Five Stats to Know about the Texas Longhorns
Today we will take a look at a variety of stats pertaining to the Texas Longhorns. Some are good, but most will probably make us Cal fans nervous. My own prediction on how well we would do certainly declined after looking into these numbers, but we should still have a realistic shot at winning. At worst, this game will just be a repeat of the 2008 Sun Bowl (Oregon State defeated Pitt in a 3-0 barnburner). Now let's dive into some numbers!
1: Texas holds onto the ball for 34:03 minutes per game (3rd in the nation)
This is a team that thrives on running the football. As a result, they tend to dominate the time of possession. Against Kansas, they held onto the ball for over 44 minutes. Only twice all season did they lose the time of possession battle, in a 52-20 blowout win over Texas Tech (Texas' ToP: 28:54) and in a 5-17 los to Missouri (Texas' ToP: 29:30). As you may have guessed from this impressive ToP, Texas loves to run the ball. The Longhorns run an average of 46 times per game, with a respectable 4.56 yards per run.
This isn't the quick-scoring, run-for-20-yards-at-a-time Oregon offense, however. On 554 carries all year, the Longhorns only had 83 runs of more than 10 yards and 22 runs of over 20 yards (and the longest run of the year was only 55 yards). As a comparison, our sturdy Golden Bears ran the ball ran the ball 100 times fewer but had 70 10+ yard runs and 21 20+ yard runs. This is a run-up-the-gut, grind-it-out type of offense predicated on short and consistent gains. To win, the Bears will have to limit gains on first and second down to force third-and-long situations. Anything shorter than 3rd and 5 might as well be an automatic first down against this Texas offense.
As the season wore on, Texas lost top running backs Fozzy Whitaker, Malcolm Brown, and Joe Bergeron, but the running game remained nearly as effective thanks to the efforts of D.J. Monroe and Cody Johnson. Brown and Bergeron should be available to play in the Holiday Bowl, but their effectiveness remains unknown. Since midseason Brown has been slowed (literally--he has lost his explosive speed) with a case of turf toe. Bergeron, meanwhile, is nursing a hamstring injury. Texas has a stable of capable backups and we should not underestimate this rushing offense despite the injury woes.
Join us after the jump for more on the strengths and weaknesses of these Longhorns.
2: Texas converts 51.02% of red zone possessions into touchdowns (104th in the nation)
While Texas has an excellent field goal kicker in Justin Tucker (more on him later), they tend to struggle mightily on the first three downs in the red zone. While Texas runs on 62% of its plays, the Longhorns run on 75% of their red zone plays. On those passing plays, Case McCoy completes only 35% of his passes while David Ash completes 42%. McCoy tossed three TDs and one pick while Ash threw one of each. Even worse, they have combined for only 43 yards on 29 red zone passing attempts. Much like on the other 80 yards of the field, Texas is much better off putting the ball in the running backs' hands than relying on the QBs in the red zone.
Someone who has watched more than ten minutes of Texas football this season may be able to help explain why Texas comes away with no points on 27% of their red zone possessions (it's certainly not the kicker's fault). On 49 possessions, they scored 36 times. Two of these missed opportunities were missed field goals and two were interceptions. What happened on the other 9 possessions remains a mystery. Without more fine-grain data on Texas' red zone possessions, I'd guess that fumbles may be a problem in the red zone. The other option is that they attempt and fail to convert an unusually large number of fourth downs in the red zone. With a kicker who made 85% of his field goals this season, Texas would be silly to go for that many fourth downs. Alas, the mystery remains...
Now we move onto a couple of notable stats for the Texas defense
3: Texas has one of the best passing defense in the nation despite registering only 1.9 sacks per game (or 1 sack per 18 passing attempts)
Of all the stats we'll look at today, this one worries me the most. Texas has an excellent pass defense. They give up only 6.0 yards per pass (7th in the country), hold opponents to a 111.8 pass efficiency rating (14th in the country), and allow opponents to complete only 56.5% of their passes (27th in the country).
If Texas can force us into third and long, we might as well punt on third down. Passing on 3rd and 7+ is fruitless against this defense. On 75 passing attempts on 3rd and 7+, Texas gave up only 18 first downs. Feels bad man.
For this next one, you might want to sit down. Texas has notched a whopping 60 quarterback hurries this season. Let that number sink in for a moment. LSU and Alabama have pretty good defenses; they must have had at least 50 or so, right? How about 35 for 'Bama and 37 for LSU. Cal, by contrast, only had 6. That is either an error or we are DOOOOOOOOOOMED. Cfbstats.com does not allow you to sort teams based on hurries, but I guarantee Texas is near the top. Watch out for these guys getting after Maynard: LB Emmanuel Acho (7 hurries), DL Alex Okafor (13), DL Jackson Jeffcoat (7), and DL Kheeston Randall (6). I hope Coach Michalczik has some magic up his sleeve, because our O-line is going to be under siege all game. The only positive is that Texas doesn't often sack the opposing QB.
