SB Nation Bay Area Editor's Pick
A Closer Look at Cal's 2009 Defense and Special Teams, Part 4
For this next installment, I am going to stray from the format of the first 3 posts in this series to spice things up a little bit. Instead of subjecting loyal readers to a whole season of failures from a specific area of the defense, I will take a closer look at the failures for the first half of a game from 2009 in this post. This defensive area fell well short of expectations. In this next post, I decided to look into everyone’s favorite topic: Pressuring the Quarterback.
Pressuring the Quarterback
Contrary to popular belief, blitzing just to blitz in hopes of sacking or disrupting the quarterback is not effective. Blitzing is most effective when sending specific pressure to attack the weak parts of protection schemes during certain down and distance situations. Dialing up the right pressure at the right time is important to the success of the defensive playcall. Equally important is having the personnel capable of executing the blitz, which means they must have a diverse set of moves, must know their assignments, and having extra athleticism to make up for a miscue always helps.
Upon thumbing through last season’s statistics, I noticed that Oregon State was #82 in the country in sacks allowed and I selectively had forgotten that Cal did not sack Oregon State’s quarterback a single time. Spiked by curiosity and recalling the complaints about Cal’s ineffective pass rush against the Beavers and rushing 3 too many times in that game, I took a deeper look into things and cut every pressure play that involved a blitz, zone blitz, and the additional 4th rusher from the first half of the 2009 OSU game.
Without any further ado, here are some of the relevant statistics to this post (well, most of them are relevant) and clips:
| Total OSU Offensive Plays, 1st Half | Run | Pass |
| 39 | 15 | 24 |
| Cal Defensive Personnel vs OSU, 1st Half |
3-4 | 3-3-5 |
| Total # of snaps | 36 | 3 |
| # of Rushers on Pass Plays | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Play Action |
| Total # of times | 4 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Pressure (5+ blitzers) on Down | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| # of Times | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Pressure (5+ blitzers, zone blitz, and 4th rusher) on Down | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| # of Times | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Down and Distance, All Plays |
# of Plays |
| 1st and 10 | 14 |
| 1st and Goal | 3 |
| 2nd and Goal | 2 |
| 2nd and 1-3 | 1 |
| 2nd and 4-8 | 2 |
| 2nd and 9+ | 7 |
| 3rd and Goal | 2 |
| 3rd and 1-3 | 1 |
| 3rd and 4-8 | 1 |
| 3rd and 9+ | 5 |
| 4th and short | 1 |
| Down and Distance, Pass Plays Only |
# of Plays |
| 1st and 10 | 7 |
| 1st and Goal | 1 |
| 2nd and Goal | 0 |
| 2nd and 1-3 | 0 |
| 2nd and 4-8 | 2 |
| 2nd and 9+ | 7 |
| 3rd and Goal | 1 |
| 3rd and 1-3 | 0 |
| 3rd and 4-8 | 1 |
| 3rd and 9+ | 5 |
| 4th and short | 0 |
4th "Mystery" Rusher
The left, right, and middle of the offensive line was pressured in these clips. Note how little pressure the linebackers get.
1: Left Inside Linebacker (Bishop) is the 4th Rusher and takes on the Right Guard
2: Left Outside Linebacker (Holt) is the 4th Rusher and takes on the Right Tackle
3: Operating out of 3-3-5 personnel, the Middle Linebacker (Young) is the 4th rusher and he goes up against the Left Guard
4: Right Outside Linebacker (Young) is the 4th Rusher and is blocked by the Tight End
Pressure with 5+ Rushers
The OSU offensive line is attacked from the outside on both sides and straight up the middle. Less than ideal success rate.
1: Cal sends 5 guys (3 DL, 1 OLB, 1 ILB). The additional rusher that gets sent is the left inside linebacker who had a clear path to the QB, who got the pass off rather quickly. Notice how the pass was completed to the area the ILB was blitzing from but also, the safety covering the OSU WR was the victim of a pick route.
2: Cal sent 5 guys (3 DL, 1 OLB, 1 SAF). This clip is a bit frustrating to review for a few reasons. First, Cameron Jordan (Defensive End on the bottom of the screen) is held and there was no call. Second, Aaron Tipoti (Nose Tackle) got a very good push on the center but let up when he thought the running back had the ball. He did realize his mistake and went back to the rush. If Tipoti never let up, he probably would have gotten a hand on Canfield and even sacked him, changing the face of the game.
