Eric Kiesau & Ashley Ambrose: What Colorado Buffaloes Fans Think
There is a lot of excitement regarding the return of Cal wide receivers coach Eric Kiesau--he was one of the best developers of talent, and our passing offense tended to be successful during his tenure (even Joe Ayoob managed to get his receivers a lot of action). It has been five years since he's been at Berkeley though, and his time with the Colorado Buffaloes came during the Dan Hawkins era.
Cal secondary coach Ashley Ambrose is a fresh name, but ultimately none of us really know anything about him; he was a secondary coach for only one year at Colorado and this will be only his second year working with defensive backs. Like with Tosh Lupoi (great success!) and with Kevin Daft (fail fail fail), Jeff Tedford is taking a chance in his coaching evaluation; time will tell if it will pay off.
To clear up any misconceptions of the two, we talked with Bob Bell of The Ralphie Report (our SB Nation Buff counterparts) to learn more about what our new coaches in Boulder were like. Our questions in bold, their answers below.
1. Your team sucked last year - why should we be excited about hiring two of your coaches?
I think it is tough to evaluate any of our coaches under Dan Hawkins. I don't believe he provided the best platform for coaches to be successful. That being said, both Kiesau and Ambrose were seen as two of the better recruiting coaches CU had. Many wanted Ambrose to stick around after the Hawkins because of his NFL experience and his future ability to attract solid prospects to Boulder. I think Ambrose is going to be a star at Cal recruiting defensive back talent.
Kiesau was always seen as one of the best if not the best recruiter Colorado had. He showed some growth as an offensive coordinator the last few games of the year. The good thing with Kiesau is he is familiar with Cal, knows the ins and outs of the program and that should be a benefit in recruiting.
2. You guys have a couple of NFL draft prospects in cornerbacks Jimmy Smith and Kalil Brown. How much of an effect did Ambrose have on them in his lone year of coaching DBs?
No doubt Jimmy Smith progressed last year as a player. Whether that was him maturing or Ambrose's coaching, I don't know but he is 6'3" 210 pounds and should be one of the first five corners taken in this year's draft. Jimmy Smith has always had first round talent, last year we saw it all the time so some credit should be given to Ambrose.
3. How was the passing game (for both WRs and QBs) affected by Kiesau's movement from WR coach (where has was from 2006-08) to offensive coordinator/QB coach?
What was interesting about Kiesau as offensive coordinator was the difference between gameplans when Tyler Hansen was in the game compared to Cody Hawkins. Again, who knows the plans laid out by Dan Hawkins but when Tyler Hansen was in the game, the playbook seemed restricted and felt like it operated in a 10 by 10 box. When Cody Hawkins took over after injury late in the season, the offense showed signs of life. The Buffs were challenging the safeties and allowing their playmakers to make plays. That best describes the offense the last five years under Dan Hawkins: lacking identity and inconsistent. I don't think Kiesau brought a ton of consistency to the offense last year.
Bottom line, Cal got a first hand look at the Buffs last year and it's offensive ineptitude.
4. Would you rather have Kiesau and Ambrose or Marshall? (We're going to ask you this again for our pre-game Q+A when we play you in 2013).
Probably Ambrose from a potential recruiting standpoint (after all the negative we have heard about Marshall). I think all three can be successful, though.
5. What was Coach Kiesau's role in Tyler Hansen vs Cody Hawkins?
Supposedly, Dan Hawkins and Eric Kiesau worked together to make the quarterback decisions. Let's just say we are happy to move on from all of this quarterback controversy. I think Kiesau realized the benefits of playing Hansen but when Hansen was in, the game plan presented by Kiesau didn't always play to his strengths.
The Dan Hawkins era is tough to explain. A lot of it doesn't make any sense.
6. Who should Coach Kiesau really punch in the face for opponents' lack of fear in Colorado's passing attack?
I don't think one person is necessarily responsible but the success of the offense really falls on Kiesau, hence the term offensive coordinator. The Buffs lacked a consistent offensive line and let's face it, Cody Hawkins and Tyler Hansen aren't world beaters. Colorado's inability to recruit a blue chip quarterback to lead this team was one of the reasons they weren't successful.
7. What was the one thing Coach Kiesau could've done better during his tenure @ Colorado?
Recruit a blue chip quarterback.
8. What was the one thing Coach Ambrose could've done better during his tenure @ Colorado?
Don't know. Wasn't here long enough.
9. Any indication of what type of teacher Coach Ambrose is w/ his wealth of NFL experience?
According to reports, he has good energy and obviously knows what he is talking about.
10. What should we expect from Coach Ambrose on the sidelines?
Wow, I am impressed. 10 questions about position coaches! I think you will like Ambrose.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, I am impressed. 10 questions about position coaches
He underestimates us
In other words, Go Bears!
