KNOW YOUR ENEMY: Washington State Offense Preview
Hello again, fellow bitter and disillusioned Cal fans. I'd like to apologize for my UCLA preview last week. Couldn't have been more off base. Obviously I made the mistake of trusting this team and staff to, you know, beat a shitty team. So that's my fault. I turned on the game feeling brightly optimistic (read: completely vulnerable), and was rewarded with one of the more epic stinkbombs I can recall during the Tedford era. Funny how a complete and utter lack of execution, a faulty defensive gameplan, and Zach Maynard confusing Tevin McDonald for Keenan Allen THREE TIMES can turn the tables. I got confident, and was bitchslapped by reality. The lesson as always to Cal fans: Never let yourself become confident in this team. EVER. Some of you have this down pretty well already (tip of the cap to KikiRevenge, you were spot on), and I have seen the light. Lesson learned. Unfortunately the realization that I'm a supporter of a team currently hovering somewhere between mediocrity and irrelevance has knocked down my smugness quite a bit. Thus, I warn you this is probably a pretty crappy post. You have been warned.
The team will be back at the overpriced and home-field-advantage-negating confines of AT&T Park this Saturday to host the Washington State Cougars. Normally I'd be relieved by this scheduling boon. It's the Coogs! Chalk up a needed win right now! But this team ain't the Wazzu the PAC has known and destroyed over the last several years. They actually compete now. And in a twist that a Cal fan can hardly fathom, they've managed to thrive offensively with a backup QB seamlessly making a transition as a starter. Marshall (Lobby) Lobbestael...he's better than our QB. Let that marinate a bit.
Wazzu started the year off with a bang, jumping out to a 2-0 record by annihilating two lousy teams at home...despite losing starting QB Jeff Tuel to a broken collarbone in week 1(enter the Lobbster!). They were brought back down to reality in a hard-fought loss at San Diego State in week 3, then escaped Boulder with a tight win over CU before dropping their last 4 games. They put up a bigger fight last week in Eugene that we did, and were a few untimely red zone turnovers and special teams blunders away from making things really interesting. This phenomenon is referred to UW folks as "Cougin it". I'm sure everyone is familiar with the classic and timeless American film "Kingpin". Well, consider "Cougin it" the Pac-12 version of "pulling a Munson". Hey, at least they have a name for it. Should we get on that too?
Sitting at a 3-5 record, Wazzu folks have this weekend circled as a big step towards achieving bowl eligibility for the first time in 8 years. We've been inconsistent enough to give them reason to be optimistic. But we need this game badly as well. The Cougs bring in a passing attack ranked 10th in the country, so you know they can put up points. Which team will prove to be more disappointing this weekend? Will Cal pull a Maynard Munson? Will the Cougs keep Cougin it? An offensive preview that ranges from pessimistic to indifferent after the jump.
2011 record: 3-5
Week 1: WIN vs Idaho State (64-21)
Week 2: WIN vs UNLV (59-7)
Week 3: LOSS @ San Diego State (24-42)
Week 4: WIN @ Colorado (31-27)
Week 5: LOSS @ UCLA (25-28)
Week 6: LOSS vs Stanford (14-44)
Week 7: LOSS vs Oregon State (21-44)
Week 8: LOSS @ Oregon (28-43)
Last Season: 2-10 (LOSS vs Cal 13-20)
2011 Offensive Stats:
Passing: 316.1 yards/game (10th)
Rushing: 121.0 yards/game (95th)
Scoring: 33.3 points/game (33rd)
QB
STARTER- Marshall Lobbestael, Senior (RS) - 6'3, 215 lbs
The Lobbster has performed admirably in place of the injured Jeff Tuel, and the stats don't tell the whole story...even though they're pretty impressive (2076 yards, 16 TDs, 7 INTs on 62.9% passing). Consider the lack of support he has on this offense: little to no running game (95th nationally), a WR corps that suffers from bouts of inconsistency and drops, and an O-Line that imitates matadors more than blockers (3.18 sacks allowed per game). The guy is running for is life most of the time. And yet he still chucks the ball all over the field and racks up yardage. Considering many folks thought the WSU season was essentially over when Tuel broke his collarbone in week 1, this guy has been quite the surprise. Its also interesting that the Coogs two biggest margins of defeat (a 14-44 loss to Stanford and a 21-44 loss @ Oregon State) came in games that Tuel started during a short-lived comeback from his collarbone injury (he then suffered a serious calf injury that may see him miss the rest of the season). Lobbestael has surpassed expectations, and his ability to not only endure, but thrive, is the main reason that this passing offense is ranked #10 in the country and second in the PAC-12.
