Re-Opening Old Wounds, Revisiting 2009 Cal @ Oregon Part III: Baited & Busted
In case you missed the previous posts in this series, you may find them here: Part I: The DL Zone Read. Part II: A Defensive Stop.
----------------------------------------------------------
One of the biggest gripes by many Cal fans regarding the 2009 Cal @ Oregon game, was the inability of the defense to cover the Oregon TE Ed Dickson. On the day, Dickson had a total of 11 catches for 148 yards, and 3 touchdowns.
So as I re-watched the game, I tried to keep an eye out for why Dickson was getting so open, and was being so successful. Upon watching Dickson's first touchdown, I discovered the reason for his first success: the Cal defense got baited, and there was a busted coverage.
Please join me, as we take a look at what went wrong.
The key to understanding what went wrong on Dickson's first TD catch requires us to look at a different play first. Why does what occurred on a different play matter for Dickson's touchdown play? Because in football, each play is not mutually exclusive. Each play is not independent. Plays are dependent on each other. Plays are related. Plays are sequenced together in an intelligent, purposeful patterns in order to bait the defense (for a great example of this strategy, please read my previous 2007 Cal vs. Tennessee post). So let's look at the first play.
Play #1: The Bait
Here is the pre-snap picture.
Oregon has 12 personnel out on the field (2 WRs, 2 TEs, 1 RB). They are aligned in a trips formation with one of their TEs in the near slot.
That TE in the near slot is #83 tight end Ed Dickson. Based on this formation, you should immediately know what the offensive play will most likely be.
The play is a run/pass option, more specifically an inside handoff or wide receiver bubble screen option. The QB has the choice, based on the what the defense presents to him, of either handing the ball off to the runningback (red arrow), or passing the ball out to the WR in the trips.
Regardless of whether the QB hands off the ball, or passes the ball, the non receiving receivers in the trips formation will block defenders.
On this particular play, Oregon's QB, Masoli, chose to pass the ball. He passes the ball to the outer-most WR in the trips. That WR cuts inside behind his blockers.
And runs for a 9 yard gain.
This is a very common and basic play for any shotgun spread team. Cal has seen this play before from Oregon in previous years, and probably from the tapes of Oregon from this same year.
Now, let's get to the next play.
Play #2: The Switch
And by next play, I mean, THE VERY NEXT PLAY. Yes, this next play was immediately following the previous play (the offense is headed in the opposite direction because the 1st quarter ended right after the first play, and this second play is immediately at the start of the 2nd quarter).
Above is the pre-snap formation. Notice anything? I hope you do. It's quite obvious.
SAME FORMATION.
Oregon is lined up in the same formation as the first play. Again, 12 personnel. And again, the same formation (it's flipped but it's the same formation).
Oregon's primary TE, Dickson (#83) is again in the near slot.
Cal counters with its 3-4 defense. Again, something in the picture above should jump out at you. Hopefully, ya'll see it. We'll get to that later.
Immediately following the snap of the ball, the Oregon offensive play looks exactly like the first play: an inside handoff WR bubble screen option. Masoli even looks at his outer most WR to pass (green vision cone).
But then Masoli suddenly looks down the field (green vision cone). It's a fake. It's not an inside handoff WR bubble screen option.
It's a designed passing play (can you tell why?). Masoli looks downfield towards Dickson who is running along the field numbers. Cal safety, Ezeff, is caught out of position.
And Dickson catches the ball for a touchdown.
Let's go back and see what the heck went wrong in the coverage. Here's a view of the trips formation just prior to the snap.
The first clue that this isn't an inside handoff WR bubble screen option, is the fact that the other trips receivers are not blocking the Cal defenders, but releasing on routes down the field. The second clue, is the blocking technique of the offensive linemen. They don't explode out of their stances into the defensive line and push up field, but drop back into pass technique. Hence, clearly, a designed pass play meant to look like the previous play.
The fake WR bubble screen has pulled the Cal cornerback (CB) down below the line of scrimmage, leaving a huge void where Dickson may catch the ball. However, the Cal CB isn't really to blame for this touchdown.