Yep, he got annoyed with the work after question 7. HAHA.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Feb 15, 2011 12:08 PM PST up reply actions
And that’s why CGB is “different” from all the rest.
by paleodan on Feb 15, 2011 1:22 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Cal saw the worst of the Buffs last year in that 52-7 game
…but that’s no need to come out and say “Your team sucked last year” to open the dialogue. CU had the worst coach in the country, were outcoached in every game and still should have made a bowl game.
That being said, these two coaches can recruit but I never though that Kiesau was any good at coaching up/developing players, and I never thought that Colorado offensively outschemed anyone. Execution was poor, players were confused. When Colorado’s offense was good, it was due to the players overcoming their coaching and just playing mean, physical football. Ambrose is probably an upgrade for Cal but I don’t see him sticking around long.
I think it was meant to be a joke. Also, Cal fans tend to tell it like it is. OUR team sucked last year; we’ve never been shy about that.
yea, i was gonna say we both sucked last year, and most Cal fans feel exactly the same way.
by ucsdgoldenbear on Feb 15, 2011 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
CFB is known for its tongue-in-cheek manner
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - R. Feynman
Dude, if you’re going to hang out here, get used to “your team sucks,” especially when it does. For heaven’s sake, our team sucks, but we’re not afraid to admit it.
Their team sucked is an understatement. Colorado lost 52-7 to a team that was absolutely obliterated in 4 games and had two games over by half time. No offense, but relative to our suckitude, Colorado’s suckitude was at least as bad as ours, but most likely far worse.
You are merely pointing out how neither Cal or Colorado could win a road game last year
When I kept seeing Cal’s road game results last year, it looked familiar… You guys killed CU at home and nearly beat Oregon, etc. Colorado at home showed it was capable of beating teams like Georgia and a ranked Hawaii.
That best describes the offense the last five years under Dan Hawkins: lacking identity and inconsistent
I thought Cal fans were the only ones who used the lame layman line of “our offense lacked identity” when searching for answers to the team’s struggles on offense.
The Persians felt that their offense lacked identity in the movie 300. So, there is that!
The internet's most successful troll!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
their Left Tackle was terrible, not being able to stop Price, commit holding penalty, or both. Yet he’s projected to be a first round draft pick.
It only took our great coaching staff 4 games, but they figured out that the center (the one who started against you guys) was tipping the snap count. So your guys were just teeing off. We changed centers and the entire line suddenly got a lot better in pass protection.
But, our left tackle had a great senior bowl week, and the only person that got the best of him was a DL from Cal (can’t remember who). So as long as he stays away from Cal grads in the NFL he should be ok.
Yes, that was pretty bad. I noticed that from the stands actually. I think Colorado like Cal was probably better than its record showed. Unfortunately for us we can’t blame an aspect that is no longer with the program to show that there will be improvement in the future. As much as people complained about Ludwig, our failures were not on him. Colorado’s addition by subtraction should give it a substantial help.
But I think the Buffs might be a bit surprised by the depth in the Pac-10. We may not have the juggernauts that are OK and TX, but we don’t have historical pushovers like Iowa State, Kansas, Baylor, KSU, or the crash and burn teams like TTU and A&M (well save maybe Cal, LOL).
Say it like Ron Burgandy signing off: "Stay Classy, Bears!"
by PlayClassyBears on Feb 16, 2011 3:50 PM PST up reply actions
We may not have the juggernauts that are OK and TX
They’re called Oregon and USC.
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Feb 16, 2011 8:45 PM PST up reply actions
The DL was Cameron Jordan
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Feb 16, 2011 8:44 PM PST up reply actions
What is your guy's beef with Marshall?
I’d be interested to hear what his issues were at Cal because honestly all I know about him is that he was at CU in the past when our o-line and running game was awesome and a former player I heard talk about him thought he was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
As far as Ambrose and Kiesau go, my opinion is pretty similar to Bob’s. Ambrose seems like a good young coach who was also a good recruiter, I would of been ok with us keeping him. I’m really glad Kiesau is gone though (there was talk of keeping him because he had a year left on his deal but thankfully Embree brought in all his own guys). He was bad as a coordinator/play caller (I know he wont be doing that with you guys) and handled our QB’s very poorly. He didn’t coach to their strengths at all. Hansen is a very good runner but for some reason was practically forbidden to make plays with his feet.
Mainly it stems from the fact that our Oline was pretty bad under his tutelage.
I’m spazzy fuckin mcgee
by Spazzy Mcgee on Feb 16, 2011 6:17 PM PST up reply actions

by 
























