Upside: Better than Maynard
Downside: Doesn't run the Pistol, red zone turnovers...Cougin it.
What to expect:
Stop the passing game and the Cougs are toast. Easier said than done though. Despite a weak running game and opposing defenses using sacks as currency, Lobby gets his yards. In games that he's started, he's only failed to surpass 300 yards passing once (230 yards on 70% passing in the week 5 loss @ UCLA). That stat may also speak to the fact that Wazzu has been playing from behind a fair amount though...their defense sucks. He hasn't gotten much help, but he's mobile enough to extend plays and make throws if his receivers can get open...and catch the ball. I also have some concerns about how our defense handles the Wazzu no-huddle offense. Will we be prepared? Will we be able to effectively sub out or front 7 to keep them fresh? I'm not sure. Lobbestael runs this offense well, and he has one stud receiver in Marquess Wilson along with a decent enough supporting cast. So how can we avoid a replay of Tyler Hansen in week 2? Maybe we won't. But while the Coog offense moves the chains, they struggled in the red zone against the Ducks last week. Lobby threw a couple big picks down there that could have changed the course of the game...possibly. He'll get his yards, unless we hurt him. That's probably the best way to stop this whole offense, actually. Just hurt their quarterback. Ok, cool. That was easy.
RB
STARTER- Rickey Galvin, Freshman (RS) - 5'8, 171 lbs
Carl Winston, Junior - 5'8, 200 lbs
The Cougars have a couple of little guys spearheading their rushing "attack", redshirt freshman Rickey Galvin (67 rushes for 406 yards, 4 TDs) and junior Carl Winston (83 rushes for 334 yards, 3 TDs). Galvin is the sizzle...bringing more speed and wiggle into the game, while Winston is the steak...used more for the inside run game. That's kind of just me making assumptions, because the Cougars just don't run the ball a whole lot. Surprisingly, they don't use either guy much in the passing game either. There is a bruiser back on the roster in the form of senior Logwone Mitz (6'1, 223 lbs). He's only carried the ball 35 times for 132 yards and 1 TD...but I felt like typing the name "Logwone Mitz". It's a neat name. Galvin is the guy to watch for though. He's athletic and can make a few things happen in space.
Upside: Meh.
Downside: Size, pass blocking...Cougin it.
What to expect:
If I say "don't expect much, this running game is garbage", does that pretty much guarantee they gash us on Saturday? I'm thinking so. Rather, I'd say we should expect the Cougs to try to get these scrappy little fellers into space. I also think they will be utilized some in the passing game, likely on screens or in the flats if we overpursue Lobbestael and create some coverage voids. While this running attack is not the kind designed to milk the clock or control a game, it can keep a defense honest. They found some success against Oregon and UCLA. Mostly because they don't run a read option or the Pistol, I feel pretty comfortable saying that Wazzu won't beat us on the ground. OMGJINXDOOMWTF!!!
WR
STARTERS-
Marquess Wilson, Sophomore - 6'4, 183 lbs
Isiah Barton, Senior - 6'1, 187 lbs
Jared Karstetter, Senior - 6'4, 210 lbs
Bobby Ratliff, Freshman (RS) - 6'2, 194 lbs
Wilson is the stud of this group, hauling in 52 catches for 889 yards and 6 TDs on the season. He's just a sophomore too, which sucks for the rest of the PAC. He was a First Team Freshman All-American last year after notching 55 catches for 1006 yards and 6 TDs. Wilson is by far the best Cougar receiver, and also their main deep threat. He's a big body who can really stretch the field with nice speed. He's the guy to worry about. Barton is the slot receiver, and he's been up and down. He's tallied an impressive 41 receptions for 467 yards and 4 TDs, but he's also suffered from a bout of inconsistency and drops. Karstetter is another big body guy, who has seemed to benefit the most when teams focus too much on Wilson (37 catches for 418 yards, 4 TDs). He's been inconsistent as well. Redshirt frosh Bobby Ratliff (20 catches for207 yards) is another guy to keep an eye on. Despite the up and down performances of this group from week to week, they are talented and will pose a big challenge due to their length.
