Film Study: The Playside Zone Read
Disclaimer: I'm not an expert. Rely on the following analysis at your own risk.
--------------------------------------
While watching the Cal vs. Utah game a while back, I noticed Cal doing something new on offense. Cal was executing a zone read, but something seemed very odd about it. It didn't seem right. Upon closer inspection, Cal wasn't really just running a zone read. They were running -- what I will call for lack of a better term -- a "playside zone read."
This is a new play to the Cal playbook. I haven't seen Cal run it in previous years, and I'm pretty sure this is the first game in 2011 which Cal has shown this play. So let's get right to breaking it down!
Cal is facing a 1st and 10 from their own 37 yard line in the 1st quarter against Utah. Cal has 11 personnel in the game (1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WRs). Utah has their nickel defense in the game (4-2 variety: 4 defensive linemen, 2 linebackers, 5 defensive backs).
There is actually a Check-With-Me (CWM) on this play, and a pre-snap chess match going on between the Cal offensive coordinator (Kiseau) and the Utah defensive coordinator, but I don't want to focus on that in this analysis. I just want to focus on the playside zone read. So I'm going to skip all that...
So here's the pre-snap look after Cal runs its CWM. Cal is still in shotgun (QB five yards behind the center). The Cal RB has moved to the offense's left and is about four yards behind the line of scrimmage and in the offense's left B-gap (space between the LG and LT). Cal's TE is off the line of scrimmage to the offense's left as an H-back.
Utah is still showing what appears to be a Man Free look on defense -- that's man coverage with only one defender playing as a deep safety.
So let's talk about what a typical zone read is, and how it compares to this playside zone read. On a typical zone read the RB will run across the QB's face. The QB will read the backside zone defender (backside is the side of the offense that the play is going away from). The backside zone defender is usually a defensive end although it can sometimes be a linebacker too. In this case, it's a defensive end. If the defender being read pursues the RB, then the QB keeps the ball and runs in the opposite direction. If the defender being read sits or jumps outside to take away the QB's running lane, then the QB hands off the ball to the RB. Duh, we all know this. This is your typical zone read.
And as you can see, this is what a typical (outside) zone read might look. The RB runs one way, the QB runs in the totally opposite direction.
But with the playside zone read, instead, the offense will read the playside zone defender. In this case, it's the playside defensive end (playside is the side that the offense is running towards). This is the opposite of the typical zone read which reads the *backside* zone defender.
And more interestingly, here you see the running lanes for both the QB and the RB on a playside zone read. On a playside zone read, the QB runs to the same side as the RB, which is exactly opposite to that of a typical zone read (where the QB runs in the total opposite direction).
So how does Cal like to block these playside zone reads? Let's take a look at that. Let's start on the playside --which is the side that the run is going towards (offense's right; viewer's left). The playside tackle and guard will both block the playside defensive tackle together, but then the T will break off his block and then move to block that backside linebacker.
The Cal center will block down on that Utah backside DT, sealing him off from both the QB and the RB.
Then on the backside, the Cal left tackle and TE will maintain their backside gaps -- in what basically becomes a quasi pass block -- and just prevent any backside defenders (such as the backside DE and the safety) from penetrating the offensive line.
Finally, the backside guard (Cal's LG) will pull and block the playside linebacker.
And remember, the playside DE will go unblocked. He will be read by the QB.
In total, Cal has 8 players dedicated to the run threat (5 OL, 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 TE). It's important to remember that we're counting the QB as a run threat because this is a play where the QB may actually run with the ball.
On the opposite side of the ball, Utah only has seven defenders dedicated to stopping the run (4 DL, 2 LBs, 1 Safety). The safety dedicated to stopping the run is the one on the right (#4). The other safety on the left (#10) is actually a good 15 yards off the line of scrimmage and is defending against the pass.
This is 8 offensive players versus 7 defensive players. The offense wins.
So how does the actual "reading" of the defender work on the playside zone read? It's actually different from that of a zone read.
If the playside defensive end gets upfield or to the outside -- thereby essentially cutting off the RB's running lane -- then the QB will keep the ball and run up the middle.
On the other hand, if the playside defensive end sits or jumps inside -- thereby essentially cutting off the QB's running lane -- then the QB will hand off the ball to the RB who will run to the outside.
So how does this play turn out? Above is the post-snap picture. The defensive end has jumped inside thereby cutting off the QB's running lane. The QB reads this. The QB will hand the ball off to the RB.
