Running Back Styles: Comparing Shane Vereen to Jahvid Best
The first thing I’ve always noticed about Jahvid Best are his strides--long and galloping. Every step he takes seems to bring him a foot futher away from a defender trailing him on the play. It’s why he’s virtually unstoppable if he gets past 5-10 yards from the line of scrimmage, and why he’s racked up enumerable gains of 50 yards or more throughout his career.
The next thing you notice is his upper body. You can see how his torso is always straight and facing forward, regardless of which way his legs are moving. How his eyes are always straight ahead, allowing him to survey the entire field ahead of him. Best’s wingspan allows him to wrap that arm around the football tight and he’s able to move the ball from one arm to the other in full stride.
Ron Gould running backs tend to learn how to optimize physical ability with proper technique. You can probably see this with every runner over the past decade, but no one looks better doing it than Best.
The third and final thing I notice the most when watching Jahvid is his stop and go motion. It’s not like he just decelerates down and makes a cut when a defender’s on top of them (that’s 2008 Jahvid). It acts as a short cutback where he stops, let the defender reach out vainly for where he expected Jahvid to be, then make a quick movement away from the would-be tackler before accelerating right back at full pace (He sometimes does a hop-step to avoid leg tackles). It’s as if the Millenium Falcon went from lightspeed to zero in barely under a second...and then went right back to lightspeed in that same instance of a second. Sometimes Best can pull off this maneuver, but he usually requires some open space between him and the defender to make this work.
So how does that compare to Vereen?
Vereen doesn’t have the same long strides. But he isn’t that much slower than Best because his feet are hitting the ground at a much faster pace. He operates at a more natural rhythm that allows for him to change direction without appearing to slow down.
So while it appears like Jahvid is in a realm of his own when it comes to speed, Vereen’s no slowpoke himself. His first kick doesn’t look like much, but it’s enough to elude unblocked rushers from the outside. Get him out in the open field and he can outrace most defenders, although he’s not as unstoppable as Best inside.
Vereen’s upper body isn’t as upright as Jahvid’s, but he utilizes his posture well. He hugs the ball close to his compact frame and leans forward when expecting contact. Plus the constant moving feet seem to help; defenders have trouble on where to approach hiim and wrap him up properly. Defenders seem to find it harder to take down a guy who’s feet keep on hitting the ground rather than someone who requires more track strides, probably because
I’m never going to say Shane Vereen is a better running back than Jahvid Best, but he could be more consistent without having the same long runs. It’s one of those deals where you have to ponder this question: Do you want the guy who will hit a home run every five to six at-bats, or the dude who keeps on dinging singles and doubles once every two to three at-bats?
All I know is that for the past two years, it’s been a luxury to have both.
31 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As someone who doesn’t study these things, it always felt like Vereen rarely got stopped behind the line for no gain (or a loss) whereas Jahvid had a bunch of those. However, Shane had maybe 8 or 10 really long runs where Jahvid had double or triple that.
No pictures or vids to show us what you’re talking about?!
Defenders seem to find it harder to take down a guy who’s feet keep on hitting the ground rather than someone who requires more track strides, probably because
Still waiting for the conclusion to this thought! ;)
It’s as if the Millenium Falcon went from lightspeed to zero in barely under a second…and then went right back to lightspeed in that same instance of a second. Sometimes Best can pull off this maneuver, but he usually requires some open space between him and the defender to make this work.
I knew exactly what you were trying to describe the whole time, and I’ll say that I think Desean did this better than anyone I’ve seen. The end around against Tennessee when Hefney or whatever his name was (All-SEC safety) went flying by him….perfect example.
A few thoughts on Jahvid v Vereen. First, Vereen reminds me of Frank Gore in his running style. Efficient. No wasted steps. Always moving forward. Squeezes through holes. Falls forward, and can make something out of nothing. Jahvid is more like Chris Johnson with his blazing speed, vision and sheer athleticism, though I’m not sure he can break tackles well enough to be that kind of NFL superstar.
If the o-line is opening up nice holes for your back, Jahvid is the easy pick – the only other RB’s I can think of off the top of my head that even compare to him with space to run would be A Peterson and C Johnson. Given we haven’t had that kind of line play recently, I think Vereen might be the better back for us, especially against stronger competition. If the holes are smaller, the defense good and the big plays are going to be mostly stopped, I’d rather have the guy that can consistently pick up positive yards and help move the chains. I really like Vereen, I think he can replace Jahvid much the way Forsett (another guy Vereen reminds me of) repaced the more talented Marshawn, yet arguably outproduced Marshawn.
One more point I’d like to make – on my way home from work, I like to read ESPN’s chats on the train if they had chatters I found interesting that day. I occasionally read KC Joyner, “The Football Scientist”, and one of the points he’s made is how well a RB does on well blocked plays is really the biggest factor in how good a RB at the NFL level is – basically, the difference on plays where the blocking is bad really isn’t big between RB’s – and the maybe 1 ypc (I’m making that number up, the point is it’s smaller) difference betweent he best and worst on poorly blocked plays isn’t nearly as important as the 3-4+ ypc difference between the best and worst on well blocked plays. That seems to me to favor Jahvid, though who knows if the Lions will ever give him a line that can actually block well often enough for him to be successful. I’m not sure whether that translates to college, either, if it does, it might mean we should expect a downgrade to Vereen, though I do still think he’s talented enough to be another quality member of Tedford’s RB line. I also am not quite sure good how KC Joyner’s work is, though I do think he at least has the right basic concept for how to statistically evaluate players (but then again, he does work for ESPN!)….
how well a RB does on well blocked plays is really the biggest factor in how good a RB at the NFL level is
Interesting. That seems counterintuitive to me about how to assume RB talent — do you have a link to that article?