Upside: Size
Downside: Consistency, drops...Cougin it.
What to expect:
This isn't the most talented group of receivers we've seen this year, but they still pose a significant threat. Wazzu wouldn't have the #10 passing offense in the country if their receivers sucked. Wilson, in particular, is the guy we need to slow down. Consider him the Paul Richardson/Robert Woods of this bunch. I like our odds of winning much better if he becomes a non-factor in the passing game. Wazzu's 3 and 4 WR sets should provide an opportunity for us to play a lot of Nickel and possibly Dime packages, especially with an anemic rushing attack that shouldn't require us to stack the box (famous last words). Cattouse and Campbell will need to play some Gold Glove-level center field; we can't let these guys get behind us if Lobbestael gets flushed out of the pocket and buys time like Tyler Hansen was able to do. Like I said in the QB section, I don't anticipate us completely shutting down this passing attack. We're not as good as our lofty pass defense ranking, I think that's obvious. But we have talented pieces. If we can shut them down in the red zone and not allow Wilson to beat coverage deep, we should be able to minimize the damage...at least as far as giving up points.
TE
STARTER - Andrei Lintz, Junior (RS) - 6'5, 252 lbs
Lintz has three catches on the year for 52 yards and 1 TD. He has a whopping four total career catches (one last year). He was born in St. Petersburg, Russia and emigrated to the US when he was 6. That's about all I've got. Washington State runs primarily a single back spread formation and rarely uses the tight end. That's good I guess.
Upside: Rarely used
Downside: Rarely used
What to expect:
Nothing, except that Lintz seeing the field will likely mean we're wrecking the Cougar O-Line and they need another blocker. Three catches in eight games. No point in wasting a bunch of words on that.
OL
STARTERS-
LT: David Gonzales, Senior - 6'6, 286 lbs
LG: John Fullington, Sophomore - 6'5, 290 lbs
C: Matt Goetz, Sophomore (RS) - 6'4, 270 lbs
RG: BJ Guerra, Senior (RS) - 6'3, 321 lbs
RT: Dan Spitz, Junior - 6'7, 300 lbs
Now here's a group that just plain not very good, but is actually better than past years. Even though they've allowed 25 sacks on the year (108th nationally), they were giving up an average of FIFTY SACKS PER SEASON over the previous three. So...that's good. They're up and down as a group. Gonzales started the first 7 games at left tackle in 2010, his first year with the program after transferring from a JuCo, before missing the last five due to a broken arm. He's light in the ass, but he's got good length. Fullington started six games at tackle for the Cougars in 2010 as a true freshman before moving to left guard this year. He'll ultimately move back to tackle, but he's good enough in relation to the other Cougar lineman that he needs to be on the field. Young but athletic, and gaining experience. JuCo transfer Matt Goetz has done an okay job at center replacing injured senior Andrew Roxas. BJ Guerra has started 25 games at right guard for the Coogs, and is the group leader. At right tackle, Dan Spitz took over for starter Wade Jacobson, who is out for the season after a back surgery. He's been the shitz, too! Not really. I don't have many good things to say for this group, which is odd considering you'd think such a productive passing game would be related to good O-line play. Well, it's not. And they can't run-block much either.
Upside: They're getting better!
Downside: Pass-blocking, run-blocking...Cougin it!
What to expect:
Not sure, but I'd guess we try to bring some pressure knowing that Wazzu will be passing a lot. There's a good chance we can get to the Lobbster too. Expect a lot of our 2-5 front as we'll be working to stop the pass. I'll be very curious to see how our young OLBs perform and just what their assignment consists of. Unless the Cougars come out in the Pistol...McCain, Wilkerson and Whiteside should all be given carte blanche to pin their ears back and get to the quarterback. They can do that, and asking them to do much more will only nullify their ability to make plays. I expect us to pressure at the edges, and hopefully make Lobbestael step up in the pocket where our big uglies can take some shots at him. Of course, I make no promises as to what kind of positive effect this yields, or if it will work. As I alluded to earlier, hurting Lobby may be our best bet to slow this offense down. Sigh.
