Cal Football: A Golden Spotlight on the Goal Line Stand Against the USC Trojans
It's a little hard to do a best and worst when there were so many turnovers or near-turnovers to chose from. Not to mention that fake punt which a worst play of the decade candidate in and of itself.
Instead, let's focus on one of the bright spots: our slowly improving defense.
Here's the situation. After Keenan Allen fumbled on our first possession, USC completed a long pass to Marquise Lee to put them 1st and goal. Cal was in Cover 2 and playing pass coverage. Williams was in good position, but Cattouse was late coming over and Barkley made a perfect throw. A score here could be a huge blow to morale and harken back to last year's utter collapse.
USC goes with 21 personnel, 2 backs, 1 TE, 2WR. They have an offset I, and motion their TE creating a strong formation left. Uber-5-Star frosh George Farmer is the tailback. Cal looks to be in a Cover 1 look with a 5 man front, one safety in the box, and one staying slightly deeper.
Barkley pitches to Woods. Their WR(Lee) and TE(Ellison) block down while they pull two linemen. It's a deliberate attempt to take advantage of Cal's youth by attacking the edge covered by true frosh McCain and McClure.
Cal shows good gap discipline and flow towards the ball. Holt, Kendricks, and Owusu close down any cutback lanes. McCain disengages from their WR. McClure comes up in run support and engages their TE.
McClure slips by their TE and cuts off the outside. McCain makes a great burst upfield and tackles Farmer for a loss.
Burning a redshirt for a -4 yard gain? Priceless.
2nd and goal. USC stays with 21 personnel and has a strong look left with their TE and offset I. Cal counters with a Cover 1 look and five man front.
Although it looks like a power set to the left, Barkley looks right to Lee on the slant. Meanwhile, McCain uses an outside move and appears to beat their tackle.
But it's a designed swing pass screen. Their tackle heads downfield while Barkley lobs it to the tailback. Lee stops his route and picks off Kendricks. It's a Cal tradition to be absolutely burned by this play. 'sc has scored countless touchdowns with it over the years.
It looks like Tyler has a free lane to the endzone. Their tackle looks to wipe out Williams and clear the way. This is another clever attempt to use misdirection to attack the edge against our inexperienced OLB and our smallest CB.
But despite giving up 200+ lbs, Williams will not be denied. He slips the tackles block and cuts off the sidelines. This allows Campbell to catch up and drop Tyler for little gain.
3rd and goal. USC goes 11 personnel. 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 back. Cal counters with their nickel look. Holt stays in the middle, Kendricks moves to the outside with Wilkerson on the opposite side. Hill lines up against their slot WR. One safety(Cattouse) shades towards Woods. Campbell shades towards Lee.(off-screen)
Coach Pendergast rolls the dice and calls an all-out blitz. For those of you clamoring for more pressure, feast your eyes on a seven man rush including a corner (Hill), both OLBs (Kendricks, Wilkerson), and Holt on a slight middle dog.
'sc's tailback has to decide whether to block Hill or Holt. He chooses Hill.
Barkley pump fakes trying to set up a hitch and go. Woods pushes off and heads towards the corner. Not only does Williams not fall for the fake, he fights off hands to the face and remains in Woods' hip pocket. Meanwhile, Holt's pressure forces Barkley to throw early.
The throw sails high and wide. This is a combination of great coverage with pressure. More please!
Kiffin decides to be really clever and lines up in a quasi-fake-field goal formation. It might have been trickier had their kicker actually been on the field.
Their center throws a legal but atypical sideways snap to wing TE, Ellison. The snap is low and offline. (I cannot confirm nor deny that the Trojan center hangs out and trains with Galas during the offseason...)
Ellison shows why he was switched from TE to FB by dropping the snap.
Although 'sc has two blockers out in front against two Cal defenders(Kendricks, McClure), Guyton crashes in and recovers the fumbled snap.
Overview: 'sc had a clear plan from the outset to attack the edges of our defense. Coming off a sudden and disappointing turnover, it would have been easy for our guys to get punched in the mouth and give up an early score. Instead, you had our smallest defender(Williams) fight off a lineman, great plays by true frosh (McCain, McClure), and heady plays by veterans. (Campbell, Holt) Although the rest of the game didn't go well, the defense really stepped up here to give us a chance.
