Palms of Victory: Cal Beats Arizona State, 47-38, to Assure a Winning Season and Solidify Bowl Standing
It was one of those key defining swings in game momentum that a seasoned and scarred observer of Cal football thought for sure would work against the Bears. Leading 24-14 in the second quarter, Cal's Marc Anthony intercepted a Brock Osweiler pass and returned it deep into Arizona State territory. Alas, the Bears could muster only a field goal to increase their lead to 27-14. Though Cal had a 13-point lead after the field goal, getting a touchdown there might have been soul crushing to an ASU team that had lost three straight games and had no Pac-12 South Division championship to play for anymore after Utah lost to Colorado earlier on Friday.
Settling for a FG looked especially costly when ASU scored two touchdowns before halftime (the first on a 4th-and-10 play and the second one after a Cal fumble on the ensuing kickoff) to take a 28-27 halftime lead. Suddenly, the Bears found themselves behind in a game they had controlled for most of the first half. And when ASU took the second half kickoff and drove for a field goal to make it 31-27, a Cal fan could not be blamed for resigning himself or herself to the doom that was sure to befall the Bears.
But Cal never quite made it to the land of doom. Instead of folding in the face of a resurgent ASU team, the Bears reseized control of the game. Cal outscored the Sun Devils 20-7 over the last 27 minutes on the way to a satisfying 47-38 win that assured the Bears (7-5 overall, 4-5 Pac-12) of their ninth winning season in the last ten years. The win also gave Cal its first Pac-12 road victory of the season and first Pac-12 road win since November 6, 2010 at Washington State. What's more, Cal likely nudged itself ahead of Arizona State (6-6 overall, 4-5 Pac-12) in the pecking order for the Pac-12 bowl tie-ins, as the loss sent the one-time frontrunners in the Pac-12 South race to a fourth consecutive loss.
Look out San Antonio, San Diego, El Paso, or Vegas: here come the Bears.
Cal's ability to take control of this game had a lot to do with the offensive line and running backs. The Bears rushed for 247 yards, going over 200 yards for the third time in the last four games. Cal averaged a fat 6.2 yards per carry, with the lion's share of the damage done by Isi Sofele (21 carries, 145 yards, 1 TD) and C.J. Anderson (10 carries, 48 yards, 2 TD).
But it was not only the running game that came through for the Bears. After falling behind 31-27, quarterback Zach Maynard led Cal on a seven play, 77-yard drive that featured four runs and three passes. Maynard completed all three of his passes on the drive, which culminated in a 3-yard TD run by Anderson to give Cal the lead for good.
And Maynard was not done making plays with his arm and feet. After the Cal defense forced an ASU punt, Maynard and Anderson hooked up for one of the biggest plays of the night. Facing a 3rd-and-4 at the Cal 26-yard line, Maynard slid out of the pocket to his left to elude the ASU pass rush and buy some time. On the run, he found Anderson, who made the catch behind a defender and took care of the rest, rumbling down the sideline for what became a 74-yard touchdown reception to give Cal a 41-31 lead with 2:53 left in the third quarter. It was Cal's longest pass play to a running back since Kevin Riley's 59-yard touchdown pass to Shane Vereen in the 2008 Big Game. For the game, Maynard completed 19 of 26 passes (73%) for 237 yards and one touchdown, posting a completion percentage of at least 68% for the third straight game (and his fourth straight game completing at least 58%).
ASU appeared to rathet up the offensive shootout with a touchdown to pull within 41-38 at the end of the third quarter. But Cal's defense, which gave up 477 yards of total offense, pitched a shutout in the fourth quarter, picking up timely turnovers along the way to stifle the Sun Devils' chances at a comeback. After the Cal offense kept the ball for the first 5:52 of the fourth quarter, getting a 19-yard field goal by Giorgio Tavecchio (one of four field goals made without a miss by the Cal senior), the defense got the turnover the Bears needed. With ASU driving to take the lead, D.J. Campbell forced a fumble at the end of a 22-yard run by ASU's Cameron Marshall. Cal's Mustafa Jalil recovered at the Cal 40-yard line. Though Marshall was ruled down on the play, the replay forces finally worked in Cal's favor: the call was reversed, as replay showed the ball coming free before Marshall hit the ground. The Bears had the recovery and a chance to put the game out of reach.
And the Bears did just that. Cal kept the ball for 5:25, drove 47 yards on eight straight running plays (including a highlight reel 26-yard run by Sofele capped by a brutal lowering of the boom on an ASU defender), forced ASU to burn all of its timeouts, and got a 30-yard field goal from Tavecchio to increase the lead to 47-38 with 3:32 left in the game.
Cal ended all reasonable doubt on the next drive when Josh Hill intercepted Osweiler for ASU's fourth turnover of the night (to just one for Cal). And on a night on which Cal scored its most points in a Pac-12 road game since 2009 (in a 45-26 win at UCLA), the Bears won a high-scoring shootout and picked up its seventh win of the season.
A winning season belongs to the Bears. And a confident team will be headed to the program's eighth bowl appearance in ten years.