3: Left Cornerback Blitz. If this were a pass play, it looks to me that 5 guys would have rushed. However, it turned out to be a run play that was defended very well by Cal’s defense.
4: Blitz near the Goal line. Cal sent 6 guys and had man coverage on every eligible receiver. The OSU tight end stayed into block so one of Cal’s safety’s served as a "safety." OSU ran another pick route which blocked Cal safety’s from covering the WR who scored.
Zone Blitzes
The zone blitzes in this clip came on 2nd and 9+ (with the exception of a 2nd and 5) in the 2nd quarter. Screens are a good play to pick up some yardage to make easier 3rd down situations for the offense when in 2nd and longs. OSU called a screen play in the 1st quarter on a 2nd and long which was stopped by a 3 man rush. The next two 2nd and longs had regular blitzes beaten BADLY so the zone blitz was dialed up next and there was success with the exception of the first lowlight in the video.
1: Cal blitzed the free safety from the left side and dropped the NT into coverage. I am not sure what the previous defensive coordinator assigned the nose tackle on these blitzes. Drop into the short middle zone, spy the running back for screen and dump off passes, or both? Something I have to check into. However, if the NT is assigned to spy on the RB in this play, this is clearly his bad which set off the chain reaction.
2-4: The last three zone blitzes in this clip are essentially the same concept with a Nose Tackle dropping into coverage/spying the running back and the defensive ends and outside linebackers on both sides rushing (OK, I got lazy with my breakdowns but I got tired of watching rushers run straight into blockers).
Thoughts on OSU's QB and OL
Pressuring the quarterback against OSU were pretty bad to say the least. The OSU OL did a very good job of protecting the QB. Some missed holding calls but overall, they held strong against the Cal pressure. When in 1 on 1 situations, the OSU offensive linemen held their own just long enough for the QB to get the pass off (I do not believe he threw the ball away once in the first half). I think the only clear shot Cal landed on him was in the very last clip of the Zone Blitz video where Kendricks popped the QB just as he was throwing. Cal touched him a few times otherwise, but never to the point where he was shaken up by a hit. The OSU QB was very good at getting rid of the ball quickly against Cal and I think a bunch of that could be accredited to being a 5th year senior and the OSU game plan. Overall in this game, OSU's offense just flat out executed. It does not matter if OSU was #82 in the country in sacks allowed. What matters is that they played better that Saturday.
How Did Cal Fare When Sending Pressure?
- Cal sent 5+ blitzers 4 times out of 24 passes and were beaten 3 times (17% of the time and 25% success rate)
- Cal blitzed zone and 5+ rushers 8 times out of 24 passes (33% of the time and 37.5% success rate)
- Cal sent the unknown 4th rusher 4 times out of 24 passes(16.7% of the time and 0% success rate)
- Cal sent pressure in the form of 5+ rushers, zone blitz, and 4th mystery rusher 12 times out of 24 passes (50% of the time, success rate 25%)
- Cal rushed 4 fourteen times.
- Cal rushed 3 four times and got beaten badly once but sniffed out a screen, got a holding penalty, and batted down a pass the other times (75% success rate).
So what was the problem?
- Coverage? Much better coverage was needed especially while in zone. Sometimes there was adequate pressure despite not getting to the QB but coverage was not tight enough.
- Playcalling? I would say part of it is playcalling when looking back in hindsight. I am not a Sunday morning quarterback so playcalling is near the bottom of my list. Cal's safeties took a beating when OSU got them in man coverage and when Cal had busted coverages. It was some brilliant playcalling on OSU's part. However, Cal did adjust it's playcalling but I really would have liked to have seen more creative pressure on zone blitzes.
- Personnel? A good amount of plays were run out of the 3-3-5 last year in long distance situations. Out of 39 plays, Cal ran the 3-3-5 three times in the first half vs OSU. Most of Cal’s cool defensive calls from 2008 came out of the 3-3-5. Believe me and I know for a fact that a large section of the defensive pressure package was left unused in 2009. Though, I do not expect everybody to believe me. However, if you do not, check out this post, a compilation of Cal’s defense in the 3-3-5 in 2008. That section was not just torn out of the playbook and used to start fires for heat to keep the coaches warm at Memorial Stadium during cold nights last fall. This section of the playbook was left untouched because the personnel could not execute it.