Final Thoughts:
1) Considering his rough debut, McClure really bounced back and played a good game. He doesn't look like a true frosh out there. He's more physical than I would have thought and generally plays tight coverage. When he gets his legs under him, I think he's going to be a great Bear.
2) It was great to see Wilkerson and McCain growing up before our eyes. They still make mistakes, but you can see that both of them are starting to get comfortable and are starting to be able to use their athleticism. A number of Barkley's errant throws were due to pressure off the edges. That's a promising sign moving forward.
3) Give credit to Monte Kiffin for a solid defensive game plan. They started off showing a strong anti-run look, and then mixed it up throughout the game. Although they're usually a Cover 3 team, they used a lot of Cover 1 and switched to Cover 2 during passing downs. Like Hydro mentioned, they mixed up Cover 3 and Cover 1 to confuse Maynard with man versus zone coverages. Another thing they did a lot on early downs was line up their linebacker in slot coverage, then send him on a run blitz.
4) Tedford's playcalling was actually rather creative and could have done a nice job countering the Trojan defensive calls without all the execution errors.
5) With another week of shooting ourselves in a foot, I wonder if we're trying to do too many things on offense. We have spread, pro-set, and pistol formations. Conceptually, it's harder for the opposing defense to prepare. But practically speaking, it doesn't matter how many different looks we can present if we can't pull them off. Although Tedford talked about condensing the playbook during fall camp, perhaps he couldn't help himself from tinkering. It sure looks like we're using new plays and formations each week. Perhaps it's time to dial things back and go back to the fundamentals.
6) It's easy to call for the backup QB. Heck, I was pulling for Bridgford to start the second half. But, we don't have the benefit of seeing practice. If Maynard is steady during the week, and then inconsistent during the games, it would make more sense for Tedford to leave him in. Let's hope that the light comes on and the game slows down sooner rather than later.
The way we've lost the last two games has been disturbing to say the least, but there's still plenty of football to be played. Let's regroup and beat the Utes. Go Bears!
104 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post Kod, and that was an awesome series. In a sea of red, I stoud up and shouted “Carroll’s not here anymore Kiffy!”
However, I don’t think we can call the playcalling necessarily creative for this game. This game, like a lot of 14+ losses, feature a healthy dose of the shotgun, which we might as well scream out “WE’RE PASSING!” Additionally, Maynard only threw to Allen in the first quarter, and threw to Jones (3?) and Miller (1) a handful of times total in the first half. No passes to RB’s, FB,s H-backs, or Calvin. Now, maybe the playcall didn’t feature Allen as the #1, and Maynard just made it the #1 option. I believe we only had 45 yards rushing, and we got a nice push on a few runs. Finally, was it my eyes or did we try and run a reverse to Calvin, who I think has had surgery on every limb? It resulted in a fumble…but he’s not exactly a burner to begin with.
During our nice 3.5 game winning streak, I thought the playcalling was more “Old Tedford,” particularly with using the FB in the running game, the H-back (Ladner is it?), DeBo, and hell even Calvin in the passing games.
Let me be clear: the reason we lost was not the playcalling, I just didn’t think it deserved this either:
4) Tedford’s playcalling was actually rather creative and could have done a nice job countering the Trojan defensive calls without all the execution errors.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I can’t decide if you are typing whatever pops into your head with your biases already in place just to get under people’s skin and waste their time correcting you or if you are just clueless. Even if you are trying to spark civil/decent conversation or are interested in hearing what other people say, regardless, it’s hard to take you seriously when you post stuff like this:
a healthy dose of the shotgun, which we might as well scream out "WE’RE PASSING!"
This is a bullshit statement. Check out 5:57 in the 1st quarter and you will Cal running out of the shotgun.
Maynard only threw to Allen in the first quarter
Another complete bullshit statement. Allen wasn’t the only target thrown to in the 1st quarter.
No passes to RB’s, FB,s H-backs, or Calvin.
Some more bullshit but I’ve come to expect that from you. Check out 10:36 in the first quarter and you will note a pass thrown Calvin’s way.
Clearly I’ve upset you, and that’s not my intention. I enjoy your input on this blog but that doesn’t mean I’m going to put up with you being a dick.
I think we can agree on a few general concepts:
- plays out of the shotgun, particularly when we’re trailing, are passes or runs that will likely be less effective. Sure, you can find an example or two of the opposite, but it sure doesn’t feel like we’re running the zone-read all that often.
