Golden Spotlight: Nevada Wolf Pack Pistol Offense
Normally I'd focus on every aspect of our opponent in the Golden Spotlight (like I did last week with Colorado), but I have literally zero tape on Nevada's defense and barely any background on them. All I know is they kind of sucked last year, so I'd be very disappointed if the Cal running attack finally didn't break out on Friday night. Otherwise this team is in trouble.
So today I'll focus on the big thing that success next week depends on, the Nevada Pistol. It's an offense that is maddening, frightening, and requires pounds worth of discipline from the defense. Today I'll break down the basics. Tomorrow I examine counter-strategies by the defense.
Here's a sample Pistol formation, where the Nevada offense is in blue, the Cal 3-4 defense in black.
The essence of the pistol balances the spread and pro-style aspects of offense. Let's talk about those elements in bullet points after the jump.
- You'll have a quarterback (this year, Colin Kaepernick) that'll be able to stand in semi-shotgun (the QB is usually about five-six yards behind center in a standard shotgun--Nevada's pistol has him about a yard or two closer. Here he can still replicate what a pro-style quarterback does--throw from shotgun and release from shotgun. But he also has the ability to decide when to take it and run utilizing the zone read, or decide when to drop back and pass.
- You'll have a running back (this year, Vai Taua, with occasional doses of Lampford Mark) standing behind the quarterback, probably around two to three yards behind him. He'll have similar responsibilities as a running back in the I-formation, but without a lead blocker--he'll be asked to move off tackle, attack the hole, and find the cutback lane.
- You'll have a wide receiver coming in motion on a jet sweep play (like the fly sweep, excet to provide essentially a variation of the triple option. The quarterback can handoff to the running back, keep it himself, or handoff to the wide receiver.
- The offensive line (Steve Haley, John Bender, Jeff Meads, Jose Acuna, Chris Barker, a very strong unit) can run either pro-style blocking (mainly inside zone, where they'll usually double-team the defensive linemen, and then still unoccupied linemen move to the second level to try and occupy linebackers), or an element of spread blocking (usually a variation of outside zone, where the linemen try to get their bodies between the defensive back and the sidelines, but in).
- These terms are nebulous by the way--blocking is blocking, and it's hardly any different from any other offense. But mixing those disparate elements in with what the quarterback is doing.
- If the wide receiver does not get the ball, he usually acts similar to a pulling lineman and tries to block the freed linebacker.
- In terms of the passing game, downfield receivers will generally act either as safety valves when it's a pass or block when it's a running play. They won't run many traditional pro routes other than verticals. Kaepernick has really improved throwing quick routes down the middle, and is also plenty adept at aiming the ball down the sidelines.
So those are the basics. Here are the gears.
The Veer
Nevada's bread and butter and their main version of the zone read. This is probably the most common play they use, often to deadly effectiveness. Instead of trying to block everyone on the defense (something I wouldn't recommend, especially for a team with such small linemen as Nevada's), they'll leave one man unblocked on the edge. Everyone else is playing to seal off the corner, very similar to outside zone (blocking the defender to the sideline).
Against a 3-4, because of the attention the line will have to show toward the rotating defensive line, I'd assume Nevada will chose to leave the outside linebacker (either Keith Browner or Mychal Kendricks, then Jarred Price) unguarded and make him read the play. I doubt this'll be the only permutation, as Kaepernick has shown he can read linebackers, defensive ends, and even defensive tackles. But the formula remains the same: The quarterback reads the unblocked defender and makes a decision about what to do with the ball.
If the unblocked defender being read bites inside to aim for the running back (labeled "FAKE"), the quarterback will fake the handoff and will sprint to the outside (labeled "REAL"). The outside linebacker will have left a wide-open lane for the quarterback to take the ball and go with it, and Kaepernick has been able to make people pay for that aggressiveness in the past.
nevada pistol veer (via smartfootballchris)
If the defender overpursues (and overpursuit isn't much, it can literally be one extra step forward) to watch out for the quarterback, the quarterback will handoff to the running back, who now has the inside running lane and will run right past the unblocked defender. Ideally, he'll have a big line in front of him, but ultimately the runner will probably take one hole to cut into and across.
Nevada Read Option Dive (RB Keep) 2 (via nevadawp)
The veer will probably be the most common play we see, since it allows Nevada the opportunity to use double teams to attack the defense. The blocking will be different on almost every play, but unless Nevada finds a weakness they can exploit elsewhere, this is probably the play they'll use the most.
Jet sweep/sweep fake
Here the wide receiver (probably Rishard Matthews) comes back and takes the handoff from the shotgun set rather than the quarterback taking a step back under center (the more commonly used fly sweep).
