Golden Nuggets: Cal-Nevada Predictions
It's Thursday and that means everyone and their uncles have college football predictions. First, Uncle Ted's prediction:
California 38, Nevada 30: Warning, warning, warning, Cal Bears! Nevada is not a push-over, particularly not at home. The Wolf Pack has averaged 592 yards and 50 points in its first two games. Cal fans, if you want my advice, you should feel nervous about this one.
Bruce Feldman predicts a 44-35 Cal win, adding that he's been very impressed by Cal this season.
Andrea Adelson, ESPN's non-AQ blogger predicts a Cal victory:
California 28, Nevada 17. The Wolf Pack haven’t had much success against AQ opponents, losing 8 straight games. Though the defense has looked much better, and defensive coordinator Andy Buh spent the last three seasons as a Stanford assistant, California simply has too much talent on offense. The Bears will find a way to slow down Colin Kaepernick enough to win.
John Tamahana predicts a 38-27 Cal victory, citing Cal's defense as the key to victory.
If these positive predictions are causing too much hand-wringing, take solace in the fact that four out of five CBS writers predict a Nevada victory.
Attendance Prediction: Last week the models predicted 57,283, 63,342, and 63,757 while the actual attendance turned out to be 55,440, low enough to place in the top-5 lowest turnouts since 2003. Since I'm only predicting home game attendances, we'll have to hold off on predictions until October 9th, when the Bruins visit Cal.
After the jump Tyson Alualu gives back to his hometown, Gary Peterson has an entertaining comparison of ranked Cal versus unranked Cal, Pendergast and Nevada coach Chris Ault talk about Friday's game, and Scout previews the matchup.
Football
- Tyson Alualu may be a millionaire now, but he's just as generous as he always has been. He's giving back to the community by building a church in the rough neighborhood where he grew up.
- Ted Miller's "What to Watch" this weekend asks whether the nation's top defense will continue to impress when it takes on the nation's top offense.
- Freshman TE Jacob Wark broke his ankle last week and will miss the rest of the season. On a positive note, he should be able to redshirt this season and will not have a wasted year of eligibility. Jarrett Sparks will also miss this week's game with an ankle injury. Steve Williams underwent surgery on his thumb and may play, depending on how much pain the thumb gives him.
- JO has some quotes from Pendergast as he talked about the Nevada offense after Wednesday night's practice.
- Cecil Whiteside has cleared a series of NCAA hurdles and should join the team this spring.
- Nevada has struggled against high-caliber competition in recent years. Because of these struggles, they look at Friday's game as an opportunity to excel against stiff competition. Chris Ault's team is 2-18 against BCS schools, Boise St, and bowl games since 2004.
- Quarterbacks (including Kevin Riley), defenses (including Pendergast's D), and the Cal pass rush are all trending upwards in Ted Miller's Pac-10 stock report. Shane Vereen is trending downward after two mediocre performances.
- Gary Peterson examines the bizarre tale of two teams: ranked Cal and unranked Cal. Why is it that unranked Cal is 13 games above .500 while ranked Cal is 7 games below .500? The world may never know...
- JO takes a look at how running the second team as the scout team has changed the team's preparation for its opponents. Mohamed and Holt praised the idea because it allows them to work against a faster, more experienced unit.
- Daily Cal looks at Golden Bears in the pros, this week featuring running backs Marshawn Lynch, Justin Forsett, and Jahvid Best.
- Scout previews the matchup between the nation's top offense and defense.
- Bruce Feldman has Keenan Allen at 10th in his list of the top freshman and sophomore players in college football.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
All 5 CBS guys picked Furd over Cal last year
Yes!
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
Egg everywhere -> their face
Drew: 'Oh no.. That is certainly the meaty part alright, but it's not the thigh..."
Randy: "No... that bone is NOT connected to the thigh bone..."
www.fearthefin.com
I rushed the farm's crappy field in 2009
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by SeanCrosby87 on Sep 17, 2010 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Fixed
I’m not sure why I put David.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
And three picked UW over Nebraska. I think it is safe to ignore their opinions.
by HelloBowlesHall on Sep 16, 2010 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m not nervous about UCLA’s suckitude.
by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions
I put down $26 on Cal tomorrow
I thought I went broke after losing too much money on the world cup, but I still have money in my account. Here’s $26 to covering the spread. Go BEARS!!!
If this fails I’m gonna have to seriously play some hardcore short stack poker and build my account back up.
The dutch won me a lot of money last world cup...
Until the last game haha.
FUCK.
Oranje bojen!
Drew: 'Oh no.. That is certainly the meaty part alright, but it's not the thigh..."
