Golden Spotlight on Cal Men's Basketball: The Guards
Brandon Smith:
MPG PPG FG% 3FG% FT% APG RPG BPG SPG
27.2 5.6 36.3 35.7 63.0 3.8 2.2 0.0 0.769
Offense: Although no one is going to mistake him for the departed Jerome Randle, Brandon Smith has shown some nice improvements from the beginning of the year. Where he was previously turnover-prone and occasionally hesitant about running the offense, he's stepped forward to provide steady play at the point. Because Smith is able to handle the bulk of the ball-handling, it really allows Jorge to focus on his strengths instead of also trying to run the team. Smith has gotten a lot better at initiating the sets earlier in the clock and has improved his timing with feeding the ball to guys in the right places on the wing or in the post. His handles are good enough to push the ball in transition, but he's still very inconsistent with his pull-up jumper and with finishing it at the rim. Also, as Coach Montgomery pointed out recently, he needs to get better at running the break when they have numbers. Surprisingly, his three point accuracy has steadily improved throughout the year despite the fact that his legs should be showing the effects of heavy minutes. He doesn't take a lot of 3's, but the other team has to respect that he's 11 of his last 21. (right ucla?)
Overall: Let's be honest, we've gotten more out of Smith this year than any of us would have expected. Considering that he got almost no meaningful playing time last year, for him to come in and hold his own for the most part is a fairly big deal. Historically, most Cal point guards have struggled mightily during their first year of starting. Think back to Anwar McQueen, Shantay Legans, Ayinde Ubaka, and even Jerome Randle. All of those guys had higher high's, but lower low's than what we've seen from Smith. He's relatively steady; he doesn't turn the ball over much, usually plays within himself, and gets the team into their sets. Does he do the things that an elite point can do with regards to dictating tempo, directing traffic, or creating shots? No. But, I think it would be unfair to expect that of him at this stage of his career. It will be interesting to see how he continues to develop under Monty's tutelage. I know many fans are eager to see touted transfer guard Justin Cobbs and fully expect him to start next year. Worst-case, Brandon Smith is a steady backup who can capably run the team as needed. Best-case, he continues to develop his jumper and turns into one of those annoyingly competent guards that are a near-trademark of Monty-ball.
Full stats are here.
PPG
FG %:
3PG %:
Assists/G:
Turnovers/G:
Emerson Murray:
MPG PPG FG% 3FG% FT% APG RPG BPG SPG
7.75 0.8 20.0 13.3 41.2 0.58 0.54 0.0 0.125
Offense: Although touted by noted Cal alum Jason Kidd that Murray reminded him of former Zona stand-out Jaryd Bayless, we have yet to see this potential translate to the court. He's clearly still more of an athlete playing basketball than an instinctive player right now. His handles seem solid enough and he shows a nice burst when he decides to take it to the bucket. Unfortunately, shaky is an extremely polite way to describe his outside shot and he hasn't shown any signs of having a pull-up or mid-range game yet. As is typical for most young guards, decision-making remains suspect; he'll show great vision one moment and force it into traffic seconds later.
Defense: There's plenty of potential here. He's easily got the quickest feet and best lateral agility of the Cal guards that we've seen this year. Once he gets strong enough to avoid getting rubbed off screens and experienced enough to figure out where he needs to be, he could really become a strong defender. Admittedly, this is an optimistic projection. But, I like his willingness to mix it up and be active on the defensive end. He just needs to keep working and keep learning.
Overall: The serious illness that kept him out of most of training camp really slowed his development. Under most circumstances, this would have been an ideal year to blueshirt. It's still hard to say exactly what we have with Emerson Murray. He's certainly got the quicks and athleticism to make you eager to see him continue to develop.
Full stats are here:
Jorge Gutierrez:
MPG PPG FG% 3FG% FT% APG RPG BPG SPG
32.96 13.8 39.2 35.7 77.4 4.3 3.7 0.12 1.4
Offense: Definitely more of a scorer than a shooter at this stage of career. Still, having watched him the past two years, it's a testament to his hard work that he's transformed himself from a complete offensive liability to someone the defense has to respect. Sure, when he comes curling off a screen, no one knows what's going to happen - not even Jorge. But, you have to respect his willingness to take and make the big shot at any moment. His passing ability is a bit underrated - he has a real knack for drawing defenders and then finding guys in traffic. The move off the ball really helped him and it's amazing how much his ability to finish at or near the rim has improved. He's at his best in transition or coming off of movement. He's not as good at trying to create on his own by taking guys off the dribble, although his handle seems to improved from early in the year. You love his desire and toughness, but he does have a tendency to try to do too much and will settle for either forced shots or early shots. Although he draws a lot of fouls with his aggression, it can be fool's gold when he goes out of his way to initiate contact instead of looking for good shots within the flow of the offense. (*Edit: Just added after the overtime win against ucla - Forgive me, Jorge. You can do no wrong. Take all the shots you want, whenever you want.)