This has some advantages. For one, the man in motion will generally be trailed by a cornerback or a linebacker, so Nevada can use that to take a good run-stuffing defender out of the play.
Again, I expect Nevada to be reading a lot more than they'll be blocking straight up. There are plenty of different blocking schemes the Wolf Pack can use. I suspect Nevada will leave an athletic defensive end alone on this one (or simply leave a beastly defensive tackle to roam free, like Oregon did last year). It's just easier for a running back to go outside and block a defensive back rather than go inside and block one of the front seven men. There are other possibilities of course.
The cues are the same. The quarterback determines what the unblocked defender will do by monitoring his movements. He'll handoff to the wide receiver if he sees the defender taking steps in front of him, and he'll keep it if the defender keeps on taking steps toward his outside area. Committing to either scenario is likely to ensure a sizable pickup if the blocking downfield is solid.
The first big play in last week's Colorado State game came off a simulated receiver sweep (Hat-tip to Kodiak for sending the footage along to me). Essentially the receiver from the left came in and faked the handoff. The defensive tackle was left unblocked and Kaepernick took advantage of his slow-footedness to race past him for a 40 yard gain. I'd be interested to see if the Wolf Pack signal-caller tries the same trick on one of Cal's nose tackles, but I'd guess they'll use a variant of this and read edge rushers than risk having to deal with the nasty interior linemen. You never know though--Kaepernick might have the confidence that he can sell a receiver handoff and get away with it.
Nevada Read Option Dive vs. Missouri (QB keep) (via nevadawp)
The other variant is that the wide receiver comes in motion, but the quarterback never fakes the handoff to him. He instead fakes it or hands it off to the running back after reading the freed edge rusher, while the wide receiver goes out to block whoever is left unblocked (usually the free safety). The receiver suddenly takes the form of a pulling, so you see zone blocking principles by the defenders, but some vestiges of man blocking by the receivers.
Designed handoff
Once the spread elements of the Nevada offense get going, Ault is happy to dial up a few pro-style plays. Keep in mind that while the impetus of the Wolf Pack offense is spread-based, its blocking schemes are primarily the same as anything you'd see from the Bears. So get ready for a faster set of I-formation plays (think if the fullback was handling the ball and giving it to the running back rather than the quarterback coming back to pass).
This has its advantages and its disadvantages. The quarterback's no longer reading the defender, so you're running the risk of letting him come off the edge and tackle the running back for a loss. However, because your back is now to the unblocked defender, he still has to be disciplined and guess whether you're handing it off for a run or dropping back for a quick bubble screen. If you don't have faith you can let him come off the edge, you might have to do some cutblocking to keep him up.
Sometimes they'll mix it up. They'll send the wide receiver in motion to give the defense the thought that a jet sweep might be coming, leave a defensive end or outside linebacker unblocked, and then the in-motion receiver will come over and block him out (like the diagram above).
Sometimes a designed handoff can work just as well as the zone read, although it's rarely as explosive. But it can be a nice change of pace when reading the defensive line isn't working as well.
Here's one little fun wrinkle: The horn play, which utilizes man blocking principles and a couple of pulling lineman, but also working to seal off the edge of overzealous defense and give the running back the edge.
The Passing Game: Play Action & Four Verticals
Nevada is not a huge passing team, but they've been working toward a greater balance (last year it was about a two to one ratio in favor of the rush, whereas this year it's close to one to one).
Wolf Pack play action comes out of the zone read on occasion, but usually on the designed handoff so the quarterback doesn't have to risk getting pounded out of the backfield. This is a lot quicker than the traditional under center quarterback, who has to go back into his five step drop, fake the handoff, then look to throw. With the Pistol the play action is almost instantaneous, making it difficult for cornerbacks to get a read on the throw if it comes out quick. It can be a good five to six yard pickup if a defense is focusing in on the run and playing zone coverage outside. Tight end Virgil Green seems to be Kapernick's most popular target.
I wish I could say more about Nevada's passing attack, but their attack seems to be mostly vertical. All the available wideouts run straight down the field and mostly stop at designated locations. Here's an example of play action.
play action bootleg (via smartfootballchris)
Coming tomorrow: How Cal's defense can try and stop Nevada's offense.
Additional Reading
There are a lot of great posts on the Internet on the Pistol offense and I recommend them all.
Smart Football's breakdown of the Pistol at Doc Saturday is all you need if you want a simpler explanation. More on the horn play.
Bruins Nation did some good breakdown of reads and looks in the Pistol offense in preparation.
Awesome stuff from American Football Monthly.
A good history of the Pistol Formation from Shaking the Southland.
Thanks to Kodiak for sending me the Nevada-Colorado State clips.
