Roll On: Previewing The Washington State Defense
Everything I say each week appears to be the opposite of reality. I say that Cal will score in the 20s against USC and they barely manage 9. I see a Utah defense that has played well against every team they’ve played, including teams with better offenses than Cal, and I predict a struggle. Cal scores 27 points on offense. I see a horrible UCLA run defense, predict that Cal should gash them, and the Bears barely manage 4 yards a run.
I know nothing. My job is to scour the depth charts, pour over the stats, analyze what I’ve watched so far this year, read what the smart people have to say, and then tell you what I think will happen on Saturday when Cal’s offense is on the field.
And yet I’m always wrong.
I suppose I should find that frustrating, but I long ago admitted that pretending to understand college football is just another exercise in lying to yourself. So I’ve come to terms with making guesses each week and passing it off as ‘expert analysis.’
I’ve watched Washington State play three times this year, against Stanford, UCLA and Oregon. Their defense did not look good at all against UCLA, but managed good first halves before surrendering to the inevitable against Stanford and Oregon. As you will soon see, the stats don’t treat the Cougar defense kindly. But then again, the stats don’t have friendly things to say about Cal’s offense either. Hit the jump to learn more!
Defensive Line: Jr. R. End Travis Long ; Sr. Right Tackle Brandon Rankin ; Jr. Left Tackle Anthony Laurenzi ; Jr. L. End Lenard Williams
One important note is that Toni Pole is a big contributor as a defensive tackle but missed the Oregon game with an injury. He might be back playing against the Bears and his ability to contribute could have an impact on Cal's ability to run up the middle.
The Cougs have picked up 12 sacks in 8 games, but six of those sacks have come from their dynamic linebackers. Of course, last week I highlighted how little pass rush production UCLA had been getting from their defensive line and the proceeded to bother Zach Maynard most of the game. So take it with a grain of salt.
Linebackers: So. SAM Sekope Kaufusi ; So. MIKE C.J. Mizell ; Sr. WILL Alex Hoffman-Ellis
This unit is really the strength of the defense. Hoffman-Ellis leads the team in both tackles and tackles for loss, an indication that he’ll get all over the field and can shed blocks. Based on the production levels I don’t get the sense that there’s much depth, or that the starters come off the field much. The three main linebacker backups have only collected 28 total tackles on the season, about 1/5 of the total collected by the starters.
I’d suggest wearing them down, but even Oregon struggled to do that so I wouldn’t anticipate Cal pulling it off.
Secondary: Jr. RCB Daniel Simmons ; So. SS Deone Bucannon ; Jr. FS Tyree Toomer ; So. LCB Damante Horton
.
When Washington State goes nickel you’ll probably see Casey Locker come in to the game.
Horton and Bucannon have four and three picks respectively. The fact that a safety has three interceptions seems like a horrible omen. Still, despite the interceptions this isn't a secondary that has had any kind of sustained success this year. In their last four games the Cougs have faced six different QBs thanks to an injury and Chip Kelly's flights of fancy. Five of those six quarterbacks have averaged 9.3 yards/attempt or better. (Fun fact - that 9.3, the lowest of the five, was achieved by one Andrew Luck).
Against the run
4.37/attempt, 72nd in the nation
I think that’s actually a pretty solid number considering that A) Wazzu has already played Stanford and Oregon and B) I can’t remember the last time Washington St.’s run defense wasn’t a total sieve. On the other hand, UCLA and Oregon State both had pretty good success running the ball, and Washington St.'s stats wouldn't look nearly as good if you take away dominating performances over FCS Idaho St. and really really bad UNLV.
At the very least Cal should be able to open up holes so that Sofele will have the chance to make linebackers miss. His ability to do so might be the difference between a meh day and a good day.
Against the pass
8.5 yards/attempt, 111th in the nation
And that’s where things fall apart for Wazzu. An inability to stop teams from moving the ball through the air is the reason Washington St. is in the 90s in scoring defense and yards/play defense. True, there's no shame in getting shredded by Oregon or Stanford, but what kind of defense allows Kevin Prince to throw for more than 13 yards per attempt?!? (ed. note: Not ours, we let him beat us with his legs! /reaches for the open bottle of jack).
It's pretty clear this game will come down to 'which Maynard will show up?' I think it's reasonable to say that Cal's receivers were equally open against Utah and UCLA, and will likely be similarly open against Washington St. So will we get the quarterback who threw generally accurate, catchable balls at home against Utah, or the guy who overthrew the ball into the arms of the safety over and over against UCLA?
Stats of Dubious Predictive Value
Turnovers
13 total turnovers, 76th in the nation (8 interceptions, 5 fumbles)
That's just high enough to plant the terrifying seeds of doubt.
3rd Down
50.93 conversion rate, 114th in the nation
Almost exactly what you'd expect to see from a team with a bad secondary in a league that generally gets good quarterback play. At least one of those explanations will still be in effect on Saturday.
Red Zone
68.97 touchdown percentage, 102nd in the nation
God would I love to see our two 6'3'' stud wide receivers punish a bad secondary in the end zone. I don't ask for much!
