Re-Opening Old Wounds, Revisiting 2009 Cal @ Oregon Part II: A Defensive Stop
In case you missed the previous posts in this series, you may find them here: Part I: The DL Zone Read.
-----------------------------------------------------------
While watching the game, I did come across one lone bright spot: the Cal defense holding Oregon's offense from scoring a touchdown. Let's check out what happened.
Above is the pre-snap picture. It's the first quarter, and the score is Cal 3-0. Oregon is facing a 3rd and goal from the 13 yard line.
Oregon has 12 personnel out on the field (2 WRs, 2 TEs, 1 RB).
Cal counters with its 3-4 base defense. For those of you who know your football, I'm sure something jumps out to you in the picture above. We'll get to that later.
Just before the snap, one of Oregon's tight ends (TE) whips around into the backfield! Oh noes! What's going on?!
I'll tell you what's going on. This is a triple option play! The QB has the option of either handing the ball off to the RB by reading the Cal defensive end (represented by the red arrow), either keeping the ball himself and running (green arrow), or pitching the ball to his pitch man the TE (the yellow arrow).
And as you can see, as the QB and the RB mesh, the triple option becomes more obvious.
But what's this?! Masoli doesn't hand the ball off! Nor is he running with the ball! Instead, he's pulled up the ball and is preparing to throw! This isn't a triple option! It's a passing play! By the way, we know it's a *designed* passing play based on the blocking technique of the offensive line.
Oregon's QB, Masoli, passes the ball! (yellow dot)
But the pass is high! Also, a Cal defender is on the scene to lay some wood on the Oregon WR and probably would have broken up the play regardless.
Cal stops a touchdown! Isn't this cool?
Okay, I'm sure the coolness of this play is probably lost on many of you so let's dive into things a little deeper. Do you see what this offensive play was designed to do?
The play, based on the pre-snap motion, looks like a triple option run play. The fake triple option essentially serves as a "double play action." The play is designed to get the defense to bite on the hand off to the runningback, and if not that, then have the defense bite down on the fake option. The offense is specifically targeting the defenders directly opposite to the WRs by running the option at those players. That would be the cornerback (CB), outside linebacker (OLB), middle linebacker (MLB) and safety (S). The offense is hoping that those four defenders bite on the fake-option (represented by the blue arrows), so that the WRs may run their routes (yellow arrows) right by the deceived defenders!
Tricky devil!
So what is the defense doing? How does the defense stop this play? Well, let's see what the defense is doing. Here's the defensive alignment again. The defense is in a 3-4.
The defense sends three four defenders on pass rush towards the QB!
As for the coverage, the defense drops a total of seven defenders into coverage.
The two safeties play the outside deep 1/3rds of the field. The MLB drops back into the middle deep 1/3rd of the field. And both CBs, an OLB, and the other MLB drop into underneath zones. That's three deep zones, and four underneath zones.
What do we have here???? We have a Tampa 2 defense! A Tampa 2 defense is a defense that is fairly similar to the Cover 2. Instead though, it drops the MLB into deep center to play the middle third of the field, essentially putting the defense into a Cover 3. In other words, the tampa 2 defense is a sort of cover 3. The defense also usually plays four underneath zones.
The strategy and rationale for dropping the MLB into the deep 1/3rd of the field allows the safeties (who are playing the outside 1/3rds of the deep zone) to play more aggressively against WR routes along the sidelines and past the CBs -- the traditional vulnerability of a Cover 2 defense.
Here is a better picture of the Tampa 2 defense which I've represented by blue ovals representing the different zones.
Earlier in this post I mentioned that something should have stood out from the above picture. Remember that? Well, hopefully, all you really intelligent Cal fans out there who know your football should have immediately said: TAMPA 2!
Yes! If you did, great! You really do know your stuff.
The clue here is the MLB playing really deep pre-snap. That's what you should have seen, and what should have triggered you to say TAMPA 2! That MLB is playing too deep for a normal 3-4. Also note that the safety to the bottom left corner of the screen is playing a bit too wide. In fact, he's playing the outside shoulder of the slot WR. That is another hint. That safety is playing wide, and giving up the area towards the middle of the field, because he knows he has help to the middle from the MLB. All that together should scream TAMPA 2 to you!
And it's the Tampa 2 defense that successfully defends against this offensive play. Who is that in the endzone breaking up the pass play??? None other than Mikey Mo!
There he is playing that deep center 1/3rd of the field.
If you watch the video replay of this play (at about 6:05 in the 1st quarter), you'll see that not a single Cal defender really bites on the fakes. This is great situational awareness. Remember, the offense was facing a 3rd and Goal from the 13 yard line. It's highly doubtful that the offense would run the ball. Therefore, despite the fake triple option run look by the offense, the defense still drops back into their zones to prevent the touchdown.
This is a great defensive play that was executed well by the Cal players on the field; a lone bright spot in a hot mess of a slaughter.
46 comments
|
11 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cool analysis!
