California 52, Colorado 7: Portrait Of Kevin Riley As A Young Man
(To discuss tonight's games, click here. To see postgame reaction for the Buffaloes, check out the Ralphie Report. This thread is to discuss the Golden Bears!
Don't forget to fill out the report card. Onto the recap!)
Throughout the rout of the Buffaloes, Kevin Riley was being Kevin Riley.
There he was rolling out and finding Jones on a deep spiral early in the 4th quarter to give Cal one last burst on offense to bust the game open. There was the low release he put on what looked like a slip screen that dropped short of Shane Vereen. There was the fearlessness he showed to take off with the ball and pick up a first down, as well as taking a designed handoff and go right down the middle and barrel into linebackers. There was also the recklessness he showed with leading with his body and seeing him go down head first, leaving him vulnerable to headhunting defensive backs.
There was the pressure throw he made when his right tackle blew his assignment and throw an off-balance pass that sailed over Marvin Jones's head. There was the ability to throw on the run and find Marvin Jones crossing on the end zone to make it 14-0. Most importantly of all, there was the excellent accuracy at the goal-line to Keenan Allen on an out route and Isi Sofele on a play-action fake to wrap up Cal's offensive scoring.
All-in-all, it was as if the Colorado game was some elaborate metaphor to illustrate Riley's entire career as a Golden Bear--brilliant at some points, head-scratching at others. But the maturity seems to be there, and the improved decision-making allowed him to complete 15 passes on 24 attempts for 194 yards, 4 touchdowns and no picks. If you're a Cal fan, you take that, you move onto the next game, and hope he can keep on providing similar performances when the opposition gets stiffer. He's going to need them.
Cal's offense didn't have to do much in this one. As Ted Miller pointed out, the Bears started four of their first five drives in Colorado territory. They needed to drive a combined 57 yards to score 17 of their first 24 points. Jeremy Ross's big punt return (highlighted by one of his patented spins) put the Bears close to their own red zone to set up the first scoring drive. Andy Ludwig had a pretty impressive playcall on Cal's first scoring drive: the strong side wide receiver went on a crossing route to draw Colorado's cornerback inside. Then he put Vereen on a wheel route, getting a mismatch on the linebacker for Riley to target along the edge. Vereen leaped up and managed to haul it in along the sideline to make it 7-0.
Colorado spent the rest of the game killing themselves with penalties and turnovers. Colorado's most successful drive in the first half took them all the way to the two yard line--and then a chop block and a false start took them out of the red zone, leading to a missed field goal and effectively ended any hopes of a Buffaloes comeback. Colorado notched 9 penalties for 72 yards and shot themselves in the foot on one too many drives.
Because they're masochists over there at Boulder, they proceeded to shoot themselves in the kneecap. The Buffaloes turned over the ball five times, leading to 31 points, 14 directly by the defense. Mychal Kendricks sacked Tyler Hansen as Colorado drove to midfield, then Jarred Price hit Hansen on the very next play and forced a fumble that Kendricks recovered. Cal got another short field and drove 31 yards in under three minutes, capping it off with Riley to Jones to make it 14-0. Bryant Nnabuife took advantage of heavy quarterback pressure to reel in a bad decision by Hansen to release the ball, setting up another short field and a quick field goal.
There was a pick six "whoa is this my ball? I'll take this ball" for Michael Mohamed right before halftime to make it 31-0. Very late in the fourth, Robert Mullins stripped Ryan Deehan from behind and the ball landed right in Darian Hagan's chest. Hagan then took the ball 81 yards to cap off the scoring. Although Cal won this game fairly handily, Colorado killed themselves with their own errors. It should've been a much closer margin if not for a few unlucky breaks and their own executions in mistake.
Before you knew it, it was 31-0 at halftime, making it the second game in the row the second half doubled for extended garbage time.
For the second game in a row, the Cal offensive line was unimpressive. Riley got sacked on a 3rd down to kill the opening drive and was pressured on a few more occasions--although Colorado's defensive line is experienced, it's a little discouraging to see the front four manage to hold their points and keep Riley on his toes. The Cal run attack was depressingly average. Vereen never could get going on the ground, managing only 60 yards on 3.8 yards per attempt (although he did have a rushing score). Sofele was just as quiet, gathering 10 yards on 4 carries. Cal might've been playing vanilla down the stretch to see if they could beat the with the box loaded with eight and nine defenders, but it's a worrying sign that our linemen can't get push on our out-of-conference opponents with Pac-10 defenses looming down the road.