60 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks
this is well done. The site has been pumping content the last couple of weeks: kudos. (And thanks for being judicious with pumping sunshine.)
I watched a little of the Colorado State game. Nevada had better players, execution and scheme from what I saw. So far, Nevada seems to have come up short against better competition, but I have been very concerned that they would put it all together for the Cal game. I hope that Cal’s athleticism will disrupt this offense, I’ll be curious to read your analysis.
jh
Blocking aspects of the pistol....
Seems like the blocks executed by the WRs on the outside are super critical to the success of this offense when they run off the corners. How do our DBs stack up against Nevada’s WRs in terms of blocking? Do we appear to be quicker, bigger, meaner than them? Seems like shedding the WRs and making a play on the QB or WR sweep option is key.
I’m looking forward to your defensive analysis…..can’t wait……
I like Darian Hagan
winning his matchup against Nevada’s WR’s trying to block him. Hagan’s always been a physical corner and he should be able to shed Nevada’s blocks. I haven’t seen too much of Marc Anthony to get a good read on him, but he’s been pretty physical the last two games. Both our corners have solid size at 6’0 and 190+ lbs.
this is one area i think steve williams would suffer. too small plus thumb injury.
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Sep 16, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I do feel like we have the advantage in terms of run blocking, which is why we might see a lot of early quick passing from Nevada. That could draw the corners in, and make it easier to block them and make sure they don’t get involved in any running plays.
We should wear them down over the course of the game, but there are ways for the Wolf Pack to strategize out of that early on.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Big Big Big Big test for our linebackers. Hope we have enough speed and patience to figure it out come Friday. We can thank Oregon for giving us plenty of looks with their similar style offense. My personal feeling is that we’ll be absolutely prepared for their offense but that the game will be determined whether we can execute on defense.
People are talking about whether our defense can handle their offense. The overlooked story might be whether their defense can stop our offense. I know I know UC Davis, Colorado. I know I know. But still, we have some big threats on offense that will be problems even against real good teams.
GO BEARS!
If Cal’s offense doesn’t put up at least 35 points on Friday night, we’ll have much bigger worries than whether the defense is up to snuff.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Great stuff. I am surprised to see you use the base 3-4 look though, given that against CU 3-WR sets we played pretty much exclusively the 2-4-5 (or 4-2-5 if you prefer). I would be very surprised if we didn’t play a lot of that against Nevada, to get more speed on the field.
If we do, I would expect Nevada to run a little more power-running than usual to try to take advantage of the size of their line vs. our 2DT 2LB front four. However, if we do end up playing 2DT frequently, that will allow us to rotate them heavily to keep them fresh.
Anyway, great stuff, can’t wait for the follow-up tomorrow… oh yeah, and the game!
Steve Williams would have
helped the secondary out so much in this game if we started using a 2-4-5 approach.
Two reasons why I feel we’ll be running more out of a 3-4 than a nickel formation
1) Nevada is a run-first team. You want that extra defensive linemen to occupy the linemen to allow the linebackers to fill through.
2) In terms of stopping the pistol, discipline is so much more important than speed. I don’t trust my secondary to be as disciplined yet as I do our front seven.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe this is better for tomorrow
But any chance Cal uses a 3-5 defense, basically stacking 3 linebackers over the 3 down lineman and having the outside linebackers rush freely each time? Throw one of the safeties into the box, bank on our CBs shutting down their WRs (who, from the CSU game, did not look very dangerous)?
Lots of hits on the quarterback, force him to make quick decisions/release the ball before his receivers can get deep into their vertical routes, plenty of help in the middle for the dive/fast rush linebackers possibly making contact in the backfiled.
Obviously, this puts the defense at risk for a big pass play or a well-designed screen, but it could take Nevada out of their element early
by calbeers05753 on Sep 16, 2010 8:30 AM PDT reply actions
do you mean basically a rush 8 defense?
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Sep 16, 2010 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions
No. 2DL and 2LB are the rushers… so there are four of them. This allows you to have 4LB on the field but still have nickle coverage, at a cost of size on the line. I believe we ran this almost exclusively last week against 3WR sets… Pendergast talked about it a bit in his post-game comments.
I am also not a fan of WR on S when the S is deep. I’d rather see nickel packages with one S in the box. Also, have the OLB’s line up on the LOS and just outside the T/TE. This will allow for 2 ILB’s and a S for the interior line while having 5 on the line. Booyah.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
That’s what I was going for.
With this, you’re basically forcing one of their WRs to block one of our rush linebackers on each running play (not going to be successful over the course of a game) or forcing them to go w/ a 2TE set, further neutralizing their ability to pass the ball.
by calbeers05753 on Sep 16, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions
yup. make Nevada beat you through the air, but cover the WR’s with appopriate CB’s instead of a deep S or an OLB like Gregory ran vs. Oregon.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Interesting wrinkle you suggest. The two OLBs at the LoS would almost certainly force the line to run
Two problems that Nevada will probably take note.
