Zipper with the idea that Miami and Florida State would meet frequently in the CCG; it hasn’t happened yet.
BTW, if the ACC sucks at football, what does that say about the Pac-10 during the same period (2005-2010)? I don’t know that Pac-10 teams as a group ranked significantly higher than ACC teams during the same period.
Probably not. My point was just that I don’t think the zipper (or any divisional alignment) has any real impact in “promoting the conference”; really that’s mostly based on how the teams perform.
FWIW, I think the Pac-12 should have picked the zipper. I’d much rather have been in a division with Oregon, Washington, Cal, UCLA, Arizona, and Colorado. No WSU or OSU would be nice, and the divisions would be fairly balanced.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 12, 2011 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I think that Larry Scott would disagree with you
My point was just that I don’t think the zipper (or any divisional alignment) has any real impact in "promoting the conference"
When the Pac-12 Divisional Alignment was announced, Larry Scott made a point of saying that competitive balance and traditional rivalries were the cornerstones in forming the divisions. The Pac-10 press release also noted that the divisions as constituted made it easy for the fans to follow Pac-12 football.
Given all of that, it was logical that the California schools would be split North and South and the Bay Area-LA rivalries would be preserved as inter-divisional games played annually.
Obviously I don't totally agree with Larry, considering he went with North/South
But sure, i think competitive balance and traditional rivalries are important considerations. I think the “easy for fans to follow” factor is blown way out of proportion, though. I think once the divisions were set, people would figure it out pretty quickly. I don’t know if you were around here during the debates around divisional alignment, but I thought that the Pac 12 Cooler proposal, which was a variant of the zipper, was clearly the best choice. It looked like this:
Teams would always play their side of the graphic, PLUS the teams in their row every season. Then they would play 2 of the remaining 4 teams. This results in every team playing every other team twice out of every four years, and at least once in each stadium over a four-year college career. All teams would have exposure to each region of the Pac-10 every year and would also play all their regional rivals.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 13, 2011 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions
In case you find it hard to tell, in that scenario we would have Oregon, UCLA, Colorado, Washington, Arizona in our division and play them every year, PLUS we’d play Stanfurd and USC every year. We’d rotate through ASU, WSU, Utah, and OSU every other year.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 13, 2011 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions
The Pac-12 Cooler concept is interesting.
I also believe, as you do, that the “easy for fans to follow” factor was overblown.
But if the Pac-12 Cooler concept was acceptable and the “easy to follow” factor is overblown, then I submit that there’s another concept worthy of consideration: Dynamic Divisional Alignment (or DDA).
I actually proposed DDA to the Pac-12 in June. In short, DDA allowed for the preservation of traditional annual rivalries (such as the Bay Area vs. LA schools; Oregon schools vs Washington schools) through designated permanent inter-divisonal opponents, while also ensuring that every non-California school hosted and visited an LA school in 6 out of every 8 years.
The Pac-12 Cooler is essentially a Zipper; DDA preserves in-state pairings while rotating the divisional alignment once every two years (hence, the “dynamic” portion of the name).
The advantage of DDA over any other alignment is that the Oregon schools, Washington schools, Arizona schools, and the Rockies schools get an equal number of opportunities to host and visit the LA schools and the Bay Area schools.
I wasn’t against DDA per se, but I think there is some (small at least) value to having set divisions.
The Pac-12 Cooler did everything DDA did, though, didn’t it? It preserved in-state/regional pairings (Cal/UCLA would play each other, as well as USC+Stanfurd every year, Washington/Oregon would play each other, plus WSU+OSU every year, Colorado/Arizona would play each other plus ASU+Utah every year), and the Mountain/NW schools could each have 3 CA games every year.
For example, if you’re Washington, you’d play Cal and UCLA every year, and 1 of USC or Stanfurd. They could do Stanfurd/Utah one year and USC/ASU the other year.
Similarly, if you’re Utah, you’d play USC and Stanfurd every year, and you could play either UCLA or Cal every other year.
So, it had everything you’re talking about, plus stable, fair divisions.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 13, 2011 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions
I think it's a matter of nuanced preference
Kind of 6 of one, half dozen of the other kind of thing.
DDA perspective
every non-California school plays UCLA and USC, Cal and Stanf*rd an equal number of times over the same 8-year period.
Those same schools could play:
both UCLA and USC 4 years out of 8 (e.g, Years 1-4) while also playing
Cal in 2 of those 4 years (e.g., Years 1 & 2) and
Stanf*rd in 2 of those 4 years (e.g., Years 3 & 4)
both Cal and Stanf*rd 4 years out of 8 (e.g, Years 5-8) while also playing
UCLA in 2 of those 4 years (e.g., Years 5 & 6) and
USC in 2 of those 4 years (e.g., Years 7 & 8)
Pac-12 Cooler perspective
Blue/Green Division schools play
UCLA every year
Cal every year
Stanf*rd in 4 years out of 8 (e.g., Years 1, 2, 5, & 6)
USC in 4 years out of 8 (e.g., Years 3, 4, 7, & 8)
Red/Yellow Division schools play
Stanf*rd every year
USC every year
UCLA in 4 years out of 8 (e.g., Years 1, 2, 5, & 6)
Cal in 4 years out of 8 (e.g., Years 3, 4, 7, & 8)
I like DDA more because the distribution of games amongst non-traditional rivalry games is equal across the board. Otherwise, I agree that the number of visits to a region are effectively equivalent under either system.