Instead, the blame is really on the safety, Ezeff. Ezeff is caught, looking and covering the other Oregon WR who is attacking the right hash seam, and leaving his back to Dickson down the right numbers.
Ezeff attempts to turn himself around quickly to make a play on the ball...
But can't do it in time, and allows for the touchdown. This is the busted coverage. But what was the coverage? Let's go back to the pre-snap picture.
Above is the pre-snap picture for the second play (the second safety is hidden off the screen but I put an "s" to show where he is relatively). Based on the defense's alignment, you should at least have an idea of what the defense might be playing. I'm sorry if I'm stating the obvious, again, but it's TAMPA 2!
I covered the Tampa 2 in my previous post.
Notice how the middle linebacker (MLB) to the open side of the field is playing so deep? That hints at Tampa 2!!!
In fact, this play is a slight variant on the Tampa 2 because it puts five defenders into underneath coverage, whereas a typical Tampa 2 puts four defenders into underneath coverage.
Above is a down-field picture of the Tampa 2 coverages. The Cal safety, Ezeff, has responsibility for the right 1/3rd of the deep zones. He has to cover any receivers entering his third of the field.
But as we saw from a previous picture, which I've shown above again, Ezeff is caught giving coverage aid to the MLB (Mohamed) in the middle deep 1/3rd zone, and has lost sight and awareness of Dickson in his zone. Ezeff should be a few more yards towards the sidelines, and playing over Dickson to prevent the pass to him. It's imperative that the safeties in a Tampa 2, be aware of any receivers down the sidelines who come into their thirds of the deep zones. Because the safeties, and the safeties alone, are the only players who can prevent passes to those areas. If a pass goes to the middle, both the MLB and the safeties can make a play on the ball. However, a pass to a receiver down the numbers or sidelines can ONLY be defended by the respective safety to that side. In other words, the safeties should be playing outside to in, rather than inside to out. Since Ezeff was playing inside to out, he gave up the outside -- where he has no help to make a play on the ball.
This is the busted coverage. This touchdown falls squarely on the shoulders of Ezeff.
The busted coverage is much more visible when watching the actual video of the play. To view this second play in video form, please click on the link below and watch from 0:10 to 0:29 of the video:
(clicking this link will open a new window to a youtube video, and I have pre-set the video to start at the appropriate time) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVnjYGD_ewE
Conclusion:
These two plays illustrate the baiting of the defense, and the busted coverage. Interestingly, the bait didn't really confuse the defense that much. While the CB to the bubble screen side of the field did bite hard on the bait, the Cal safety to that side (Ezeff) wasn't pulled down. He did remain in coverage, but lost awareness of Dickson entering his zone. So in my opinion, the real fault for this touchdown is due to the busted coverage, rather than the bait.
Thus, what would otherwise be an easy break-up by a safety should they have been properly positioned and aware in this Tampa 2 defense, turns into a touchdown.
49 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What’s beautiful about Oregon’s gameplan is that they effectively took away Cal’s top corner and, interestingly in this play, the second corner. They’re attacking WR’s and athletic TE’s on LB’s and safeties – favorable matchups for even Masoli to figure out. Syd (RCB @ top of screen) is left covering either the # 2 TE or the RB coming out for a pass. And he has safety and LB help.
Thank you Hydro for these posts. This entire offseason I’ve wondered how Cal can have a lockdown corner but have their secondary routinely get burnt like Snookie in a tanning bed. Cal’s committment (insistence?) to the zone allowed OC’s to predict where Syd would be and put their primary receivers away from him – leaving you, in this instance, with Syd covering a RB or # 2 TE.
What gives me real hope this coming season is that no one knows if Clancy’s planning on primarily zone coverage, man coverage, or a nice combination of the two.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I’m not sure you can really give credit to Oregon for “taking Syd out of the game” – that’s like giving the Chargers credit for avoiding Nnamdi’s side of the field when they play the Raiders. It does mean that the Bears probably should have tried to give a little more help to the side of the field not covered by Syd, though. From what I’ve read about the Jets’ defense, their strength is that they roll a lot of coverage to the non-Revis Island side of the field, which forces opposing QBs to throw at one-on-one matchups on the other side where Revis is locked up with a receiver, and that’s a matchup that he usually wins.
