Golden Spotlight: The Colorado Buffaloes
Cal fans, don't write the Colorado game off as a sure thing yet. Because based on their first victory, the Buffs look pretty good.
Colorado vs Colorado State 2010 (via buffvision)
Yeah, you'll say it's Colorado State. But we're not in any position to talk about easy victories.
Last season: 3-9.
Glass half-empty review: Offensive offense. One of the most anemic passing attacks in the country, as head coach Dan Hawkins's son Cody and current starter Tyler Hansen combined for 5.7 yards per attempt (108th in the nation), 52.9% completion percentage (107th in the nation) and about a 106 passer rating (111th in the nation). And arguably the running game was worse--113th in rushing yards per game, 116th in rushing yards per carry. Tailback Rodney Stewart only managed 73 yards a game, his backups combining for only around 30.
Glass half-full review: People expecting the Bears to blow out Colorado best be wary. Dan Hawkins teams get outcoached often, but they rarely get blown out by their opponents. Last year, they lost the majority of their games by two scores or less. They dropped their final three games by seven, three and eight points, all to bowl-eligible teams (including almost-Big-12-champion-by-just-a-second Nebraska). They showed signs of life in Austin, holding a 14-3 lead two minutes before halftime and holding the Longhorns offense to only 17 points (the other 21 came from a pick-six, a punt block, and a punt return).
So if you're expecting Cal to cover that 7.5 point line with relative ease (which apparently many of you are, since the line's jumped to 9.5), you've been warned.
2010 Season Up To This Point: Beat Colorado State 24-3.
How much you should draw from this result: Colorado lost to Colorado State last year. Colorado had won 23 of the past 30 meetings. It's hard not to say Colorado wasn't amply motivated to take this rivalry game back.
Colorado State is also on a ten game losing streak dating back to last year, so you can't really tell whether the Buffalo shut-down of the Rams is that impressive. But it's safe to say Colorado's own is probably the best of the two 3-9 Colorado teams.
Colorado Run Offense
Rodney Stewart looks like mini Jahvid Best. He's a speedster, he breaks from side to side, he makes things happen in the open field. But I call him mini-Jahvid because he's too small to be anything more than a spotting scatback. Standing at only 5'6 (5'6!!!), Stewart goes down pretty quickly at first contact and will probably get bottled up by a physical front that keeps the holes tight.
To really get moving, Stewart's going to need help from his line to get him going, and they looked pretty weak against the Rams. Colorado State played Colorado straight up (seven men in the box), and the Buffs only managed to generate 3.3 yards per carry, Stewart with 67 yards total. It was a pretty timid effort.
It's surprising, because Colorado's linemen are big--each one weighing around 300 pounds. But it seems they struggle with their girth to get downfield and block for Stewart, who always seems to get piled on earlier than he should. If Colorado wants to get their offense moving this weekend, they're going to need more from the ground to get into the end zone.
Colorado Pass Offense
Hansen won the starting spot midway through last season after gaining the experience needed to run Hawkins's offense (no soccer dad mentality here!). He is definitely more athletic and more mobile, showing his ability to run on more than one play. He spread out the Rams with wide receiver screens (sound familiar?) before resorting to simple receiving routes, like crossing or stop routes that went away from the defense. He did make a bad interception, but he threw for two scores (relatively easy scores) and ran for another one.
To get to Hansen, Cal's pass rushing defensive line will have to get through their big offensive line, primarily left tackle Nate Solder, who will do his best to shut down Cameron Jordan and the various defensive ends in the Golden Bear rotation. Solder had an excellent game against CSU, according to DavidAGerhardt of Ralphie Report.
Nate Solder is good both in pass protection, and in-line blocking and pulling. He's becoming the total package. I'm interested to see how well he anchors against bigger and stronger Defensive Ends, but I think his footwork and hand placement is catching up to his athletic ability. We'll know for sure after the Cal game, and then again after the Georgia game. But damn is he agile out in open space. There were a couple of adjustments he made while pulling that were SPECTACULAR. Holy cow. He wasn't perfect, but he's getting there.