Conclusions
Look, it's simple. Isi will get his yards, but Washington State's 2011 run defense isn't Washington State's 2008 run defense. We can't win this game just running the ball through Moala-sized holes in their defensive line.
The good news is that their pass defense is very exploitable, even by much maligned Zach Maynard. Hopefully, back in the vaguely friendly confines of AT&T Park, Zach can rediscover is Utah mojo and just hit open receivers for short and medium gains. We don't need deep balls on this defense.
If Zach plays like he did two weeks ago I think we win this game by 10 points or so. If he plays like he did against UCLA we'll lose by double digits. The likely answer is something in between, which means a tense affair that stays tight into the 4th quarter. Washington State's late loss to UCLA might be a far comparison.
Needless to say we're in no position to complain about style points in a win. As bad as Cal looked last week that doesn't change the fact that they are still a more talented team than Washington State, and playing at home. This should still be a win, regardless of last week's ugliness. Unfortunately, shoulds don't mean much these days.
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't have a clue as to what'll happen tomorrow...
And that’s a damn shame when you’re playing Washington State and the odds makers say 9.5 favorites, but your brain says “wouldn’t be surprised if we lost”.
Lawrence Ross
Whichever team has the ball last will LOSE 6-0, on a botched Field Goal attempt. When the snap and the hold are flubbed, the holder will attempt to throw for a score, but that will result in a INT. Luckily, as he is running the pic back the player who intercepts the ball will fumble before he scores, but unluckily the kicking team will try to scoop and score the fumble themselves and they re-fumble it. Finally, there will be a mad scramble for the ball as its booted up and down the field and then the team who was defending the kick will fall on it in the endzone. Six points, no extra kick. Game over. (Upon review)
Wazzus plan is obvious even to someone as completely ignorant of football strategy as me. They will place 8 to 9 guys inside the box on every play, and integrate a variety of stunts and delayed blitzes. The goal is to not only contain the ground game, but to put enough pressure and confusion on Maynard so his throws are wild, inaccurate, and desperate.
The sad thing is, there’s no reason to believe that they won’t be successful. I wouldn’t bat an eye if it turns out we only score 10 points, and Maynard has another three INT day.
I sincerely hope this isn’t the case. I want Cal to win, Maynard to do well, and the team to get back into a positive groove. I just don’t expect it.
That shitstorm last week really took the wind out of me this season. It wasn’t the loss, but the manner in which we lost that did it. I just can’t seem to get pumped any longer – the inconsistency and frequent craptastic efforts have just drained my energy. I feel like I did back in ’86, when we learned very early that the team was going to break our hearts, so it would be best to not expect much. Oh sure, we embraced them and continued to hold them close, but much like the parent of an uncoordinated child, we learned not to put too much of a hope in the outcome.
Go Bears!
Being an Old Blue means embracing the "meh".
Yes, that should be Wazzu's plan,
AND, there is plenty an OC can do to deal with such a 1-D defense. Like take your mobile QB out of the pocket on purpose and let him sling it to his single-covered brother.
Will the coaches call these plays (as they should) – or doggedly stick to running Isi up the middle ‘to try to establish the run’? Will the players execute it – or infuriatingly throw picks and fumble balls unforced so the offense never has a chance?
And what on earth will our defense do? Get huge push on the line, pressure the QB all day, and be stout against the run? Or turn every mediocre WSU player and offensive coach into a school-record setting star?
No one knows! Excitement awaits you at AT&T park. 3:30PM kick-off – cheap tickets for the best seats in the house (Sections A-C)! Please please please come out and have more Bears than Cougs in the house. Just for school pride – regardless of what happens on the field.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Close enough
I’ve been given permission to use part of his soul to maintain my CalBear-ness at very high levels.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Uhh
The goal is to not only contain the ground game, but to put enough pressure and confusion on Maynard so his throws are wild, inaccurate, and desperate.
Wazzu doesn’t have to put 8 or 9 guys in the box for this to happen. they just have to show up.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
Looks like we might get some rain at the game tomorrow
Thunderstorms with a 70% chance of precipitation
DOOOOOMED?
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
Nice. Only the hardcores will be out!
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 4, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Dangit
Looks like I’ll need to find a way to waterproof my paper bag :p
by TooUsedToGapage on Nov 4, 2011 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Fingertips...
Will be wet, perhaps. Which means tipped balls. Which equals Wazzu picks inside our own 40.
I think there will be at least one interception, and Tavechhio will win a close game for us.
Or not…
This is my fear.
Scout.com: Scouting Washington State
Considering the setting, Washington State had one of their better offensive showings with 462 yards last week at Oregon. But WSU struggled to turn all the yards into points with just two offensive touchdowns…
I’m sensing yards and POINTS from the cougs this week. Wanna be so wrong.
by Anchorsteam Bear on Nov 4, 2011 10:46 AM PDT reply actions
It's important to go in with no expectations WHATSOEVER
If you have any strong ideas, inclinations, insights, or predictions or hopes for what the Bears will do – the football Gods will prove you wrong.
This is the lesson of Cal fandom. Seasons like this are a good reminder that your goal is to achieve zen-like emptiness of hope or prediction before each game, and simply let it happen (while you cheer like mad on defense because this is your team).