That might have been something from Gregory to consider, but that’s water under the bridge now. In this case I do put the blame on Ezeff, since TE’s usually are covered by a S rather than a CB anyway.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Aug 31, 2010 6:43 AM PDT up reply actions
By the way, I think this is a nice highlight of your earlier questions about why the safeties line up so deep.
by Missing Barry on Aug 31, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Like this post.
This set of plays also reminds me of that Shane Vereen touchdown at the USC game that got called back for illegal formation…
Hydro, wouldn’t you agree that if Ezeff would have been a few steps over and in better position defending Dickson, that it would have left Maehl open? Granted, that would have been a better situation for Cal, because Ezeff would have been able to put himself in a position on a receiver that was already been trailed, but it looks like to me, Maehl would have been a step ahead, and open on a reasonably well thrown ball in that case.
That’s generally why they run routes that makes a safety commit, he becomes the read for the pass.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-L-W-A-R-M-A-N-D-F-U-Z-Z-Y"
Presumably it would have been a slightly more difficult pass since he would at least been covered by someone at all.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Aug 31, 2010 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Isn’t Maehl the WR running the fake bubble screen? The other WR running the steak is pretty well covered by MM.
GOLD OUT MOZAMBIQUE!
You’re right about Maehl. It was Lavasier Tuinei that was running down.
Again, it’s difficult to tell, and maybe it is in my green tinted glasses, but it looks like he has a step ahead of Mike Mohamed with Ezeff shutting down part of the lane. I am assuming he was running a corner route, until the ball was thrown to Dickson.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-L-W-A-R-M-A-N-D-F-U-Z-Z-Y"
I don’t think Tuinei was running a corner router. I think it was a seam route. If Tuinei had been running a corner route there would be spacing issues between him and Dickson as they would have been running into the same spot. In this case, Mohamed had good coverage on that play.
If Ezeff was going to help on the inside guy, he should at least have played an outside technique turning his shoulders the other way so he could run towards the sideline without having to spin around.
(First post, long time lurker. Great site. Hi All).
Welcome! (I know… duck fan, but whatever. Welcome to CGB!) Thanks for replying.
You do make a good point, and he probably wasn’t running a corner route, but it could have been a zig out route. Oregon often runs one receiver under and one receiver over, baiting the safety to either come up or push out. Here is a video of different routes (Slant and Post routes) in a different formation, but the same concept.
If Tuinei was running a post or up route, Mohamed was in great position, but Tuinei had a step advantage on an outward route. Also, Tuinei was deeper, as he had a more direct route, while Dickson ran a wheel route, which helps layer the field to read the safety.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-L-W-A-R-M-A-N-D-F-U-Z-Z-Y"
Thanks for the welcome (even if it’s from a Duck fan).
I see what you’re saying, but I think the example you show is a little different because the receivers are working their way across the field which gives them a little extra space to work with.
Either way, Ezeff could have played that better. If he was very concerned about the inside guy cutting outside, he should have played an outside technique on him (letting Mohammed take the inside) which would also have made it easier for him to run out to Dickson.
I actually wonder if even though Ezeff didn’t jump all the way up on the bubble screen fake, if that fake slightly threw him off enough to lose track of who he should cover. I could easily understand if he took a false step forward, he might freak out and just run back to cover deep and lost track of his responsibilities.
Welcome to CGB. From a real, honest to goodness Stanford fan. I mean Cal fan, Cal fan, yes, thats right Cal fan. Welcome from a real Cal fan.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Thanks for the welcome. It’s a great a blog even if you’re a bunch of Tedford Sunshine pumping, Nate Longshore loving, Bob Gregory defending, “soft” zone aficionados. (Did I do that right? I believe that encompasses the general hysteria.)
I mean, we have to defend Bob Gregory because he sure didn’t defend much.
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 31, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Credit for a great pass
This is one of those passes that Masoli made where I just kept shaking my head saying “who is this guy?” He played SO well and the location of this pass and the look fake he gives on the corner were just perfect.
