SB Nation Bay Area Editor's Pick
A Closer Look at Cal's 2009 Defense and Special Teams, Part 2
In the first installment of this series, I touched upon mistackling and briefly mentioned field position . In this installment, we will dive into why field position is so important in football.
Special Teams
Unless you were living under a rock last year or are completely new to Cal football, special teams heavily impacted the outcomes of some of Cal's games in 2009. Special teams are the 3rd phase of the game of football that have a tendency to go unnoticed. Although they only take up 10-15% of the total amount of plays during a game, each special teams play is crucial.
Field goal and point after touchdown (PAT or Extra Point) attempts are the responsibility of the placekicking team and can be the difference between a 1 point loss or win (think Cal vs. Oregon 2004 when the Oregon placekicker missed a PAT attempt, which proved to be the difference in the game). Special teams also consist of the kickoff return and coverage as well as the punt return and coverage units. A kickoff return, punt return, or blocked punt score can result in 7 points for either team in less than 10 seconds and completely change the face of a game. The chances of a touchdown being scored on special teams are an even smaller percentage of the total amount of special teams plays in a year. Season and career performances like Desean Jackson’s on punt returns are rare and phenomenal to watch.
More after the jump.
Field position is a critical component in the special teams phase that tends to be heavily overlooked. To give you an idea of how important field position is, here are some statistics I dug up from a playbook I have sitting around the house:
- Between their own goal line and the 20 yard line, an offense has a 1/30 chance of scoring
- Between their own 20 and 40 yard line, an offense has a 1/8 chance of scoring
- Between their own 40 and 50 yard line, an offense has a 1/5 chance of scoring
- Between the opponent’s 50 and 40 yard line, an offense has a 1/3 chance of scoring
- Between the opponent’s 40 and 20 yard line, an offense has a 1/2 chance of scoring
- Between the opponent’s 20 and 10 yard line, an offense has a 2/3 chance of scoring
These statistics were taken from years back. Since the NCAA has moved the kickoff spot back to the 30 yard line and there are more high powered offenses we are seeing nowadays, I would not be surprised if these statistics are a bit different at the present time.
Looking further into the statistics above (just in case you thought I made them up), some of you might recall a study published back in 2005 by David Romer, a professor in the Department of Economics at our very own UC Berkeley. His paper examined "a single, narrow decision—the choice on fourth down in the National Football League between kicking and trying for a first down—as a case study of the standard view that competition in the goods, capital, and labor markets leads firms to make maximizing choices." In his research, Romer mathemagically (Math was NOT my forte at Cal so maybe the Mathematicians can further explain Romer's study in the comments section if they wish) came up with a point value for every yard line on the football field. For those who are interested, you can find Professor Romer’s complete study here. However, for the basic nature of this installment, I have simply taken a graph from his findings that is relevant to field position:
As you can see, the chances of giving up points increases as an offense gets closer to the defense's end zone. A defense that can begin defending at the opponent's 20 yard line has a greater chance of being successful in stopping a score than if they started defending at the opponent's 30 yard line. This is a very simple concept, but it would surprise you how many people look past, and even completely ignore, the connection of starting field position for a defense and their success rate at keeping an offense from scoring.
Cal's special teams left the defense in very bad positions in 2009. Let us now take a look at some of the special team gaffes from last season that, for the most part, influenced the outcome and flow of games. I honestly feel based on feedback that most folks do not care to relive the excruciating pain caused by special teams last year, so I will make this as quick as possible and just note the significant impact of each play.
Kickoff coverage within the first 6 minutes of the 2009 season. I almost forgot about this one but I clipped it to show that Cal’s kickoff coverage was poor from the get go. Although Maryland scored a field goal from this breakdown and put its first points up of the game, this play has no big influence on the outcome of the game.
This clip fast forwards us to the last game of the season. Kickoff return coverage is still atrocious 13 games into the season. I normally keep a cool head watching Cal football games but this miscue sent a piercing scream through Qualcomm Stadium. I had a bad feeling this was the shot in the arm Utah needed. Cal was up 14-0 and only 10 minutes into the game when this play happened. This one play breathed life back in Utah and punched Cal in the stomach. Utah went on to score a touchdown on a questionable call and never looked back.
When momentum is against your team and you have an All-American caliber punter on the roster, you can usually rely on him to swing some momentum back on your side by changing field position with a punt. In this play, Cal’s highly regarded punter shanked the punt for a net of 5 yards. Oregon scored a touchdown and slammed the door on any chance of a Cal comeback in the 2nd half. Punting is essential to winning field position and when your defense is struggling, a good play on special teams could light the fire under them. This was a missed opportunity by the Cal punting unit to swing some momentum back onto their side before going into the locker room at halftime.
A member of the kick return team is fielding this kick at the Oregon State 30 and bringing it out to their 44. Please consult the statistics listed above for why a defense that starts defending at the opponent’s 44 yard line is not good. I will note that this kickoff was after Jahvid Best’s scary injury, but the kicker needs to be more mentally tough. OSU scored a touchdown on this drive.