1) The scheme you suggest with no deep safety puts HUGE pressure on the ILBs to rotate and hold the running gaps accountable. If it was healthy Holt and Mohamed this wouldn’t concern me as much, but with Holt, not-so-healthy Mohamed, and whoever the backups are (Mullins, Fanua, Forbes), this is a huge question mark. I would keep the safety deep and have faith that the front seven can hold the fort.
2) It would immediately push Nevada to the outside and running a lot of play action and screens. This would put pressure on the corners to open field tackle without any immediate support, since they’ll almost certainly be playing zone rather than man coverage. Putting the safety in close could exacerbate mistackles.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions
That second sentence was incomplete
The two OLBs at the LoS would almost certainly force the line to run and leave one of them unblocked, since I don’t know how well Nevada’s linemen will be able to block to the outside and open a hole inside for the quarterback or running back to cut down the middle.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
they’ll leave one man unblocked on the edge
God, I hope that’s Kendricks. He can fly.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
Holt doesn’t have the same speed as Kendricks though.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 16, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions
And he won’t be unblocked. He’s an inside linebacker.
His duties will be different in this one. Probably more important than the OLBs.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh…and…can someone remind me why I wasn’t too scared about this game? I’m really forgetting right now
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
1. Keenan Allen
2. Our defense dominated a BCS opponent.
3. SUnshine overdose.
Most people recognize this as a trap though, so hopefully Tedford can get things in order.
I see your funny picture and raise you

by wearecb4life on Sep 16, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
omg, i just got REALLY annoyed by just looking at that spelling of ‘flavor.’
no cal bear? no care
by EchoOfSilence on Sep 16, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
I take it you don’t read Rishi’s posts very much…
by atomsareenough on Sep 16, 2010 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions
1) Chauncey?
2) Kevin Riley is the 2nd best QB of all time forever rose bowl part party national championship?
Fire Starkey. You... complete me.
CHAUNCEY
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 16, 2010 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Bigger, stronger, faster players. I’m worried as much as anyone, but I only see us losing if we turn the ball over a lot, play undisciplined D and get a 2009 vs. USC performance by Riley.
They’ll be amped up as hell to play us and I wouldn’t be suprised at all by a few big plays on their end at the start of the game. But I think if we don’t panic, we’ll figure it out and wear them down.
by KikiRevenge on Sep 16, 2010 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, I could see it being a 2007 Armed Forces Bowl start.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 16, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Or like Texas A&M scoring a touchdown really quick in the Holiday Bowl, then getting absolutely trucked for 55 minutes.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
That game was so awesome. I don’t know if I’ll ever forget the punishment Desmond Bishop gave their QB…
by Missing Barry on Sep 16, 2010 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Recs2T_k4Uo
Starting around 1:40. I’d recommend the whole video, though*. Good times. ;)
Also, damn, when Longshore was on his game, he was a heckuva QB.
*Some of the video is kinda spazzy.
by Missing Barry on Sep 17, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
I, Admiral Ackbar, recognize what we are up against
[img]http://i.bnet.com/blogs/its_a_trap.jpg[/img]
Does anyone know what the status is for Matt Summers-Gavin?
by curiousgoldenbear on Sep 16, 2010 12:41 PM PDT reply actions
Backup lineman as far as I know. Edwards should still be starting at RT Friday, with MSG spotting.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Is Fisher still out?
Say it like Ron Burgandy signing off: "Stay Classy, Bears!"
by PlayClassyBears on Sep 16, 2010 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions
He played on the next drive in the Colorado game. He’s good to go.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Screw the pistol offense and #1 offense in the nation or whatever
Anyone else worried that we’re ranked? I’d be so much more confident if we weren’t.
That’s going to be the biggest thing going against us on Friday.
No. If we were ranked #2 and #1 lost, I’d be a little worried.
by atomsareenough on Sep 16, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
That’s going to be the biggest thing going against us on Friday.
Yeah, screw what that other team does on the field. Clearly some nebulous meaningless fact holds the key to victory or defeat.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 16, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Meh
I guess this post was … ok… You can have a rec
/sarcasm.
This post was fantastic. Great scouting report for what to look for tomorrow. I’ve read some of the links you posted before and I encourage anyone who wants to read more to check those out too.

by 




































