- Option 1 is Allen and Option 2 is Jones. Few passes were thrown elsewhere. We’re definitely not the “7 different receivers caught passes” type of offense as of late.
- I think the real strength of Tedford’s offense is the WCO, with the QB under center, and finding all WR’s, TE’s, and RB’s. I feel like the play action can really work and it keeps the D from zeroing in on Allen. I like the pistol and shotgun when it’s used well and when we run option plays out of it (including zone-read). It does seem like Maynard’s running less.
To get to what you were saying, I did glance take a quick glance at The Ocho’s play-by-play. I haven’t and won’t review the tape.
Looks like I did miss one pass attempt to Marvin Jones in the 1st quarter, but I think the gist of “we’re not spreading it around” stands strong
3rd and 5 at CAL 45 Zach Maynard pass incomplete to Marvin Jones.
All that being said, I don’t think it was “genius play-calling” but I don’t think it lost the game for us either. It was OK-to-good. Definitely an improvement over Ludwig, and such an improvement should not be understated.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Carp, I think you are a good guy so don’t take this personal, but it’s getting tiring reading your comments that are so factually incorrect lately. Perhaps I’m taking what you say too seriously and literally?
This
a healthy dose of the shotgun, which we might as well scream out “WE’RE PASSING!”is interpreted differently from this:
plays out of the shotgun, particularly when we’re trailing, are passes or runs that will likely be less effective.If that’s what you meant in the first place, then perhaps you should be more clear so people don’t misconstrue your points.
Looks like I did miss one pass attempt to Marvin Jones in the 1st quarter, but I think the gist of "we’re not spreading it around" stands strong.
I did glance take a quick glance at The Ocho’s play-by-play. I haven’t and won’t review the tape.
Let me get this straight. You are going mainly off of a play by play sheet, the box score on ESPN, and memory from a first person perspective taken in close to the sidelines at the game for what happened on plays to form your opinions? Ok. I debunked most of you statements on what you think you saw. Most people could if they watched the first 10 mins of the 1st quarter again. I don’t know anybody that can see everything that happens on a given play – coverages, routes, blocking, and so on – and be able to critique it correctly without watching film. The issue isn’t so much as you wanting to get to the bottom of things and have a better understanding of the heart of the matter. It’s more of you saying things that are inaccurate, harping on these things in the comments section, and expecting people to convince you otherwise. I’ve commented with you in the past and I stopped because once you get going in a certain direction, I’ve found it very hard to convince you otherwise without spending hours on this blog.
- Option 1 is Allen and Option 2 is Jones. Few passes were thrown elsewhere. We’re definitely not the "7 different receivers caught passes" type of offense as of late.
And you know this how? You are generalizing all pass plays with saying Allen is the #1 option all the time and Jones is #2 which is NOT the case. Am I taking you too literally again? How else am I supposed to interpret what you said?
So do you understand coverages? Do you understand designed plays that put the ball in Allen’s hands? Do you understand that Allen gets open a lot even when he is the 2nd or 3rd option or on a scramble drill? Do you understand that there are different reads on each play? Please explain why you think what you said is true and back it up with evidence outside of the box score. Most likely, you can’t, and I’m not saying that to be a condescending dick but I know for a fact that if one breaks down the passing plays, you will see that the questions I raised have the answers and what you said above is not true.
You want 7 receivers to catch passes? Please tell me how many other players were in the game who were eligible receivers on passing plays that Maynard missed, they dropped a pass, or weren’t covered by good defense. Just because the box score doesn’t show 7 guys receiving passes doesn’t necessarily imply that Maynard “isn’t spreading the ball around.”
- I think the real strength of Tedford’s offense is the WCO, with the QB under center, and finding all WR’s, TE’s, and RB’s. I feel like the play action can really work and it keeps the D from zeroing in on Allen. I like the pistol and shotgun when it’s used well and when we run option plays out of it (including zone-read).
Point taken. This is an opinion and I interpreted it like that.
Sure, you can find an example or two of the opposite, but it sure doesn’t feel like we’re running the zone-read all that often.
There’s plenty of times this has been run. Take my word for it.
It does seem like Maynard’s running less.Was he not playing injured against Oregon? There have been plenty of zone reads that happen but he hands the ball off and sometimes he makes the wrong read when he should keep the ball.
Look, I think me frustrating you leads to a worse blogging experience for others. I don’t mean to be ornery.
