Cal had been considering bids from AT&T Park, Candlestick Park and the Oakland Coliseum. The school was believed to see advantages and disadvantages of each venue. Candlestick obviously is the most outdated stadium and also the farthest away from Cal. The Coliseum could have been a scheduling headache with the A’s and Raiders also playing there, but it’s the closest to campus. The biggest drawback of AT&T is that it has a significantly less capacity than Candlestick or the Coliseum. But it also is the newest facility with the best amenities, and considering it is right off the Bay Bridge, it’s a tolerable location.
So there are plenty of merits listed above. Let's give our expanded pros and cons after the jump.
- AT&T Park will be adjusted to hold around 45k. Still a far cry from Memorial, but it should be a pretty decent increase from the current capacity.
- There will be up to six home games. So that means five games at home or six, since we already know we have six road games.
- A 24 hour turnaround from football to baseball and back is feasible (although unlikely, since baseball series usually start on Friday on weekends, meaning that SF would have to be on the road the week Cal is playing at home). So I'm guessing the Bears and Giants will just alternate the park week-by-week until their season concludes.
- As I suspected, there will be separate sidelines. I was pretty sure Tedford wasn't going to have five or six Emerald Bowl experiences having to go from the zero to the fifty.
- Visiting tickets will be hard to come by, so it'll be a true home field advantage (however, it won't be easy to come by single season tickets. Looks like it'll be a year for the season ticket holders).
- Cal athletic director Sandy Barbour believes the school will be able to accommodate its approximately 38,000 season ticketholders.
- A Giant playoff run next October could mean the Bears have to play at an alternate location during that month.
- The goal again is to be back in Memorial by opening day 2012.
What are your thoughts on this decision? Agree or disagree? Vote in the poll and register your thoughts in the comments.
Some pros are obvious.
1) Close proximity to San Francisco, which should be attractive to students (tailgate, then explore and/or party afterwards).
2) Great bar scene in the South Beach area for the alums, way better than anything at Berkeley.
3) Good transportation from around the Bay (BART from East Bay, CalTrain from around the peninsula and South Bay); should be relatively easy for fans to get to and from games.
4) Natural grass field will be an interesting adjustment for our players, but since I assume we'll be practicing at Witter next year while Memorial gets the retrofit, our team will be well-adjusted to the playing surface.
5) Picturesque scene with McCovey Cove and the Bay right behind the stadium. Not quite as good as Memorial (how do you beat the whole Bay?) but it's pretty ideal.
Also, the drawbacks.
1) Smallest stadium, which could mean the weakest home crowd advantage, and trouble for non-season ticket holders to buy individual games. Other than the students and young alum, it's likely that only the richest fans will be able to attend Cal games next season.
2) It's a baseball field. Converting it to a football stadium is not going to be easy, and we could see at least two or three games played with that annoying infield still in place (Dolphins and Raiders games get super messy in September with that dirt track in one corner of the field).
3) If the Emerald Bowl is any indication, we might have sideline issues.
4) Playing with a baseball field for at least the September games, possibly the October games. Might mean lots of home games near the tail-end of the season, when it gets miserably cold.
5) For those who choose to drive...we wish you luck. Could have wandering first quarter crowds that only start filling up by the second quarter.