When I looked at the pre-snap photos, thought it was a nickel D. Without the benefit of seeing who the personnel is, MikeyMo looks like he’s playing in a safety position.
Why not just play nickel here? What is the advantage of having a LB play like a safety? MikeyMo is very good in coverage, but generally wouldn’t it be wiser to add a safety?
GOLD OUT MOZAMBIQUE!
I think that goes back to what Hydro mentioned yesterday, which was that Gregory wanted in general to have his best run-stopping team on the field by having four LBs as much as possible.
Although that is still a good point, since they were at 3rd and goal from the 13 – the chances of them running 13 yards for a TD seems relatively low in this situation and it seems like an obvious passing down.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Aug 26, 2010 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions
MikeyMo>Conte maybe?
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 26, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m guessing they weren’t in nickel because they were facing 12 personnel.
by Missing Barry on Aug 26, 2010 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, exactly what YellowFever said above. Gregory was probably protecting against the run still, even though a 3rd and 13 is a very unlikely running down. That seems to suggest that Gregory has an immense amount of respect for Oregon gaining 13 yards through the ground, and in fact, based on what happened during this game, it’s quite obvious that Oregon can easily gain 13 yards on the ground.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I would also say it’s probably not just about the run, either. In terms of defending YAC, your linebackers are your better tacklers, so it makes sense to want linebackers in the middle of the field rather than DB’s who don’t tackle as well. Especially since the offense is only using 2 WR’s, which means more TE’s and RB’s that linebackers match up better against than DB’s.
by Missing Barry on Aug 26, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Cal might have just called the play with whoever was already on the field to avoid substitution, thus a true nickelback was not present.
by neodarksaver on Aug 26, 2010 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Awesome…rec’d!

Why does Cal often not use two corners on the same side of the field, thereby having 2 WR’s matched up against two CB’s?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I don’t really understand why zone can’t be played with 2 CB’s on two WR’s, with the LB’s shifted appropriately.
yeah…and, if I may speculate, I think that’s a key part of the answer as to why Cal had a shutdown corner but still got burnt like toast…
let’s speculate that the LCB in this case is Syd (kinda looks like him). Here, we’d have him matched up against Dickson or I suppose the running back should he be going out for a pass. If it were Dickson, or another athletic TE, then I think it’s a mismatch. Not to mention, this puts an LB on a WR who will likely need safety help. One can then think that the WR lined up against the CB will, very likely, be 1-on-1. Sure enough, that receiver gets the pass thrown to him (although Mohamed picks him up as the play was in his zone), and WR vs. LB (even Mo) is a fairly favorable one for the Ducks. Not bad for 3rd and goal from the 13.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I don’t think teams ever really do that – 2 CB’s on one side and none on the other – when they’re playing zone, do they….?
by Missing Barry on Aug 26, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions
CB’s in the middle of the field also means they might have to make an open field tackle on a guy – potentially a TE or RB.
by Missing Barry on Aug 26, 2010 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions
There’s no mention there of putting both CBs on the same side – that would really only apply in man coverage like OskiMonsta said. Although I did also enjoy this passage:
Teams that have been successful against this defense have managed to run the ball up the middle past the defensive tackles, or throw passes in the seams between the outside linebackers and the cornerbacks (often the most effective receiver against a Tampa 2 defense is a tight end, since they often line up against this seam). Other tactics that have shown to be effective on occasion are misdirection plays that take advantage of the defensive speed and rely on the defense ‘over-running’ the play (such as the middle linebacker rushing to the line of scrimmage on a play-action pass), or overloading the safeties by having multiple receivers running deep routes, creating more targets in a zone than defenders. Recently, some teams have also been able to exploit the seam between the cornerbacks and the safeties, when the quarterback can throw a pass to a receiver in that seam faster than the safety can rush up to close it and cover the receiver. A recent trend is for teams to send a receiver up the middle, creating a mismatch against the linebacker in coverage. The popularity of the Tampa 2 means that offenses are now finding it effective to exploit the deep middle, where the safeties have to cover the most ground.
So, yes, Gregory should probably have thought about playing less zone after Dickson kept gashing the team, as it’s an inherent flaw of the scheme.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Aug 26, 2010 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Even if Gregory had placed some man coverae in there, Dickson would have just been sent on more mid range slant routes.
Slant > Man every time
California Golden Blogs! Every day should be like September 27, 2003.
another thing that irks me is that, following pre-snap motion, we have a S, OLB, and a CB committed to the remaining TE and perhaps a RB. Why didn’t anyone follow or shift with the in-motion TE?
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Because you don’t shift in zone defenses – that’s really only applicable to man. If you’re given an area to cover, you cover that area regardless of who’s coming in or out. You might have guys who don’t have anyone in their zone shading over, but you don’t move people to entirely new zones completely based on a pre-snap read.
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Aug 26, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I, for one, am looking forward to more man coverage. I like to cover opposing players, not empty patches of FieldTurf™.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Well, you better hope that coverage is good, and not just:
Slant > Man every time
over and over…..
by Missing Barry on Aug 26, 2010 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I swear there was a post by Hydro regarding man vs. zone (maybe during the armed forces bowl?). Just as always playing Zone doesn’t help, neither does playing man.