You don’t cheer because you think we are great, or hope we’re going to win, or expect something – you cheer because cheering is how fans help the team. And it’s fun to get involved.
Cal fans like me believe that when the majority of the fan base is empty of hope, our winning chances are highest. We are skeptical of how much it depends on the QB. Based on past history, we believe the QB’s performance is not so much what athleticism or coaching he has, but how we in our hearts felt about him in the week leading up, and if we said anything stupid out loud like “We’re going to crush UCLA!”.
A Daily Cal writer once penned a column titled “No Hope” with a great line: “The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning”. While he may have meant the Vegas betting line, I have interpreted it to mean the collective amount of hoping that the Cal fan base has been doing leading up to gameday.
The only way Cal gets to go to the Rose Bowl is if enough fans banish hope from their hearts for enough games in a season so that the football gods allow the wins to occur. Hope loses Cal games – not players or coaches. :-)
So just show up and see what happens!
P.S. I also try to enjoy the traditions of Game Day – the Band’s entrance, the script Cal, the Anthem, the yells, the cheers, old friends. Especially the Band. Take these little things all as victories and it improves the worth of your season tickets, regardless of what happens on the field.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 11:07 AM PDT reply actions 5 recs
You don’t cheer because you think we are great, or hope we’re going to win, or expect something – you cheer because cheering is how fans help the team. And it’s fun to get involved.
I agree with this sentiment. BUT: It’s difficult to maintain the enthusiasm and energy when you aren’t certain the team will reciprocate with effort on the field.
Yeah, I know that is a completely unfair statement because nobody but the guys wearing the unis on the field know whether they are giving full effort, but what we see isn’t often an illusion.
Like many others on CGB, I’ve been a Cal fan for a while. Next year will be 30 years of blind support of the Bears for me (and I know there are those with more than me here). In all that time I’ve never soured on the team nor stopped cheering the kids. Even now, I am still 100% behind them and do root for them. But after last week I just don’t have the energy to invest a lot of emotion right any longer. A win on Saturday will be nice, but it won’t result in me whooping it up. A loss would be disappointing, but I won’t get upset by it. That’s just where I am.
Being an Old Blue means embracing the "meh".
I feel you, SoCal
After your soul is shredded, sometimes it goes numb for a while. I go through the same thing.
It’s usually the secret hopes and expectations I had for the team dying inside me. In my clumsy, stupid way, I’m trying to give you a plan for staying 100% behind the team and having it hurt less when this crap happens to us – which will be often.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
You don’t cheer because you think we are great, or hope we’re going to win, or expect something – you cheer because cheering is how fans help the team. And it’s fun to get involved.
This!!! So much eff’n this!!!! Its way more fun to get involved, and word has it young men, between 18-23, like to be encouraged when they busting their ass and giving it their all (so you can have a nicer afternoon).
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
With you my brother
Let’s just scream our lungs out and have a blast…it’s really the only material thing we can add to the outcome anyway… embrace a day of college football….pumping sunshine all the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Nov 4, 2011 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't buy it...except for the watching The Band.
It’s about winning. It’s about finding the right ingredients to produce the winning menu. For example, look what’s happened to the Indy Colts without Peyton Manning. Look how well Price has carried the Huskies, who don’t have the best defense in the league. And, here Cal sits with a stable of elite QB’s, yet the Coach is sticking with a guy that keeps throwing interceptions. Hope does no good when logic is the issue.
Did you even read what I said about hope?
hope does no good when logic is the issue.
Hope is the enemy! That’s what I said! Spare me the logical football analysis – I’m not actually trying to argue sincerely about how much of a difference a QB makes. I’m trying to make it easier to be a Bear fan. It’s kind of necessary when you consider the QB situations we’ve had over the decades.
It’s about winning
I guess you shouldn’t come to any more games, then – since we’re just going to throw a lot of interceptions and probably lose – you have the logic to prove it! I’m just harshing on you because it sounds like you’ve given up on the team and being a fan, because of logic. And I don’t like that kind of cold cynicism that seems to say “why are any of you even going to the games?”. I was trying to bring people up a little in a down season.
You wouldn’t be the kind of guy who’d tap me on the shoulder and tell me to sit down and stop cheering on defense, would you?
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
You wouldn’t be the kind of guy who’d tap me on the shoulder and tell me to sit down and stop cheering on defense, would you?
and a rec #3…. Hate those d-bags.
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
by CruzinBears on Nov 4, 2011 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
Elite QB's
Highscool is one thing, FBS conferences are another.Wasn’t Ayoob a JC champion QB or something?
If Tedford went with Bridgford and he does lousy, then there’s the back and forth thing, and then the season – which is still at .500 – would be “proper fucked”.
Hard to predict
Whether we bring Desert Eagle – .50 – or replicas that cause my cack n’ bulls to precipitate inta’ shrinkin’
I fuwkin' hate pikeys
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Nov 4, 2011 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions
...
pour over the stats
What are you pouring over the stats? I hope it’s kerosene :)
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded


























































