Cal-USC Football 2010 Game Review: The Outside Zone Run
I continue the review of the Cal-USC debacle looking at particular elements of this game, first focusing on the run game.
Normally, Cal's run defense has been stout to the task at limiting the Trojan rush attack to modest levels. That was not the case this past season. The Trojans rushed for around 170 yards in 2009, but it took them 44 carries to get to that total. In 2010, USC rushed for 124 yards in the first half alone on 15 carries for over eight yards a carry. There were multiple 10+ yard runs that went for first downs on multiple drives.
So what happened? Let's start by focusing on the Trojan playbook and how Cal struggled to counter plays we've seen for years, starting with one of their staples, the outside zone run.
The Trojans used it on several occasions in different variations in their first half demolition of Cal. A better description of the play, plus two such examples of the play, follow after the jump.
If all the defenders crash to the playside, a cutback lane should open to the backside (opposite of where the play is going) and the running back should be able to get a nice gain up the field. Multiple options, multiple opportunities.
(Notice a defensive end is left unblocked here--usually one outside defender is left alone on the play and is either blocked out by the H-Back or is forced to read the play. He will have to watch for play action or a bootleg with the quarterback rolling out, or the H-Back leaking out of the pocket. If it works, this will open up a larger cutback lane for the ball carrier.)
Thanks to the excellence of their offensive lines and their ability to handle most Pac-10 defenders at bay, it has become a deadly element of their game.
First play of the game for the USC offense
Cal defends this one fairly well.
1st and 10, USC 44, 13:41 1st quarter
USC: Wildcat originally with trips left, Matt Barkley comes back to the LoS in shotgun.
Cal: 3-4. Mike Mohamed is out guarding the inside receiver on the left. Chris Conte is guarding the middle man, Darian Hagan the outside guy.
Result: 21-Bradford, Allen rush for 3 yards to the USC47.
The design of this play is outside zone the entire way (although those arrows are not indicative of the amount of lateral movement the linemen make, they're flowing and trying to seal), even though the quarterback is usually under center. Here Barkley simulates the handoff and takes off running in one direction to try and feint out the unblocked linebacker (circled above) on the weakside, Mychal Kendricks. USC puts the left tackle Matt Kalil on weakside defensive end Ernest Owusu, has the center Kristofer O'Dowd placed on Derrick Hill and right tackle Tyron Smith engaging with strongside defensive end Cameron Jordan. The guards Butch Lewis and Khaled Holmes leak to the second level to take on D.J. Holt and Keith Browner.
The strength with this type of run is that it creates multiple holes for a tailback to attack and exploit (as opposed to the power run game, where teams design one gaping hole for a running back to try and move through), meaning that a good runner between the tackles should be able to cause all sorts of issues for the Trojans. You see a cutback lane appearing here.
However, the ideal situation isn't what plays out on this situation. It all starts with the Cal nose tackle on this play Derrick Hill. Hill is able to straight up man-beast O'Dowd into the backfield. This limits the opportunities for Bradford, as he now has only one real lane inside, which would probably end up with him being swallowed into the trash. He is forced toward a cutback lane, which in this case is a straight run up the middle.
Thankfully for the Trojans, Kalil has pushed Owusu off-balance enough that Bradford has a big enough lane for him to burst through for some gain on the play. The unblocked Kendricks trips him up before he gets tackled by Holt and Browner for a three yard gain.
Here's a replay of the run (at 50% speed) to allow you to digest the play better.
Cal USC Outside Zone Run 1.wmv (via avinashkunnath)
Credit Kendricks for doing a great job on the edge, reading the play and ensuring he is equally between quarterback and running back when he goes to make the tackle.
So what does an ideal outside zone run look like? Well, let's take a look at what a running back can do when he gets good running lanes to attack.
Sixth play of third USC drive
2nd and 8, Cal 40, 2:42 1st Q
USC: I-formation 113 (2 WRs & TE right, 1 WR left)
Cal: 3-4 look (Mychal Kendricks at the LoS as the left OLB, Keith Browner the ROLB, back with D.J. Holt RILB & Mike Mohamed LILB. Kendrick Payne is in for Hill at NT.)
21-Bradford, Allen rush for 6 yards to the CAL34.
A more successful attempt at an outside zone run play, and all that's needed is one distinct difference in personnel--nose tackle. Payne is in for Hill at the line of scrimmage, and he gets taken out of the play.