In other words, Go Bears!
Keeps ‘em honest…the zone can be quite effective in luring the QB to chuck a pass when he thinks a receiver’s open…and then…Mohamed’s there to intercept it.
Mixing in more man vs. zone sounds good to me. I’m a fan of the best matchups possible, such as putting DB’s on WR’s.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Posts like this are the reason I started reading CGB daily
Then I just stayed for the amusing comments. Thanks Hydro!
by Bears07 on Aug 26, 2010 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
This
Yep.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Aug 26, 2010 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions
I saw the super deep MLB! But I didn’t know that was a Tampa 2. So now I have to take remedial classes at summer school.
As far as effectiveness goes, it seems like the real advantage here was situational awareness. On 3rd and 13, you can afford to drop your coverage and semi-ignore the run/play-action.
On all those passes to Ed Dickson or whomever, were there two tight ends lined up on those? I can’t remember.
On all those passes to Ed Dickson or whomever, were there two tight ends lined up on those? I can’t remember.
That’s something you’ll find out in the next parts of the series.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Thanks, Hydro!
I, too, saw the deep MLB, but didn’t realize that meant Tampa 2. I do recall hearing a lot on radio that some of our woes in the passing game were related to the LB’s not getting deep enough in their zones.
I suppose re-living the pain is worth increased knowledge…So bring on Dickson and his onslaught of doom.
Old Toothwrangler
Problem is, if the linebackers get too deep too quickly, it opens up all the underneath routes like slants and crosses!
by Missing Barry on Aug 27, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I want to know where to learn about these offensive and defensive schemes.
by atomsareenough on Aug 27, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m not sure if you’re joking or serious, but I will admit, that video games have gotten quite realistic.
NCAA Football (for xbox or ps3) has always claimed that they watch actual college football games to learn the plays so they can put those plays into the game. And they really have. I was watching some of the Oregon film lately, and I recognized them running a passing play that I’ve seen (and even used myself) in NCAA football.
So I mean, perhaps you are joking, Missing Barry. I don’t know. But video games are actually a decent resource for learning formations, schemes, and plays.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
A little of both. I have found video games have improved my knowledge of stuff – like take Tampa 2 – both Madden and NCAA generally give you the option to run it in many formations, as well as normal cover 2, and it really should help you figure out what the difference is when you see the MLB drop back much deeper in Tampa 2. But I’m only half serious because of course you can’t learn everything from video games. ;)
by Missing Barry on Aug 29, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
We’ll see a lot of Tampa 2 this year….in the Coliseum, against Devon Kennard and Chris Galippo.
One of the big reasons Oregon crushed was because Dickson was athletic enough to get into the zones very quickly, and they exploited that mismatch for most of the game.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 26, 2010 10:17 AM PDT reply actions
Why wasn’t Cal able to effectively counter? It was bleedingly obvious quite quickly that Dickson was able to exploit this coverage pretty much at will… was there anything Gregory could’ve done about it?
by atomsareenough on Aug 27, 2010 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I very much doubt Gregory kept on running this play because he was expecting a tight end screen. I expect he was putting these coverages in place to counter other holes that were appearing in Cal’s defense as the game went on, and when the Tampa 2 appeared the Oregon OC dialed up the TE out.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 27, 2010 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I have the game at home, but I haven’t had time to watch it. Did Cal run a Tampa 2 a lot against Oregon? Because that scheme’s weakness plays into the strengths or Oregon.
Of course, this situation, a Tampa 2 defense is the perfect play call. 3rd and goal on the 13 yard line? Chip Kelly has called run plays in similar situations, but with a 3-4 base, you likely want to pass instead of run. That’s a great defensive play call.
it’s spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-A-L-L-W-A-R-M-A-N-D-F-U-Z-Z-Y"
Did Cal run a Tampa 2 a lot against Oregon?
You just want me to reveal all my secrets don’t you?
Again, I don’t want to ruin the surprise of my future posts, but your question is the topic of another post.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Rec'd - nice analysis, Hydro
Can’t wait to see more. I know it’s painful to go over losses, but I find it so valuable and fun.
It’s like when I play cards – the post-mortem is at least as important as the game itself.
And it give us MORE FOOTBALL.
God, I’m sick of these other boring sports – FOOTBALL FOOTBALL FOOTBALL. Why can’t the season last longer?
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on Aug 26, 2010 11:06 AM PDT reply actions
Matt Summers-Gavin to RT, Hagan and Anthony at Corner
Oh, nice analysis, btw.
Oregon didn't score!!!!!!!!!
Really, this is all I care about.
No longer a member of the Martinis. I'm now a member of the Twisties...fans of TwistNHook go to www.twistys.com* *Note: TwistNHook does not endorse this site.

by 




























