I don’t think I need to have 100% confirmed/re-confirmed opinions before offering them on this blog. Shoot, in my experience I’ve even offered facts to only to have them sunshine pumped. I also think there are those with Epic Football Knowledge who get extremely pissed when the common man offers something that cuts against the grain so they immediately cut apart their argument rather than thinking about what this common fan is trying to say.
Something may be debunked, but I’m not necessarily sure my point is either being interpreted or comprehended in a the way that I intend. Cal Football, for some reason, does a lot of head-scratching things.
All I’m saying is I’d like to see the ball thrown around a bit more to other offensive weapons.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Carp, if we’ve learned anything in this whole blogging experience, it’s that I have no idea what the hell is going on down on the field 95% of the time.
And if I can offer my opinion after that, then anybody can!
As long as people stay inside the Community Guidelines, then that’s cool.
Blogging: So easy, even Twist can do it!
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
and remember my crazy ass Pac12 expansion fanpost that Larry used as the Official Initial Pac-12 Doctrine: A Complete SBN Review to Make Life Better? I caught some heat from that, especially from UDub and FUCLA fans.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
You are like the Martin Luther of our time. 96 Theses indeed!
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
All I’m saying is I’d like to see the ball thrown around a bit more to other offensive weapons.
Well OK then. Point understood. That was easy!
Since the 3 game losing streak has ensued, there’s been a lot more inaccurate and unsupported stuff thrown around here lately and it’s just not . I don’t have an issue with people stating what they think as long as they support it with facts. Since you’re a fellow Cal fan. I don’t have a huge ego to protect , and am not asshole like Harbaugh, I can admit that I should not have commented to you in the tone I did. I will try to watch my tone in the future but no guarantees.
Do you need a tone babysitting to watch your tone for you while you are out? I’ll do it for 2 popsicles and a bird cage I found behind your dumpster.
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
Still got it!
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
there’s been a lot more inaccurate and unsupported stuff thrown around here lately
Oh no, the on-the-field contagion is spreading!!!!
California Golden Bears: 2nd place is nothing to sneeze at!
by atomsareenough on Oct 19, 2011 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions
the heck is wrong w you carp said nothing that deserves this kind of crap.
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 18, 2011 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Being in science so much, you look at a lot of work very critically. I suppose I do that with Cal football and I, like a majority of football fans, don’t know much more than what we see on the field or on Madden. :) That’s fine.
I’ve tried to stay away from FireTedford crew, and I really feel the best possible result will be for Tedford to find someone who can throw the ball accurately and do other “normal QB things” so that he can resurrect this thing.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
no no I was agreeing w you. punctuated properly:
“the heck is wrong w you!! carp said nothing that deserves this kind of crap.”
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 18, 2011 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, so that super-loud “CRACK” I heard this morning was your head exploding, I guess?
Being an Old Blue means never accepting success.
BULLSHIT!
Number one fan of Justin Bieber being the number one fan of the Dodgers, and not the [2010 World Series Champion] Giants.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 18, 2011 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Im' just utterly bored
and determined to put forth my opinion on everything. :)
FWIW, I agree with many of your points. Just not the tone.
Let me clarify a little, carp.
I’m not saying that the play calling as the football equivalent of Michelango. But when I did the re-watch, I tried to ignore the results and looked instead at the chess match between their defensive coordinator and Tedford. There were some adjustments on our side that ended up getting overshadowed by some serious errors.
For example, ’sc sent a number of run blitzes early, particularly with their edge linebacker crashing hard on our tailback.
Tedford countered with:
1) A WR slip screen that took advantage of the vacated slot coverage.
2) Zone-read that took advantage of the overly aggressive OLB…but failed due to a botched snap. (This was later executed properly for our TD run where Maynard essentially walked untouched into the endzone.)
3) Pass targeting our slot WR. (dropped)
Old Toothwrangler
I really liked that goalline playcall that featured Maynard running. I think that works against UDub.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Oct 18, 2011 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I thought it was 1st down pass to Miller (neat play), 2nd and 3rd down runs by Isi, and the fade attempt to Allen? Or did you mean earlier in the game (in which case I don’t remember). If they did, as you say, then I can see why they didn’t try and run it later in the game!
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Let me be clear: the reason we lost was not the playcalling, I just didn’t think it deserved this either:
I think it’s deserved, the offense has looked very good this year from a playcalling perspective.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
I really liked the play-calling in a lot of the games…especially the pulling sweeps with Isi, and using all our offensive weapons. I think Maynard and Isi are deadly on the option, but I don’t know we’ve only seen that twice this year.