Solder's performance against Cal's defensive ends could go a long way to securing his pro credentials. He's already getting looks as a first-rounder.
It's the rest of the offensive line that's a major concern in making sure their quarterback stays on his feet. One thing that Ralphie Report mentioned is the constant rotation at left guard and center due to their inconsistencies in pass protection.
Both Adkins and Keenan Stevens had some issues out there. Stevens had some mis-calls in protection and he got thrown around a bit by the Rams DTs. As did Adkins. Adkins was the culprit on the 2nd half sack of Hansen. The DE twisted around the DT and as Adkins tried to shift and pick him up, he fell down, giving the DE a clear shot at Hansen. Ryan Miller got back there and tried to help, but it was too late by then.
If Hansen gets the protection he need, he has a much, much improved receiving corps thanks to NCAA transfers. Most people who have followed the Buffaloes are probably familiar with Scotty McKnight. He's on the Biletnikoff Watch List, and for good reason.
A former walk on who will leave CU with most of the receiving records. He has become a legitimate WR, not just a possession type guy either. He has been given that title because he has generally been double-covered since he was our only receiving threat for much of his career, but he will get downfield this year. He is also a legitimate NFL prospect. Maybe not a high draft choice, but he is every bit as technically sound, intelligent and dedicated as guys like Wes Welker. He will probably lead the team in receptions for a fourth straight year, and he will be a security blanket for his QB.
This year though, McKnight is not the sole weapon. Thanks to transfers Toney Clemons (junior from Michigan), Travon Patterson (senior from USC), Paul Richardson (former UCLA commit), Colorado can spread the field more and give weapons for the young quarterback to work with and grow with during the season. Clemons is probably the most impressive of the bunch, as RR has gone on record as saying he will lead the team in receiving yards. Kyle Cefalo is a good change-of-pace guy who can go brutish and shed tackles when necessary.
If the Bears have their usual success in plugging up the run, Cal could be in their nickel formation early and often trying to defend these multiple options. There's a lot more skill and an athletic look to this lineup that wasn't there in year's past.
Colorado Run Defense
This offseason, I highlighted Colorado's secondary as the strength of their team. Perhaps I should have looked at their front seven, which dominated the Rams. I don't care what team you are, giving up under 2 yards per rushing carry is impressive, even if you know Steve Fairchild will run the ball on 1st down no matter what the score.
All four starters from the defensive line return, but none of them jump out at you. But they took care of the Rams with great instincts and ability to close up running lanes easily, getting into the backfield and gobbling up Rodney Carter. Shane Vereen will have his work cut out for him if he gets that kind of protection.
The linebacking corps has no clear leader, but sophomore Jon Major might be the best guy out of all of them.
He's starting to look like the guy we all thought he would be when we signed one of the top LBs in the country and the best player in the state. He is recovering nicely from the nasty knee injury, and looks to be as fast as he was before, if not even a little faster. He can run and hit and he is really instinctive. He still has some technique stuff to work on, like shedding blocks and he could stand to be better at tracking guys in coverage, but I am being pretty nitpicky with him. He's awesome. This year he should be good, and he could be great the year after that. He should be one of the next noteworthy CU LBs that Cabral has pumped out. He seems to have a starting position pretty well locked up, but they definitely will do some rotating with guys to keep them fresh. Like I said, he could stand to improve in coverage a bit, and they guy behind him is a former safety.
Colorado Passing Defense
For those waiting for Kevin Riley to get tested, this is the first big one. The two cornerbacks form one of the strongest tandems he'll face all season long, both with genuine professional talent.
- Jalil Brown, Sr: They've been working hard on creating turnovers, so I fully expect Brown to get his hands on plenty of passes this season. I wouldn't be surprised to see him be among the Big 12 leaders in picks at least through the pre-season, if not at the end of the year as well. He's one of the strongest DBs we have, and isn't afraid to come up to make a tackle. Has very good size and speed, and should be even better in coverage this season. He looked better in fall camp than he did at any point last year.
- Jimmy Smith, Sr: He is finally doing what he needs to do to become great. He is dedicated, intelligent and he finally knows exactly what he's doing out there ... He is the complete package. He's tall, has long arms, is both fast and quick, is smart, knows how to use the sideline like an extra defender and can hit. There isn't really much he can't do.