6 of one or half dozen of the other.
Yeah, I see where you’re coming from, but from the Cal perspective, I’d MUCH rather play UW, CU, UO, and UA every single year and WSU, OSU, ASU, and UU every other year, rather than 6 years out of 8 for every school. Put another way, in an 8 year period, we’d be replacing 1 trip to Pullman, Corvallis, and Salt Lake with a trip to Seattle, Eugene, and Boulder. I’ll make that trade any day. I’m neutral between Tempe and Tucson, so that doesn’t really make much difference to me.
Also, having set divisions gives you more of a tradition, because you know you’re playing those same schools every single year, so the rivalry with them gets built up over time. Switching might bright somewhat more conference cohesion overall, but I think divisional cohesion is probably more useful.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 13, 2011 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand where you're coming from, too.
I’d probably prefer Seattle, Eugene, and Boulder over Pullman, Corvallis, and SLC, also. It’s probably also reasonable to assume that many other Pac-12 fans would feel similarly.
But knowing that this inevitably leads to others enjoying less of the fun, it seems logical to spread as much joy around as possible. Ergo, DDA.
Meh, that doesn’t move me very much. Oregon and Washington are regional rivals with OSU and WSU in the same way we are with UCLA and USC. Utah and ASU will get to play Arizona and Colorado more, which isn’t so bad.
Anyway, it looks like you prefer DDA but wouldn’t mind Pac-12 Cooler, and I prefer P12C but wouldn’t mind DDA, and we got neither :)
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 13, 2011 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Why not have Big Game in the middle of the season when the weather in the Bay Area is at its best? That is a tradition worth establishing.
by CaliforniaEternal on May 12, 2011 8:03 PM PDT reply actions
Emotion
We should not move it on grounds of weather because part of the spirit of the Big Game is just the environment. Not to say we haven’t had great weather the past few years, but the Big Game is frankly the only game that matters during the regular season some years.
It’s the game where records and rankings are laid aside and only grit, determination, and passion, with some of the craziest calls you will ever see determine the winner. To move this game in the middle of the season means you lose part of this reflection. As we have seen in many posts here at CGB on the history of this contest (or you have been in attendance or read this stuff for fun elsewhere), many a time a coach has been on the way out the door and only at the end of the season in devotion to the coach have their players rallied to give them one last send off. That send off isn’t against an Arizona school, or an LA school, or any one from the Pacific Northwest: they have rallied against their rival across the Bay. That kind of emotional outpouring just doesn’t come in the middle of the season, it can only come at the end.
"Our hearts shall sing and our voices ring for the dear old Blue and Gold!"
by Joe Bandsmen on May 12, 2011 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions
I don’t understand the importance of having Big Game as the last game of the season.
Is the game any less significant if we play it in October? or the first week of November? To Twist’s point, I totes agree that it can’t be the week of Thanksgiving because of the week of activities and events leading up to the game, but any other week seems fine by me.
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
Additionally, to ensure each game gets plum viewing, you might see games move to their own exclusive slots to ensure guaranteed interest in Pac-12 matchups week-by-week.
While it doesn’t satisfy the weekly thing, exclusive time slots during Thanksgiving Weekend is really easy to solve. In years where Stanford ends at home against Notre Dame, potentially five rivalry games could end on Thanksgiving weekend, each with their own exclusive time. Two on Friday (one day, one night) and three on Saturday (one at noon, one at 3:30, and one at 7PM). Big Game would be the biggest game the week earlier, assuming the conference doesn’t schedule a marquee game as well that week, like this year’s UO-USC matchup against Big Game. Of course, the downside to this is that Cal would need to either schedule a bye during Thanksgiving weekend (meaning playing 12 straight weeks in seasons that only have 13 Saturdays), request a waiver to play an out-of-conference team that weekend, or beg one of the other rivalries to move their rivalry game back a week as well and shift the burden of an out-of-conference game or bye that weekend on another school.
In years where USC ends it’s season against Notre Dame on Thanksgiving weekend, Big Game would HAVE to go against USC-UCLA if both schools went with a pre-Thanksgiving week rivalry game. The pros to this, though, are 1) an All-California rivalry weekend, 2) Stanford can end its season against it’s old rival of SJSU and 3) Cal ends its season against UCLA during Thanksgiving week. If you don’t consider that a pro, though, then perhaps you can take solace in the fact that because of the three week thing specified in the new media rights contract, Stanford would probably have to open conference play against USC in September when no students are on campus — every year.

by 


























