Above is the play just after the mesh (where the QB and RB meet on a zone read). The playside DE has crashed inside and given up the outside edge to the RB. The QB has just handed off the ball to the RB too. The only defender in immediate position to stop the play is the playside linebacker. This is the guy that the backside guard should block. But unfortunately, the backside guard (Cal's LG) got caught up in the trash (the mess of bodies blocking and being blocked) that he couldn't pull to block that playside linebacker (#52).
So the Cal RB has a defender in hot pursuit. The Cal WRs to the playside are blocking their defenders to help try and get this play to the outside. This play goes for a good gain of 7 to 8 yards.
This play, in its entirety along with the endzone camera view, can be seen in the video link below from 7:05 to 7:45 (video is pre-set to start at the correct time):
http://youtu.be/g5maZWgsJIU?t=7m7s
If you'd like to see this play run again, but this time with the DE jumping outside and thus the QB keeps the ball and running, then watch the video link below at 7 minutes 51 seconds (video is pre-set to start at correct time):
http://youtu.be/g5maZWgsJIU?t=7m51s
Conclusion:
So that's Cal's new "playside zone read." There are a few important take-aways from this play.
First, the playside zone read involves a reverse read by the QB. In other words, the read and reaction by the QB in the playside zone read is opposite to that which he would do in a regular zone read. Below I've shown the reads and reactions that the QB must make in both the zone read and the playside zone read.
ZONE READ: If DE crashes inside .... then .... QB keeps the ball and runs.
PLAYSIDE ZONE READ: If DE crashes inside .... then .... QB hands off the ball to the RB.
ZONE READ: If DE goes outside .... then .... QB hands off the ball to the RB.
PLAYSIDE ZONE READ: If DE goes outside .... then .... QB keeps the ball and runs.
As you can see, the reads of a playside zone read are the opposite of that of a regular zone read! In a regular zone read, if the defender jumps outside, then the QB hands the ball off to the RB. But in a playside zone read, if the defender jumps outside then the QB keeps the ball and runs!
And likewise, in a regular zone read, if the DE crashes inside, then the QB keeps the ball and runs. But in a playside zone read, if the DE crashes inside, then the QB hands off the ball to the RB!
How confusing!
I've actually simplified the reads a little bit in that above quote. I left out what to do if the DE "sits" -- meaning, the DE doesn't really commit to either the inside or outside. I left out that stuff so it would be easier for people to see the oppositeness of the reads. Below is the full reads and reaction by the QB:
ZONE READ: If DE crashes inside .... then .... QB keeps the ball and runs.
PLAYSIDE ZONE READ: If DE sits or crashes inside .... then .... QB hands off the ball to the RB.
ZONE READ: If DE sits or goes outside .... then .... QB hands off the ball to the RB.
PLAYSIDE ZONE READ: If DE goes outside .... then .... QB keeps the ball and runs.
Even more confusing!
The second thing to take away from this "playside zone read" is that it's not even really a "zone" running play!
Zone runs generally require that blockers block whomever comes into their areas. Zone runs really don't specifically assign certain blockers to block certain defenders (actually, contrary to what people say, they do but that's a whole different matter that doesn't need to be discussed right now).
On the other hand, man blocking schemes have strict blocking assignments. Any blocking scheme which involves a pulling offensive linemen is usually a dead giveaway for a man blocking scheme. I believe Cal would categorize this blocking scheme as "man" and not a "zone."
So why'd I call this play a "playside zone read"?
Because it's basically like a zone read -- aside from the fact that the QB is reading the playside defender.
And it's basically like a zone read -- aside from the fact that the blocking scheme is more man based than zone based.
But you can clearly see the resemblance between a regular zone read and this "playside zone read". They're both from the same family of plays -- plays in which the offense leaves one defender unblocked, that defender is read, and the offense always makes him wrong.
So there you have it. Cal's "playsize zone read" ... or whatever you want to call it.
=================================
Special thanks go TouchedTheAxeIn82 and everyone else who helps create and seed torrents. Without your guys' help, I couldn't do analysis posts like these.
40 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great work, Hydro. Other than giving the defense something else to read and react to, do you have a sense of why Cal ran this (e.g. saw some tendency for the DEs to try to shut down the inside running game)?
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
California Golden Blogs
Thanks
I don’t know why Cal ran this particular play against Utah and not against other teams. Obviously, the Cal offensive minds must have seen something in Utah’s defense which they thought could be exploited with this play. I have not scouted Utah so I can’t really say why in particular this play was run against Utah.