In summation, the Texas pass defense does absolutely everything but sack the opposing QB. Are you excited to see Maynard run for his life and throw to well covered receivers? Me neither.
4: Texas gives up 3.34 yards per carry (19th in the country)
Were you hoping that pass defense was the primary strength of the Texas defense? I'm afraid I have some bad news: the run D is just as stout. The only teams who ran well on the Texas D were Oklahoma State and Baylor, who relied on excellent passing games to open up some running room.
Remember how Texas "only" had 83 runs of 10+ yards and "only" 22 runs of 20+ yards? Well, they have only given up 42 runs of 10+ yards and 11 of 20+ yards (on 373 attempts). On top of that, they have only given up 14 rushing TDs all season (32nd in the nation).
The Stanford defense appears to be very similar, so if you want an estimate of how well we will do against Texas, assume we will do as well as we did against Stanford (which was just okay). Because we will not be able to rely consistently on the running game, we're going to need Maynard to move the chains for us. That, as we saw, will be a difficult process.
So what do we have so far? We have evidence of a solid Texas run game, a mediocre passing game, and a stellar defense. That certainly sounds like last year's Cal team. This game could turn into a defensive slugfest, which means this next and final stat may be pretty encouraging. At the very least, this should help the most pessimistic of us take a step back from the ledge.
5: Justin Tucker averages 38.5 yards per punt (98th in the nation)
If that sounds like a pretty low number, that's because it is. Bryan Anger, by contrast, boots the ball an average of 44.6 yards per punt. If there is a lone bright spot in the Texas punting game, it's that they force fair catches on 70% of punts. When the Longhorns do allow a return, however, they give up an average of 8.5 yards (meaning there's only a 30-yard difference in field position). When Texas allows a return, their coverage appears to be pretty iffy. Tucker tackled the returner on 7 of the Longhorns' opponents' 17 returns. When your punter is the guy making the tackle on 40% of returns, you have problems. The Longhorns avoided giving up a TD on punt returns, though.
If the Bears can keep the Texas running game in check, we may be able to take advantage and get some good field position for the offense. That, of course, hinges on some semblance of a return game, which we have lacked all season.
Conclusions
So what have we learned? Texas has an impenetrable defense, a consistent running game, and not much of a passing game. The Bears should match up well against the 'Horns while on defense, but our offense may struggle. Chances are good that this game comes down to who has better special teams and who has fewer turnovers.
References: All stats came from cfbstats.com and ESPN.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Relying on Special Teams for a victory?
Doooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmed
by solarise on Dec 21, 2011 5:11 AM PST via iPhone app reply actions
I know, right?
When we’re talking punt returns, I’m just happy if we manage not to fair catch it at the three yard line.
I think you’ll see Cal do more QB reads than ever and possibly some option.
As for whether I want to see Maynard run for his life and throw to well covered receivers, that IS marginally better than having him drop back, NOT run for his life, and hurry a throw from the pocket. A problem that may occur is that Maynard will try to escape the pocket by running out of it backwards….and if he gets caught doing that, then the yardage losses may be great indeed. I don’t think we can discount the possibility of sacks just because Texas doesn’t do it very much. Texas probably hasn’t encountered many quarterbacks that try to escape the pocket that way.
The key to beating the Horns is getting the lead first
This team really struggles when falling behind early because we try to pass our way back into contention which inevitably leads to turnovers and loss of opportunity given our weakness in this area as you point out.
Our defense takes at least one, if not two, series to get tuned up. If you can post 10 points before UT scores, and hang on for dear life, you’ve got a substantial shot at winning the game.
We Are The Joneses - Burnt Orange Nation
Follow @TXStampede
While reading your first paragraph, I thought you were a Cal poster talking about Cal.
Funny how similar we are
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Dec 21, 2011 9:05 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Hurry
60 hurries sounds like stat padding. Who is counting hurries in a game, anyway? An aggressive front with mediocre secondary? Sounds like a lot of screens and dump off passes to Keenan Allen coming.
PLEASE run quick screens and short dumps,
are CBs and safeties are aggressive and will eat that for breakfast NOMNOM
TXStampede above is right on....if you can get ahead early, our OC tends to panic and trys to pass...which so far has not worked....
Your problem is going to be getting points early as our D is smothering in most respects. We have all been hoping our new OC would just stay with the banging run game and not try to pass us back into the lead, as our young QBs have just not shown they can do this.