IN SUMMARY
This is a one-dimensional offense that is pretty damn good at the one thing they can do. Taking away that element will be a big challenge, and frankly I don't think our defense can do it. Our secondary will be under fire all day, whether we're ahead or behind. The key is whether we can be disciplined enough in our coverage and assignments to keep the receivers blanketed, keep the quarterback and o-line under pressure, and wait for them to start Cougin it. If we can force them into a few three and outs or turnovers, and our offense finds a little rhythm, we should be okay. Think of it as a game of chicken to see which team really shoots themselves in the foot first most often. I expect Wazzu to put some points up, plain and simple.
Worth noting though, their defense is bad. Like, really bad. We should be able to run and throw on them effectively (famous last words). Plus, the fact that we're playing back at AT&T should have some sort of a positive impact. For whatever reason, we seem to have success beating other lousy teams when we're hosting. And there is that extra bit of incentive that seemed to work so well for UCLA last week: coming off a disappointing loss, angry fan base, some coaching turmoil, yadda yadda. Funny how the tables have turned in just a week. Ironic even. And obviously we really need this game if we want a realistic shot at bowl eligibility. That all should provide plenty of motivation for the team. And I think they'll be ready . So having said that...
PREDICTION: There's no way in hell I'm venturing a prediction as to the final score. I've lost my faith!
FACT: Being a Cal fan really sucks sometimes most of the time.
LINKS:
CougCenter - For Washington St. Cougars Fans
cfbstats.com - 2011 Washington State Cougars
Washington State Cougars Official Athletic Site
'Cougin' it' defined | The Daily of the University of Washington
93 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
thanks for the report
I am particularly interested in how Cal pressures the quarterback. As you note, the play of the young linebackers will be key. I would like to seem them get to the passer quickly and contain him (with a tackle or forcing early throws). I have been concerned that Cal’s pressure has not been quite good enough: a little late and not making the tackle.
Jason Hafemeister
Little known fact
Lobbestael improves the more you blitz him. Even though he can’t move at all, he’s excellent at reads and checks.
Also
The RBs are very, very good at blitz pickup. They’re two of the better pass pro backs you’ll see in the conference, despite their size.
thanks
1. we’re doomed.
2. The Cal 3-4 scheme relies on pressure from the linebackers, in particular off the edge, to complement the three linemen (who I think are quite good, but tough for three guys to make the pressure by themselves). Since our outside linebackers are generally young (inexperienced and not too bulky yet) it has been interesting to seem them get into the mix.
3. If the WSU qb can sense the pressure and make good adjustments and anticipation, he will have the chance to make some plays.
4. therefore, see number one
Jason Hafemeister
Sigh. the Lobster will throw for close to 400 yards, the Coogs will put 10 men in the box and Maynard will still have only a 50% completion rate, as Wazzy rolls to a 34 – 10 victory.
That’s not snarky. That’s my honest belief. I just don’t see this Cal team being able to take control of this game at all. I hope I’m proved wrong, but it doesn’t really matter. I’ll be rooting for our guys, but I really don’t expect much at all.
Being an Old Blue means never accepting success.
Well, you’re not likely to be disappointed, that’s for sure.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
ManBearCal…love these, but you should expect the TE to harnish is inner Cougarness and gash the Bear defense to the tune of 10 catches for 115 yards w/ 3 TDs. ;)
Storm the field if Cal wins?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
You'll actually see the TE on the field a fair amount
He just won’t catch any balls – primarily used for blocking, both run and pass pro.
Easy time of what is the question.
@KikiRevenge – Your brother and I owe his old boss a pizza lunch after that Oregon game. He needs to return to the Mainland to pay up.
I'm disillusioned
But I’m looking to see us come out with the win, and then we only need one more for bowl eligibility!
Let’s Go Bears
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Nov 3, 2011 8:26 AM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Well
Last week we said UCLA had no passing attack, and we were right. They didn’t have one, but they ran all over us.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
Maybe, just maybe....
…..Harbaugh will dislike the pros and he’ll go the Montgomery route.
Fuck that guy.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m in the minority here but I have no issue with Harbaugh at all.
I saw Harbaugh coach at USD and turn them into a powerhouse while he was at USD.