How about "playside read option"?
On another note, when I saw your arrow showing the LG assignment, my immediate reaction was “how the hell is that guy supposed to get over there?” But because the DE crashed inside and the run went outside, that LB wasn’t in a position to contain very effectively.
If the DE had chosen outside contain and ZM had kept the ball, the LB would have been in perfect position to stop him for little gain. I don’t see how the LG is supposed to execute that assignment given how quick the play hits and the distance he has to travel.
“Playside read option” is probably a fine description and probably better than “playside zone read.”
Yes, the LG (or the backside pulling guard) does have a very tough assignment on this play. As you noted, if the play does go to the outside (the RB gets the ball), the RG is behind the play and doesn’t really have the angle to block that backside LB.
The LG’s block is much easier if the QB keeps the ball. I do see your point that the play is so quick that it may not give the LG time to pull and block the backside LB, but it’s just what he has to do. Schwenke is a pretty athletic lineman and I think he can do it. As for Cheadle on the other hand… he’s a little slower.
Nitpick: I don’t think a 4-2-6 is allowed.
by iVinshe on Dec 22, 2011 9:28 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Further reading:
I think you and Chris Brown over at Smart Football are describing the same thing.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
yes, looks very similar

"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 22, 2011 10:38 AM PST up reply actions
Really nice write-up, Hydro
I remember thinking that the zone-read occasionally looked different, but couldn’t figure out what the wrinkle was.
Thanks for taking the time to explain things so clearly.
Old Toothwrangler
No, it was a really clear and straightforward explanation! (clearer than Chris Brown’s, if you ask me :) ) Thanks man.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 22, 2011 11:21 AM PST up reply actions
If I might be a little greedy, what do you think the Check-With-Me read was in this particular case?
I know Utah was playing lot of Cover One/Man-Free, one safety up and one deep, essentially an 8-man box.
I thought I remembered that they had some injury issues which affected their team speed; it might be why we attacked the edges so often in this game.
Would the CWM have something to do with man vs. zone, or the alignment of the LBs? I know that some teams play a multi-WR formation by keeping their OLB out wide in zone coverage to guard against either a run, or a short pass to the slot WR.
Old Toothwrangler
The CWM Chessmatch
On this play Utah is playing Man Free. At first it appears like a two-deep man defense but it becomes apparent that it’s Man Free once the safety (#4) drops down into the box to more closely cover the TE.
Either way, whether the defense was playing two-deep man or Man Free, that only leaves six or seven defenders in the box to defend the run. Cal’s OC saw this, and went with this play because it includes the QB as a run threat. Thus, the offense has 8 players which threaten the run (5 OL, 1 RB, 1 QB, 1 TE). Like I said earlier, the defense only has six or seven defenders in the box. Defense loses.
That was the chessmatch going on. It’s all just a numbers game.
So nice to see the minds at work behind a play. I appreciate your input.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Similar Plays
One play that caught my eye during this game was a read option out of the pistol formation. The play looks very similar to the one highlighted here, where the QB reads the DE and the QB or RB will be both attacking the same side. The difference is that from the pistol, the QB runs to the outside if he keeps, and the RB runs inside if he receives the ball. Cal used this same play twice to score two touchdowns, one at 13:48 in 2nd quarter and again at 8:09 in the 3rd.
These zone reads/read options were just gold in this game.
That's gold, Tedford! GOLD!

"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
California Golden Blogs
by Berkelium97 on Dec 22, 2011 12:49 PM PST up reply actions
TE formation
Does the fact that the TE on the backside is left to block the backside DE give away that the play is going to go to the playside? Because if it were a typical zone read, wouldn’t that TE get in the way of the read?
At first I was inclined to answer your question as a “No” but I think it could be “Yes” too.
Having the TE on the backside (assuming that this play was going to be a typical zone read) would not necessarily make the TE in the way of the read. The TE could just step around the backside DE, and block a linebacker or safety.
But the fact that the TE on the backside (and more importantly) is off the LOS does sort of put him in the way of the read (as opposed to being in a three point stance on the LOS). So I guess you could say that the formation might tip this play off as going to the offense’s right instead of the left.
The defense still has to respect that left side of the offense though. Cal could have run an option to the left with the TE as a lead blocker. There’s a lot of offensive players to the left (well, just the RB and the TE) that the defense has to worry about. So, even if the defense thought they knew the play was going to the offense’s right, I would think they still can’t just abandon any defense of the offense’s left.
