UW 92, Cal 71: The Inevitable Rout
It says something about the talent and inherent advantages that Washington held over Cal that the general consensus was that the Bears didn't play that badly last night - at least initially. For thirteen minutes Cal played even with the Huskies, and then UW took over with a flurry of 3 point attempts, some wide open, others contested. The game got ugly (uglier?) in the second half as Washington continued to shoot the nets off and the Bears stopped making the plays that were keeping things close in the first half. The result was a 21 point loss that could have been much worse if UW had decided to keep their foot on the gas.
I can't speak for everybody, but I think most Cal fans felt this one coming. The Bears had played over their heads for three games and played an exhausting overtime game on Thursday. Washington played well below their ability and lost their first conference game to Stanford. A correction seemed inevitable. So perhaps it's just as well that the correction involved zero drama and heartburn. It's always easier to accept defeat when an obviously talented opponent plays to the near peak of their ability. Every mistake Cal made, Washington took advantage of. Every forward that wasn't boxed out got an offensive rebound. Every missed defensive rotation led to an easy basket. Every screen that wasn't fought through ended in a 3 pointer rattling home.
I mean that much less as an indictment of Cal's play and more to credit Washington. Most college players (particularly inexperienced ones) will make mistakes. Good teams playing well take advantage. Washington did that and more, to the tune of a rather outrageous 62.3 eFG% and 20 assists. Isaiah Thomas's play made us all pine for Jerome Randle, and Justin Holiday and Matthew Bryan-Amaning had essentially whatever they wanted down low. It was a reminder, after the high of Thursday's win, of how far this collection of players still has to come. But I did see enough flashes to remain steadfastly optimistic.
If I remember nothing else from this game, I'll remember Allen Crabbe's reverse scoop layup, when he blew by his defender off the dribble, ducked under a charging Bryan-Amaning, flew past the basket and deftly kissed the ball off the glass for a spectacular, acrobatic basket. For the majority of the year Crabbe has proven to be an above average shooter who can find baskets within the flow of the offense, but he hadn't shown that type of explosiveness much. It's a reminder that he's still just scratching the surface of what he can do on the basketball court.
Cal's other freshmen showed flashes as well. Richard Solomon had the chance to go one-on-one with Washington's seemingly endless supply of long, athletic big men and acquitted himself quite well in 20 minutes of work - going 5-5 from the field, drawing fouls, blocking shots and even collecting 3 assists. He showed an exciting aggression and confidence in the face of high level opposition.
Even Emerson Murray showed some flashes with a beautiful and-1 basket, an athletic looking near put-back and a few nice defensive plays against Thomas. He also badly missed two 3 pointers and was, like every other Bear, victimized at times on defense. Still, he's made obvious progress from earlier in the season and the more playing time the better for 2012 and beyond.
Unfortunately, the less said about the performances of everybody else not named Harper Kamp the better. Everybody just seemed a little off, which probably shouldn't be surprising since half the team logged 40+ minutes and then had to come back to play one of the fastest teams in the nation. We'll put this game behind us and look ahead to a trip to L.A. that will finish Cal's exceedingly difficult early Pac-10 schedule. If the Bears manage to steal a game against suddenly reeling USC or the mercurial Bruins then I think most Cal fans will have to consider the first seven games of the conference schedule an unqualified success.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice writeup, Nick. Sorry you drew the short straw on this one.
This game reminded me of playing Arizona led by Damon Stoudamire (right before he went pro and won co-rookie of the year honors) when we were starting frosh Anwar McQueen, Randy Duck, and Yogi Stewart. We just got plain lit up by a player who was in the zone and on the top of his game.
Thomas was like that last night. When you throw in the fact that Gant and Holliday were taking and making deep 3’s early in the shot clock…well…um….
Even though MSF had told a reporter that he was feeling close to 100%, he sure didn’t look like it.
This was a good splash of cold water for our team. Like you said, many of the guys looked a little off – like they were really bothered by having guys up in their face all night. We won’t face anyone with the same combination of athleticism/length/experience, but we’d better be able to play together if we want to avoid future beat-downs in conference play.
Old Toothwrangler
Nice write up Nick, I have to agree I felt this one coming (although I hoped I was wrong).
What was Harper’s final stat line for the game? He constantly impresses me as one of the most fundamentally sound players in the Pac-10.
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
Yikes, I thought that was Harper’s worst game as a Bear, he was driving me crazy all night. The missed layups, odd shot selection, the turnovers, it was really frustrating. Not that if he played up to his usual form we would have won, but still, he usually plays much better.
Am I known as Cugel the Clever for nothing?
Harper did okay early, but was definitely pressing later. He was trying to make things happen. Not his game.
Old Toothwrangler
Maybe I was just thinking about early in the game, my concentration most certainly trailed off after we got down 15+ pts in the second half…
"Remember the Maine! TO HELL WITH STANFORD!"
by CruzinBears on Jan 17, 2011 11:02 AM PST up reply actions
Looking to the future
You are right, this game made me pine for J-Randle. Which makes me think about our recruiting and whether we have someone coming in who could play the point more like we saw from IThomas last night. Not to diss on Smith (he’s performing above my expectations so far this year) but having someone like Randle or Thomas makes all the difference.
Anyone have encouraging names for me to make me feel better? Who’s the guy from Minnesota and is he the answer?
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
Justin Cobbs is the PG transfer from Minnesota. He was highly regarded out of HS. From all accounts, he’s the best PG on the team right now. Apparently, he often dominates practice.
We’re going to take our lumps this year, but next year could be really interesting.
PG – Cobbs
SG – Jorge (Sr)
SF – Crabbe
PF – Kamp (Sr)
C – Solomon
Backup PG – Smith
Backup wings – Murray/Rossi
Backup PF/C – Bak Bak + Kravish
Old Toothwrangler
Justin Cobbs is his name, but I haven’t seen him play any to offer much insight. He didn’t get a ton of playing time at Minnesota, so you can’t get much from his stats (10 min/game, 2.1 points, 1.3 assists). Monty has certainly spoken very highly of his practice performances, for whatever that’s worth.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Farudo had some insight as well
There are times in practice, according to coach Mike Montgomery, when Cobbs takes over.
"He can dominate sometimes," Montgomery said. "He’s pretty good. He’s hard to guard. He’s very strong. But of course he’s not playing, so it’s hard for him to be motivated every day.
…
Asked to describe Cobbs’ point guard style, Montgomery said, "He can distribute, but he can also score. He can get where he wants to get. For a while today, because his team was turning the ball over, he said, `I’m going to make plays.’ And he’s hard to guard."He can cause lots of problems."
Aside from the obvious....
…..bad decisions, missed open shots, etc, I was still impressed that every once in a while some truly beautiful passing resulting in an easy or impressive basket (and completely flummoxing the Huskies) would occur. Despite the result the quality of play by this team was still light years ahead of the Notre Dame game.



























































