SB Nation Bay Area Editor's Pick
Spring Practice Thoughts
On Saturday, I attended Cal's final open practice at Contra Costa College. There was quite a crowd of Bear fans filling, if not quite packing, the stands for a beautiful day of simulated football and real practice. At first, it was a bit of a three-ring circus as the position coaches led their respective groups through several drills. It was better just to pick one group and watch them for a while, otherwise, it was a bit overwhelming. After a hour or so of drills, the orange over-hats came out and a scrimmage commenced.
To be honest, I'm no superhuman football expert who can see 11 match-ups all at once, and commit everything to memory. I mainly followed the ball, and my main curiosity (in common with quite a few fans) was who is going to be the starting quarterback in the fall. I assume our defense is going to be good so I didn't pay that much attention to their play.
Maynard (with the first team) took the most reps of all the QB's on the day because he kept drives going. He has really good pocket presence, and was able to scramble and gain yards on a busted play. He generally looked good, until the end of scrimmage when they were in the red zone drill and he threw 2 picks. The first one snagged by C.J. Moncrease was underthrown, allowing Moncrease to get position on the receiver. The second one was particularly horrendous, as I couldn’t figure out which receiver he trying to hit.
My thoughts on Maynard? Officially nervous, it seems like Tedford is embracing his inner riverboat gambler. I think our offense will look much different than it has in recent years. My guess is that Tedford will incorporate more option play in the playbook, and Maynard will be deadly effective with the option play. I was also impressed by his ability to scramble, and still keep his eyes downfield for an open receiver. These abilities will keep drives alive in the fall.
Mansion did not have a good day, but in fairness to him, he did have arguably the nicest throw of the scrimmage, a perfect TD pass to Micheal Calvin in the red zone drill. But he continues to miss wide open receivers, and I don't believe he can keep drives going with his inconsistent play. There was also a noticeable drop-off in athleticism as he followed Maynard.
To my eye, Bridgford looked solid, in fact, I would say he would be the safest choice for starter, and more in the mold of prior Tedford QB's. He made good decisions out there, and I couldn't detect any lingering problems from his shoulder surgery, his balls had plenty of zip. This is not really germane for the 2011 season, but during the QB drills, I thought Austin Hinder looked fantastic. Yes I know it's just a drill, no pressure of any sort, but he was throwing extremely accurate, consistent, catchable balls, with a very flat trajectory. The future at QB looks bright.
As to the running game, Sofele had a great 65 yard run straight up the middle for a TD that was quite exciting. Yay! Touchdown Bears! Oh wait, that was against our D, ah the eternal conundrum of a scrimmage. I have no doubt (unlike some) that Sofele will be just good as the offensive line allows him to be. There was no real opportunity for the other running backs to make an impression, and I'd guess it was 60% or above passing plays on the day.
The offensive line play was a bit ragged. I didn't attend the other open scrimmages so I can't comment on whether they have improved, but there were at least 1 false start and 2 illegal motion/illegal formation penalties. The O-line had difficulty in opening holes for the running game, other than the one big play by Sofele. They also allowed sacks and tackles for loss, but if I had to pick, I'd say they were marginally better in pass protection than opening holes to spring the running backs. With three starting linemen out with injuries, I'm not worried per se, but I just hope that the one month of fall camp is enough time for the O-line to gel effectively.
The one thing that really did worry me was the absolutely abysmal kickoff and punt coverage. If the way they played on Saturday continues in the fall, we are going to give up 48-60 touchdowns on special teams. Either that, or Kaelin Clay will score 24 touchdowns returning kickoffs. He really did look quite good yesterday, but some of that has to be attributed to the abysmal coverage. Somehow, someway Genyk has got to get better results out of his cover teams.
Other special team thoughts; Anger looked good as usual, and Jed Barnett looks like he will be solid next year, though he has a way to go. Based on both kickoffs and field goals, Travecchio clearly has the starter position nailed down, and looked a bit improved from last year.
My final thought after the scrimmage was just how strong the Bears are at the skill positions, particularly at receiver. The question remains whether we can consistently get the ball to them in a position to make plays, but if we can this will be a more dangerous team in 2011 than most Bear fans anticipate.
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
32 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the write-up!
Yay! Touchdown Bears! Oh wait, that was against our D, ah the eternal conundrum of a scrimmage
Either way, we win! or, we lose.
n.b. -- This comment does not constitute official chemical advice.
Re: Maynard's two picks
"Actually, we blew a blocking assignment on the first one over there where Zach was suddenly under heat and throws it up," said Tedford. "(On) the other one over here we just put the play in this morning so I’m not concerned about it. I’m thinking more about the other great plays that he made that’s what sticks out to me."