Smith had two picks, ten pass breakups and seventy tackles last year; Brown two picks, fifteen pass breakups and sixty-six tackles. They combined for another seven tackles and a pick in the season opener and kind of look like the 2008 combo of Syd'Quan Thompson and Darian Hagan.
The pass defense did force three interceptions last week on quarterback Peter Thomas. But that was a redshirt freshman Colorado State was throwing out there, and most of those were rookie throws. So a lot of the pass defense could depend on the front seven's ability to get pressure. Colorado did go to a four defensive end front on third downs to try and get more athleticism and get past the linemen), with marginal success. Major can also go back and cover tight ends pretty well, which would lead to some interesting matchup issues against Cal's two tight end sets.
One note: Parker Orms, the hard hitting safety who would've really solidified this unit's foundation, is out for the year with a torn ACL. That's a tough loss for the Buffs, but Travis Sandersfield came in and played very well in his place, even snaring an interception. Don't expect the Buffaloes to be easy to pass on by any measure, and don't be shocked if Kevin Riley has a tough Saturday. This game could come down to which defense blinks the most, because both units will probably make the offenses work hard for their points.
Colorado Special Teams
Their senior kicker Arik Goodman does not inspire confidence. In Boulder, he finally put it together last season, nailing 7 of 9 field goals. Away from the silver state though, he's a headcase. In his Buffalo career, he's 9 of 20, 45% in road games. Last season alone, he nailed a mere 3 of 9. You could expect a lot of 4th and short situations on Cal's side of the field where Hawkins thinks twice about sending Goodman out onto the field. His kickoffs away from Boulder also don't provide much promise, decreasing by an average of six yards on the road compared to home games.
Ralphie Report detailed him quite well.
Goodman has shown us time and again that he can't deal with the pressure of game-day. He always looks good in practice, but then his technique starts to falter during games, and he lets misses affect him way too much. He starts to pick up his head before he's kicked the ball, twisting his body and throwing off his accuracy. You need to keep your head down and watch where the ball WAS, not where it's going. You do that pre-snap. He may just be too high-strung to be a successful college kicker.
Yikes. And we thought we had kicking woes.
Freshman punter Zach Grossnickle is a good upgrade over the worst punting unit in the Big 12 last season, improving the average punt a good three yards from about 38.07 yards (awful) to 41.43 yards (average) in the season opener.
However, the punt return game should be much improved. After finishing 117th the year before in punt return yardage (a meager 3.33 yards averaged per return), the talented Patterson has taken over responsibilities, and it showed with 11.5 yards per punt return, including the highlight in the video above at 5:44 where he juked out a few Rams.
Conclusions
So even if the Buffaloes went 3-9 last season, don't go sleeping on them on Saturday. There's a lot of new talent (both from within and without) that's injected Colorado with plenty of ability, ability that could definitely spring an upset in Memorial.
And if you do sleep on this and think Ralphie's Boys are ripe to be railroaded? Well, I'll be shaking my head when you come crying later this weekend and spew on about how we didn't do our job right. Just remember that the other team plays football too.
(Thanks to norcalnick and Kodiak for their help with compiling this, and of course Ralphie Report for their invaluable posts on Colorado football)
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Buffs fan boards seem to indicate a growing confidence among them about grabbing a win this Saturday. A lot of that comes from some optimism after the first game, but I think there is also a fair amount of disregard (or at least low regard) for our Bears by their fans.
In any case, they’re not only feeling good about the game, but believe there will be upwards of 10K + Buffs fans in Memorial.
My feeling is that Cal is just a bit better in all facets – from coaching to talent to execution to fans – and that if our guys play the way they can covering the spread won’t be a problem. And all that confidence makes me way too nervous. Like you said, that other team plays football, too.
Oh go
Careful, man. There's a beverage here!
True on some points
I think we have a growing a confidence, but I wouldn’t say that long time Buff followers (like me) think we can win this game. Our road record is dreadful. Yes, we have some more experience and more weapons, but we will see how far that takes us on the road.