You'll see that the play is flowing to the right, as defenders get entangled in blocks. Stanley Havili comes in and helps Tyron Smith to pin Mychal Kendricks on the edge, and Khaled Holmes and Cameron Jordan tango just long enough to prevent him from blasting the play up.
The backside of the play is the key here, as the O-linemen execute their jobs perfectly. They leave Ernest Owusu (circled in blue) unblocked, then move to take out other defenders. The squares indicate two successful cutblocks by the LT Kalil on Browner, and the LG Lewis on Payne, pretty much taking them out of the play. The squares below indicate players that are on the ground when Bradford gets ready to hit the inside or cut back to the outside.
This play is a bust for the Cal defense the moment Payne hits the turf. The nose tackle must be able to hold their blocks, but most importantly occupy space and prevent the USC offense from getting clear lanes. When Payne hits the ground, USC now has a gigantic inside hole on the backside to exploit. There's your cutback lane, which is wide and gaping with the two backside defenders now on the ground.
Owusu (who is watching for the bootleg) isn't able to make up all that space and pursue from the backside, so only Payne making some contact while on the ground with Bradford and a good adjustment by Mike Mohamed (who was flowing with the play) coming back from the inside prevent a first down.
Still, it's a successful play. Six yards might not seem like much, but the difference between a 3rd and short and a 3rd and middle is so crucial in college football, and runs like these helped set up ideal 3rd down situations for Matt Barkley and the Trojan offense all of the first half.
Check out the play from the sideline camera and particularly the end zone camera replay, again at 50% speed. You'll probably see the crucial error Payne makes that takes him out of the play.
Cal USC Outside Zone Run 2.wmv (via avinashkunnath)
You can see that the defense moves to the playside. But Payne doesn't engage his blocker, the left guard Butch Lewis. Instead he turns his shoulder, tries to shoot the gap and go straight for the running back rather than trying to fight off the block. You can see both Cameron Jordan and Mychal Kendricks both doing their job on the playside, forming that wall, keeping themselves straight up and trying to force Bradford into a tight running lane on the outside. By going straight for the ball carrier, Payne allows Lewis to cut block him, taking him out of the play and opening up that wide cutback lane. Kudos to Mohamed for keeping this play from becoming a disaster.
This is a recurring theme in this game: Players aren't able to win their one-on-one assignments, or make mental mistakes (or schematic mistakes, depending on what the DC tells them to do on the play), and at some points get straight beat and big openings for the offense. This leads to steady gains like the one above.
Unfortunately, this is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of good offensive plays for the Men of Troy, and far from the worst of the run attack that USC would flash in this one. More on this in future posts.
(HT to HydroTech from additional insight, and from keeping me from confusing inside with outside zone again.)
27 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wondering how well this relates to the Oregon State game, another game where we gave up a million yards to zone running.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Thanks for the analysis Avi
It really helps to have the diagrams and the half-speed video – know that’s a lot of work to put together.
by SierraBear on Apr 13, 2011 7:37 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Oh yeah the half-speed video was a pretty genius touch.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Yeah. Excellent work. I LOVE posts like this.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Apr 13, 2011 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I predict the next time we beat USC, Tiny will have a solid game. Lose the battle in the trenches, particularly at the nose, and you’re done.
Would have also liked to see more of the 5-2 style of 3-4 w/ the OLB’s on the LoS and the DE’s bunched towards the inside a bit more. I think it would have made some of those linemen account for these guys a bit more and free up the ILB’s to make tackles.
Again, would also like to never ever see a LB on a WR ever again. It weakens the pass defense and keeps that LB out of position from making a play on a run.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Again, would also like to never ever see a LB on a WR ever again. It weakens the pass defense and keeps that LB out of position from making a play on a run.
A linebacker is versatile enough to guard pass and run equally well. This is a facet of football defense that is unlikely to change in the near future.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 13, 2011 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions
what!
I mean, yes, that sounds like a good definition from wiki. They’re be great covering the TE and running backs. In practice, Cal putting a LB against any WR from USC is a fucking mismatch, no doubt about it. The benefit, of course, is to claim that the LB can make a play in the run game, which is better than putting a 5th DB in the game. I believe, however, that said LB is so far removed from places where the ball carrier will likely travel that he has no impact anyway. I follow this standard rule of thumb:
If the offense shows 2 WRs, have 4 DBs on the field with both CBs on the WRs
If the offense shows 3 or more WRs, have 5 or more DB with both CBs and the nickel/dime backs on the WRs.