188 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great win.
So glad we won’t be in the cheese bowl.
If we can get a win against a good team in a respectable bowl, that is some nice momentum heading into next year.
I know almost everyone else here will disagree with me, but I actually really like the blue-white-yellow road uni combos. Way better than the blue pants. I don’t even rate the abomination of the stormtrooper.
Nice game by our boys. Certainly not perfect, but much like Colorado and UW, it was clear they wouldn’t go down without swinging.
Being an Old Blue means embracing the "meh".
by SoCal Oski on Nov 26, 2011 8:17 AM PST reply actions 3 recs
I like the blue pants too.
you should stop with the clearly incendiary posts after such a great game.
incendiary?
Dude, you must be extra flammable.
Being an Old Blue means embracing the "meh".
by SoCal Oski on Nov 26, 2011 11:33 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I think he is being facetious! Also, maybe he is being inflammable!
FUTBALL IZ SRS BUSINESS GUYZ // ONLY HAVE FUN WHEN ROZ BWL
--Thoroughbred
No, I’m with you. They looked good :)
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 26, 2011 8:55 PM PST up reply actions
Could it be...
That no matter how frustrating Maynard was against ‘SC, UCLA, etc. that Tedford really is developing him? This is the type of improvement I can get behind. The game appears to be slower to him, he’s making acceptable decisions (that’s not to say EVERY decision is great. But no QB makes a great decision each time) and it appears that Tedford is understanding how to use him. I’m cautiously optimistic about ’12.
Lawrence Ross
by alpha1906 on Nov 26, 2011 8:18 AM PST reply actions 4 recs
I was thinking about how last week we were saying ‘Well, Maynard played pretty great against Stanford, but he’ll have to do it again to prove that it’s more than just a one game random event, like Riley in 2009.’
Well, ASU’s pass defense is pretty sad, but he still took advantage of it. It’s still just two games, but it’s looking less and less like a fluke. Hopefully he keeps it going in the bowl game!
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
I voted for him to get the game ball
I also wanted to give one to Isi (I thought this was his most impressive game, btw) but ZMay really led with poise, even when he was throwing the ball away to avoid a sack. He did it all right against ASU. Very impressed.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
I can’t get over the change.
Maybe in some weird good for the overall development way, the UCLA game will be a big turning point for him and for Tedford.
In any event, winning 3 of our last 4 conference games (including a thoroughly entertaining and well played Big Game against a once in a generation Stanfurd team) to finish 7-5 in what was clearly always going to be a transitional year has me elated this morning.
Beyond Tedford/Kiesau’s ability to put him into situations where he is more comfortable, Maynard has made major strides in his accuracy. At the beginning of the season I would have been shocked if you told me that he was completing 70% of his passes over the final three games.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
by Berkelium97 on Nov 26, 2011 10:02 AM PST up reply actions
I would have been shocked if you told me he was completing above 60%.
by puresilence on Nov 26, 2011 10:30 AM PST up reply actions
I agree
I feel like now he is more often throwing to his routes / reads as opposed to scrambling against a broken play and trying to somehow connect with his brother. It was fun to watch the dynamic duo find each other when it looked like a doomed play, but to me that never seemed like an approach that would work effectively against better defenses. Now, those scrambles are less common and our throwing and route running have both improved.
Maynard is way calmer
He seems to be seeing the field better. And JT was right about the escape dimension. He is developing his QB and Maynard has the right temperament.
by bearacious on Nov 26, 2011 8:24 AM PST via iPhone app reply actions
Props to Coach M
The biggest difference over the last 4 weeks is the O-line, really look forward to next year if this continues. Hopefully Wulff keeps his job so WSU doesn’t come calling.
by MV Bear on Nov 26, 2011 8:51 AM PST via mobile reply actions
THIS. THIS SO HARD.
no bear, no care
by EchoOfSilence on Nov 26, 2011 9:06 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
THIS.
I also don’t think Mizalchick will leave really. He’s got a nice spot and I don’t think he’s HC material.
In other words, Go Bears!
I spoke with him at the Big Game bonfire rally, telling him how happy he was back and some other stuff… he said he is really enjoying himself at Cal and was glad to be back “where he felt he belonged.” Also, what a really really nice guy.
he seems like a great guy to have like a 4th of July BBQ with.
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2011 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
Cal can’t sell high salaries, low cost of living, or school devotion to football to prospective coaches. Hopefully the coaching staff will be happy here based on the strength of what Cal can do well, which is the Bay Area lifestyle and Cal culture.
FUTBALL IZ SRS BUSINESS GUYZ // ONLY HAVE FUN WHEN ROZ BWL
--Thoroughbred
He probably will stay. One of the big things for Michalczik taking the Raiders job was that he didn’t have to move his family up to Seattle. I also think him and Tedford have found the role that keeps both sides happy.