If Maynard can pass under pressure, you could be ok….because we will be in your pocket.
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize
by MeatchickenHorn on Dec 21, 2011 8:51 AM PST reply actions
The Texas O
They’re Stanford with better running backs but a worse OL and QB.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
I grow more and more convinced that Cal and Texas are basically the same team
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - R. Feynman
I think they’re more like the Mansion-led 2010 team but with a much, much better O-line. Still, the similarities are striking.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
California Golden Blogs
by Berkelium97 on Dec 21, 2011 11:11 AM PST up reply actions
Muck Back Frown
(just giving the old dead horse a little jostle)
A little more detail
Regarding TOP – I’d offer that as a testament to the defense getting offenses off of the field as much or more than a testament of our offensive ability. We’ve run the ball really well in a couple of games, but our defense has been good in just about every game.
Regarding the sacks/pass defense - Texas really struggled getting sacks in the first half of the year. Whether that was due to poor performance, defensive design, I don’t know, but I don’t think either of our DE’s (one an All American) notched a sack in the first 5-6 games of the year. A light came on for the entire defense in the second half of the year. So the takeaway on this could be that we had 3-4 per game in the second half of the season. This is particularly good when you consider 3 of those games were against good mobile QB’s (Baylor, Kansas State and A&M).
Regarding the red zone problems – chalk that up almost entirely to our OC getting a little too cute on the play calling, unexperienced QB’s, and poor blocking by our fullbacks early in the year. At least one of these 3 issues has been fixed.
Regarding the punting – For most of his career Tucker has been a rugby style kicker. We’ve had some miscues using that during the year and have gone to more traditional style punting the last half of the season. Apparently on a campus of 50k+ we can’t find a punter that can get both distance and hangtime, so the coaching staff has gone for the latter over the former. It is definitely a weakness in terms of field position on individual kicks, but over the course of a game the net average hasn’t been terrible.
Sacks (or rather, lack thereof) in 1st half of season...
… was due in some part to having the DEs play contain so much given the competition.
DOOOOOOOMMMMMMM
crawls under desk to await the apocalypse.
Go Bears Go
if you can shut down our running game you'll win
but this isnt exactly news
In The Morning To You
by horns1025 on Dec 21, 2011 3:31 PM PST via Android app reply actions
This game is decided by the coin toss and who gets ball first... start laughing now, get it over with,... done?
and in reality, if CAL does not have a greater than 3 point lead going into the 4th quarter, game over and texas wins. Texas D is lights out in 4th quarter even in loses. over each game:
0, 0, 0, 14(2nd string D), 0 (the 7 pts. in 4th for OU was a D fumble recovery), 0 (Ok state), 0 (Kansas should not count), 7 (2nd string D), 0, 0, 9 (F’in aggies), 7 (Baylor).
that averages out to 3.336 points allowed in 4th quarter all year, with 8 shutouts.
take out highest and lowest (14 and 0) and you get 2.6 pts. allowed.
i have looked all over for 4th quarter stats rank, to no avail. however#1 and #2 Defenses, Alabama = 1.75; LSU = 2.15 pts. allowed in the 4th quarter. Texas’ 3.33 is pretty darn good.
can’t wait!!!! Our D will shut em down, and our Offense will have some Time of Possession long drives for TDs and some razzle dazzle to equate to a 43-10 vicotry for Texas….
Everyone hates Texas, even though every college team has a player from Texas.
43-10 vicotry for Texas….
…So, you’re saying crack is the drug of choice in Austin?
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Dec 22, 2011 9:27 AM PST up reply actions
(childish reply approaching...) yeah, your mama's crack ;^) just kidding
crack not so much, weed? indeed.
if any place loves its crack it is berkley, stones throw from oaktown home of the rock (just ask Short dawg!)
Everyone hates Texas, even though every college team has a player from Texas.
by hornyaustinite on Dec 22, 2011 9:58 AM PST up reply actions
Short Dawg!
Hahaha. “So you wanna be a gangsta?” That’s funny.
NYCGOBEARS
by NYCGOBEARS on Dec 26, 2011 2:46 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
Great D?
Stats are one thing, and the W/L is quite another. Texas still managed to loose 5 games for all the great defense they have.
no sir, lost cause of our injuries thus ineptness on offense... our running backs are back...
minus fozzy and 80% shipley is better than no shipley…. and watch out for our TEs. especially the sleeper.
Everyone hates Texas, even though every college team has a player from Texas.
by hornyaustinite on Dec 22, 2011 9:59 AM PST up reply actions

by 

























