He has proven he can win at a school with tough admission standards and as far as we all know didn’t committ any NCAA violations. Harbaugh has always gone to bat for his players.
Sure he comes off as a bit of a dick but he hasn’t done anything wrong to give his program a black eye or had a run in with the NCAA.
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 1:09 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Sure he comes off as a bit of a dick
I hereby nominate you for the Understatement Of The Year award.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
As long as coach is graduating players, not violating NCAA or school rules, embarrassing the school, and winning what is wrong with being a bit of a dick.
I had no problem when he went for two against SC, SC had been the big bully of the Pac 10 so I found that funny.
What else did Harbaugh do? The man is eccentric, loves football, and loves his players. What is wrong with that?
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 2:25 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I had no problem when he went for two against SC,
Had no problem with it? I actively applauded it.
I was very disappointed when we let up on USC in 1991 and let them score 30 on us. I wanted to win by 80. You can never ever run the score up on USC enough.
Yeah I agree about running up the score on SC. Was going for two and the “what’s your deal” quote the reason why a lot of people consider him a dick?
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 2:40 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree that he is a very good football coach, but everything about his demeanor just screams that he is a raging hard-on of a human being, and every time I have watched him it has confirmed my impression of him. I like confidence and intensity, but he doesn’t come across as merely that, he comes across as an arrogant jackass, and that’s not the type of person I want to see representing Cal.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately I think this is true for all the really good coaches
he comes across as an arrogant jackass,
What great coach doesn’t come off like this? I am not putting Harbaugh in the great category, he is really good.
Saban, Tressel, Miles, PC, Bilicheck(sp) all come off as arrogant ass holes but they all win so it’s tolerable.
Once again, if a coach is merely arrogant but still graduates his players, doesn’t have any major recruiting, NCAA, or school violations I don’t see being a dick as a major issue. How much of Cals collective “Harbaughs an arrogant dick” is due to him reviving our rival and coaching our rival? If Harbaugh had accomplished such success at say Kansas would Cal fans still fell this way about him? Would we still not want him as a HC?
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 2:49 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Well, if he had done it at Kansas I’d probably be a lot less familiar with his personality. But like, I have no problems with Mike Montgomery, because he seems to truly be a gentleman. AND he’s a really good coach. So there, it’s possible to be a really good coach and not be a douchebag. When Tedford was at the top of his game in ‘04-’06 he didn’t come across as arrogant. I don’t think Les Miles is a jerk either. Saban…. he probably might be. I think Chip Kelly is an asshole, and I wouldn’t want him either. Mike Riley on the other hand is also a very good coach but I think he’s a good guy as well. Chris Petersen seems doesn’t seem to be arrogant, but then I don’t really have too much exposure to him because I don’t follow BSU or the WAC/Mountain West that closely. Wittingham has been very successful and seems relatively humble and modest. So, I don’t think it’s true for all the really good coaches.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Marquess Wilson is 6'4" and only 183?
Is there a famine in Pullman? Someone get this guy a steak, stat!
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
I had a massively depressing epiphany while writing this post.
I’m just not excited to watch this team any more.
And I don’t know if that’s just a pathetic overreaction (likely) or a sadly accurate barometer of where this team is right now (equally likely).
/lights candles
/plays “Goodbye Horses”
/gets in bathtub
/drops toaster into bath
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
by ManBearCal on Nov 3, 2011 8:49 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
This team was so fun to watch at the beginning of the season. There was excitement, and a sense that anything could happen. The Colorado and Washington games were both hugely entertaining.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
Even when the defense was letting up, we actually had an offensive spark to keep in any game (or so it seemed).
I'm still looking forward to the game...
We shouldn’t blow the UCLA game out of proportion. We generally play well at home, and I think the Bears come out with something to prove, and win this going away.
Yeah, we have a better idea of Maynard’s limitations now, but I think he’s a better QB than at the start of the season and still improving. I don’t think we’ve seen this team’s best game yet.
FEEL THE SUNSHINE!
I do think he gotten better (I know it hurts to say that after the UCLA debacle) but Tedford is right, the Utah game, he played a lot better, and even though he threw those picks against UCLA, he was making the right reads at least; which was a big improvement over the USC game.