However, if Cal's frontline didn't make any noise, Cal's defense dominated. Colorado got themselves blown up in the first quarter, managing -19 total yards. Their first four drives ended up going backwards from the original line of scrimmage. Left tackle Nate Solder seemed to hold his own, but the rest of the offensive line got pushed around quite a bit, particularly right up the middle and off the right edge. Rodney Stewart managed only 32 rushing yards on 12 carries and got stuffed at the goal-line on both of Colorado's forays toward the end zone. Hansen was sacked six times, with Kendricks, Price, Cameron Jordan, Trevor Guyton and Ernest Owusu getting into the act.
The receiving weapons of Scotty McKnight, Travon Patterson, and Toney Clemons were held in check, managing 9 catches for a modest 84 yards. Hagan had an impressive pass breakup in the first quarter when Hansen went deep to Toney Clemons, and Marc Anthony did the same to break up one to Patterson. D.J. Holt played a very solid all-around game, getting seven tackles and nearly had an interception (he was probably surprised that Hansen threw it right into his lap). Kendricks came off the edge unblocked a few times to stuff Stewart from cutting tot he outside. Mohamed was his steady self, racking up 14 tackles.
The Bears defense will move onto a stiffer challenge in Nevada and senior Colin Kaepernick. We'll learn a lot more about our defense's ability to stop a real offense if they can run-stuff the flux capacitor that is Chris Ault's Pistol attack. Taking down an FCS quarterback in his first start and an inexperienced Colorado QB who can't throw into coverage just doesn't mean much in the big picture.
The one thing that we can take from this is Cal's special teams looks much better. Bryan Anger was back to his old form, booting punts of 66 and 58 and pinned Colorado deep close to their own end zone on another occasion. Ross is really showing he can handle the punt returns. Kick return coverage was good at times, spotty at others. The real pleasant surprise is Giorgio Tavecchio, who hit almost every kick inside the ten, even hitting a kick into the wind deep into the end zone. AND he nailed a 31 yard field goal right down the pipe (to outsiders this might seem amusing; to Cal fans this is dreamy). Replicating those performances in Reno and Tucson would be a huge, huge deal, considering how much more special teams means when trying to pull out road victories.
In short, this didn't feel like a 52-7 victory. But it did feel like a victory. The upcoming weeks will tell us if these wins mean something, mean everything, or mean nothing at all.
212 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The lack of a running game is starting to worry me
I am not a huge fan of Sofele as the 2nd back and would prefer CDJ. I know CDJ was running in garbage time but he looked good.
I am really starting to think Marshall is not the man to replace Coach M as our OL coach.
You are right about this game being a sort of recap of Rileys career.
I liked Isi. Hes so shifty out there and his legs are always churning hard.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
He seemed to get tripped up in the backfield a lot. If he had a homerun-type play to balance that out, I wouldn’t mind, but I don’t remember too many big runs from anyone today.
by atomsareenough on Sep 11, 2010 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I think we were more spoiled by Best than we’d like toa dmit.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
yea i realized how spoiled i was by him today..
i really like isi though, he’s fast and reminds more of best than vereen (he just seems faster)…i think getting tripped in the backfield has more to do with the OL than him.
By “home run” I’m not looking for a 90+yard touchdown run (did you see that one Best had against UCLA?! :) ) necessarily, but even a couple of 25-30 yard scampers are well within Vereen’s and Sofele’s capability.
by atomsareenough on Sep 11, 2010 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions
But you have to admit
Covaughn DeBoskie Johnson looked really good. And its not just this game, but I noticed he’s always looked good in the games hes played in. You could say its because hes facing less competition with the secondary units on, but he has EXCELLENT speed burst, is very shifty, has great feet, and hits the hole hard. It might just be a practice thing, but IMO from what I’ve seen from last year and this year (albeit a small portion), DeBoskie should be the 2nd running back.
I feel like we lack the information necessary to be proclaiming “shoulds” here. We know that Isi can play very well based on what we saw last year. This year, he has shown some good sutff, too, including a great burst around the left side today. DeBoskie has also shown some great stuff, but in very limited action.
Without further knowledge regarding the skill set of DeBoskie against top flight competition it is difficult for us to say who “should” be starting.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I agree
I’m not a coach and I don’t see enough of CBJ. I just think that from what I have seen, I would play CBJ more.