Block somebody, please. There are 3 Stanfurd players that get through the protection. I know I said I would not get into breaking these plays down but the lack of attention to detail on this play sticks out like a sore thumb and is just frustrating to watch. When you are that close to your own end zone, it should be priority #1 to make sure that the punt gets off. The players need to know their blocking assignments. Note the Cal player on the bottom part of the screen in the second row that takes off downfield. That was by design. But there is confusion on this play with the middle man in the second row. The man in the middle sees the Stanfurd player "attacking the edge" and knows his fellow comrade is taking off downfield. To compensate for this, the middle man shifts over to stop the "attack on the edge," but the Stanfurd player put on the breaks and went downfield. When the middle man shifted over, he left the middle wide open. It should be no surprise then that the blocked punt came from up the middle where the Furd player blew by the Cal long snapper and had an unobstructed path to the punter. I will not even address the mess at the top of the play in the protection. Stanfurd went up 14-0 after this play and Cal easily could have waved the white flag like they did in previous games, but thankfully, they decided to battle to the end for the win.
Bad call by the special teams coordinator for Cal or a blown assignment in the blocking by the player? I am curious to know what you think!
:( A blocked punt gave Utah good field position. They scored a touchdown to finish off their drive and take the lead for good in the bowl game.
Kickoff coverage is bad. Again. The UCLA kick returner was one of the best in the land last year, but that’s no excuse. Up 14-0, Cal was firing on all cylinders until this kickoff miscue. UCLA put their first touchdown up on the board to finish this drive. Cal was fortunate to land the knockout blows in the latter part of the first half. When there is a chance to keep pounding the opponent into the ground, it must never cease until the game is well out of hand. In this case, the southern branch school got a little bit of room to breathe, took advantage of it, and made the game a lot closer than it should have been.
Special teams are just as important to the game of football as the defense and offense phases and can change field position in an instant with great punt and kickoff return teams. Field position is critical in the success of a defense not giving up points. As you witnessed in these videos, Cal’s defense was put into some very tough spots all year long by special teams. If Cal wants to take the next step and become a consistent top 25 or top 10 team, special teams needs to step up their game and own the field position battle.
Stay Tuned for Part 3 of 5.
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
19 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
this post is far more disturbing than the previous one…it seems special teams are the main reason we cannot sustain momentum in games.
Rec'd. But...
…it was all pain. Couldn’t you at least have shown D-Jax’s highlight reel, too?
And I do want analysis of whether it was player breakdowns or poor coaching/schemes or what.
With Tedford’s statement that special teams coverage units will try to stay in their lanes, and not get around blockers…what does that mean? Can you find examples where they went around blockers and that put them out of position? Or vice versa?
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Aug 26, 2010 2:17 PM PDT reply actions
With Tedford’s statement that special teams coverage units will try to stay in their lanes, and not get around blockers…what does that mean?
The quote was this “JT said coverage philosophy has changed. Players will no longer be avoiding blockers on kickoff coverage and running into space but will instead play their gaps and be more physical.”
Players run down field in “lanes” and they are supposed to attack the protection at an angle in which the returner remains to the inside of their shoulder. This strategy is to collapse the amount of space on the edges a returner has to work with thus forcing him to go inside where space is much tighter and there are more defenders. You ideally do not want the returner getting to the outside because if he is a burner, there’s a lot more space for him to move around in. When a player attempts to go around a blocker, he loses his lane which can open up a big enough hole for the returner to run through. The best and easiest way to think of kickoff return coverage is 1 gap responsibility on run defense. Though very different, the concept is similar. Basically what Tedford is saying is that going around blockers clearly didn’t work all these years so Cal will be more physical to impose their will on kickoff coverage. It’s an attitude adjustment. . I like this mentality 10x more because it sends the message to the other team that “we’re going to go through you to get to your returner so bring it.”
Can you find examples where they went around blockers and that put them out of position?
Take a look at the very first vid in this post. At the way top of the screen, keep an eye on the defender who reaches the 25 yard line first. He left his lane and attempted to go around the blocker. He basically took himself out of the play and opened up a lane for the returner to run through. Had that player maintained his lane, it looks like the returner would have went wide and out of bounds or cut it back inside where Cal could have taken him down.
Rec’d and thanks for the write-up…But the pain…Oh the pain.
I remember playing ’sc to a standstill when David Lonie whiffed on a punt from deep in our territory. That gave them the field position to score and blow the game open.
My uneducated guess is that players simply weren’t taught very well how to cover, how to protect, or what to do when the opposing team does x, y, or z. (I’m cheating a little by basing this guess off of observer comments who saw previous ST practice vs. this year.) Sure, we still had individual player execution errors, but these were compounded by also having poor group execution of our coverage and blocking schemes.