Whether it’s enough remains to be seen, but the trajectory is moving in the right way.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
I honestly hope you are right….really, but I think the ZM we see right now is similar to the one that played in Buffalo. He was 5-7 overall and 3-5 in conference. He threw 20 TD’s to 15 interceptions and had trouble with zone reads there also…now I’m NOT bashing ZM at all, he is what he is, but I can’t tell yet if he is actually improving or basically staying within his skill ability of latter years….like you said, it remains to be seen.
GO BEARS !!!!
Show me on the doll, bigdruid, where the sunshine touched you
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
I had a massively depressing epiphany while writing this post. I’m just not excited to watch this team any more.
Welcome to my world. That same moment of clarity hit me after our third possession last week. And now, I don’t have the energy to be either excited or upset.
Pretty sad, huh?
Being an Old Blue means never accepting success.
there's a difference
I’d find our performance easier to accept if we just plain sucked. But this team makes you believe and get your hopes up before crushing them in spectacular fashion. At least you’ve known what was coming.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
You'd think that would be preferable.
After the malaise of the mid-2000s, that’s what I told myself. It would be better if we just sucked and didn’t have to deal with the failed hopes.
And then 2008-present happened, and I realized that full-on sucking is much, much worse.
by displacedcoug on Nov 3, 2011 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
7-1 with a Lobby or a Tuel.
Maybe 6-2. Neither Lobby or Tuel play safety/responsible for Kevin Craft.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
You mean Prince? It doesn’t matter, if we hadn’t given UCLA the ball mostly in great field position 5 times, we would have won that game.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude.
I can’t believe you forgot to fill the bathtub with water. Your playcall was fine, but your execution was horrible.
Fire Twist!
Old Toothwrangler
by Kodiak on Nov 3, 2011 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Great write-up, btw. I always enjoy reading these. I think we’ll see a hefty dose of our big nickel package with 2 DL and 2 OLBs subbed in as DEs. Probably mix up man free and Cover One on the outside.
Old Toothwrangler
Bingo
i’d expect McCain and Wilkerson/Whiteside at DE for most of the game. We’ll get some sacks, but Lobby will get his yards too.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
Suicide is still slowing down for me
But at least I’m making the right read!
/drops toaster into sink instead of bathtub
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
by ManBearCal on Nov 3, 2011 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Dude this team is still fun to watch. I’m serious, it really is. It’s the fucking fans that have become insufferable.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
The only really bad games were LA and SC. The rest were totally fine.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
2nd half of Oregon wasn’t very fun, but overall, yeah.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions
yeah but we mostly lost b/c they played their usual good self, not because we totally ballsucked.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
Yay more Football!
Before the season, I was like—I can’t wait for football season!
Now, I’m like—holy cow, the season is still going? My suffering bank is full! It is FULL!
I feel the same way. I was so excited for the start of the season and in retrospect I was building all that excitement for what…this? A 4-4 record and 1-4 in conference play?
And no matter that outcome of this season: 4-8 or 8-4, I’m going to be just as eager for football to start when next August rolls around.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
DOOOOOOM!
Not only will the Lobster throw for record yardage, but Ricky Galvin will suddenly come alive, be impossible to tackle, and run for more than 200 yards. Also, their red zone efficiency will be 100% touchdowns.
That being said, I’m obviously worried about this game. However, as I said numerous times before, I’m really hoping that the UCLA crap-fest shocked the team into becoming a much better products (the talent and skill is there) than we’ve seen so far.
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Nov 3, 2011 8:57 AM PDT reply actions
What will be a higher number? Points scored by WSU? Or students attending the game?
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
what is that all about? price? distance? what?
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Nov 3, 2011 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
The price, distance and
The fact the AD gave the students the worst seats at AT&T.
I loved this write up. Disaster has such away of bringing Cal (and WSU) fans together.
by DancingBear96 on Nov 3, 2011 12:50 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Points scored by WSU (1000+)
doom. I can’t even work up the emotion to shout “doom” anymore
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Nov 3, 2011 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
MARSHAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!
Just getting ready.
In order for this to be a "good" win
We have to beat WSU by atleast 17 points.
If this is a close win, by a TD or less that is not going to inspire much confidence in me and probably the majority of the Cal fan base.