It really is Ezeff’s technique playing inside-out that got him. If he has the outside corner that forces Dickson and Tuinei into each other’s routes making that throw that much more difficult, but credit to Masoli for hitting his spots and making head turning fakes all day. This game was a freakin’ clinic on the Zone Read. Let’s see if Darron Thomas can run it the same, otherwise…could be a LONG day for the ducks.
by PlayClassyBears on Aug 31, 2010 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes? But Tuinei still would have been covered better than Dickson.
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 31, 2010 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions
While the TD is on Ezeff, I’m not entirely sure that the busted coverage tells the whole story. He had his gaze turned inward, which is what you are supposed to do when playing zone because you are reading the receiver and the QB (if at all possible). His first problem was that he was a little too close to the seam, and had he been closer to the sideline/Dickson, he would have been able to make a play on the ball. It’s not like he was completely out of his zone.
The bigger issue in my opinion was his technique. He spun the wrong way when the ball was in the air, as he turned counter clockwise to turn to the corner. Since he had already tuned onto his right shoulder and was looking to his left at the seam WR (and probably had an eye on masoli), as soon as he saw the throw going behind him he should have turned clockwise, spun his head/torso around to the right, and run to the corner.
It might sound weird when reading it, but when its done properly, it actually makes a lot of sense and allows for a much quicker recovery. Ezeff essentially went from running straight, turned into a slight backpedal, and then resumed running normally to the corner, and in the video its easy to see how long and clumsy this looks. Instead, he should have continued to run normally and just snapped his head and arms to the corner, which will bring your torso around. This is the difference between a 75-80 degree change in direction compared to a 270 degree change of direction.
Clearly, the TD is on Ezeff, I just think that had he displayed proper technique, he might have been able to make a play on the ball to break it up. For all his time wasted turning the wrong way, he actually was not that far behind the play because masoli lofted it a bit.
On further review of the film, he also didn’t react to the ball in the air until it was halfway there. He must have been too occupied with the seam route and not looking at masoli based on his slow reaction to the pass. And damn, that video was ugly. I feel for you Hydro. I was at the game and immediately erased the DVR of the game when I got home and never looked back. It makes me sick to re-live those plays. I need a shower.
"The trees on the [Student Athlete High Performance Center] are not protected -- and cannot be 'saved' -- by any law."
What I wonder is, if this particular touchdown essentially just a result of Ezeff’s mistake, and not a flaw in the coverage, then that still doesn’t explain the eleventy bazillion other plays where Dickson bent us over. What allowed Dickson to go hogwild on us that day, then? Was it just that a Cal player simply made a mistake on all of his big plays?
by atomsareenough on Aug 31, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
The next parts of my post will focus on Dickson and how he got so open on some of the other passes.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Awesome, I’m really looking forward to it. Thanks so much for writing these, Hydro!
by atomsareenough on Aug 31, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions
The bigger issue in my opinion was his technique. He spun the wrong way when the ball was in the air, as he turned counter clockwise to turn to the corner. Since he had already tuned onto his right shoulder and was looking to his left at the seam WR (and probably had an eye on masoli), as soon as he saw the throw going behind him he should have turned clockwise, spun his head/torso around to the right, and run to the corner.
It might sound weird when reading it, but when its done properly, it actually makes a lot of sense and allows for a much quicker recovery. Ezeff essentially went from running straight, turned into a slight backpedal, and then resumed running normally to the corner, and in the video its easy to see how long and clumsy this looks. Instead, he should have continued to run normally and just snapped his head and arms to the corner, which will bring your torso around. This is the difference between a 75-80 degree change in direction compared to a 270 degree change of direction.
I agree with all this.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I agree. I think Ezeff made a series of compounding errors on this play.
1) He should have just covered the outside guy (Dickson).
2) If he was going to cover the inside guy (Tuinei) he should have had his shoulders turned the other way to better cover an outside cut since he had help inside.
3) Not having done 1 or 2, he should have turned the other way when reacting to the throw to Dickson to more smoothly make a play on the ball or the receiver.
Don’t mean to criticize Ezeff too much here, but it seems clear he could have done better on this play.
Wrong.
It was Longshore’s fault.
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 31, 2010 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions
What coverage/package is the first play?
Loooong time lurker here.
I love these posts. Thanks for putting them up.