- Bad Pass Rushing Skills and Lack of Moves? When breaking down this film, I saw absolutely too many rushers running straight into blockers. A tackling dummy would have been more effective at times. When pass rushing, the rusher needs to have an assortment of moves to get to the Quarterback. On a lower level, this is a talent, experience, and position coach problem. Going up a level, this is defensive coordinator problem. On a higher level, this is a head coaching and recruiting problem. The problem is intermingled on all levels, however, I feel Cal has already taken the right steps in addressing it. We will see soon.
Stay tuned for Part 5/5 in the next few days.
The first 3 installments of this series can be found at these links:Part 1: Mistackling, Part 2: Special Teams, and Part 3: Run Defense
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
23 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Is it a failed understanding on my part, or did OSU basically destroy us the same way Oregon did: using their TE to convert critical long-yardage situations?
If I remember that game correctly, our D did a fantastic job of shutting down the Beaver running game, forcing them to win through the air. And I also remember them having no problem finding a constantly open TE who then also racked up repulsive YAC numbers.
If my memory is actually correct, what was it about our defense that gave them that? Is it just poor execution, poor play calling, outstanding effort by OSU?
Careful, man. There's a beverage here!
It was coverage miscues or a good playcall by OSU that left the safeties in one on one with the OSU TEs and WRs. Also, There was something OSU saw on tape beforehand and I would say they probably noted LBs passing on receivers to the safeties behind them in zone coverage on 2nd or 3rd and long. OSU attacked the safeties in those down and distance situations each time and was killing Cal with the midrange game. I did not pay close attention and it is hard to see the coverage on tv, but Cal looks to have adjusted by putting another defender back there or dropping a bit further back in coverage. Once Cal adjusted, OSU started utilzing shorter routes and dump off passes.
Great, this is exactly the kind of thing I hoped someone would look at! Hard to come to definite conclusions from one half of one game, but definitely the kind of information that interests me.
Oh yeah, and rec’d for looking at exactly what I wanted to know!
by Missing Barry on Sep 1, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Personnel better this year?
I’m really anxious for the season to start because I want to see how the LBs and Safeties handle themselves this year. Clearly there was a lot of competition (which is good), but I worry about continuity and experience. The Defenses of years past had very smart LBs and tough safeties. All too often it seemed to me last year that we got MORE pressure rushing three (Alualu was that good I guess). Maybe that’s why Gregory was dropping guys back and rushing three all the time? Perhaps we have been too hard on him and not putting the proper amount of blame on the players as well (not that it is all their fault).
I worry when I see our best linebacker, Mikey Mo, struggle to make tackles. There is just something lacking in terms of strength and speed in that D. I sincerely hope these new guys can bring a fire we’ve lacked since the departure of the esteemed Zack Follett. I am not a die-hard Follett fan (I think he was a “little” overrated), but he clearly had the athleticism that made this defense work. From what I understand about the way Pendergrast has made his living and from what I saw in the Spring Game, I’m not sure that there will be ALL that much of a difference in scheme. Perhaps in attitude? It’ll be interesting to revisit this at year’s end and compare Pendergrast to Gregory.
Anyone else worried about LB situation???
I worry when I see our best linebacker, Mikey Mo, struggle to make tackles.
That is definitely something I’ve been noticing in these breakdowns, too. He does seem to be around the ball a lot, but you just never see much of a hit coming from him, you know? Whereas someone like Patrick Willis (or guys like Williams, Follett and Bishop) will occasionally just run someone the F over, Mikey Mo seems to always be dragging guys down, when he’s making the tackle. A couple of plays it’s resulted in a broken tackle. I’d really like to see him hitting guys a lot harder….
by Missing Barry on Sep 1, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Mohamed isn’t a big linebacker. He can’t just run guys the F over. He was recruited to be a 4-3 OLB, and he’s playing out of position because of the formation changes and to quarterback the defense on the interior. He’s better in pass coverage than in run support, but because none of the guys he’s played with are as savvy and versatile as him he’s been cast inside to make sure he can survey the field and alert the defense to anything he sees from the offense.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 1, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
He’s not the biggest, I do understand that, and of course size plays a role in how hard you can hit. That said, I still believe a guy his size is capable of showing some more hit power from time to time. I guess my point is that he makes a crapload of tackles like you would expect out of a run stuffer, but really, they tend to all be of the drag down variety.
by Missing Barry on Sep 1, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
He was “casted” to the inside because he’s better suited to play on the inside than the outside in the 3-4, not because everybody else sucks around him.
