Colin Kaepernick Draws First Blood On The Golden Bears
This post is meant to expand on the two early big Colin Kaepernick runs and the defensive breakdowns that caused them. This is from the first drive of the game.
Second play from scrimmage: 2nd and 7, Kaepernick rushes for 17 yards on a veer play.
With Nevada putting three wideouts, Cal seems to be in a base 3-4. The linebackers are in two point stance at the line of the scrimmage, ready to crash if they get read on the play.
Nevada now lines the tight end on the right side as opposed to the left.
Nevada is running the veer--you can tell by the way the linemen seal off everyone to one side. Outside linebacker Keith Browner is left unblocked on this play.
The pulling tight end wrinkle is interesting. Nevada is utilizing man principles to lead for the runner, while using zone blocking for the linemen to keep Cal's defensive line out of the play. On this play, both achieve their purpose.
Browner is already crashing for the inside line now that he knows he's being read. It seems the plan by Pendergast is to goad Kaepernick into faking the handoff and taking the outside...only to get met by one of the inside linebackers. Unfortunately, something has gone horribly wrong behind him.
D.J. Holt does the right thing and stays in place. Robert Mullins, on the other hand, takes off toward the interior. Perhaps he's trying to provide the second level of support against an inside draw play so that Holt can make the tackle. But the moment Browner crashed toward the tailback, Mullins should have curved to the outside. Take a look at how wide open the outside lane is for Kaepernick to crash into.
With Mullins occupied, Holt is the only defender standing between Kaepernick and a first down.
Unfortunately, the pulling Virgil Green stands in the way, and he pushes Holt off and gives Kaepernick the lane to the second level. If the defense executed properly, Green would've probably blocked out Mullins and Holt would've made the tackle for a minimal gain. The lack of containment outside cost the Bears a first down.
Imagine how different this play is with Mike Mohamed in there instead of Mullins. Sads.
Seventh play from scrimmage: 2nd and 13, Kaepernick rushes for 21 yards on a veer play.
Kaepernick had two big scampers on the opening drive. This is the second, and far more egregious breakdown.
Cal again lines five defenders at the line of scrimmage (three down linemen, the outside linebackers in two point stance). Kendrick Payne is now at nose tackle.
The right flanker comes in motion. If any of the last couple of plays are an indication, that means Nevada is probably running to the left. The veer play is coming again.
Browner again is left unblocked. The wide receiver does not come into block and seems to get ready to turn upfield. You can tell by the way the offensive line is blocking and the way Kaepernick is looking that this is the veer play again.
Browner crashes toward the tailback Taua on the simulated handoff, but Kaepernick has kept the ball. Browner is just doing what he's supposed to do (at least that's what I suspect, since I can't understand why he'd be hitting the tailback without even looking at the play ahead of him).
It's what's happening behind him that makes very little sense to my knowledge-less eyes. Again, with the outside linebackers crashing to stuff the run from the edges, the inside linebackers or safeties should be pulling outside to handle the outside running lanes, especially for a play as dangerous as the veer.
I'm not sure where Chris Conte is going on this play. There's no reason he should be racing ahead of the linebackers, especially when there are already four people racing to contain inside.
Robert Mullins again leaves his responsibility (the outside lane is left way open) to crash the interior. This I can only chalk up to inexperience. I wouldn't be surprised if Clancy Pendergast told his players to be proactive and find the proper lanes to attack, because that's the only reason I can think of why Conte, Mullins and Holt all converge inside and leave a WIDE gaping hole down the left hashmark.
However, despite ALL of these setbacks, there's still reason for hope, Darian Hagan (#26) diagnosed it right. He immediately recognized the scrape-exchange and hedged in on Kaepernick. He races toward the quarterback, evading the wide receiver block by Rishard Matthews. Thankfully, it looks like he'll get to him on a stutter step and minimize the damage...
HEY! ILLEGAL BLOCK IN THE BACK BY MATTHEWS!
THROW OUT THE YELLOW FLAGS REFS! Hagan could've made that tackle if he didn't get hit from behind!
And that's why you play disciplined football on the road. You can never count on the officials to do the right thing by you.
Note: If you like the post and the supplementary material in the three gamefilm analyses I managed to write and would like to see more of those, I would gladly accept donations (just click on my People's Park box below).
If you are poor, your recs and your insight in the comments will be great too. Thanks!