I don’t like the “we’re losing so let’s pass out of the shotgun” play-calling. But maybe we have to do that because Maynard’s uncomfrotable dropping back, or our OL can’t really do that well. Maybe when you’re down 20 at the half you have to abandon the run anyway? I don’t know what the right call is there.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
It was difficult to determine some of the play calling here, because, unfortunately, many basic errors occurred before the play even got started. Fumbles on snaps, fumbles on hand offs.
In the Game of Trolls, you either troll or you die.
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: Read It | Follow It | Like It | Wear It
I’m curious as to how Monte Kiffin put together a “great” game plane against Cal when he as pretty much sucked up until now.
Heh. Yeah, I think it starts with “Cal offense has an ineffective passing attack…Hmmm….Hmmm…Soooo…y’all think we should try to stop the run?”
Even so, I grudgingly thought that the disguised coverages after setting up a heavy dose of very aggressive anti-run schemes and calls was a clever way to fool a QB who has shown issues with making the right reads. It’s an NFL trick – I think it’s the same thing that Fangio used with the 49ers to completely befuddle Josh Freeman and the Bucs last week.
Old Toothwrangler
Haha ya, but did you see that quote from USC’s linebacker Chris Gallipo about Maynard “telegraphing the heck out of his passes”? That makes me not want to give too much credit to Monte for this game.
I’m definitely in negabear mode right now, but I do see light at the end of this dark tunnel over the next 4 games
True. I was trying really hard not to go all dark with this post. I could have done a slow-motion of the fake punt and all the interceptions…but that takes self-loathing to a whole new level.
Although Maynard made it easy for the Trojan LBs, I could see why he might not have been expecting them to be there.
Usually in Tampa 2 coverage, the MLB plays deep and drops. I think that ’sc was lining guys up in the box and then dropping them late. Or, after blitzing repeatedly with their LB lined up on the slot, they faked the blitz and dropped instead.
As I said, only giving grudging credit to Monte Kiffin here. I think it’s pretty clear that more of the issues were self-inflicted.
Old Toothwrangler
FWIW, I think most of the time, like 95%, your analysis is spot on. A few times I disagree with the conclusion but all in all you do an OUTSTANDING job….keep up the good work !!!!
I don’t expect everyone to agree with me 100% of the time – I don’t know any more about the game than the next guy. But, it’s a good starting point for discussion. I’ve learned a lot from when some of the more knowledgeable posters correct me or add some additional insight.
Thanks for the kind words. I really appreciate it!
Old Toothwrangler
I wonder if we’re trying to do too many things on offense. We have spread, pro-set, and pistol formations.
I would say most of the problems on the offense is blocking. Regardless of what is being called, the defense can shift around and use different fronts so the blocking assignments need to be adjusted accordingly.
I definitely agree with you that blocking is an issue. But, is part of that having too many different blocking assignments per formation?
Tedford’s old playbook involved a lot of different line calls from the center. Galas may have a nasty edge to him, but he doesn’t strike me as an Alex Mack-type when it comes to getting guys lined up.
Just speculating here – maybe they’re taking the audible/linecall responsibility away from the players by having everyone look to the sidelines presnap. If so, that might allow for more of a macro-adjustment (we’re blocking with Scheme B instead of A) instead of more specific adjustments. (Tackle takes the DE, RB has responsibility for the blitzing LB, TE is going to release)
Old Toothwrangler
It seems like the majority of bad blocks occur due to technique errors or just getting beat by the defense due to their play or playcall on run plays. It doesn’t appear to me that most of the players have problems identifying their assignments. Occasionally, I’ll see a guy completely block the wrong guy but it’s not too often. Pass blocking (in very simple terms) is more about technique to hold the pocket and pick up pressure. There have been plenty of times where guys have got to Maynard as he was throwing due to guys getting beat. There have been some free runs at him by defenders but not many that I can think of off the top of my head.
Is it fair to say our Oline is over-performing, with respect to last year’s OL? I understand what you’re saying, but it seems like the OL is going as well as it can go.
Perhaps you’re referring to the blocking abilities of the TEs, WRs and RBs?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Well, they seem to be doing better with pass protection but run-blocking still seems a little iffy. They’re having trouble opening holes (they’re getting better though) and sometimes completely whiff on some of their blocks. Not sure about runs to the outside because midterms are pushing memories of those types of out of my brain.