KC Joyner espouses that pretty constantly. The idea is that no RB does well consistently with bad blocking, so you might as well throw that out the window, but if you have a great line and you’re still only getting 4 yards on attempts where the entire line nails all their blocks, you might have LenDale White on your hands.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
Yep, plus, like I said, the spread in results from the most talented to the least talented RB on poorly blocked plays is going to be much smaller than on well blocked plays. I don’t have a link (I think all of his articles are Insider anyways), I just see him bring it up in his chats. ESPN has a chat archive if you want to go back and read some of his stuff.
by Missing Barry on Aug 9, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Vereen’s more like an Emmitt Smith-type RB and Best is more of a complimentary back, with enough talent to become an NFL HoFer.
Which brings up the question…how to evaluate RB’s when they have different styles? Vereen, to me, seems more likely to set the offense up for reasonable 2nd and 3rd downs, while Best is as likely to take it to the house on 1st and 10, 3rd and 10, or on a simple swing pass. It is this that frustrates me with the 2010 Cal offense – we didn’t learn Vereen was consistent/dependable/awesome until after Best was concussed again. Had they broken fall camp knowing that Vereen’s 1a and Best is 1a.5 (w/ ample “touches” in ST and the passing games), Cal may have had a better offense.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Vereen’s more like an Emmitt Smith-type RB and Best is more of a complimentary back, with enough talent to become an NFL HoFer.
I think this is overly optimistic, but you don’t achieve anything if you don’t dream big. Like marrying Tosh Lupoi’s girlfriend. It just couldn’t have happened, let alone produce Carp Jr, if you hadn’t dreamed big.
No longer a member of the Martinis. I'm now a member of the Twisties...fans of TwistNHook go to www.twistys.com* *Note: TwistNHook does not endorse this site.
by dballisloose on Aug 9, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions
I’ve never received a compliment from Jahvid…..
by Missing Barry on Aug 9, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Jahvid is free.
"UC Davis??? hahahahaha" - Aaron Rodgers
by atomsareenough on Aug 9, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Jahvid costs 9.8 million!
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
Then carp is wrong. I feel totally misled.
"UC Davis??? hahahahaha" - Aaron Rodgers
by atomsareenough on Aug 9, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Vereen, to me, seems more likely to set the offense up for reasonable 2nd and 3rd downs, while Best is as likely to take it to the house on 1st and 10, 3rd and 10, or on a simple swing pass. It is this that frustrates me with the 2010 Cal offense – we didn’t learn Vereen was consistent/dependable/awesome until after Best was concussed again. Had they broken fall camp knowing that Vereen’s 1a and Best is 1a.5 (w/ ample "touches" in ST and the passing games), Cal may have had a better offense.
Maybe, it does seem like Vereen is more consistent than Jahvid. I’m not sure how true that is or how big the difference is, though – looking through last years schedule, Jahvid had 4 poor games, which happened to be against Oregon, USC, Arizona State and OSU (up until the concussion). Vereen had his success against UCLA, Arizona, Stanford, Washington and Utah. Maybe the competition had something to do with it? I’ll also point out that MSG happened to miss the USC, ASU, OSU, UW and Utah games, so oline might be a big factor here, too…..
Nothing definitive, but definitely points to take into account.
by Missing Barry on Aug 9, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I think the greatest strength of Vereen was exhibited in the Big Game. He gets us into those 3rd and manageable situations that make it easier for us to continue drives. Obviously the greatest benefactor of that was Kevin Riley.
Thanks for the excellent read, Avi!
California Golden Blogs! Objectivity. Some journalists have yet to be introduced.
by Maisbikkja on Aug 9, 2010 1:03 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Comparing Shane Vereen to Jahvid Best
The comparison regarding 100m times in high school may not be a totally valid comparison. I believe Jahvid ran the 10.66 in the CIF State Championships. Shane pulled his hamstring in CIF Southern Section prelims, the first step in making it to the CIF State Championships. Had he not injured himself, he would have run in the Southern Section Finals and Southern Section Masters meets before meeting Jahvid at the CIF State Championships. I’m certain he was trained to peak at the CIF State Championships, or shortly before, so we really don’t know his best 100m time, as his season was cut short due to injury. Recall also that during their junior year of high school the two of them had the two fastest times for juniors at the CIF State Championships, but never met their senior high school seasons.
I’m never going to say Shane Vereen is a better running back than Jahvid Best, but he could be more consistent without having the same long runs. It’s one of those deals where you have to ponder this question: Do you want the guy who will hit a home run every five to six at-bats, or the dude who keeps on dinging singles and doubles once every two to three at-bats?
………………………………………………………………………..
i think shane may have a lot of long runs this year with a full load. i think vereen is actually the type of back that will ding singles, doubles and surprise you with a home run.

by 























