Coaching is going to kill us in the end. We are ready to move on from the Hawkins era. I have met coach on numerous occasions and his rhetoric gets old. He should have never played Cody do much. I like Cody. Nice guy. Extremely hard worker. Not a Big 12 QB though. Hansen is going to get us to a bowl this year at 7-5, but that’s about it.
We are really looking forward to seeing a PAC 10 opponent prior to our arrival hopefully next year.
Can’t wait for the game.
no, they suck
we will crush them and their ten (sorry, not thousand) fans there. Is their coach’s daughter knocked up by the QB yet?
Classy, very classy
I thought we leaving fans like this in Lincoln. I am one of the 10 (10,000) who have traveled to watch the game. I think the current Buff team is underestimated by this review, I hope they show up Saturday. GO Buffs!!!!!!
Well hopefully your team doesn't overlook us
Any team can win at any time. I can list examples over the last few years (some of them ours) where seemingly easy wins, turn into nightmares.
Pretty good Bill McCartney reference though. I think he was the coach that led us to a National Championship and coached our only Heisman Trophy winner. It was so long ago……haha
We can't overlook anybody
After what happened last season, I’d be surprised if this year’s Cal team overlooked anyone.
Yes, I am an Old Blue. Now get off my lawn.
Oh, don’t worry. I’m sure your team has our full attention.
I think most serious Cal fans are very concerned about this game. We still don’t know enough about our team to know whether the defense (particularly pass defense) has improved or whether our o-line and QB have taken the next step.
Old Toothwrangler
If Cody Hawkins were still their starting QB, that would be a very, very offensive statement.
by atomsareenough on Sep 9, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
They look pretty decent on tape, but after looking a bit more closely I think (oh i hope) that colorado st. is really really bad.
The only thing that somewhat worries me is their qb’s mobility. He seems to be pretty aware in the pocket and can scramble pretty well. We’ve had trouble containing those kind of qb’s lately in the past few seasons. Hope we can punish him and make make him think about running. Big test for our LB’s this weekend.
Go Bears!
Meh
With all due respect, Juju…
Judging solely from the video, they look decent.
Offense is ok, made self-induced play killers.
Their D is the only thing that brought up red flags. We’ll see, we just won’t be looking past these guys when they come.
no cal bear? no care
As a Cal fan, I immediately assume we’ll lose until the clock hits 0:00 and we have yet to lose.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Sep 9, 2010 9:17 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Appreciate the detailed write-up.
Looks like they have some talent, but it just hasn’t gelled together. Hopefully that’s on the coaching, which won’t change between now and this weekend.
We hear this song and dance from opposing fans who come into our stadium every year. ‘oh, you are underestimating us…..just wait till Saturday….anyone can win……Cal is not that good….blah blah blah.’ I mean, we even heard stuff like that from the Davis fans (although to a much much lesser extent). Then after we beat their brains in, they give us no credit for the win, and just complain about how bad their team sucks. It happens EVERY SINGLE YEAR, without fail. I cannot remember the last close OOC home game we’ve even had. If your name isn’t USC or Oregon State, the chances of you coming into Memorial and winning are slim and none (and that’s even when we have crappy teams).
I’m not trying to make Cal out to be the greatest football team that ever played the game. We have serious issues on the road (both OOC and in conference), and we tend to melt down after Halloween. HOWEVER, if you’re going to play us at home, in September, good luck.
Someone should look into how many times we have “covered” at home against an OOC opponent. I bet the number is very very high.
Your optimism and confidence are admirable, and speak to youthful exuberance and a severly limited experience with Cal football.
Our recent history does point to a favorable outcome for us this Saturday. As you mentioned, OOC opponents don’t seem to have much success in Memorial. But while Buff fans may be optimistic about their chances, I haven’t read nor heard any of them talking the sort of trash you seem to be reacting to. The Colorado folks have been pretty consistent in recognizing that this will be a tough game. Sure, they’re biased toward their team and some of them may be basing their expectations on the Cal performances of last year, but there isn’t any disrespect. It would be nice if our fans show the same attitude.