Randy: "No... that bone is NOT connected to the thigh bone..."
www.fearthefin.com
I rushed the farm's crappy field in 2009
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by SeanCrosby87 on Sep 17, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I have so much faith in our D
Im sitting Colin K in the CGB fantasy league
http://www.youtube.com/user/HANDSOMElifeOFswing - Cal Football Highlights+ More Bay area sports
by 4Ever Golden on Sep 16, 2010 10:48 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Green.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 17, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions
all this positive talk
is getting me really worried…
by ucsdgoldenbear on Sep 16, 2010 11:32 PM PDT reply actions
Stop being worried about positive vibes, dudes... They are warrented...
I follow the wac… and I follow Nevada football… Lots of homies at UNR, because I go skiing up in Tahoe all the time with them.
Nevada has all the offense in the world to hang with most half-decent teams… but they don’t have enough defense to stop a snail… Literally anyone can put up points on this squad…
any team that’s balanced on both sides of the ball, and can score both ways like Cal can do, is going to have no trouble putting points up against Nevada. They can run all day against anyone… and they will get yards… but they are by no means going to make this Cal defense look silly all night long… We have a strong, fast run defense, that’s opportunistic and knows what it’s doing out there. Not to mention… Nevada doesn’t exactly come out in droves and create some wild atmosphere that’s tough to play against… especially when Reno has a crapload of Cal support… so don’t expect to have a very small contingency tomorrow. I’m bringing 6 people along who I know are loud, and proud of the bears… and we are going to make Mackay stadium wish it was never built…
ROLL ON!
Drew: 'Oh no.. That is certainly the meaty part alright, but it's not the thigh..."
Randy: "No... that bone is NOT connected to the thigh bone..."
www.fearthefin.com
I rushed the farm's crappy field in 2009
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by SeanCrosby87 on Sep 17, 2010 12:42 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Amen!
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 17, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions
OMG
This is epic. Please do something very stupid in the stands that will get you on ESPN. I will be watching.
Fire Starkey. You... complete me.
We will be quite inebriated...
expect to see shirtless bears.
Drew: 'Oh no.. That is certainly the meaty part alright, but it's not the thigh..."
Randy: "No... that bone is NOT connected to the thigh bone..."
www.fearthefin.com
I rushed the farm's crappy field in 2009
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by SeanCrosby87 on Sep 17, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Attendance Prediction: Last week the models predicted
What are these models you speak of? I love models.
Fire Starkey. You... complete me.
They’re not that exciting—just a handful of OLS regression models.
"Some people watch adult videos on their computer - I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me going."- Jim Schwartz, Detroit Lions head coach
I really wish Ole Miss was more cool and would make him their mascot...

Seriously. It would make me respect the SEC like .8% more.
Drew: 'Oh no.. That is certainly the meaty part alright, but it's not the thigh..."
Randy: "No... that bone is NOT connected to the thigh bone..."
www.fearthefin.com
I rushed the farm's crappy field in 2009
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
by SeanCrosby87 on Sep 17, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Gary Peterson examines the bizarre tale of two teams: ranked Cal and unranked Cal. Why is it that unranked Cal is 13 games above .500 while ranked Cal is 7 games below .500? The world may never know…
If Petersen is using these as his “recent teams” stats, and it looks like he is, then he doesn’t know how to do basic math:
The Bears have carried a Top 25 ranking in the coaches poll into 13 of their past 36 games. They are 3-10 in those games. As an unranked team over the same period, the Bears are 18-5.
3-10 is 13 games. To go .500 over 13 games, you’d need to be 6.5-6.5. Cal is 3.5 games under .500 while ranked recently.
18-5 is 23 games. A .500 record would be 11.5-11.5. The Bears are 6.5 games over .500 while unranked recently.
(BTW, “recently” is arbitrary anyway, as they’re not counting Tedford’s first 68 games, where Cal had a GREAT record while ranked. Also, not only is this “analysis” a small sample and fairly arbitrary, it also doesn’t take into account opponent quality, injuries, or many other relevant factors)
by atomsareenough on Sep 17, 2010 11:03 AM PDT reply actions
I’m guessing if you looked at the quality of the opponent in those two groups, the group Cal played while ranked would be a decent amount better than the group Cal played while unranked…
But yes, Gary Peterson should not do statistics…
by Missing Barry on Sep 17, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Peterson is consistent with the way “over .500” is typically used. That is, how ever many wins you take away until your wins and losses is even is how far over you are, the opposite for games under .500. Now, you can argue that that standard is misleading, and you would have a point, but that is way it is done.

by 

























