None of this CB on #2 TE bullshit (Oregon 2009) or LB on WR (any year). Man coverage with safety and LB help when applicable.
If available for this game, the 5th DB I would have used would have been Sean Catthouse and hope that he doesn’t get burnt like toast.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Cal's nickel formation against USC in the first half
16 yard gain, touchdown USC
Sack
12 yard gain
Incomplete
14 yard gain
22 yard gain, touchdown USC
8 yard gain
11 yard gain
6 yard gain
11 yard gain
11 yard gain, touchdown USC
Two of the other TDs were on double-moves by WRs on our DBs.
Pretty sure the reason we put a linebacker on a WR is we trusted them more to defend receivers than we did some of our secondary. I recall Kendricks played tight man coverage in one instance.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 13, 2011 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions
so I guess we don’t have the players then huh? did they have Catthouse as the 5th DB?
What does our 3-4 look like?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Cattouse was not the fifth back. He didn’t play in the first half.
The rotation was Hagan/Anthony/Williams/Nnabuife at the corners, with Hill and Conte at the safeties. Conte would come in and play nickel back on a few occasions.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 13, 2011 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Um, yeah, that’s a rec. Great post. Love the half speed video. I like how USC has their receivers running a screen pattern (bubble screen in the first one, normal WR screen in the second) to keep our guys not in the box honest. Seems to me like that’s better than having them run routes, at least.
Good point about the screens. Didn’t really mention them because Mohamed and Conte had good recognition. Conte even came in and got contact on Bradford in the second run.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 13, 2011 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Regarding Run #2
This play is a bust for the Cal defense the moment Payne hits the turf.
Instead he turns his shoulder, tries to shoot the gap and go straight for the running back rather than trying to fight off the block
I think the criticism of Payne is a bit harsh and off.
We have a pretty good idea of what SC was trying to do in this play. The offensive grouping was 20 personnel (2 backs, no tight ends, and 3 wide receivers) and for simplicity sake, we’ll just say their blocking scheme was outside zone with a lead blocker right while Cal was using 3-4 personnel and showing a 4-3 over front.
If this play is looked at from the offensive standpoint, it will change the view on Payne a bit. In this play, Payne was lined up on the left shoulder of the Center and since the play was going right, his angle on the center was very bad. The SC center went straight to the second level to block Mohamed. What did not go right for SC is that Mohamed followed the lead blocker (SC fullback) rather quickly AND Payne got enough of a hand on the center to slow him down just enough to make him change his intended blocking target to Holt. In the meantime, the SC left guard cutblocked Payne and the cutback lane opened up that resulted in a gain.
Looking at the replay from the endzone camera, it is pretty easy to see the open hole and space the SC RB would have had if O’Dowd was able to get to Mohamed and Payne was still on his feet. However, looking at the replay from the sideline camera, there’s not nearly as much open space as the endzone camera makes one think. Conte would have likely gotten there to make the tackle but the RB could have bounced it all the way to the outside where there were more blockers and open space.
Point being, Payne was not shooting a gap nor trying to be a stud. He had a very difficult assignment to handle and in a perfect world, he would have stopped O’Dowd and kept his feet to stop the cutback. There was good or bad coming out of this play from Payne depending on how you want to look at it.
The big issue is technique
Payne turns his body and shoulder when reaching for the center. Even if he whiffs on the block, he needs to stay upright and keep the cutback lane narrow for the tailback. Compare Payne’s technique to the way Kendricks and Jordan keep their bodies upright and shoulders parallel to their blockers. They don’t get their bodies turned and don’t get pushed away from the gaps.
I’m not really sure Payne’s push on O’Dowd affected who he would’ve blocked, since Mohamed is already flowing toward the playside. Holt was probably who he would’ve ended up on.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 13, 2011 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Payne turns his body and shoulder when reaching for the center. Compare Payne’s technique to the way Kendricks and Jordan keep their bodies upright and shoulders parallel to their blockers. They don’t get their bodies turned and don’t get pushed away from the gaps.
Jordan and essentially Kendricks are lined up on the outside shoulders of the LG and LT while Payne is lined up on the inside shoulder of the center. Payne has another 1/2 to 1 steps to make up in order to engage his assignment so to compensate, he sacrifices technique.
I’m not really sure Payne’s push on O’Dowd affected who he would’ve blocked, since Mohamed is already flowing toward the playside. Holt was probably who he would’ve ended up on.