Kind of what I think too; he also seems too close to Wulff (ex-OL alum). Maybe the WSU job would work for Gregory who expressed an interest in becoming an HC and wouldn’t even have to move since he’s @ Boise. I think we as fans dismiss the “other stuff” like family, stability and working conditions too readily. Ask Urban Meyer about that.
by MV Bear on Nov 26, 2011 12:23 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Glorious!
Can’t wait for the Bowl and next season in Memorial…opening with Nevaada…let’s pack it!
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Nov 26, 2011 9:27 AM PST reply actions
For the game yes, for much else in the stadium, no.
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
by CruzinBears on Nov 26, 2011 10:54 AM PST up reply actions
Agree, but I was actually looking for Giorgio
His FGs were pretty key, his first one was a bomb and his last one basically clinched the game for us. Maynard has shown some great improvement of course, but Giorgio has improved so much as well. He’s such a great guy and has become a really good kicker as well this season.
by ucsdgoldenbear on Nov 26, 2011 11:14 AM PST up reply actions
That last FG just BARELY squeezed in. I was so dang anxious when he was getting ready to kick it, and thought he missed it, so I basically crapped my pants when it was good. Did someone get a finger on it? When I watched the game again this morning, I really couldn’t tell.
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Nov 26, 2011 11:19 AM PST up reply actions
I think it was tipped...
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2011 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
That would make sense
as a couple of the ASU players (one in particular) were very visibly upset that it made it through. Maybe that guy got a piece of it and was expectedly disappointed that the lead had been extended to two scores.
by SturdyGoldenBear on Nov 28, 2011 1:54 PM PST up reply actions
My bad there
I did my poll choices stream of consciousness right after the game. This morning when I wrote the recap, I updated the stats on the choices, but otherwise didn’t give them any more thought. Tavecchio would have been a worthy poll option (though, IMO, he’s edged out by any one of the other four).
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Or Jed Barnett
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Punter? He looked pretty good in practice. (not Anger good, but ok)
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
My bad — I thought Barnett was a dual kicker but he’s only listed as a P. D’Amato and a redshirt frosh named Benjamin Calder are the other placekickers on the current roster.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
ST players for next year
Pos Name (Exp in 2012)
P Jed Barnett (RS So)
K D’Amato (Sr)
K Benjamin Calder (RS FR)
LS Matt Rios (Sr)
LS John Sheperdson (RS Fr)
LS Cary Kriegsman (RS So)
LS Brandon Madueño (Jr)
We have a lot of LS…
In other words, Go Bears!
I remember when Cal football tended to suck down the stretch
After the UCLA game, I watched a team that finished the season very strong. Looking forward to watching Maynard and co. continue to develop
By that you mean 2010? We were pretty good down the stretch in 2009 except for the last two games
In other words, Go Bears!
And we've already ensured that can't happen!
Losing to Utah was one thing, but combining that with the blowout at Washington made for a depressing “stretch”.
I was thrilled to have the axe but I still didn’t feel very good about the program. Now, It would take an enormous bowl game blowout for me to go into next season with as little optimism as I have the past two years. I love me some sunshine! Pump on CGB! Pump on!
Man, even though this season really isn’t so much different from last season, it sure feels good to finish strong in the Pac 12. Totally jazzed about next year, especially offensively.
I would love to win a bowl game. Icing on the cake.
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
I vote for co-MVPs
Even though I voted for Maynard today… Could have easily been Isi too… but it all starts and ends with Maynard and he was simply terrific.
And passes like a blindfolded Brock Mansion
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
by Berkelium97 on Nov 26, 2011 10:27 AM PST up reply actions
Just a short while ago,
people were writing fanposts like this
My my, how things have changed
Yes, but that was not written by a Cal fan. What do you expect from a Fresno State alumnus?
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
SUCCESSFUL TROLLING!

"RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!"
-TwistNHook
by Redonkulous Bear on Nov 26, 2011 10:34 AM PST up reply actions
I bet he’d write the same thing now.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
I am so impressed with Gould and Isi
Isi is not big, not fast, and doesn’t have great natural instincts or vision (as we saw at the beginning of the year). Yet he is playing like a monster right now. It’s not that he is suddenly naturally talented of course, he’s simply a much, much better running back than he was at t the beginning of the year. And it’s not that the o-line is blocking better than they were two months ago – they are, but that is beside the point. You can see Isi’s improvement in plays like his huge gainer in the 4th quarter last night, when, on 3rd and short, he could have kept going straight ahead and picked up the first, but instead made an extra cut and bounced it outside for 30 extra yards. You can see it on a run to the left, where he picked up four yards – that would have been all 2 months ago, but he got super low and carried the defender an extra three yards.
Gould has been our best coach for a decade, but I think this is his best work yet, his magnum opus. What a phenomenal job.
I’ve been frustrated with Cal’s lack of football IQ in recent years, as evidenced by our continuing trend of burning time-outs because we can’t get the play in on time – it happened twice in the second half last night, as it seems to happen every damn game. But there were also promising signs – see Josh Hill falling on his own interception to ice the game, instead of trying to return it amidst three defenders. I also loved Maynard feeling actual pressure in the pocket and getting out of harm’s way, instead of earlier in the season when he’d feel non-existent pressure and bail on the play. In the second half last night, he did a great job escaping the pressure and throwing the ball away near their endzone, and then of course his flip to CJ for a touchdown. I think that was Maynard’s single best play of the year.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by CBKWit on Nov 26, 2011 10:38 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
I agree about the CJ Anderson play. That thing was a play of beauty. I was just waiting for the flag sign to pop up in the corner there.