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Oct 18, 2011 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I haven’t decided if the OL is better than last year’s. I’m leaning towards it being a push and even no. In terms of run blocking technique, it seems like that has improved a bit but there are still missed assignments. Snaps are way worse this year. In terms of pass protection, I think Maynard has been able to disguise a bit of OL pass protection issues with his legs and the passing game has changed this year with more quick throws. Overall effort has been much better – I don’t recall seeing many times with them easing up it when down.
What do you think about Brazinski at center and Galas at RG? Is Galas big enough? Brazinski was a highly touted recruit, and I get concerned when you see an on-field weakness (like Galas’ snaps) and you supposedly have a stud recruit waiting in the wings. What do you think about MSG at RT?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I’ve thought about that for a while, too.
Especially next year when Cheadle graduates.
Unfortunately, I remember reading in spring practice that Braz was really struggling with his shotgun snaps. (Doh!)
I’m curious what Cali49a thinks of MSG. Oline evaluation is really a weak spot for me. But in the times I’ve re-watched film on slow motion, I’ve seen a lot of missed blocks by MSG.
Old Toothwrangler
MSG has struggled a lot and in looking at the UW game and early against Oregon, he put us beind the chains a few times with missed blocks on running plays in the red zone. MSG is not a tackle imo, he’s a natural guard and is better pulling and nailing people. Maybe he needs to get more reps at Tackle to get better but I’ll also note that he has had a lot of injuries at Cal. He’s also had alot of penalities called against him. Maybe even the most on the OL but I’m not sure on that one.
I hated on Cheadle the past 2 years as you probably noted but he’s shown a huge improvement from last year imo so I’m more than happy to eat crow.
Yep. MSG is playing out of position and has looked that way most of the year. This is the consequence of our total dearth of offensive tackle talent. You’d prefer him to play guard (and you hope he can move back inside when Cheadle graduates), but right now the situation dictates he play on the outside.
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 18, 2011 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Great analysis!
….great analysis…keep them coming. I agree that McClure is a player. We have a excellent DL, so yes, people are attacking the edges of the Cal defense, where we seem a little slower than past years.
Second down play
That had a weird camera angle and it was hard to see, but I thought that was a sure TD on a screen pass to the right.
I remember being really surprised that we actually stopped him.
Don't know where else to ask this
Going up to the game, and meeting friends, hopefully for a tailgate. What is the tailgating like at AT&T? How early do I have to get there. Any information would be helpful.
Thanks.
we tailgated in the lot outside of Pier 43, just south of the ballpark. it was fine. plenty of bars too.
by ginfizzbear on Oct 18, 2011 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
On the 2nd down play
I would just like to point out how Barkley does a great job selling the slant by staring down the WR. Doing this gets the defense to bite on the slant. The offense is hoping, specifically, that the playside safety, and especially that playside cornerback bite on the slant. If they bite, they’ll come towards the middle of the field, and away from that RB on the swing pass. It’s a very intelligently designed play that was executed well, but not as well as Cal’s defense.
Great post, Kodiak.
edited for clarity
I would just like to point out how Barkley does a great job selling the slant by staring down the WR. Doing this gets the defense to bite on the slant. The offense is hoping, specifically, that the playside safety (Campbell), and especially that playside cornerback (Williams) bite on the slant. If they bite, they’ll come towards the middle of the field, and away from that RB on the swing pass (who is running towards the outside of the field). It’s a very intelligently designed play that was executed well, but not as well as Cal’s defense.
by HydroTech on Oct 18, 2011 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Thanks for the added insight, Hydro. When I saw the play unfold, I thought for sure it would be a TD.
Does the fact that Williams stayed home mean that we were playing zone instead of man on the outside? If so, then this is a switch-up by Clancy – he’s been leaving the CBs manned up a lot when we go with Cover 1. Either way, great read and play by Williams/Campbell.
Old Toothwrangler
Zone or Man
It’s hard for me to tell because (1) I’m not looking at the video itself; and (2) I only count 10 Cal defenders in the picture. But it appears like it might have been zone.
Well, Maynard should adopt that too. By now, everyone (other Pac-12 teams and their DC) should know Maynard’s tendencies to stare down at his targets. Maynard should try to take advantage of that by first looking at his non-target receivers before turning his head to his intended receiver. That would fool a defense.