It looks like in the first play there is press man coverage with an Kendricks coming from the outside (or is he “manned up” on the QB). What is that called based on the pre-snap formation, etc.?
Did Oregon know they’d get the Tampa 2 in that down/distance/field position? Can’t you disguise a bit? I mean even in H.S. 20 years the DBs I played against hid coverage somewhat.

Here’s the pre-snap coverage for the first play. Cal is in its 3-4 defense. I’ll admit, I’m not entirely sure what the play is exactly. Mike Mohamed has placed himself onto the LOS, perhaps showing a blitz. And the secondary defenders (safeties and CBs) have shifted over towards the trips side of the field.
As for disguising the Tampa 2 in the second play, you’re right that Cal didn’t do a very good job — or any attempt at all — to really disguise their coverages. I’m not sure why Gregory chose not to disguise things, but perhaps it was to keep the players on defense focused on the Oregon formation and players rather than their pre-snap movements and responsibilities.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
That was one of my issues w/ BG’s defense this past year. There was a lot of “what you see is what you get.” Even when he did rush a 4th or 5th guy, it was always pretty obvious who it was going to be and where they were coming from.
I’m not positive, but I thought this was different from previous years. I wonder if the lack of practice time for our starting safeties + relative inexperience at LB forced him to cut down on pre-snap shifts or disguised coverages.
Thanks for the write-up, Hydro! Awesome (if painful) as usual!
Old Toothwrangler
I don’t know if anyone else noticed the best part of this play, so I’ll just point it out. Check out the ESPN ticker on the shots that have it. ;)
Great stuff, very interesting Hydro. Keep it up, love the film sessions/review.
One of our 11 wins last year. 24 wins in the past two seasons….think if Cal could pull off something like that. ;)
by Missing Barry on Aug 31, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
CAN WE PLEASE CLOSE THIS WOUND AND MOVE ON?!
I’m ready for 2010 to wash away the bitter taste of 2009…
We may or may not have 5 more posts in this series.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Awesome. I love the pain.
That’s why we’re Cal fans right?
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
by CalBandGreat on Aug 31, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Our next post is a frame-by-frame analysis of what Kevin Riley was thinking when he decided to run with the ball on October 13, 2007.
Then, an analysis of exactly how much of Desean Jackson’s shoe touched the sideline in Tucson.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 31, 2010 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
See, now THAT'S what I've been waiting for!
Being there at Memorial Stadium that evening, remembering that wave of excitement that filtered through the crowd as news of LSU’s defeat—and our impending and inevitable ascent to the #1 ranking—came out, as well as that exciting final drive to our all-but-sure victory, these are things I had pretty much forgotten about.
I don’t remember my friend Keith looking at me, asking, “That’s it? It’s over? Just like that? We lost?!”
I don’t remember felling dumbfounded and incredulous at the IMMENSE emotional letdown and crash that followed in those first few minutes. And walking back to upper Hearst with that feeling one has after a loud and long concert, when the lights come back on and there’s a surreal but hyper-clear fog all around?! No, I don’t recall any of it.
We need to revisit that game FOR SURE! Then, just for fun, let’s hit the 2006 Arizona game, you know, when, ranked #8, we all-but-had the Rose Bowl, but instead had to “split” the Pac-10 title with, who? Oh yeah, $C, of course! THEY went to Pasadena.
Yes, please, bring back all the fun. I’m a Cal fan, I can handle it!!
Go Bears!
And anyone who doesn’t want to relive the pain can choose not to click them! Win-win!
by Missing Barry on Aug 31, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
This post makes me wonder if playing the Tampa 2 was putting way too much pressure on our safeties, which nobody would have picked as the strength of the defense going into 2009. Granted, I don’t know the alternatives to the Tampa 2, but it seems dangerous to have so much relying on the safeties when one of them couldn’t even practice with the team full time.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Except Masoli wasn’t considered the main strength going into the game. I guess Gregory figured the safeties could play well on his inaccuracies, which never happen.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 31, 2010 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions

by 









































