And the recent dominance at Memorial has coincided with the arrival of some guy named Jeff Tedford. Before that even scrub teams could come in there at any time and kick our sorry butts.
Careful, man. There's a beverage here!
whoa there. I’ve been following Cal since the Troy Taylor days, grant it, not as long as some, but longer then a lot of people here. Obviously, I was referring to the Tedford era concerning our OOC home dominance (since that would be the only RELEVANT stat to cite – I thought that would be obvious, but guess not). so yeah, I’ll say it again, Tedford has been dominant in home OOC games. No data or facts can refute that. So I don’t think I’m being “youthfully exuberant” Lets just say this, the odds are greatly, greatly in our favor for winning on Saturday. and I don’t understand all the hand-wringing about this game…I guess that’s what being a Cal fan for so many years does to you.
Also, check out the boards over at netbuffs and allbuffs if you want some arrogance coming from a team that are 10.5 underdogs. Look, when we went to Tennessee, there is no way I was going to talk shit before that game. And we were favored. I’m just saying, if Cal was a 10 point underdog, I’d keep my mouth completely shut till after the game. And I think most Cal fans would do the same.
Look, I’m all for respecting the opposing team and crap like that….when they freaking deserve it. I respected Tennessee, I respected Michigan State, Minnesota, even Maryland last year since they beat our ass. But I’m not going to respect a 3-9 football team till they actually prove it on the field. If they end up beating us, I’ll congratulate and respect them then. But you gotta earn respect first.
The line opened at 4. The bettors pushed it to 9.5. Might be tough to cover. I trust vegas more than the betting public.
by TheOfficialSunshinePumper on Sep 9, 2010 11:09 AM PDT reply actions
I’m not a gambler nor a Vegas watcher, but when the opening line is set, isn’t that more a prediction of how the betting public will react rather than a prediction of the game itself? Thus, rather than interpret this big move in the line as evidence that the Vegas experts are less optimistic about the Bears’ chances than is the betting public, isn’t the correct interpretation that the Vegas experts screwed up and underestimated how confident in the Bears the betting public would be?
Who knows? Maybe the Vegas experts think Cal’s going to win by 20, too, but they set the line low because they expected there’d be a lot more money going toward Colorado.
Anyone who follows Vegas, please correct me if I’m wrong. And I’m curious, for games in early September, how much do the lines normally move. Is a move from 4 to 9.5 really big, or is that typical for this time of year?
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Sep 9, 2010 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
The line
The lines during the first three weeks of play are usually not based on enough data for Vegas to really get things right. There’s a lot of speculation and assumption (sort of like early polling), and betters can have a much bigger influence on things because they tend to also bet based on speculation. So, for a second game, having a line move by almost double isn’t too odd (though it’s still big). In this case, I don’t think the oddsmakers intentionally set the line low so betters can correct it – they probably really do only think Cal is 4 points better than Colorado based on what they know right now. That doesn’t mean they are right, but that their data tells them that 4 points is correct. Fans think and act differnetly. And in early OOC games there’s a lot more emotional betting.
However, after the 4th week not only are the lines much more accurate, but they tend not to move very much. Even as little as a 1.5 point shift is kind of surprising.
Careful, man. There's a beverage here!
“they probably really do only think Cal is 4 points better than Colorado based on what they know right now.”
Actually, that’s not right at all. Opening lines are not score predictions (ie Vegas did not set the opening line at -4 because they thought Cal was 4 points better). The oddsmaker’s goal when setting the line is to keep an equal number of bets on both sides of the game. A sportsbook’s worse fear is to have a game “sided” (ie too much betting on one team). Vegas is not in this business to gamble. They make money by having money even on both sides and then taking the vig. So Vegas thought that -4 would keep both sides equal. Obviously they were wrong. the betting public thinks the line is 10.5. Vegas might think its 1.5 or 20.5, nobody knows.
Not entirely true. While the result of setting lines is to get a near 50-50 split in bets, the nature of the line is actually analagous to a handicap in golf. By setting a line the oddsmakers are saying that team X is this much better than team Y, thus making a level playing field and getting a more-or-less even split.