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
I agree about Isi. The improvement in his vision and awareness of his surroundings is incredible. It’s his improvement in the fundamentals (like vision) that gives him many more opportunities to use his shiftiness and elusiveness against the opponent. I’m looking forward to having a solid, experienced thunder and lightning running attack next year.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
by Berkelium97 on Nov 26, 2011 10:46 AM PST up reply actions
Game Ball should go to Gould. Dominant performance by both backs. O-line was good, but running outside instead of up the middle, as well as CJA’s super awesome 74 yard reception that was mostly RAC, demonstrates the backs dominated.
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Nov 26, 2011 11:17 AM PST up reply actions
Don't undersell the OL improvement
And it’s not that the o-line is blocking better than they were two months ago – they are, but that is beside the point
The OL improvement is a BIG reason as to why our running game improved and for Maynard’s improvement
In other words, Go Bears!
you miss my point
yes, the o-line is much better, but the reasons I included those examples is because they illustrate both Isi and Maynard’s improvement INDEPENDENT of the o-line. Read, son!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
The Oline actually hasn’t improved this year as much as I had hoped.
MSG is still out of position at RT, we’re not great at blowing guys off the ball straight up the middle, and we have issues with fast edge rushers.
However, the coaching staff has done a nice job of using pitches and pulls to take advantage of our strengths (mobility) to attack the edges.
I worry a bit what we’ll do after Schwartz leaves. It would be nice to put MSG back at guard, but two new tackles is a scary proposition. Coach M, Coach Blasquez, work your magic!
Old Toothwrangler
I think they’ve improved about how much I expected – a coach can’t work miracles in a single offseason. They weren’t gonna turn into a Stanford-like unit overnight, but they’ve definitely gotten better and better and turned into a strength of the team.
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2011 11:58 AM PST up reply actions
Totally agree. I think Isi is pretty zippy, though, when he gets space. Certainly not so much slower than Vereen.
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2011 1:19 PM PST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure he's significantly slower than Vereen
Vereen is a really fast dude, he just seems slow because he followed Best and everyone is slow compared to Best.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Prob is we rarely see it b/c he doesn’t get into space too often.
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2011 1:28 PM PST up reply actions
Vereen ran track in high school, right? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe Sofele did.
i'm here to clean your pool but i don't have a pool *bowchica bowow*
Yes he did. That doesn’t mean Sofele isn’t fast, though! All I’m saying is maybe he’s not on the level of Best, but I certainly wouldn’t characterize him as “slow.”
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 26, 2011 1:39 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah this whole "Isi is slow" thing needs to die.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
I'm sure Isi is #60 among BCS running backs in terms of speed.
/rolls eyes
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
oh christ
fine, I hope this is a precise enough definition for you hair splitters:
Isi is below the mean speed for starting running backs on BCS teams. That is my guess. Obviously he is fast compared to the bulk of humans aged 18-22.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Unsurprisingly, making incredibly nebulous unsupported comments does not provoke a positive response in discussion!
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
how the fuck is this nebulous?
Isi is below the mean speed for starting running backs on BCS teams
That is specific and concise, no?
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Dude was a 4.4 guy in HS. Never seemed to run fast until the 2nd part off this year.
Old Toothwrangler
4.4 in high school?
really? I would be surprised if he is actually a 4.4 guy. If he is, I stand corrected.
But that doesn’t change the fact that my post was anything but nebulous. Inaccurate, maybe!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Yeah, listed as 4.44 on a few different scouting sites, for whatever that’s worth. No big deal.
You’d figure that no one would offer an undersized back unless they could scoot.
It’s nice that we’re able to quibble over little things like his 40 time. Fact is, he’s getting it done. Two schools of thought prior to this year: 1) He didn’t get carries last year because he wasn’t that good. 2) He didnt’ get carries because Vereen was that damn good.
Doesn’t really matter at this point. Vereen was great. But, Isi has worked really hard and Gould has helped him improve. Better Oline + non-gimped QB play = solid running attack.
Old Toothwrangler
Right, I forgot this is your pattern lately.
Troll, wait for a response, find a reason to take offense, repeat.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
how am I trolling?
I left a very positive comment! You are making shit up about my response
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
he is slow compared to high major starting runningbacks, yes
oh christ
fine, I hope this is a precise enough definition for you hair splitters:
So: make meaningless statement, get defensive about it, repeat.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
hey
you attacked me, and I stand by my statement. I was extremely positive about isi above and you were looking to pick a fight. To call me out for trolling is ridiculous.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Personal attacks (by anyone) are not helpful to rational discussion; please both of you, confine your disagreement over the facts, not who started this argument.