Old Toothwrangler
Special teams take a certain mentality and I think Cal has lacked it for a while. There are times when the guys play fired up, hit whatever is moving, and do a fantastic job. Other times it felt like the coverage team would rather be getting a manicure somewhere. Special teams need to be emphasized by the coaches more, probably practiced a bit extra each day, and players need to take pride in them. I think Urban Meyer is the coach that said his players will not start be starters unless they play special teams and do a good job there first.
From the sound of it, Tedford and Genyk are switching things up to “putting their best players on special teams.” If MikeyMo is playing on coverage teams, or if highly touted freshmen are burning their blueshirts for special teams, that should send a message.
I remember talking to one of the Cal staff a few years ago. Follett was asked to play special teams and he didn’t want to do it. Ironically, standout special teams play w/ Detroit is what helped him stick. It’s really surprising to me that this isn’t emphasized more.
Old Toothwrangler
Yeah, special teams isn’t glamorous. A lot of guys don’t like being on special teams unless they’re the punt returner, kick returner, long snapper, kicker, or punter (those guys usually all want to be on special teams as since that’s the only time they’re going to see the field!). Some think it’s below them. Some think it’s a disgrace. Some are lazy. Some think it’s for the “lesser” players.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I think, in the niterest of fairness, I think you have to include the injury risk on special teams. These guys are getting huge running starts and running full speed into each other. If I was a starter, I don’t think I’d want to play ST for that reason.
by Missing Barry on Aug 27, 2010 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Hope you don't mind me adding in my insights
1) The first one looks like more like a horrible kickoff. It’s almost impossible for special teams coverage to look that good when they’re expecting a much deeper, longer kick and the coverage has barely any time to get set.
2) Pretty bad. The coverage on the left runs itself right out of the play rather than forcing the kick returner to move on an angle or away from his intended running lane.
3) As much as people love Anger smash, he was hopelessly erratic last year. Again, I blame Alamar.
4) I’m not sure if that’s mental toughness or horrible mechanics. Look at the way Tavecchio lurches that ball off the stripe—no real stride. It’s like he’s attempting a free kick in the World Cup. Alamar’s directional kicking disaster.
5) Saw this play reviewing the Big Game and saw the exact same problems. Good call with this one.
6) Blockers on the left totally gaffe—one guy doesn’t pick up his blocker, so the man inside has to pick him up, leaving the interior free for someone to come straight up and leap right into Anger’s punt. Disgusting.
7) Pretty bad. Kickoff is poor and too many guys just run into blocks. Good special teams work by UCLA here though—seems like they’re well-equipped to handle the middle kickoff return.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 26, 2010 5:18 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd, good stuff
Well, good in the “this post made me violently ill” way.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 26, 2010 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions
1) See description above in response to JWillard
2) Similar to what happened in play #1, a player lost his lane. Follow the 3rd guy from the top carefully and notice how when he gets close to a blocker, he ends up in the lane to his left.
3) Yes.
4) This is simply a bad kick. I’m not fine tuned on kicker technique but yes, this was totally on the kicker.
5) One thing I should have noted. Sometimes for defenders who play special teams, it’s hard for them to actually block somebody because they are so used to shedding blocks. Mohamed knew who to block but one of the Stanfurd players beat Stevens badly so Mohamed somewhat froze because he had 2 guys to block.
6) I thought this was a cool play by Utah. I have to give it up to them. Lots of movement and Cal’s protection was confused as to who was coming. Sorry about the footage cutoff, but if you look at the very beginning you will notice Utah has 2 guys lined up wide at the top of the screen. One of the guys cheats over, which is a dead giveaway what Utah was trying. Utah sent 2 guys to engage 2 blockers and then a somewhat delayed 3rd guy who picked the open area to run through. Anger is known to take a bit longer to get his punts off so I would not be surprised if we see teams try to do something similar this year.
7) I would say this is a bad kick. I seriously doubt the play was designed to kicking the ball to the middle of the field to one of the best returners in college football and giving him the options to go any direction he chose.
re: #7, probably a bad kick, but again you see the coverage man furthest to the bottom completely overrun the play. If he holds his lane, maybe he forces the returner to slow down, bounce to the outside, and they can catch him. Too often it seems like we have our fastest guy get down there and run right past the returner without even laying a finger on him or forcing him to change direction. If a guy can just catch the kick and run straight up the field, you know you’ve got bad coverage.
And #4 — again, a terrible terrible kick, but even given that, the first guy down there has a chance to make the tackle and stop it for minimal return. He completely whiffs, overruns the play. I’ll grant that on a short kick, it’s easier for the coverage to overrun it (especially if they’re expecting something deeper), but still — if he stays in his lane that’s maybe a 5-yard return at best.

by 

























