It’s hard to see on the small youtube video so if you have a version you can blow up and watch from the endzone view, perhaps it will provide a clearer take. What gives away the blocking scheme SC is using is the fullback. The fullback in zone blocking schemes can be used in a number of ways and in this play, he’s not being used as a “lead blocker” in the traditional sense (going through a hole and blocking a LB). In this play, Havili does not even hesitate to see where the LBs are and automatically sprints to the outside to help double and turn Kendricks so the RB would have the option of turning the corner. This means that Mohamed is unblocked and free to make a play. That would make no sense. Then again, maybe Kiffin designed it that way, but most likely not. Since Mohamed was the closest LB to the point of attack, O’Dowd was going initially after him and leaving the further and trailing Holt to make a tackle. If Havili had looked for Mohamed, then I would agree O’Dowd was going for Holt. But Havili didn’t so I stand by what I said about Payne putting just enough arm on O’Dowd to change his intended target.
When the play is blown up larger, it’s easier to see O’Dowd’s shoulders squared towards Mohamed initially then he makes a decision to block what he would get to easiest. Quick decisions made by the SC OL and RBs is what makes them play so fast unlike Cal at times when things seem to develop so slowly in the run game.
Even if he whiffs on the block, he needs to stay upright and keep the cutback lane narrow for the tailback.
Agreed but as I said above that if O’Dowd got to Mohamed, there were holes on the outside for the RB to hit.
Watching it in HD on fullscreen it does look to me like you’re right that O’Dowd is going after Mohammed. Payne definitely redirects him (with a quick facemask!). Not sure if he would have been able to get to Muhammed or not, he did have the advantage of firing off the ball ahead of everyone since he was snapping.
by Missing Barry on Apr 13, 2011 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions
By the way, seeing as how Payne manages to engage O’Dowd, shouldn’t that have been a penalty on USC? Can’t chop block a guy who’s already engaged with a blocker high, right?
by Missing Barry on Apr 14, 2011 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Good Eye
O’Dowd is not blocking nor does he have a hand on Payne so they technically are not “engaged.” If O’Dowd had a hand on Payne in some way, then yes, that could have been called a chop block
So it doesn’t matter that Payne has his hands on O’Dowd, it only matters if the offensive player is trying to block him?
by Missing Barry on Apr 15, 2011 6:47 AM PDT up reply actions
In this play,Havili does not even hesitate to see where the LBs are and automatically sprints to the outside to help double and turn Kendricks so the RB would have the option of turning the corner. This means that Mohamed is unblocked and free to make a play. That would make no sense. Then again, maybe Kiffin designed it that way, but most likely not. Since Mohamed was the closest LB to the point of attack, O’Dowd was going initially after him and leaving the further and trailing Holt to make a tackle. If Havili had looked for Mohamed, then I would agree O’Dowd was going for Holt
After re-reading , I spoke too quickly on this one without thinking things through and need to clarify some things. Havili and O’Dowd were making reads before and after the snap and from an X and O’s standpoint, Havili ended up where his reads dictated him to be and Holt was O’Dowd’s assignment. However, the non X and O’s standpoint (my instincts) still tell me that O’Dowd was a bit ambitious and wanted to initially block Mohamed despite his assignment on Holt. If O’Dowd got to Mohamed, then Holt would have been in the position to stop the cutback from the large gain. Since O’Dowd ended up blocking his assignment, a bigger cutback lane for a larger gain was there.
Going back to the original comment I made, I still feel Payne shouldered a bit too much of the blame due to the difficulty of his assignment but I agree with Avinash that had Payne stayed on his feet, the cutback lane would not have been there and the RB would have taken the ball to the play’s designed point of attack on the outside where Conte and a LB would have been in a position to make a tackle for a shorter gain. The way they play unfolded worked out for the better for SC.
It doesn’t look to me like the C had much of a chance to get to Mohammed at all, and even if he did, he would have only gotten to the inside side of Mohammed (so The Prophet could still get to the outside if the RB goes that way – which means the RB has to cut it back). Had that happened, though, Holt would be there to make the play since the C would be blocking Mohammed instead, so Holt would be free right in the cutback lane. That’s what it appears to me, though what do I know? (Seriously – not sure I know enough about football to actually break down film accurately)
by Missing Barry on Apr 13, 2011 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





































