Please? I’m trying to work.
Thank you.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
Your comment was the last one in the subhtread, so I think he replied to it not to specifically reply to you, but just generally about personal attacks.
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
Your comment was the last one in the subthread, therefore it is an attack.
The odds of Cal winning are inversely proportional to the odds of Cal winning.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Nov 27, 2011 12:44 AM PST up reply actions
Why are you making personal attacks on me?
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
Wait, fuck, now I’m the one making personal attacks.
FUCK, ENDLESS PERSONAL ATTACK ON MYSELF LOOP!?!??!
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
We’re so screwed!
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
no, since it’s not backed up by any, you know, actual facts for data points.
to put another way, Isi is actually faster than most starting running backs on BCS team.
well, I believe you are wrong
but you certainly aren’t being nebulous!
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
IIRC, Best won like the 100 meter dash and Vereen took like 3rd place. Something along those lines.
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
To me, he looks like an extremely agile guy. Probably something like 89 speed 95 agility in NCAA 2012. 89 speed is like a 4.45-4.5. We won’t know unless he is invited to the combine though :(
Looks super quick and super agile to me, too, but I agree with CBKWit here that he’s not that fast. Seen him get run down in the open field too many times. At this point, I can’t say it’s a big deal, though, because watching Isi the last few games he’s looking like a good player despite it. He gets up to his top speed so fast by the time the defenders get to theirs to run him down he’s already made a big gain…
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2011 12:01 PM PST up reply actions
I’ve seen interviews in the past where Cal RB’s talk about how they’re working on tempo….and I’ve never had any idea what that meant. Watching Isi progress this year, I finally get it. Isi’s tempo has really progressed over the season – the speed that he takes the handoff, waits for the hole, and then hits the hole. In the beginning of the season, his timing just wasn’t there – he wasn’t hitting the hole that hard, and he would get to the hole when it wasn’t open. Now we’re seeing a completely different player and seeing the improvement finally highlighted to me what “tempo” is for a RB. Isi’s getting to the hole at the right time now and hitting it hard, and the results continue to exceed my expectations.
by Missing Barry on Nov 27, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
So let me get this straight. For the best possible bowl bid… we want Oregon, Washington State and USC to win… and the Irish to lose…?
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
My turn.
San Antonio: 100%
San Diego: 100%
El Paso: 80%
Las Vegas: 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
wait, we have to root for the furd?!?!?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
by ucsdgoldenbear on Nov 26, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions
Go Ducks? No problem.
Go Cougs? No problem.
Go Trojans? No problem.
Go Furds? We have a problem.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
Root for ND to lose 2-0? Safety for furd based on botched snap?
cal. lakers. dodgers. packers. chelsea.
vols. rangers. galaxy.
No, I'll root for ND, from their own 1,
to run out of the end zone after the ’furd THINKS they got a safety and are already cheering. Then all the ’furds look really stupid when they turn around to realize a ND player is streaking down the field for an easy TD.
Then the same thing happens again. And again and again. And again.
ND 35, ‘furd 0 at the half. Then the same thing keeps happening in the second half, only twice as often. Final score ND 105, ’furd 0. Thats what I’m rooting for and I don’t care what it does to our bowl options.
by C98 on Nov 26, 2011 11:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Damn you C98, GET OUT OF MY MIND!!!!
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Nov 26, 2011 12:01 PM PST up reply actions
You forgot the alamo, didn’t you?
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
I'm a bit opposite
Go ducks? fine
Go cougs? you bet!
Go trojans? Fuck no.
Go trees? Beat the shit outta ND!!!!
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Nov 26, 2011 11:49 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I can root for everyone in the Pac12
Except the furd. Unless it meant we would make a Rose Bowl or another BCS game. Other than that, I don’t care enough about alamo vs vegas vs holiday bowl to root for the furd. ewwwwww.
by ucsdgoldenbear on Nov 26, 2011 12:27 PM PST up reply actions
Rose Bowl or National Championship (not just any BCS) game are my only 2 exceptions for rooting for the furd. Otherwise I always root for their humiliating defeat.
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Nov 26, 2011 12:44 PM PST up reply actions
It doesn’t have to be humiliating. I am content with them losing in such a way that gives them despair or kills their soul.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
This is a fair compromise.
Costs STILL assessed against Twist
by CALumbus Bear on Nov 26, 2011 1:33 PM PST up reply actions
I have no exceptions. Why would I want them to have a natchamp or RB win to lord over us? Fuck stanfurd.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 26, 2011 9:31 PM PST up reply actions
I thought CALumbus Bear was talking about a furd win getting Cal to the Rose Bowl or national championship.
Buy me Bonestorm or go to hell!
Oh wait, I completely whiffed on reading that correctly. Yeah, in that crazy scenario I might make an exception.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 26, 2011 9:39 PM PST up reply actions
I want both furd and $c to win
one game each year and tie one. beat ND and tie each other.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Nov 26, 2011 3:14 PM PST up reply actions
i mean, seriously… this. Really, it’s come down to we root for the Furd so we can go to one not terribly impressive bowl over another not terribly impressive game? No. The only time you root for the Furd is if it means it will lead directly to a CAL Rose Bowl (or sadly, in this day and age, some other BCS bowl game)
RBs
As I sit here watching the Braxton Miller-Dennard Robinson and find myself amused with which player will win the game for their team, I"ll put some thoughts out about the RBs.