He seemed to get tripped up in the backfield a lot.
That’s more on the o-line than on young Isi. And no, there weren’t any four-baggers. Vereen did pretty well with a few leg-it-outs (it’s not unreasonable to think that he’s still mildly hobbled), and DeBo ran really well against the 2nd team D. As such, i’m seeing a run attack that’s slowly finding its way – just not too slowly, inshallah.
Vereen looked a little rusty out there too. I think he could’ve broken some of them off. It’s not like we were bottled up or anything (like we did to them)
The OL’s run blocking’s going to be hit and miss all year…hopefully, many more hits than misses.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 11, 2010 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Vereen needs to work on his balance
and running ability. Might be rust, but I’ve noticed he’s not in the Justin Forsett mold and I’m not sure how well he will do in the NFL.
This
I was quite disappointed in the running game. Our OL didn’t seem to make any real statement at all, and there were way too many times when either Vereen or Sofele were forced to be elusive and creative before they hit the line.
Whether it’s the blocking execution, scheme, or talent, something isn’t working.
Hey, Ucla -
1. Get your own colors
2. Get your own fight song
3. GET A REAL BEAR!
was Colorado stacking the box? playing run first? that would seem to be the standard recipe for Cal after last year. I couldn’t tell from my on-and-off glances at the stream.
jh
Yeah, Vereen even mentioned it in the press conference (they kept an extra defender in the box)
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions
At one point late in the game I actually counted nine in the box, which was highly amusing because Isi just ran left and got himself a solid gain.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
thanks.
I reckon Colorado thought it could lean on its two highly regarded corners and try to stop the run. I have heard Nevada has the opposite situation – trouble against the pass last year.
As others have mentioned, I think Cal has some weapons on offense, particularly throwing the ball: Jones and Allen have looked very good, Miller proved himself last year, and Vereen out of the backfield is very dangerous. I hope that helps open up the run game as well.
jh
Agreed – I especially don’t see much out of Sofele – seems like he always gets hit by the first man. I thought Deboskie looked better.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions
It always seemed like he powered through a few tackles.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Deboskie did look good, and was the kind of bruising runner we haven’t really had in a while, though I do wonder if it was helping to run against Colorado’s backups.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Did Colorado bring their backups on the field?
I would think that with a blowout that bad, Colorado would leave its first team on so they wouldn’t be more embarassed.
I am unsure if there were backups out there – at the most it was a mixed lineup.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Sofele had a mediocre game against Colorado, but he probably looked the best of all the RBs against UCD.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
He was better in that one – but I still don’t feel like I have seen a lot of upside from him.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions
It would be difficult for me to disagree more. I see him on every play driving his legs hard no matter what. It is clear that he is undersized, but he is not giving up on any play. That will pay dividends
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
But that is because his strides are only 80% as long as a normal man’s.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, to be more positive, lets go with normal football player.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I thik that helps him with quick acceleration. At least, that’s what I always notice about him, that he’s really quick right after the handoff.
Yup, one would think that he would get up to speed quickly. There is a reason why pre-Bolt sprinters were all generally under 6-feet.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions
A lot to talk about, but the first andmost important thing:
What’;s up with the Colorado band??? They wre like the most stereotypical cliched high cshool style band. They played the Hey song, the Emporers death march, it was like every classic pep band song! Oy
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I felt like I was watching a sitcom of a pep band show on the WB
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
The weirdest thing...
…was that they popped like crazy when “Separate Ways” was announced and applauded like mad at the end of it.
Seriously, WTF is it with kids these days and Journey?
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
But…. we play Iron Man every time we make a sack…?
Also, don’t LOTS of college teams play the Emperor’s Death March?
I mean, I’m super-band-dude or anything, but they didn’t seem particularly worse than any other band I’ve seen in the stadium?
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
fayl
I read that as “fuck all y’all”
by atomsareenough on Sep 12, 2010 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Just because lots of other college team bands are like cliched high school bands (hi, UCLA!) doesn’t excuse Colorado.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
well come on now, if THAT many bands are cliched, then it’s NOT a cliche. Maybe that’s just NORMAL for college bands, and other bands (like the UCMB) are just better than most bands.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
well come on now, if THAT many bands are cliched, then it’s NOT a cliche.
isn’t this the definition of cliche, though?
Remember, the enemy's end zone is DOWN!
by GoldBlooded on Sep 12, 2010 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Dear heavens! i missed most of that, and thankfully so.