You hit the nail on its head!
Maybe that’s what Tedford and Co. have been trying to do these past few games! Set up what looks like a really bad tendency then completely reverse on it for the rest of our games. It’s brilliant!
by FromCtoShining(Blue)C on Oct 18, 2011 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Another intelligent aspect of the play design was the fact that USC was showing a run formation to their left — the opposite side of the field to which they were running the RB swing. By showing a run formation to their left, this causes the defense to flow to the offense’s left immediately after the snap. You can see the Cal defenders to USC’s left doing this in the post-snap picture. This is taking those defenders away from the ball which is going to the offense’s right.
So in total, both the formation of the play, and the fake slant, both are designed to draw defenders away from the RB swing. Truly an intelligently designed play.
I'm excited for our frosh on defense
McClure, McCain and Wilkerson especially. Next year is going to be special even though we lose Holt and Kendricks. And Williams is only a RS Soph so he has at least one more year left (more like two TBH). And Anthony has improved from last year (at least until Oregon decided to take pot shots).
My only concerns is on the DL and safety spots. I’ve seen Jalil and Moose play a bit but not enough to make judgements. But who are our DE (I believe Jalil and Moose are NT?)? I haven’t seen much of Lee, Walls/Sebastian, other frosh safeties to know much either.
In other words, Go Bears!
Jalil has been playing DE. Moose could be either DT or DE. I believe Payne/Tipoti will be back as seniors, and we’ll have Moala as a true soph as our DTs.
At DE, we have Coleman, Jalil, Gabe King, Scarlett. Pretty good young talent there.
McCain has an outside spot locked up. We might move Wilkerson back inside, and then promote Whiteside to OLB. Not sure who the other ILB will be. Maybe Forbes/Mullins/Fanua.
We’re set at corner with McClure/Anthony/Williams. Safety is probably Coley and Sebastian…although Hill would be in the mix at nickel and safety due to his experience. This is assuming no uber recruits come in and demand early playing time. (whistles innocently)
Old Toothwrangler
My bad. Yeah, I like that guy a lot. Also Puka Lopa. Jason Gibson might be worth a look at OLB, too.
There are plenty of guys who have lots of potential on D.
Old Toothwrangler
Todd Barr is going to be special and his folks are solid Cal fans…wonder what is up with Scarlett?..Didn’t he burn his blue shirt?…that guy has tons of potential also.
I think he might still be blue shirting. I thought I remembered him seeing him play, but he’s not listed in any of the game participation logs.
Old Toothwrangler
Jalil has been playing DE. Moose could be either DT or DE.
I thought Moose = Mustapha Jalil. I am seriously confused right now.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Thanks for this post - cheered me up
There is lots to complain about, and justifiably so, but there are also many bright spots on defense (and gasp, on offense), so let’s try to enjoy those. I really do have my expectations at 6-6, so I have to plan to have fun this season despite that.
I think the playcalling has moved from a D+ last season to a B this season. Bad execution makes playcalling look much worse.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Oct 18, 2011 11:02 AM PDT reply actions
Great breakdown
Although on one point I wonder..
If Maynard is steady during the week, and then inconsistent during the games, it would make more sense for Tedford to leave him in.
Does it?
I’m not calling for Maynard to necessarily be replaced as started but we have seen him play 6 games now and, despite how he looks during the week, we have a decent sense of how he performs on Saturdays (+ Thursdays). Obviously coaches must have an even better idea or the similarities/differences between practices and game days.
I think Maynard can improve but I’m also curious to see Bridgford play some more as I think he looked decent at Oregon.
I know I’m reaching here. But seeing what we’ve seen in the past two games, wouldn’t you pull him if that’s how he looked all the time?
All I can speculate is that maybe he’s different guy in practice. More comfortable, more confident, and more consistent. Tedford and the other coaches are hoping to finally see “that guy” in games, and that’s why they keep giving him more snaps. That would coincide with Tedford’s post-game comments about how Maynard still needs to adjust to the speed of the game.
No real answers…at least no good ones. If Maynard hasn’t been outperforming Bridgford in practice, then the only other possibility that comes to mind is that the coaches are off on their evaluations. I’m a little suspicious, but looking back historically, Tedford has generally made the right call on his starting QB. I’m just hoping this doesn’t go Ayoob on us. Steve Levy has left the building.