Sofele. Could there have been any more senseless hand-wringing over this guy in the earlier part of the season? I think the turning point for the Sofele hatred occurred when people realized his last name was not spelled B-E-S-T or L-Y-N-C-H and accepted that or around the time when Maynard took his October stumble so the fans could direct their frustrations elsewhere. Quietly, Sofele was improving every week at a faster rate than other parts of the offense. He had a good game vs UW and turned in a very solid performance with limited carries against Oregon. Oregon is the game that I felt he turned the corner and took off from there. Sofele’s put up huge numbers vs Oregon but mostly that was on a handful of carries in which he made plays by bouncing things outside. The OL did not consistently come together until a few weeks later, but that’s for another post. Sofele is a wrecking ball with a low center of gravity and when he hits you, it hurts. 2 defenders from opposite teams have BEEN CARTED OFF THE FIELD (UW and UCLA) after Sofele hits and countless other defenders have had to sub out of games because of punishment Sofele dished out. The one play of Sofele’s that stood out to me this year was the long run he had against OSU. Instead of going out of bounds and running away from the contact, he went into the contact and probably could have gotten 3-5 more yards if he pansied out of it. Little things like that show the wrecking ball’s mentality and for that, I salute him. His pass protection has been consistent throughout the season. I think Sofele has improved the most with his vision and decision making of how and when to cut. Sofele will need to work on his pass catching skills a bit more to become a complete all-around threat at RB.
Anderson. He has steadily improved over the course of the season AS HE PICKED UP MORE OF THE PLAYBOOK and became more comfortable with things. The amount of snaps he received steadily increased as the season went on. As some have noted, it was so obvious that CJA was going to get the ball early in the season when he came in but that changed as we started to see CJA being integrated more and more into the passing game and pass protection assignments. CJA has good hands, has deceptively good speed to outrun most LBs and some DBs as we saw last night, and a number of good jukes in the open field to pick up extra yardage. He’s a good goal line back for the most part and has embraced that role. The one area of improvement for CJA is to stop turning and getting turned around on runs. Hopefully that will be corrected in the offseason. I don’t have much else to say about CJA but if he keeps improving, he might take over the #1 spot.
As far as next season goes, Sofele and CJA will be a fantastic 1-2 punch for Cal.
Bigelow. Tremendous speed and talent but his youth shows in his indecisiveness and vision. Coming off the 2 knee injuries, Bigelow is about where I expected him to be this season. I originally thought he would blueshirt but his talent was too much to keep off the field though we rarely saw him. As he becomes more familiar with the playbook, adjusts to the speed of the game, and gets over any mental issues with his injury, he will only get better and see more snaps. He should be a great weapon on offense next year but I don’t think he will be a centerpeice until 2013. I won’t talk too much about his KOR skills but they need to improve if he’s going to keep that spot.
Deboskie. Not sure what his future holds but he comes to play despite knowing he will see limited snaps unless there is injury. I like that mentality. I don’t think there’s much else to say about Deboskie because his skillset is relatively known and there’s going to be a logjam at RB in his last year.
Manuel. Not enough info to make comments on him. He’s a solid KOR taking Cal out to the 25 consistently.
by Cali49a on Nov 26, 2011 11:29 AM PST reply actions 4 recs
In Gould We Trust! In particular, I’m looking forward to how Bigelow will develop with Gould’s teaching.
FUTBALL IZ SRS BUSINESS GUYZ // ONLY HAVE FUN WHEN ROZ BWL
--Thoroughbred
This
Tough, I will admit that I was a bit frustrated earlier this season by not having a reliable #2 at RB. So glad to see CJA come on strong in the second half of the season. Throw in Bigelow next year, mix it up with Manuel, and ZM15 running the zone read, we have the potential to have a dangerous ground game next year.
"Fuck DOOOOOM. We prefer BOOOOOM!! - alpha1906
I don't think the hand-wringing was senseless
Isi was our least talented starting rb since Igber in 2002. Still is. That was a legitimate concern. It is incredible how much better he has gotten this year. As I said above, I think this is Gould’s most impressive work of his career, which is really saying something.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
He has gotten better, no doubt. But he wasn’t that bad to begin with, some of the comments about him were overly harsh at the beginning of the season. Yes, Vereen was better, but he had more experience. Remember, Sofele came here as a RB, but played his first year at WR because we were so thin at that position; he done all that’s been asked of him, and without any doubt, the O-line has improved as well.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
I don't know
I remember him running right into the back of our offensive lineman against Presbo, when there was a giant hole immediately to his right. He scored on the play anyways but I remember thinking, man, that guy has no vision at all
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I think isi has some great vision but was pressing a bit as a player. If you watch his highlight film from high school, he had the ability to sense defenders and see holes.