But it’s always great to hear the Cal Band’s cromulent arrangement of Chicago’s Make Me Smile. As a high-school tuba player whose assistant band-leader was Cal Band, that tune never fails to, well, make me smile.
Riley
On his performance:
“It was average. I made some plays, did some bad things. The fourth quarter was better, but I just have to be a little more consistent throughout the game and keep drives rolling.”
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
I like this one
Tyler Hansen, QB
On California:
“Their D-line and linebackers are really good. They did some things defensively that confused out O-line a little bit, but we’ll clean that up for next week.”
“Cal’s a lot faster and more athletic than Colorado State was. We knew that coming in, but their speed surprised us a little bit. We underestimated how fast they were. I think that was the biggest key.”
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Scotty McKnight, WR
On the game:
"This is the most embarrassing game of my life. I don’t even know how to handle it."
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
He should look on the bright side...
At least he doesn’t play for Washington State
Beat my 35-17 prediction
Like most, I am gun shy about early season success with the bears, but take away a few very encouraging things. One, our defensive seems far better in getting pressure, and defending the pass. Both sucked last year. Special teams, at least the kicking part, and returning, seems better. And offensively, we seem to have a better passing game than last year. The Oline concerns and running game are a concern, but I take away these other positives.
Bottom line is that no one predicted this blow out, and we totally dominated them. So even us paranoid Cal fans should be genuinely happy and hopeful. I can’t explain how happy I am about our dominating pass rush. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of Jarred Price and Kendricks and Jordan and everybody else.
Let’s just hope Colorado’s OL doesn’t turn out to be big piles of goo and marshmallows.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 11, 2010 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I feel like our pass rush really takes advantage of our speed advantage upfront..
and btw, the secondary looked great today. was very happy with williams, hagan, and anthony. lb’s were solid as always. special teams look solid. still looking for more from the offense…riley, idk, still looks the same, and the OL concerns me as well. guess we’ll see the next two weeks. still holding my breath…
Does anyone know if Anthony is hurt?
Williams came in because Anthony got banged up somehow. Any news would be appreciated.
Anthony came back in I thought
At least I saw him with his helmet on.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 11, 2010 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes Anthony did go back and play after resting a couple of plays. He seems fine, might have just
been hit hard for a few minutes. I don’t think he gained any injury or anything serious.
Anthony was walking around fine, and actually was one of the people that ran out to celebrate Williams’ pick. Maybe it was an attempt to get the backups some reps?
First off
I would just like to state this. Although we did blowout Maryland and all of our easy opponents last year, it was visibly apparent that our defense, particularly our secondary and linebackers, was just not good. When DaRell Scott ran for that touchdown last year, I could see from a mile away that our defense was not top notch. From this game I can point out our defense is going to be solid. Our linebackers are a vast improvement from last year’s and I think that is the key difference.
Very Special Teams
Again I repeat my mantra: special teams will save us at least one win that would have been a big L last year. Every phase is just so much better than in years past.
"Well, if that ain't a show, I'll kiss your ass." - Gov. Jim Folsom Sr. (D-AL), 1948-52
There were a couple of blown kick/punt coverages on the day, but overall it was solid. Anger had an AWESOME 63-yard punt that was called back for an illegal formation.
by atomsareenough on Sep 11, 2010 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions
And then he boomed an even more awesome 66 yard punt that pinned Colorado inside their own ten again.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 11, 2010 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I thought the next kick was also similarly long, but the coverage was poor and Colorado returned it to their own 40, but it was brought back a bit by an illegal block from Colorado.
by atomsareenough on Sep 12, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Yknow when an illegal block or holding is involved and the coverage is poor, sometimes those two things are related.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Yes, I’m aware :) I saw the block, it definitely helped bust the returner free.
by atomsareenough on Sep 12, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
It seemed like our new special teams coverage is
designed to contain punt/kick returners to the left side of the field. Sort of like a bend but don’t break special teams coverage. This was apparent in the win vs uc davis as well.
Definitely worried about Vereen's health
2 weeks and we go to Arizona and we need Vereen fully healthy for that game. Our O-Line needs to block better for him though.
Jeremy Ross has been a bright spot for us in the return game. It seems like everytime he gets a chance on a return it’s going for at least 20 yards and it will be spectacular.
Defense looks good. Riley looks okay. Keenan Allen and Marv Jones are special.
Yes, Allen and Jones are indeed special.