I’m saying that his natural fit is a 4-3 OLB rather than a 3-4 ILB, if that makes sense. I do agree that he lacks the pass rush ability to be a great 3-4 OLB.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 1, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I think you’re right. He’s not a terrible fit in the 3-4 in a Patrick Willis like role (where you have a bigger guy like Spikes to take on the blockers and let you roam, somewhat similar to WOLB in 4-3), but yeah, he’s still a bit on the small side and would be better at 4-3 WOLB, I think.
by Missing Barry on Sep 1, 2010 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Great post. Your best one yet.
I have always sort of wanted to see this sort of analysis done too, but hadn’t gotten around to it myself. I think the results are interesting.
I think this post also is pretty good evidence that Gregory can be, and at times was aggressive. Far too often, people just recite how he always rushed only three pass rushers. That is simply not true. I’m not here to defend Gregory for sending only three pass rushers, but I’m just sick and tired of people reciting such a huge inaccuracy when the evidence is as plain as day and right in front of people.
So the biggest problem I see in these videos, and as you suggest, is that the Cal defenders just don’t have the skills or moves to get an adequate pass rush going when bringing the pressure. Hopefully the players improve on this area this season.
Thanks for this post.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Gregory did blitz
But his blitzes were fairly easy to pick up without someone like Follett to create the rush from the linebacking position. Bishop is not an ideal pass rusher, nor was Young. It’ll be interesting to see how Browner and Kendricks fare.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 1, 2010 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Right.
So it seems like you’re saying the talent level was the problem, not so much the scheme.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Well, I’d have liked to see more pre-snap motion (guys inching up and then some dropping into coverage, some going forward) blitzes. Also, stunts would have been good. The types of rushes Gregory sent were pretty standard (no linebackers inching up to the LoS) and easy for an adept linemen to pick up.
I might’ve missed it, but in these highlights I see a lot of blitzes running straight into the line instead of overloading a side or making the pocket collapse. See how intact the pocket looks when Canfield delivers his throws? Talent is problematic, but scheme could’ve been upgraded here too. Gregory should have known Canfield had a quick release and lets go of his throws and knew a standard blitz would’ve been ineffective (especially on that 3rd and goal, when Canfield is WAY back in the pocket and they decide to play man coverage).
Either play straight coverage or disguise and create better blitzes. I feel we could see better versions of the blitz this season.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Sep 1, 2010 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, I’d have liked to see more pre-snap motion (guys inching up and then some dropping into coverage, some going forward) blitzes. Also, stunts would have been good. The types of rushes Gregory sent were pretty standard (no linebackers inching up to the LoS) and easy for an adept linemen to pick up.
We did stunt and had some movement along the line. The result speaks for themself.
I might’ve missed it, but in these highlights I see a lot of blitzes running straight into the line instead of overloading a side or making the pocket collapse.
If you overload blitz, you better make sure your defenders can play man coverage or their zones get covered. An offense as sound as OSU’s would just find the vacated area and rip you apart.
It’s not all about the blitzing and getting pressure up front. Cal’s coverage sucked just as bad or maybe even more than the pass rush in 2009.
I do agree with your take to a degree – in some of the examples in Hydro and Cali’s posts we’ve seen some motion they didn’t seem to react very that well to, but I do think scheme was secondary.
by Missing Barry on Sep 1, 2010 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks! I finally have some time to get around to your Oregon Offense/Dickson posts. Looking forward to those.
Isn’t it amazing what people think they see?
Yes, most of the Cal defenders in those clips lack the athleticism in the form of pass rush skills and moves. The one guy who almost got to the QB from the outside linebacker spot was Kendricks, who I have been pumping up for months now. The guy is good and if he wasn’t injured and being shifted around to compensate for other players’ weak areas, he would have had better numbers last year.
Absolutely Fantastic
That must have taken an incredible amount of time to go back and review.
I also suspected that we simply didn’t use a lot of the pressures and blitzes that I had seen in previous years – I just wasn’t sure why.
Looking at the personnel, it sure looks like they couldn’t execute the pressure packages/coverages. I’m really hoping that emphasis on playing younger/more talented players lets us open things up this year.
However, Cal did adjust it’s playcalling but I really would have liked to have seen more creative pressure on zone blitzes.