In other words, Go Bears!
My thought on Maynard is that he gives Cal the best chance of success with our current o-line. He is able to move quickly and escape pressure, and with the option, he is a genuine threat to run. If we had a better o-line a prototypical Tedford quarterback would be better for our offense.
Maynard wasn’t getting any time to really sit in the pocket and go through progressions. The pocket fell apart (or was designed to move) in almost all of our plays yesterday, and Maynard made things happen on the move.
by paleodan on May 1, 2011 6:07 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
What now? What later?
It does sound like Maynard is the right guy for the current situation, but is he the right guy for the next two years? Assuming (with a big ASS) the line improves and becomes what we expect from our O-line. Do we juggle QBs and move Bridgford into the starting slot? If not, we keep Maynard for this year and then what do we do next year if the Bridgford or Hinder are better fits? Should we play for today or for the future? Do we put Bridgford in now and let him develop on the field or do we turn him into a deer in the headlights and give him PTSD?
I always think you play to win the immediate season. There are too many unknown factors to do long term planning: transfers, academic problems, injuries. If Bridgford is better in 2012, he should play in 2012. Maynard will only be around Cal for a little bit, but there is a successful Tedford precedent for this kind of player in Akili Smith.
Exactly. Maynard may be the best option next season as well. Who knows. We should cross that bridge when the time comes, next season.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on May 3, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I hate scrimmages! Can’t Cal scrimmage against another local team like Stanford? Otherwise you can never really tell if success/failure is a good or bad thing. Is success because the offense is good or the defense is bad? Failure because the offense is bad or defense is good? Argh!
Can’t Cal scrimmage against another local team like Stanford?
I don’t think NCAA rules allow this in spring practice.
Yes, I am an Old Blue. Now get off my lawn.
I wouldn’t think so. The rules should be changed!
by Missing Barry on May 2, 2011 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Pardon me while I get my spring practice in as a fan
Have to practice doing this because I hope to be doing this a lot this season—
KEENAN ALLEN!
Yes, I am an Old Blue. Now get off my lawn.
We recruited Keenan so we could lure his half brother Zach Maynard to Berkeley.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
by AERose on May 2, 2011 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well practiced sir!
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on May 2, 2011 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m still concerned with Tavecchio at kicker. It seems like we have not had a really dependable kicker in about 5 years. What is the reason for that?
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
There are lots of schools, and very few dependable kickers.
by Missing Barry on May 2, 2011 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Cugel says that Tavecchio seemd improved and I hope he does improve this season. He did improve this last year than from the year before I felt. But he just would miss that clutch so important kick. He hits a 50+ yarder in the UW game but then misses the easy Oregon kick. Very odd.
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Hopefully he is improved. I honestly don’t think it’s odd at all. Random variation for a bit below average kicker (and the average NCAA kicker misses a decent number of attempts to begin with). It happens.
by Missing Barry on May 2, 2011 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions
He also had two 50+ yarders and a clutch game winning FG against ASU on the road in 2009.
In other words, Go Bears!
Though the clutch game winner against ASU was made after missing at least one earlier go-ahead kick.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
So you’re saying Tom Schneider was our last “dependable” kicker?
Yes, I am an Old Blue. Now get off my lawn.
Here’s the thing:
In 2004, Schneider was only 9-16 FG’s. 5-5 from 20-29 yards (yay!) but 1-6 from 30-39 yards (frowny face!). 3-5 40-49 yards.
In 2005, Schneider was 9-16 again (but a better performance this time, which you can see by the splits): 4-5 from 20-29, 2-4 30-39, 3-5 40-49, and 0-2 50+ (so he was 9-14 without those two really long attempts).
In 2006, Schneider was 15-20. 5-5 20-29, 3-3 30-39, 5-7 40-49, 2-5 50+.
So over those three years, I think the general attitude would have been pretty unhappy with his performance the first two years, and pretty happy in 2006. So even for a “dependable” kicker, he was really only “dependable” for one year. I mean, if Tavecchio has a good season, his overall career will be fairly comparable to Schneider’s. Getting a good kicker in college football is hard. It doesn’t happen often. Even when you do get one, he probably won’t be good every single year you have him. Heck, sometimes you get a truly special kicker recruit come to your school as a freshman, go and win the Lou Groza award for best kicker in the nation as a freshman, and then be pretty freaking average (or maybe even a bit worse?) for the next 3 seasons. College kicking – the real problem is our expectations.
by Missing Barry on May 3, 2011 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs

by 
























