We seem to be making no attempt to even include other receivers or tight ends. Unless my eyes deceive me, Ross was the only receiver other than the dynamic duo to get a catch. No Loggy, no Miller, no anyone else. Hope that means they are just saving those weapons for later and establishing the rep for the two receivers so they get keyed on later.
I think so. It also depends on what the D gives us too. Plus, Marv and Keenan may prove to be the best tandem in the Pac-10 by the end of the year. And I don’t think that’s just blowing smoke.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 11, 2010 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, that was a joke. But Colorado 2010 will probably be as bad or worse than Maryland 2009.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I am
going to disagree with you on that one. Even without the penalties, I’m not so sure Colorado would have won. They would have had a better chance, but I still think Cal would have won by 20+ points. Maryland 2009 was just a horrible team, and Colorado definitely has more talent than that Maryland team. Colorado has better CB’s, OL, Defense, and WR’s vs 2009 Maryland.
We at least know our special teams are MUCH more improved and that is indpeendent of strength of opponent.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Not to be unnecessarily negative but it seemed like our kickoff coverage wasn’t so great today. (But our kickoffs are much improved.)
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m not sure I’ve seen you say a single positive thing so far.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Haha – I think the positives have been covered. I defended Riley below – he did great – just like everyone else.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions
I think not acknowledging Riley’s improvement and the improvement of the WRs is significantly underselling things. From an offensive standpoint, the head-scratching part in this one seemed to be the lack of a running game.
From what I recall, Riley threw one ball that was interceptable and seemed fairly poised even though they were getting some rushers in the backfield (especially early.) He also threw a number of very good passes. Fortunately, our offense, so far, doesn’t seem to rely on home run plays like it has the last 2 seasons. The second half TD drives we pretty nice, sustained, and led by the passing game.
An additional thought about passing:
Tedford didn’t let off the gas in the second half. Hopefully this signals something of a new attitude, but after the first couple drives of the second half didn’t get anywhere running the ball, we stopped running the ball. Tedford from 2005-2009 would have just been stubborn in my opinion and been happy with what still would have been an easy win. Hopefully he has learned that we need to throw balls in these easy wins if we hope to throw the ball against Oregon/SC/OSU etc.
All good observations.
Regarding the new attitude of Tedford, he also went for it on 4th down near midfield early in the game.
And that failed, so to me it is a double edged sword.
We’re working on a post about Tedford aggressiveness, actually. I hope to finish it up for tomorrow.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Ralphie Report sounds a lot like us after the Oregon game last year. After reading their comments, I know exactly how they feel.
The running game
i don’t know why, but vereen seems to be lacking that “burst” that he’s displayed throughout his career. maybe it’s rust, maybe it’s injury, i’m not sure but he doesn’t seems to explode like he used to. Hope it’s temporary…
I think Deboskie has looked better than Isi so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if he starts taking meaningful carries soon. I think Isi is valuable on those fly sweeps but I’m not sure if he’s ready to go between the tackles just yet.
by ucsdgoldenbear on Sep 11, 2010 10:21 PM PDT reply actions
There is always the possibility that Vereen’s strength was in part that he was not-Jahvid. I wonder if some of those big runs weren’t that the defense took plays off with him out there.
But I am sure he will be a very good back this season (and next!). I was shocked when people were commenting that he got “only” 4.8 YPC in the UCD game.
by Tedfordisgod on Sep 11, 2010 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow, looks like there are a lot of people who think CDJ looked better than Sofele. Maybe it’s easier to see on tv, since I was watching from an angle off the field, but I thought Sofele did pretty well. He had quick bursts, broke a few tackles, etc.
agreed
I thought Sofele looked good today. There was one play where he got blown up by a corner blitz, but that isn’t on him. He broke tackles and had one good scoot to the outside that went for a first down.
CDJ had one good run, but I’m trusting Tedford and co. on this one. If Isi keeps getting the ball, he’ll break one big. And he has good hands (except for that opening kick—jeesh).
by slaphancock on Sep 11, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions
yea maybe i’m being a little tough on Isi, and yea I watched the game on TV. It just seems like he has a little work to do with being a little more patient before he hits the hole. Seems like he isn’t waiting for blocks to develop, but i’m sure that will come with experience, so i’m nitpicking right now.