If the betting public feels that the oddsmakers are wrong, the line adjusts to compensate for that. However, the initial line is indeed a handicap, which essentially means how much better a team is.
Careful, man. There's a beverage here!
huh? the initial opening line is NOT a “handicap, which essentially means how much better a team is.” And the opening line is not Vegas’ perception of how much better they think team X is over team Y. The opening line is Vegas’ perception of what they believe the public’s idea of how much better team Y is than team X. How to better explain this? Ok, again, the opening line is NOT Vegas’ score prediction. Its not what they believe is going to actually happen. When Vegas posts Cal (-4) over CU, they [Vegas] does not believe that Cal is four points better. Lets take a hypothetical. Lets say Vegas truly believes that Cal is 14 points better than Colorado. If they think that posting an opening line at 14 points will generate a 50-50 split, they will post it at 14. If they think a 7.5 opening line will generate a 50-50 split, they will post it at 7.5, even if they think Cal will win by 14 points. Because the end goal is to generate as much action as possible. Don’t believe me?
“There is a common misconception that point spreads represent the oddsmakers’ prediction of how many points the favorite will win by. That is not the case at all – their intent is NOT to evenly split the ATS result between the teams; rather, their goal is to attract equal betting action on both sides. Stated another way, they want to create a line that half the people find appealing to bet one way while the other half find it appealing to bet the other way (known as ‘dividing the action’).” http://pregame.com/EN/main/sports-betting-basics/gambling-rules-advice/12878.html
“When creating opening lines, the incentive for a sportsbook’s oddsmaker is to choose football lines that will do a fast, efficient job of splitting action in half. Doing so guarantees that they can make the most juice.” http://free-odds.com/football_betting_lines.htm
Again, even if Vegas believes that Cal is 14 points better, they will still post a 7.5 opening line, if that is the line that will do the fastest and most efficient job of splitting the action.
That’s about right, although they do use their computer models to project the lines. It is with regards to betting action a little bit; they don’t want to see 80-20 splits when the line goes up.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 9, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
What little I understand about “The Line” tells me that your explanation is quite accurate. I am not a gambler (beyond video poker, slots, and Let it Ride whenever I’m in a gambling state), so I never really understood how this worked until an old family friend broke it all down.
It’s all about dividing the action, NOT a predictor of the final point margin or how many points better one team is over the other (as others seem to believe). It’s about figuring out that magic in-between number that will allow an equal amount of betting on either side of it.
Thanks for the very clear and concise overview…and the supporting links. I know if I had thought it worked differently before, I would now know and accept that I was wrong in that thinking. I would also be open to correction and be most grateful for having learned the correct information. (Thanks, dude.)
It’s true that it’s about dividing the action. However, a number of studies have shown that the final lines are some of the best predictors of games available. So, even though there goal is not to be predictors, the starting line plus the movement driven by betting is a de facto high quality prediction.
Therefore, since Vegas will try to set the opening line close to the final spread (because that’s closer to the 50/50 mark), in practice, it ends up being a prediction.
Interesting. If it’s the final line that is the best predictor, this seems to suggest that the betting public, in the aggregate, is more expert than the Vegas experts.
I wonder if final lines that are close to the opening line are significantly better (or worse) predictors than final lines that have moved a lot from where they opened.
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Sep 9, 2010 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Seriously
this discussion is lightyears ahead of anything you find between fans in Columbia, Manhattan (KS) or Stillwater, which usually reolves around NASCAR and tractor pulls.
Can’t wait to see if CU shows up tomorrow.
Go Buffs!
by BuffulanceMan on Sep 10, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
The line opened at 7.5. Still, a 2 point shift does indicate the betting public heavily favoring the Bears.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 9, 2010 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Methinks there’s a third party involved that’s voting in our polls.
Because we never had that many debbie downers before.
"Today's weather, excessively violent with a chance of dismemberment. Tune in later for our 5-day forecast!"
~ Three Dog - Fallout 3
We've got Sunshine Suckers afoot!!
KEEP PUMPING!!!
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.

by 





















