Defense: Unlike past seasons, Jorge hasn't had the same game-changing impact on the defensive end for most of this year. Don't get me wrong - his trademark in-your-grill intensity is still on display every night. But, we rarely get to see him play the part of the pesky lockdown stopper that we've grown to know and love. Part of it might be his realization that he has to pace himself to stay on the floor, but I think it's more due to this team's almost exclusive reliance on zone. Jorge's at his best when locked up in man where he can be physical, knock a guy off his cuts, and deny him from catching the ball where he likes. In zone, his aggressive nature can occasionally lead to him being out of position. Unlike man coverage which allows him to focus solely on his guy and play more instinctively, zone requires more total-game awareness of opposing players' strengths as well as having teammates who are on the same page. For some reason, he also seems to play the passing lanes better and provide better help defense out of man instead of zone.(*Post-ucla edit: Now that was the defensive terror we know and love. It's absolutely awesome seeing him wreak havoc all over the court, even hobbled on one leg.)
Overall: Has there ever been a better return vs. recruit rating player in the history of Cal basketball? (Perhaps Ryan Forehan-Kelly? - Sorry, have to give a shout out to one of my all-time favorites.) Let's just be honest. Jorge is the heart and soul of this team. There are more skilled players, better shooters, even bigger/stronger/faster guys. But absolutely no one is tougher and no one wants to win more than he does. If nothing else, he inspires the guys around him to play better in ways you simply cannot chart with numbers alone. Maybe we can petition former Golden State Warrior great Sarunas Marciulionis to share his "Human Karate Chop" moniker; I have no idea how Jorge makes it through each game without internal bleeding. With his skillset he'd be best served as the second or third perimeter scoring option who could get his points within the flow of the offense. Case in point, look at how much more effective he is with Crabbe in the lineup to open things up. Due to depth and youth, Jorge has had to embrace the challenge of carrying this team with varying results. Moving beyond wins/losses, you have to respect and admire his heart, not to mention his cajones. In many ways, he's exactly what's right with the college game; a hard-working, humble kid who has gotten better each year. In this spoiled age of me-first and easy instant gratification, it's refreshing to see a guy who literally leaves everything on the floor every night. I really look forward to seeing what he can do as a senior with a more experienced and complete team around him.
PPG
FG%
3 PG%
Assists
Turnovers
Group Summary: When you look at it on paper, it's been a frighteningly thin rotation at the guard spot this year. Considering the minutes played, it's a tribute to our starters' conditioning and mental toughness that they've largely been able to avoid foul trouble and provide consistent backcourt play. With the college game becoming more and more guard-driven, we knew this would be a huge question mark. Even if the Point Jorge experiment didn't pan out, at least Smith was able to step up as a steady alternative. Sure, it might be nice to have more playmaking or scoring off the bench, but that's at least a year away. For now, these are the guys we have. Honestly, they're probably playing a bit over their heads...but I wouldn't trade any of them. They're our guys. They play hard and they're going to get better. Go Bears!
17 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We lost a lot of talent at the guard position last year. I am very happy with where we are this year. Jorge seems to improve and improve and improve. I do not know much about Murray, but Brandon Smith has definitely done better than I anticipated. He was a question mark entering the season.
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Interesting that Crabbe and Nigel Carter aren’t included. There’s only one acceptable answer to the poll question, and the vast majority of the voters got it, apparently. How much worse would you feel about the perimeter players (and team in general) were Franklin still here, by the way? I still think it was a long term loss, but without him, it’s pretty easy to see some nice improvements and steps forward by everyone else, which is what we’re all looking for in this rebuilding year. Whole team deserves an A+ for the way they’ve played so far, based on expectations.
Spoiler Alert
Carter, Powers Crabbe are due next week under the “Wings.”
We had to find some way to split things up. Otherwise we’d have one monster post and the other would be a sole tribute to Jeff Powers.
Old Toothwrangler
Ah, interesting. Makes sense. I generally classify players as “point guards, wings or bigs” myself, but I guess for guys that spend some time at point and some off the ball, “guard” does make more sense. As long as you’re not lumping them in with bigs like the stupid classification of the bigger wing as a “small forward” does!
by Missing Barry on Feb 22, 2011 11:23 AM PST up reply actions
I have to say I’ve been pleased, but not overwhelmed, with the guard play. The things that trouble me the most, however, is both the TO:Assist ratios and FT%. I get that Jorge is going to turn the ball over, so it’s not surprising, but I guess I wasn’t expecting to see Smith with that many. I was kind of just expecting him to have better than 2:1 assists to turnovers. Still, not a big concern.