CDJ seems to have a little more maturity with taking his time, picking his hole, then exploding through. Altho he’s similar to Vereen in that way, so maybe Isi’s role as #2 is to be that change of pace that comes with his style.
anyways, i’m pretty sure that i’m 100% correct and tedford and gould have no idea what they’re doing, I mean it’s not like they’ve been producing NFL backs or anything…
by ucsdgoldenbear on Sep 11, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions
There was one play where he got blown up by a corner blitz, but that isn’t on him.
This. Stevens missed his block on that guy. Otherwise, Sofele had a chance to do something around the corner.
Yes, I am an Old Blue. Now get off my lawn.
the announcers commented that Vereen said to them he still not in complete game shape, and that he was playing at 85%
What about not having the opponent start at the 40 yard line every time? Because I like that!
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
And haw about that one solo ST tackle at the south end of the field?? That was awesome!!!
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
Hurrell and Moncrease have been doing a really good job getting down the field and takin’ suckas out.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Colorado was Shyte
Moncrease made a great stop on special teams today… I agree ST looks much better.
Riley looks stiff. Like he’s trying to hard to hold the ball on his shoulder instead of being a little more fluid with it. I thought I saw him pretty much staring down one receiver on quite a few occasions. Not sure if he can throw a bomb without putting too much air under it— guess we’ll find out. Can Riley throw the ball 55-60 yards?
I’m kind of feeling the Debo argument if our O-line is not that mighty.
Kendricks and Price were very fast off the edge today and I noticed several defensive sets where the linemen appear to be spit very wide with LB’s covering the middle of the line from several feet back. Pass rush looked great; but, I digress…
Had to be the long one to Marvin Jones that MJ almost took in for the touchdown (got pushed out at the 2).
by atomsareenough on Sep 12, 2010 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Sup Guys
We just blew CSU out 51-6. Looking forward to play you guys next week in Reno. Should be a shoot out.
Looking forward to the POINTS!
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 11, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions
How fast is Sofele? Is he faster than CDJ?
I think people have a stereotype of sub 5’10 backs that they are all “fast, shifty, or change of pace” but is that really true? Is Sofele truly faster than CDJ? The problem with smaller backs is they usually go down with first contact, I believe someone mentioned that in a post about Rodney Stewart earlier this week. With our OL looking like a liability wouldn’t we want a bigger back that can break the tackle of the first man than a smaller back that more than likely is going down in first contact?
Beyond that, what is Sofeles longest play from scrimmage? I am just not sold on Sofele as our number 2, does anyone actually believe that, God forbid Shane has to miss a few games, Sofele would be the starter in Shanes place? I really don’t. I believe Ludwig and Tedford should have a package of plays for Sofele but he shouldn’t be the number two, that is just one (mostly drunk) Cal fans opinions. I understand and trust that the coaching staff knows more than I do but from the small sample of games I have seen, I do not believe Sofele should be ahead of CDJ.
That being said, the defense and kickoffs have looked great.
Riley looked shaky at times.
Marvin and Allen are our best WR duo since DJax and Hawk (or Jordan) they are both playmakers.
I really haven’t seen any improvement on the OL since last season, I blame that on Marshall.
Where is Anthony Miller? Has Ludwig and Riley both forgotten that he is still on the team? We need to get him more involved.
It is always great to see Price making plays!
DJ Holt looks a lot better in pass coverage.
Good to see Hagan have a good game, especially in front of his dad.
UCLA is about to go 0-4 to start the season.
I HATE stanfurd.
That is all.
lots of good points. from one drunk Cal fan in SD to another… GO BEARS!
by ucsdgoldenbear on Sep 12, 2010 2:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Actually the SD stands for South Dakota, as in South Dakota State
beating Minnesota!
No actually I am from San Diego and not South Dakota, thankfully.
anthony miller
i’m wondering if making us and (other teams) forget about him is by design at this point in the season
It’s not so hard to take away the TE in the passing game. When the opposing D leaves soft spots for the TE, they’ll get the ball.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 6:15 AM PDT up reply actions
Great write up, glad to hear your thoughts.
I disagree that Sofele goes down with first tackle. I would argue, in fact, the opposite, that he powers through tackles, which is somewhat surprising given his size. There was a 2 yard run that Sofele had (and that doesnt sound that impressive, just 2 yards) but he powered through like 3 tackles just to get those 2 yards.
Also, you can flip your OLine liability like this:
“With our OL looking like a liability wouldn’t we want a smaller back that can get around the corner quicker than a big back that is more likely to be caught in open field?”