Just look at his eyes when he plays. Completely wide open and always looking. When you press as a player, your prone to mess up because you’re trying to outthink your instincts and vision.
I definitely think a great way to judge a player’s deficiencies is on one play, where he scored anyway…
seriously dude… chill.
No, I have to agree that Isi was having “vision” problems early in the season. The last (failed) goal-line sequence against Washington was another example; he had the chance on one of those plays to string it outside (following the blocking) for a TD, but instead he tried to push it inside and got swallowed up by the defense. This led to much frustration among the Cal fan base (who thought CJ should have been in on the goal line).
We’re not seeing much of that anymore; it’s part of Sofele’s improvement this season.
yes
that is exactly what I was doing, not using an example to illustrate a trend. I’m sorry for including said example, but of course, if I hadn’t, then you’d say “USE FACTS SUPPORT DATA YOM YOM YOM”
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
It was senseless because
many posters wanted anybody else aside from Sofele to be the starter and when you look at who else was behind him, it should have been obvous that Sofele was going to be the guy unless somebody overtook him. The chances of true frosh playing are slim unless they are very talented and they don’t play significant roles. The exception to that was Lynch and Best had a limited role so scratch Lascoe seeing PT this year because he wasn’t in the top 4 at the end of Fall camp but perhaps Bigelow could get some snaps because of his talent level but he’s recovering from 2 ACL issues and hasn’t played ball in nearly 2 years. No offense to Manuel but he’s a walk-on for a reason and unlikely to be a starter having been here less than a year and got injured in the Spring and wasn’t in the top 4 to end fall campm. Briggs? Scratch him off the list – he couldn’t even make the Fall camp roster. Yarnway is an intriguing prospect and a possibility but he runs too upright and is injury prone, which played out a few games into the season. Deboskie? He’s been #3 since 2009 and got passed up by Sofele last year. In his limited snaps vs Fresno State, you can see why he’s gotten passed up and would be used only as a router runner this year. So that leaves CJA who arrived for fall camp and was on a crash course to get up to speed. IMO, CJA had the best chance to pick up snaps based on his film and the offense he was in. This is why I used the word senseless because many comments on this board were just so off base and rather uninformed.
I used the word hand-wringing because the same posters seem to not understand that a RB does a lot more than just carry the ball and his performance is affected by the type of blocking he gets upfront. Sofele was the best of the lot in pass protection. I don’t think he has the best hands so that’s why he doesn’t go out on routes and his ball carrying skills were, relative to the other guys on the team, above average. His vision was ok. That is why Sofele has been the starter since Day 1. Yeah, he’s not the total package but he had the most complete skillset of the crop. I was patient with him – along with a lot of other people who follow the game at a more detailed level – because I knew the blocking upfront was shit half the time. Definitely not making excuses for him missing holes or running into his blockers’ backs but he’s not the RB at Cal that has done that. Best did it plenty of times in 2008 and it took time for him to learn how to control that speed. But the point is those mistakes can be corrected over time but it takes time.
I think what we all agree on is that the offense has taken a step forward and Sofele and CJA along with the blocking has gotten better over the course of the year. This goes back to the coaches working with the players and identifying what plays they are most comfortable running and going from there. I’ve been saying for a while that the OL had a lot of things to fix and bad habits to break and that takes time. I think we’re finally starting to see most things come together. Cal’s a 7-5 team but if they played UW and fucla now, they’d likely be 9-3 but then again, I think the fucla game happened for a reason. It was a real wake-up call for the players AND staff.
I don't really disagree with any of this
I’m simply stating that there was reason for concern regarding Isi, since he’s going to be our first starting runningback since 2002 that does not have nfl talent. I think that is quite reasonable.
I’m not sure why people have such a difficult time accepting what he is. As I said in my initial post in this thread, I am extremely impressed with Isi. He is worlds better than he was 2 months ago, and he and Gould get a ton of credit. In fact, his performance is even more impressive, given that he does not have nfl size or speed, like all of our backs from the last 9 years have.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Of course there was reason for concern of which some was warranted and some was unwarranted. My beef was with posters jumping on him without looking at the bigger picture. In other words, like him or not at the time, he was the guy so imo people should have accepted it and supported him more to develop instead of ripping him apart.
eh
if you take that view, then you can’t criticize anyone. Tedford is our guy so why question him? Not much room for discussion if that’s your standard.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I figured I'd get that kind of response from you
Just please don’t put words into my mouth. This is a blog and it wouldn’t be whole without people firing off criticism. You can criticize anybody you want and feel free to do so.
The criticism with Sofele came as early as after one game as a starter. My biggest thing to posters was don’t jump on the guy so quickly. Tedford has been around for 10 years so the criticism for him has a larger body of work to cite as evidence.
I think the criticism was plenty warranted after one game
he was not very good at the beginning of the year, including the first game. I never said “Isi is a terrible person and I hate him etc etc.” I said, his vision is not very good, which you can see when you watch the game. Now, it has tremendously improved, and I am giving him big props.