18 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cal's Struggle in Series
Does anyone think there’s anything to Cal’s seeming struggles in the first game of series? The bears lost their first game against Tennessee and Maryland, then came with a vengeance in their second chance. Does the team know they’ll get another shot at them and not put as much effort in the first time? Hopefully Cal comes back to dominate Nevada in the next two opportunities, but this seems like an interesting phenomenon.
This would not surprise me. I believe Cal has won almost every one of their games against a repeat non-conference opponent. Seeing how a team gameplans against you is arguably a better way for a team to practice accordingly and play well.
We will play Nevada twice in Memorial. I suspect we should have a much greater edge at home, esp. with no Kaepernick.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 20, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
meh
I think that’s more coincidence than anything else. True – those were first games as part of a home-away series, but those games featured different players and different circumstances. I don’t believe in superstition – we just flat out got worked.
I’m not certain it’s the case. Hell, I’m not even sure I think it is the case, but I’m definitely not being superstitious. There are meaningful differences between playing a team for the first time and getting a second shot at them. Familiarity w/ the players/schemes, increased motivation after having lost once, etc. I’m not ruling out that it’s a coincidence but it’s not superstition.
but i think that’s with ALL teams, not something specific to Cal. We won @ Michigan State (we won both games in the series, opened at their house in 2002) as well as winning against Colorado State (we won both games in the series, opened at their house in 2007). Those are the only two off the top of my head, but like you say, there is a meaningful difference when you open a series with a “new” team at their place.
by totallyawesome on Sep 20, 2010 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Off the subject... My bad!
CalSportsDigest Mario Gomez ($) has a comment that a Cal greyshirt went to the NC State/Cincinnati game. Does anyone know who it is?
I’d guess McCain?
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 20, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I'll rec it but ain't read it.
What don’t you just perform open heart surgery on me w/o anesthesia?
http://twitter.com/solariseCGB
So Hydro can write 8 posts about 42-3
But I’m the one who’s stabbing you?
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 20, 2010 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions
cool analysis
keep this up….I rewatched part of the game so I could better see what NV was doing (and what we were doing wrong) but it was too hard (and too painful) ….keep it up….great analysis!
Great analysis. And it clearly shows where the breakdown is. It also shows that it wasn’t Nevada’s awesome offense that did us in—Nevada isn’t nearly as good as we made them look. They might still be good, but we made their offense look stellar by playing idiotic defense.
Is #37 Conte? It is on him and on the LB (I presume Mullins). Mullins has a big TE coming out to block him, but chooses to shade inside rather than pull outside. Conte looks just ridiculous. Browner made a decision (coached or not) and it was the wrong one. But here’s the thing: because of the nature of the offense, he will ALWAYS make the wrong decision. He forces the decision and the rest of the defense needs to be playing the option that Browner forces. Here they follow Browner—they don’t trust him I guess, or they don’t have the discipline to keep on their assignments.
The only thing I can think is that Browner is the read for the entire defense—as he is closest to the ball, maybe it was his responsibility to show the back of the defense where the ball was? That is a bad option defense strategy. But how else do you explain an entire defense pinching on the dive when ALL WEEK they had been told and prepped that there is a 50% chance of every run play bouncing to the outside? ESPECIALLY when the first guy bites on the handoff.
You know what is frustrating? We are UC-Berkeley. The top public school in the nation. I like to think that our players wouldn’t faceplant mentally. But that’s exactly what happened here. Watching film must have been painful for the defense.
Handwringing aside, you raise a very good point. If we know that Browner is going to crash after the tailback, then the rest of the team should be keying in on the QB, because chances are he’s going to read Browner and keep it. Right? So, instead of reacting to Nevada, Nevada is reacting to us, and we know what is going to happen.
by atomsareenough on Sep 21, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions
- is Mullins. Holt is the one shading inside and Conte comes up from the safety slot, so everyone is filling in the middle of the field.
I really can’t blame the players—this defense is supposed to have an attacking mentality and they attacked to where they thought the ball was. It’s very disconcerting that they all bit and didn’t adjust accordingly based on how the defensive end attacked the play—if he’s plugging up one side the backup should be containing the other.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 21, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
*Number 37 is Mullins
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 21, 2010 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions

by 








































