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 12:18 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I’d take any win, thank you very much. But you’re probably right about the fan base.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
I am sure every Cal fan would be content with a close win
But I doubt people would be very happy.
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 12:31 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I don't know what to make of it all
I’m bummed an embarrassed by where we are right now…I have loved Tedford like mad, but we are in the caca right now…may win, may lose…no idea of what will happen this weekend and the rest of the season…but this morning on the way in I got a sense of perspective of what it means to be a college football fan…on a national call in show, an Oklahoma fan was calling for Stoops head, essentially because they hadn’t repeated a national championship…Stoop’s record is something like 126 and 32…. and you thought old blues were whacked….and you hear the same sort of thing coming out of the SEC, even from the top programs
So maybe it’s just the nature of fandom…we always want more, are devastated by our disappointments and don’t fully embrace the good times…I just have to keep pumping my sunshine…it does not change the objective reality, but it sure helps me get through the day…and BTW, the Harbaugh as Montgomery thingy made me wretch
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Nov 3, 2011 12:32 PM PDT reply actions
Has anyone seen or discussed this quote from Tedford?
"No one is perfect. Aaron Rodgers isn’t out here, alright? So if (Maynard) misses a ball here or there, it happens. Aaron Rodgers plays for the Green Bay Packers. He’s the only one I know that’s close to perfect."
That sounds like a bunch of sour grapes from Tedford. Would the fan base love another ARod right at QB? Of course but at this point I believe every Cal fan would be happy with a competent Pac12 QB along the lines of Brock at ASU or even Nick Foles at Arizona.
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 12:36 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Or
Reggie Robertson or Steve Levy. Two other guys on the team that only saw the light of day in bad times. 5th out of 12 is good enough. 11th or 12th just doesn’t cut it.
by DancingBear96 on Nov 3, 2011 12:54 PM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
He sounds very frustrated with the media
He has undoubtedly been bombarded with QB questions since about 7:30pm on Saturday and I’m guessing he’s giving curt, harsh remarks to get reporters to ask about something—anything—else. Here’s another example from yesterday’s practice.
“Nothing with the quarterbacks, OK? Nothing new with the quarterbacks. Next question,” Tedford said.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
Well this is what happens when you are going on year 5
Of inconsistent and erratic QB play.
This isn’t just about Maynard but Cals and Tedfords inability to recruit and coach up a good QB.
by SDBear on Nov 3, 2011 1:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Let's not forget
The “every QB in the NCAA has thrown an interception” deflection when asked about Maynard’s turnover issues. Just classic.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
This title has become SO misleading
“Know your enemy”? I think the Colorado and UCLA games show us that when those teams play Cal, we don’t know our enemy. For some reason, they like to play football completely differently once they hit the field against us.
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Nov 3, 2011 5:08 PM PDT reply actions
UCLA was exactly what we thought they were. They ran the pistol and had no passing game. We just played like crap against them, is all.
Colorado we had less familiarity with.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 3, 2011 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions
By differently I mean
The “Know Your Enemy” analysis for UCLA showed us how inept they were. Somehow they found skill when they played us (watch them go back to being completely crappy now)
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Nov 3, 2011 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions
so is your complaint
That i didn’t correctly predict that Colorado would set passing and receiving records against us while our defense failed to force a turnover or sack their quarterback once? And that I also failed to predict that Kevin Prince would channel Kaepernick last week?
Sorry for missing on those, but its kind of tough to see that shit coming. Hawaii had sacked Hansen seven times and made the CU offense look utterly pedestrian. At the time, I expected our defense to play CU better than Hawaii did. UCLA looked anemic against a poor Arizona D. Did anyone think Prince would do what he did to us?
Maybe i’m taking this too personally, but the purpose of these posts is to try and familiarize the readership with the opponent’s offensive personnel and tendecies. Do i try and predict how they’ll do against us? Yes. Am i wrong a lot? Yes. If you saw the CU and UCLA games playing out like they did, nice work.
but i stand by the title. We know the enemy…we just don’t know ourselves.
I am THE DOOMBRINGER. We Are Cal.
This
We know the enemy…we just don’t know ourselves.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach

























