Thanks Hydro
Very clearly explained, I remember these plays from the game, nice to understand what was going on.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
Love the analysis
Have to keep my football spirits up as B-Ball season takes over. Thank goodness we have a bowl game to enjoy next week – it shortens the horrible football off-season by almost a whole month!
Thanks for taking the time to do this, Hydro, I really learn so much about football from you, and it increases my enjoyment of the game so much. I am slowly learning to watch more players and more things happening ‘live’ and a get a sense of what’s going on.
I still read defenses at a snail’s pace, though (and nobody watching a game with me wants me to pause pre-snap for 20 seconds as I work it out) – any suggestions on keys to quick defensive analysis?
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Dec 22, 2011 2:07 PM PST reply actions
I’m not an expert at reading defenses either. But here’s what I do.
First, identify the personnel grouping. Is it a 4-3 personnel? Is it 3-4 personnel? Nickel personnel (5 defensive backs)? Is it dime personnel (6 defensive backs)? This is hard to do live unless you know the other team’s personnel very well.
Second, identify the defensive formation in the box. Is it a 4-3 formation? Is it a 3-4 formation? Is it a 4-3 Under?
Third, identify the secondary coverage. Where are the safeties? How many safeties are playing deep? Are the corners playing man or zone coverage? For identifying the CB coverage, think “DEA” — depth, eyes, alignment. Corner playing tight? Probably man. Corner playing 10 yards off? Probably zone. Corner’s eyes on the QB? Probably zone. Corner’s eyes on the WR? Probably man. Corner playing with outside leverage (outside alignment on the WR)? Then it’s probably zone. Corner playing with inside leverage on the WR? Then it’s probably man. Although, this last rule differs from team to team and isn’t always the best indicator.
I usually try to do this before every play. I’m not always successful. Sometimes my analysis is wrong too if the defense disguises their coverage well.
If you can get the formation down, that helps in understanding what the defense is doing in trying to stop runs.
If you can get the coverage down, that helps in understanding how they’re defending the pass and what the offense can do to exploit the defense.
It’s hard. I’m not an expert. I’m still honing my skills too.
I would guess that this play would be used particularly against Utah because it the play side is away from Star Lotulelei, arguably the best defensive lineman in the conference
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
by norcalnick on Dec 22, 2011 2:19 PM PST via mobile reply actions
This is very possible. I must admit, I am not aware of Star’s reputation or abilities. I have not focused on him individually to see how he plays. Cal very well might have been attempting to keep their runs away from him.
Here’s the thing that’s really going to make you scratch your head: the playside of both plays was to the side Lotulelei was on.
Why is that? For this play and blocking scheme, Cal wanted to double team him. In the first play, Lotulelei was lined up as the RDT and in the second play, he was lined up as the LDT. Notice how in the first play there’s a Check-with-me and Sofele changes his alignment from the right side of Cal’s offensive formation in the backfield to the left side where Lotulelei was aligned across from. That was done purposely to change the blocking assignments so a double could account for Lotulelei. In the second play, Lotulelei is aligned on the left side of the defense and Sofele is aligned on the same side. No adjustments were made. Based on these two plays, it was clear the staff did not want Lotulelei disrupting the play so they doubled him. If he was left with one OL blocking him, he probably could have wreaked havoc.
The DE on Lotulelei’s side is the defender being read and since this is an option play, based on what he does is what Maynard would do. If the DE takes on the pulling guard, handoff the ball and make the LB chase the RB. If the DE bites on the RB, pull it and oh heeeey you got a pulling guard to lead you.
Great design by the staff and great execution by the offense on these plays.
Watching the video replay, Maynard has to make the decision to keep it or hand off almost immediately. It looks like he has less than one second after the snap to make the read.
It’s so quick that to my amateur eye, it looks like the decision must’ve been already made before the snap. However, if Maynard is really making the read that quickly, it’s very impressive. Either way, credit to Maynard for executing the play effectively several times.
Yes, the decision happens very quick. It does not happen prior to the play however. The QB must read the DE and react to the DE’s movements to ensure that the DE is wrong every time. It’s tough doing this. I think the QB has to be decisive. He has to either 100% keep, or 100% give the ball. If he’s anywhere in between, there is a risk of fumble during the mesh.
Great Post
Thanks for taking the time to do this.

by 







































