Does anybody remember in the drive where Colorado went from 4th and 2 to 4th and 25 at the goal. On one of the plays (I think 2nd down) they had some fullback open on the left side. Dude was WIDE THE FUCK OPEN, but lacked speed so much that the Cal player closed really fast and stuffed the run! That wouldn’t have happened to Sofele, I can say that much.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Sofele and Vereen aren’t the problem. It’s unfair to compare Sofele’s performance to Debo because of the difference in personnel on both sides of the ball. How quickly we forget that last week, Sofele lit up UCD’s 1st team D while Debo was probably the least impressive of our 4 RB’s when he got garbage time carries in the 4th.
If the O-line, TE’s, and FB’s open lanes, any of our RB’s will do just fine. Still a work in progress there.
However, it should also be noted that CU really does have two outstanding CB’s who are going to play on Sundays. This gives them the luxury of over-committing the remainder of their defense to stopping the run.
Besides, this defensive strategy shouldn’t come as a surprise to any of us. I’d expect every team to do the same until Riley proves that he can consistently beat people with his arm. We’re fortunate that we don’t see CB tandems like this one very often.
I must admit – I’m perplexed at the absence of the TE from our passing attack. Perhaps the coaches aren’t fully confident in our O-line, know that Riley struggles when pressured, and are utilizing more max-protect schemes keeping the TE’s in?
Old Toothwrangler
I remember that 4th down play
I think it is a bit unfair to compare a FB’s speed to a RB. Had that been Rodney Stewart he probably would have scored.
I also want to add that Holt made a good play and took a goog angle to stop the FB.
I think you’re supporting his argument. Aren’t Isi and Rodney Stewart of similar size and stature?
by OaktownAggie on Sep 12, 2010 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Pass protection is also an integral part of being a running back in Cal’s system. I know people overlook that because nobody ever mentions it.
Fullbacks and Tight Ends also are an integral part of Cal’s run blocking schemes. This is overlooked as well. Marshall is not responsible for those guys. This does not excuse Marshall for OL failures, but the OL looks worse because TEs and FBs aren’t doing their job all the time.
I realize that their is more to pass pro/run blocking than just the OL
that the the TE’s, FB’s, and RB’s all play an important role.
However, as other have mentioned, I did not see much of a “push” by our OL against the CU DL.
I agree that one stereotype is that small backs are fast, shifty, etc. Another stereotype about small backs is that they “go down with first contact,” which imo Sofele has demonstrated he does not. I saw him break the first tackle several times in the UCD game and I think he also demonstrated this against Colorado. So while I don’t believe CDJ is a bad option by any means, I think Sofele is easily capable of being the No. 2 back.
I’m loving the pessimism. It shows that, deep down, most of us still think that we can win the Pac-10 this year. If Cal fans didn’t have that, we’d all be applauding how we completely dismantled CU in every facet of the game (…except for Run O…which was still 4.4 yards per carry and 160 yards).
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
Well, the fact that we seem to be quibbling a lot about backups (both in QB and RB) is encouraging. I’m not seeing a lot of BENCH THIS PLAYER NOW! posts and instead FURTHER BENCH THIS ALREADY NON-STARTING PLAYER NOW! posts. So, life cant be that bad!
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I guess it’s the hangover from Maryland? I’m a little surprised to see this much pessimism after a 52-7 victory over a BCS opponent. Yeah, sure, some of it came from flukey pick 6’s or whatever, but it’s essentially the same margin of victory as our game last week against Davis!
Sofele v. Deboskie
So the theme of the comments here seems to center a lot on a “Sofele v. Deboskie as #2 Back” debate. As somebody who’s seen both in practice (though not since July), I’ll tell you this: Tedford has it right. Groundbreaking analysis, I know. Twist is right about Isi and his tenacity and ability to stay on his feet. If the situation arose, I’d be comfortable with Isi as our #1. Covaughn is a nice guy and a serviceable back, but he just doesn’t have the moves or speed of Shane or Isi.
As far as not having a running game this week: is it possible we were just trying to save some wear and tear on our backs? We’ve jumped out to big leads early the first 2 games, as a fan, it would make sense to me if we were running it less than we would if the game were tight.
In addition, Go Bears! Great game from what I was able to see. I was especially pleased with the defense.
I've been Honked...
