2010 Mock Draft Results in Review
If there's one thing that the number of mock drafts produced every year has proven, it's that drafts are impossible to predict. I'm fairly certain the biggest reason for this is that nearly mocks assume teams won't trade - which is absurd, because there are multiple trades in the first round every year. Another big reason is that guys like Mel Kiper have no idea what they're talking about in evaluating players, and I'm still not certain as to why his opinion should be given any more weight than, say, my dog.
Ok, he probably watches more college football than my dog, but my dog wouldn't have called Jimmy Clausen the fourth best prospect in the draft this year either.
So who did the best? I rounded up sixteen mock drafts, from the following analysts:
- ESPN's NFL Network of bloggers
- ESPN's Todd McShay
- ESPN's Mel Kiper
- ESPN's Bill Simmons
- The Sporting News
- SI.com's Peter King
- SI.com's Don Banks
- NFL.com's Pat Kirwan
- The National Football Post
- CBS Sports's Rob Rang, Chad Reuter, Pete Prisco, and Clark Judge (no link because they obliterated their mock drafts once the actual draft happened...good job covering up the tracks, guys)
- Yahoo's Shutdown Corner blog
- Walter Football
- Philly.com's Paul Domowitch
- Peter King
- Paul Domowitch
- Don Banks
- Todd McShay
- Bill Simmons
- Mel Kiper
- ESPN's Blog Network
- Shutdown Corner
- Pete Prisco
- Rob Rang
- Clark Judge
- Chad Reuter
- Walter Football
- Pat Kirwan
- The National Football Post
- The Sporting News
Take from these results what you will, but I'll admit my grading system is a bit skewed as it heavily weights correctly picking whether players will go in the first round at all. It's difficult to do it any other way because the easiest thing would be to measure the difference between where a player actually went and where an analyst picked him to go - but if an analyst didn't have a player in their mock at all, it's not possible to do that.
Of course, there are a number of ways to measure who did the best. Let's start by going over the main driver in calculations - who had the most players correctly going in the first round, who they missed, and who they had going in the first round instead:
- Peter King - 4 (Tyson Alualu, Kareem Jackson, Jerry Hughes, Patrick Robinson), had Sergio Kindle, Jimmy Clausen, Taylor Mays, and Rodger Saffold
- Don Banks - 4 (Alualu, Tim Tebow, Jahvid Best, Robinson), had Kindle, Charles Brown, Clausen, Everson Griffen
- Paul Domowitch - 4 (Alualu, Tebow, Best, Hughes), had Kindle, Brown, Clausen, Mays
- The Sporting News - 8 (Alualu, Weatherspoon, Jackson, Jermaine Gresham, Tebow, Dan Williams, Devin McCourty, Best), had Kindle, Dunlap, Clausen, Mays, Bruce Campbell, Daryl Washington, Rob Gronkowski, Brandon Spikes
- The National Football Post - 7 (Alualu, Ryan Mathews, Weatherspoon, Jackson, Demaryius Thomas, Hughes, Robinson), had Brown, Cluasen, Mays, Griffen, Campbell, Nate Allen, Chris Cook
- Walter Football - 7 (Alualu, Jackson, Gresham, Thomas, Tebow, Best, Robinson), had Kindle, Brown, Clausen, Mays, Saffold, Campbell
- Todd McShay - 11
- Peter King/Shutdown Corner tied at 9
- Pete Prisco - 8
- Walter Football, Pat Kirwan, Sporting News - 4
- National Football Post, Chad Reuter - 5
- Clark Judge, Paul Domowitch, Don Banks, Mel Kiper - 6
- No one had Tyson Alualu in the first. But you knew that already.
- Everyone had Jimmy Clausen in the first. But you knew that already.
- Other than Alualu, the highest picked player who wasn't even a consensus first rounder was Anthony Davis at 11 to the 49ers. Clark Judge didn't think he was worth a first round pick.
- All 16 analysts got the top 3 picks correctly in order.
- The other two picks which were correctly picked by more than half of the analysts reviewed were Maurkice Pouncey at 18 to the Steelers, and Jermaine Gresham at 21 to the Bengals.
- Todd McShay and Shutdown Corner had the longest streaks to start the draft, by getting the first six picks in a row correct.
- No one got the 7-13th picks, 20th pick, 23-25, 29, or 32nd picks correct. These were Joe Haden, Rolando McClain, C.J. Spiller, Alualu, Davis, Ryan Mathews, Brandon Graham, Jackson, Bryan Bulaga, Dez Bryant, Tebow, Kyle Wilson, and Robinson.
- Well, that's not entirely correct - a lot of analysts had Ryan Mathews going to the Chargers, just at 28.
- In all, a total of 48 players were named in the first rounds of these mocks.
12 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BOOOOOOO.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 28, 2010 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Mcshay is great at evaluating college talent, but it’s hilarious that people treat him as an authority based on his mock drafts. Even Kiper has a better sense of who will pick what than him.
Example:
A “veteran NFL scout” emailed top pro gossip site Pro Football Talk Wednesday to a) Praise ESPN draftnik Mel Kiper, who is “not a true scout” but “works at it,” and b) Confirm that Kiper’s colleague, Todd McShay, is considered “a joke” in the league: “McShay does not have any good connections. Higher-ups in the league think he is an arrogant [expletive]. A know-it-all. And he really knows nothing. Whatever he says about a quarterback, take it to the bank, it will be the opposite.” Exhibit A is former Kentucky quarterback Andre Woodson, a McShay favorite who went in the sixth round in 2008 and is now out of the league.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 29, 2010 5:50 AM PDT up reply actions
A native of Swampscott, Mass., McShay graduated from the University of Richmond in 1999 with a bachelors of arts in leadership studies (Jepson School of Leadership).
I dunno about you, but I found that article you linked a bit ridiculous on so many counts….
by Missing Barry on Apr 29, 2010 6:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Richmond boys…
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 29, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Standard deviation and deviation from actual pick was worked into the calculations, but it wasn’t as important as whether a guy went in the first round as well. Like I said, it would be easiest to just go that route, but if an analyst didn’t mention a player in their mock at all, and then that player goes in the first round, how would you calculate how far off that guy was?
Proud to hold season tickets to the only NBA team soon to be owned by a Russian oligarch.
by yellow fever on Apr 29, 2010 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Obviously, a bunch of trades are going to happen in the first round, which screws all of these mock drafts up, but trying to predict which trades are going to happen? Gosh, now you’ve got an impossible task.
Personally, that’s why I don’t even bother reading mock drafts anymore, especially outside the top 10. After that, just rank prospects, maybe try and match them up with teams that have a need for them.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by 


















