Is is along the lines of what Avi is saying? More disguised positioning/stunting/delays? It sure seemed like many of the pressure packages we did use were fairly straightforward – the opposing team had a fairly good idea of who was coming and from where.
Old Toothwrangler
Yes, this took a gross amount of time. But it was kind of fun when I look back on it because my findings basically confirmed what I had thought all along.
Can’t speak for what Avinash said but I would have liked to have seen more creative pressure with the ZONE blitzes. Dropping a DE into coverage instead of just the NT. However, if that happened, that would mean you were taking one of your better pass rushers out of rushing and dropping him into coverage. That may have not made the staff feel comfortable. In the OSU game alone, Cal blitzed the free safety, left cornerback, inside linebackers, outside linebackers, the middle linebacker when we were in the 3-3-5, tried some shifting along the line, and did stunt (youtube linked in one of my posts above).
When Cal sent more 5+, they were beaten 75% of the time. I don’t know what more could have been done to put pressure on the QB without taking away more from Cal’s already weak coverage.
It sure seemed like many of the pressure packages we did use were fairly straightforward – the opposing team had a fairly good idea of who was coming and from where.
For the most part, defenses knew where the pressure was coming from last year, too. The difference in 2008 and 2009 was -Follett and -Rulon from pass rushing and -Felder/-Williams from covering the middle of the field. Rulon is the forgotten man. Take a look back at the 2008 Big Game Highlights. The majority of our pressure came from just the 3 DL + Follett. This is a talent issue.
There is truth to what Avinash said in his Pendergast/Gregory post about players making Gregory look good and not the opposite (I think he said that). In 2008, he had the players. In 2009, he didn’t and it showed. However, after clipping all of this stuff, I think it shows how incapable many of Cal’s defenders were at rushing the passer. No matter what he called, the defense couldn’t get pressure. So the question comes up “Is it a talent or coaching issue?” If people base the answer on Pendergast’s results from 2010, I don’t think its a fair comparison because like you said, there’s going to be some addition by subtraction this year, some more experienced players in key positions will be around, and more quality depth all across the board.
At this point, I just want this Saturday to come as soon as possible :)
This does illustrate something I’d long suspected about the 2009 defense, and that is that losing three strong LBs (Follett, Williams, Felder) killed us big-time, both in rushing the passer and in coverage.
Follett was a one-man wrecking crew as the blitzing LB. He had a knack for befuddling any OL man assigned to block him; he’d go around, through, make them run into other linemen and second-guess their blocking technique. None of the LBs on typically on the field in ‘09 had that ability. And yes, I’d also echo the comments about Rulon Davis as a pass rusher. When he was healthy enough, he was a good pass-rushing threat from the DE position as well (note how much our 4-3 D went to pot after he got hurt in ’07 — no more pass-rushing threat off the end).
Williams and Felder were strong in coverage, and Williams was also a good run-stuffer. Last year’s LBs were decent at run stuffing, but their coverage skills were severely lacking. The underneath zones were easy for a good QB to pick apart because these guys didn’t execute their responsibilities well.
Note from the 2008 BG highlights above what happens at the end — after getting hit so much, Furd’s QB starts rushing his throws in the 2nd half, even on plays where he’s not getting much pressure. He tosses floaters into coverage that are easily picked off. Getting pressure on the QB creates further advantages throughout the defense — something that should also be factored into evaluations of Kevin Riley’s play.
Agreed on basically everything you wrote.
Follett’s production from last year alone was almost as good or even better than the whole LBer crew up to this point this year. When you lose that kind of production from just one player one year and can’t generate it the next year, you are going to have problems. Add in the loss of experience from Felder and Williams, and you can see why the LB crew this year is a major step down from last year. The LBers in the 3-4 are supposed to be the guys making the big time plays. They simply are not doing that this year.
The scheme is not the issue. It’s players making plays. Bad tackling angles, no pressure from the LB rush position, mistackles, mistakes in coverage , inexperienced talent – it all adds up and can be seen in the OSU game.
I said that 9.5 months ago based on my own observations. Rulon, Felder, Williams, and Follett all graduated. The JC guys brought into to replace the 2008 LBs (Meadows, Price, Davis) did jack.
Most people over-think things and want to believe more complex theories when the answers are really simple.

by 



















