Thanks for the info, dude. Quality.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
I dunno, did you see the part where he said I was right? Clearly, he’s a raving lunatic in need of an insane asylum.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
You’re usually right when it comes to fashion and RBs. Everything else is on a touch and go basis.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
You’re usually right when it comes to fashion
Flagged
by atomsareenough on Sep 12, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Twist is right
You should seek professional psychiatric help immediately.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
You have upset Old Blues everywhere.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions
You didn’t get much of a chance to see Yarnway, did you? Was he still recovering from his injury when you moved on?
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, he was hurt a good portion of the time I was there. Before he was injured, he was making a push for a good number of reps in practice as a true freshman. From what I have seen, both then and this summer, the perception of him as a big, tough back is pretty accurate. I’m looking forward to see what he can do in the future.
I've been Honked...
CAL #1!
Did you guys see the link that TM put up. Cal is ranked #1 in the FBS for total defense! Go Bears!
This will be tested on Friday, but….
I’ll take it!
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m very, very nervous about Nevada, especially after they destroyed CSU. The difficult assessment hte last two weeks has been the quality of opponent, so while I think Cal has played relatively well, it’s hard to tell on an absolute scale.
Colorado destroyed CSU, too...
I realize not by nearly as much as Nevada, but still, the Buffs took their major in-state rival to the mat and we did alright against them yesterday.
I’m more concerned about the short week (albeit by just one day) and going on the road into WAC country.
I do believe that Chauncey will put together a top-notch defensive game plan, exploiting whatever weaknesses he finds, and Riley, Jones, Vereen, Allen, etc (isn’t nice to be able to write “etc.” after four names?!) will hold their end on offense.
I am by no means resting easy on this, but I do feel more comfortable going into it than I did two weeks ago.
Still confused… Chauncey Billups is a basketball player.
by OaktownAggie on Sep 13, 2010 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Rehasing the old Cal running game business but...
… I’m seriously disappointed with Cal’s running game. I hope that Shane isn’t still hampered by injury, suffering a sophomore slump, or letting the hype get to his head.
Anyway I’m thinking of doing a film analysis on the Cal running game with all of Shane’s carries. How does that sound? I just need the Colorado torrent first
In other words, Go Bears!
How much of it is Vereen’s inability to perform—I don’t believe for a second that he’s letting “the hype get to his head”—versus the O line’s inability to open holes, hold back defenders, etc?
Vereen looked great going up to get that TD on the throw. I think it would be more beneficial to check back on him during the first bye week to see what’s going on.
o=========<| BBBBBBEARZZZZZZ
May I offer you a glass of sunshine?
by Thoroughbred on Sep 12, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Huh
Looks like the coaches faced the same dilemma I faced in my blogpoll ballot – their just aren’t many teams worth ranking right now.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
WHOSE TEAMS?!
Remember, the enemy's end zone is DOWN!
by GoldBlooded on Sep 12, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
boo.
We haven’t earned anything yet, wait until we play Arizona. I prefer being underrated, but on the plus side, hopefully this will sell more home tix. Our stadium looked VERY empty early.
It looked empty early in part because all of the constrction makes it harder to get into the stadium on time. Need more entrances, plz.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on Sep 12, 2010 1:18 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Yknow the west side entrance is always remarkably easy to enter on. People dont like it because you gotta climb all the way to the top.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Jahvid Best has 11 rush for 20 yards and 2 TDs
as Detroit is beating Chicago 14-3 nearing the half…
Go Pro Bears!
Twist posted an NFL open thread if you want to keep discussing the pros
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
#1ish vs. #1ish!
On the heels of YleeXOtee’s pointing out of Mr. Miller’s pointing out of this week’s FBS total defense stats: have a look at these total offense numbers too.
Week two, yes; meaningless, yes. But still, what fun. Next up on the docket we have the nation’s technically, as-of-now best offense vs. the nation’s technically, as-of-now best defense. Doesn’t happen very often.
Next Saturday should make, at least, for a good show. (And lead inevitably to a tumbling in the respective rankings for both teams, so enjoy it while it lasts, Pappy’s kiddos.)
I had a thought today about our (seemingly) dominant defense. I wonder if what’s hindering these teams is a lack of film of Pendergast’s defense. I guess they could use his NFL film, but since the personnel are so different, I don’t know how much use it would be. I’m a little worried that as the season goes on, teams will start picking up our blitz packages once they have more film to study.

by 



























