It cuts both ways. I remember watching Best in Fall practice (before he even played a single game!). There was one play where he turned the corner, heading north on the east sideline, and just obliterated every Cal defender’s angle. Right then, I knew he was a special talent. I think it was a fair assesment, even though I had never seen him play a game, just as I think initial concerns about Isi were warranted.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
The OL
I voted for the OL. I don’t think it’s been mentioned but beyond ripping open holes for Isi and CJ to run through, they played with a ton of discipline last night! I don’t recall any false starts and there was like, what, 1 holding call? Big contrast to pretty much every other game this year.
I know we're happy about the win
but did anyone else notice the utter shittiness of the Pac-12 refs again? Half of the PI penalties on both teams were bullshit.
Still a great win, and I was surprised after watching the game that we held The Tallest Pitchfork to under 300yds passing.
yeah we didn’t give up too many yards. just seemed like more because they converted 4th and long at will.
whose domicile? our domicile!
by hardtobecalfan on Nov 26, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
My favorite part
was when they didn’t give us the fumble (in the first or third Q, I can’t remember when) when it popped out of Marshall’s hands a half second before the refs blew the play dead. Of course, as we saw last week, you can blow a play dead and have a player recover the fumble a second or two afterwards and it will still be a fumble recovery. But recover a fumble that occurred before the play is dead? That’s not allowed.
At least they made up for it with an equally questionable 4th quarter fumble recovery ruling in our favor.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
The fumble we got in the 4th quarter
I was going to be a little upset if we didn’t get that call because it seemed like an identical call to the one we lost with Richard Rodgers in the 2nd quarter. If Rodgers fumbled, so did Marshall. Glad it was consistent — both were big calls.
Man crush on Aaron Rodgers, since 2003.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs/Twitter/Facebook/Clothing Store
I fully agree with this
At least they were consistent (even with the questionable PIs, those went both ways too).
Yeah, there was at least one PI on Steve Williams where they went to the replay and there was just no contact whatsoever; literally, Williams never even touched the WR. Craig James was just left muttering something like “Well, they must have seen a tug or something in there . . .”
It’s amazing how often P12 refs are just looking to call a foul where none exists. This must be systematic; they are being trained to do this.
Great win. It’s so unbelievable to see:
1) Cal not shit on itself after a bad loss (UCLA) or a tought loss (Furd). The following weeks, the team “showed up and played hard” and that certainly hasn’t been the case in the last few years.
2) Road efforts: Have to be fairly pleased with wins at Colorado and ASU, as well as solid if not spectacular efforts for some or all of the UDub, Oregon, and Stanfurd games.
3) The in-season improvement of 3 key positions on offense: 1) Maynard, 2) Sofele, and 3) the OL. By the end of the regular season, all 3 groups improved above my pre-season expectations (and I’m fairly cynical). Lots of good stuff has been said about Sofele, but I’m stunned at how Maynard has improved. I’m a bit worried he can only do it against mediocore-to-bad defences, but early on he had major accuracy issues against similar bad defences which made me want to jump into bathtub w/ toaster.
4) Got a tough OOC roadie @ tOSU next year, but we get USC without Barkley and Furd, UCLA, UDub, and Whoregon at home. Could we hit 10 wins?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
easy on the sunshine with #4 there big guy
there’s a lot of doom and juju to overcome before we get there.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Nov 26, 2011 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
Also, I’m still revelling in the hits that Seabass put on the KOR and Campbell on Assweilly. WOWWY!
I’m excited about the Seabass era, and I think the loss of Holt and Kendricks will in part be mitigated by moving Wilkerson inside (with McCain and Whitesides outside). Will the 2nd ILB be Forbes?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
McClure
Anyone hear anything about Stefan McClure? I don’t like to see our future All-PAC-12 CBs helped off the field clutching their knee…
Someone on BI mentioned that it was a ACL/MCL tear with something something menscius. Probably out for 8-10 mos.
I hope this is false because if true… :(
In other words, Go Bears!
Don't know how true this is but
Don’t know if you guys know but one of our young stud CB’s Mr. McClure had a very bad knee injury this past Friday. He has at least a torn ACL and MCL (possibly meniscus too) and will require major surgery. This puts the timetable for his return to 8-10 months from now at the minimum barring any major meniscus damage which would of course push that timetable farther back.
In other words, Go Bears!
From Bear Talk
–No word yet on the seriousness of freshman cornerback Stefan McClure’s injury on Friday night. Obviously his health is pretty big for this team looking to the future.
Sounds like there’s no “official” news yet, but if true, that really sucks. I really liked what I saw from McClure this year – he looked to be a future shut-down corner. I wish him a speedy recovery.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
:( Poor kid, I hope that’s not true.
"i, for one, welcome our new atomic overlords" - GoldBlooded
by atomsareenough on Nov 27, 2011 10:13 AM PST up reply actions

by 
























