But the FT% is just not good. Anything below 70% is really disappointing. Again, I’m a bit surprised that Smith’s numbers are as low as they are.
Still, I’d say that the overall guard play has been about where expected.
I'm thinking of having a little party down in Newport.
Smith's Ratio, Smith's Development, and Jorge
Last time I heard Brandon was leading the conference in A/TO ratio. And that’s troubling? Also, I heard that Jorge was second in the conference in this number.
No one is going to laud Brandon on his free throw percentage. Still he has not missed in the last 3 games, on admittedly not many shots (5).
Additionally Smith is shooting 44% on 3’s in Pac10 play and even higher than that lately. Was it not beautiful that pretty much the clinching shot against UCLA was set up by Jorge’s drive and dish, and nailed by Smith?
Considering that it was on this site that many were dissing Brandon as not a Division I player earlier in the year, I would say that Brandon has surpassed all expectations by a mile!
As for Jorge, as much as I loved him before this year, I would say that his improvement this year offensively has been incredible. Even over the course of this year, his ability to finish his forays into the lane—while still far from perfect—are a huge step up. Finally, it is absolutely awesome to see him give so much game after game after game, despite the pounding and the cumulative toll from the pounding that he receives.
Assuming that Jorge continues to develop his game—and with health, all evidence is that he will—when he has finished his Cal career, he will have shown himself to be the best, most valuable all around Cal guard since Jason.
I think maybe I didn’t make myself completely clear. I am not disappointed with our guard play. In fact, I am pleased with it.
That being said, my surprise at Smith’s FT% and A:TO ratio were more because from watching the games they seemed better to me than they actually are. Smith has progressed very nicely, no doubt, and I am not advocating benching him or trying to criticize him. I love his enthusiasm and energy. But, that being said, I would love to see him improve his numbers a lot. No matter the number of attempts, a FT% below 70 is a red flag. And I suppose that even though Smith is leading the conference in A:TO ratio (which I didn’t know), there is no reason to be satisfied with it. A bit more experience and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it at 2.5 or better.
Again, I apologize if my comment sounded overly negative, because it wasn’t intended that way. But just because our guard play has been good doesn’t mean it can’t get better. Hell, I bet even Monty would tell you that.
But good for you for standing up for the guys!
I'm thinking of having a little party down in Newport.
Agreed
I wholeheartedly agree with your point that there is ample room for improvement.
Particularly we want our point guard to be shooting free throws really well, so that there will be no hack-a-Shaq played with him at the end of a game.
Especially with college players, but true even of the more experienced professional, skills/execution always can be bettered.
And I am sure that Monty will continue to strive for this with both of our guards.
Go Bears!
Conference only stats
Need to scroll down for the individual stats.
Jorge and Smith are 2 & 3 in assists per game, Smith is #1 in A:TO and Jorge is 6th.
Cal also has 4 of the top ten in minutes per game. I’m sure Markhuri would also be in there without the foul trouble limiting minutes
http://www.pac-10.org/portals/7/images/MBasketball/2010-11-Stats/HTML/confonly.htm#conf.wki
Considering that it was on this site that many were dissing Brandon as not a Division I player earlier in the year
]
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Feb 22, 2011 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
[cough] concordtom [cough]
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Feb 22, 2011 5:16 PM PST up reply actions
Smith reminds me somewhat of Mitch Johnson of recent Stanford vintage
Great shooter? Nope.
Aggressive penetrator? Nope.
First (or second, or even third) option on offense? Nope.
But, at the end of the day, there’s something to be said for a guy who gets the scorers the ball in positions where they can make use of it.
If there’s one thing about Smith that worries me, it’s his defense, which seems like a bit of a liability right now. He needs to work on better resisting penetration, especially on ball screens.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
Good insight about Smith's defensive deficiency
I agree, Paul Thomas. At the same time, he is doing better than Randle ever did.
True
but, you know, you can get away with mediocre D when you’re scoring 18 a game and making ZOMG CRAZY BOMBS from 30 feet away.
Either way, UCLA definitely had an exploit of Cal’s defense at the end of Sunday’s game. They could run ball screens between Lee and Josh Smith, and Cal had the bad option of either having MSF aggressively hedge and probably pick up a foul that would have sent him to the showers, or having Brandon get essentially picked out of the play such that they could easily penetrate the lane and either score or dish to an open man (someone would have to be open since at that point it’s a virtual 5-on-4). That’s one of the reasons why fouling Josh Smith out was so key to winning, although I was a little surprised that they didn’t try to keep running the same play with Lane or Stover at the center spot.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.




























