Old Toothwrangler
I’m not saying he looks like that all the time. I’m guessing he looks better at practice.
What I am saying though is that it’s possibly that Maynard just gets game-time jitters. He can’t control his emotions, tries to hard, forces balls and takes what could be a bad play (sack) and makes it worse (interception). Perhaps the great symbol of this is his head-wrenching throws during the Oregon game.
Meanwhile, Bridgford looks poised in the pocket. Yes, he had a lot less pressure because it was garbage time and for various other reasons. But I think, at least from a composure perspective, Bridgford looks better than Maynard. He’s really solid on his short passes and decent on his midrange/long balls.
The general point is that inconsistency between practice/game play is also a factor that should be weighed in when it comes to deciding who plays games. Sure, Maynard may outperform Bridg in practice but it’s moot if he can’t outperform him in games.
With that said, I’m well aware of how everyone called for Mansion and how that turned out.
Solid points.
I did like what I saw from Bridgford. But, there’s a big difference between garbage time (no pressure) minutes and managing/running the game when it’s still a contest.
Like I said, I would have started Bridgford in the 2nd half. It’ll be interesting to see how long Tedford goes with Maynard if he continues to struggle. Especially because the next few games should be winnable with competent QB play.
Old Toothwrangler
...how long Tedford goes with Maynard...
One major flaw Tedford has is his loyalty to his QB’s. Wait, is it loyalty or stubbornness? I’m not sure, but what ever it is I think it is hurting the team and the development of our younger QBs.
Maynard has eligibility for ‘11 & ’12. Maynard is a JR, plus there is Boehm (Frosh who is probably redshirting), Bridgford (RS Soph), & Hinder (RS Fr). Next year we’ll add Zach Kline too. That’s alot of highly ranked QB talent. I just hope Teddy and his “Passing Crew” spend the time needed to groom these young kids into top notch Pac12 QBs.
I pre-game @ Barclays Pub
by nor_cal_scott on Oct 18, 2011 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions
One major flaw Tedford has is his loyalty to his QB’s
Oh come on! Did people forget 2008 already!? Everyone was dissing him for switching between Riley and Longshore. They said he wasn’t loyal enough!
And last year after everyone called for Mansion to play… well we saw that there was a reason why Riley was starting.
In other words, Go Bears!
One thing, as we nit pick over minor and major things, is to look at this game compared to last year’s. A HUGE improvement by the defense compared to last year’s USC showing, and a huge improvement from the passing defense from the 2011 Colorado game.
What did we do differently? Could Anthony’s unfortunate injury (and downstream effects like more safety help) make the McClure-era defense better?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I was curious, too. There were too many plays to make a post on it.
Believe it or not, it looked to me like the overly simplistic answer is: “we played better and they didn’t play as well.”
Clancy still mixed things up between Cover 1 and 2, sending pressure and dropping guys. It looks like we were really aware of keeping at least one safety in Wood’s vicinity. But honestly, our corners played some good ball.
I couldn’t see big differences schematically except that our players had fewer breakdowns and Barkley wasn’t out-of-his-mind en fuego. Personnel-wise, the young guys are starting to make Clancy’s schemes work. It helps a lot when Williams/McClure can provide solid coverage, or when McCain/Wilkerson can both pressure the QB while still handling their run/coverage assignments.
I thought that Anthony was our best run-support corner, but he’s just a touch slower compared to Williams and McClure. If McClure can continue to play well, it might be in our favor to start McClure/Williams on the outside and move Anthony to the slot where he can also help play the run. I’m not sure if it’ll result in more safety help. Our safety play is more hit/miss. But, our defense might give up fewer big plays if we’re keeping our safeties back and letting the front 7 control the run.
Old Toothwrangler
Pendergast
You know I was slightly upset at Gregory leaving and I was down on Pendergast earlier this year (after the Colorado and UW games) but I’m actually starting to like him. The players have actually improved under him (and his assistant coaches of course).
In other words, Go Bears!
I was worried last year with the stanfurd and USC games that NFL-caliber QB’s would make Cal’s defense look like his Arizona Cardinals defenses that Pendergast coached…I’m quite impressed with him…but when they fail they fail big time.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark














































































