CGB 2010 HoF Round 1: Alexis Gray-Lawson vs Lavelle Hawkins
via grfx.cstv.com |
via bp1.blogger.com |
Today provides some real tough matchups. You have one of the most accomplished women's basketballers of our time (perhaps second only to Ashley Walker) going up against a sentimental favorite in the Hawk.
The winner goes onto a tough second round faceoff with Russell White, but neither of them can focus on the future. They've got the here and now to tackle, and this matchup is no gimmee either way.
After the jump, we look at the merits of each athlete and you can decide who deserves to move on the most.
norcalnick has been covering AGL all year long, and he gives the footnotes as to why she should be a Hall of Famer.
When she’s on, one of the most dominating offensive players in Cal history. Holds the single game record for points (47, in double OT). Played arguably the single greatest offensive game in Cal history when she scored 37 of Cal’s 54 points to defeat top 10 Stanford. Also a great defender and was named to the Pac-10’s all defense team. Leads Cal in career games played. 3rd most career points in Cal history. Most 3 pointers made in Cal history.
There are plenty more stories like that this year. She started Pac-10 play on a hot streak.
Maybe playing a brutal schedule that included 4 teams ranked in the current AP top 10 prepared the Bears for the rest of the Pac-10. Maybe 12 games was enough time for the freshmen to get comfortable enough in the offense to allow Lexi to play to the level she was always capable of. Maybe this is just the mother of all hot streaks (though I doubt it). Whatever the reason, her performances speak for themselves. To wit:
FGs 3 pt. FG FTs Pts Rbds Asts TOs vs. UCLA 6-16 3-5 5-11 20 8 1 4 vs. USC 8-14 2-5 2-2 20 8 1 2 vs. Washington 7-14 0-4 5-7 19 3 1 1 vs. Washington St. 11-22 3-7 4-6 29 6 1 2 vs. Oregon 7-17 1-5 4-4 19 4 0 3 vs. Oregon St. 13-31 4-7 17-20 47 3 2 4 Percentage/Average 46% 39% 74% 25.67 5.33 1 2.67 Alexis Gray-Lawson: Last 6 games
She's shooting spectacularly (effective field goal percentage of 51.3), she's drawing fouls, she's getting to the line, and she's not turning the ball over much despite handling the ball on essentially every possession. She's dominating despite being the clear number one option for opposing defenses to focus on. She's dominating despite playing more than 35 minutes a game and playing the entire 50 minutes of Saturday's double OT barn-burner.
From the UW game (after a sprained ankle):
After Washington made one of two free throws, the magic began. Cal began the next possession with 1:41 left and Natasha Vital missed a 3 pointer near the end of the shot clock. Who was in the perfect position for the offensive board? Alexis Gray-Lawson, of course. Twenty-four seconds later she was dribbling the ball on the right wing, stopped, and launched a contested three pointer. Swish. Four point lead. Washington, to their credit, refused to go down easily. The Huskies scored 8 points in the final 50 seconds around 4 Natasha Vital free throws to send the game to overtime. The final three pointer, a buzzer beating shot from the left corner by Sami Whitcomb, was over a clearly pained and fatigued Gray-Lawson. Ooooovertime!
Fast forward to 1:38 in overtime. Both teams have traded a bucket and a bunch of turnovers. Lexi was clearly diminished with her sprained ankle - she had not attacked the hoop during overtime and even missed two free throws. Then she again received the ball on the right wing, dribbled the ball through her legs a couple times, spotted up and launched a three with a defender in her face. Swish. (I'd like to note that I spontaneous yelled "SHE IS SO [expletive] AWESOME" after both of Lexi's clutch 3's). This time Cal would maintain their lead as UW missed a few 3 pointers and Cal sank their free throws. Victory!
Q McCall of Swish Appeal (the women's hoops SBN blog) talks about her abilities.
Gray-Lawson has had the ability to take over games for periods of time in previous seasons, but she was rarely the first scoring option when Ashley Walker emerged as an elite player when Gray-Lawson injured her knee in the 2006-07 season. With Walker leading Cal in scoring Gray-Lawson became more of a distributor to Cal’s successful low-post players and recorded nearly a 2-1 assist to turnover ratio in 2008-09. With Walker and Devanei Hampton graduating, the offensive burden fell to Gray-Lawson. At times the transition was difficult this year as Gray-Lawson adjusted to playing with five freshman and to being the clear number one threat on the Golden Bears. But when Pac-10 play started Gray-Lawson took over, combining her outside shooting talent with a hard nosed ability to drive the ball and draw fouls, and she led the conference in scoring during the Pac-10 schedule. I would attribute the scoring explosion to Gray-Lawson getting comfortable in her new role and more cohesion with the aforementioned freshmen.
As for Lavelle, he's become as much a part of our fandom with his failures (some crucial dropped balls) and his successes (big catches at big times in 2007). rollonubears has his perspective.
2007 sucked. Everyone knows that. Team morale was frighteningly low. During the 6 game period known as the Callapse, it seemed like no one was showing up on a consistent basis. There are 2 main exceptions: Justin Forsett and Lavelle Hawkins. We had a much ballyhooed WR corp that year, being referred to by some as the best top 3 group in the nation. Lavelle Hawkins was definitely not the most talented. Yet he was easily the most dependable. Every single game Hawk did his job. Didn’t have particularly gaudy stats, but he averaged 6 catches a game during that stretch and I know I felt confident that he was going to have at least a solid game every time out. I appreciate Hawk for actually being consistent during that stretch when it seemed that no one else was (sadly, that team proved that bad morale and inconsistency are contagious, as witnessed by the drops. You know which ones I’m talking about). Hawk was one of the few bright spots on that team. He was, without question, the best receiver that year. Thanks Hawk.
Also his TD catch against USC is one of the most incredible catches I have ever seen. He literally flew. His nickname is Hawk for a reason.
Lavelle Hawkins Highlights 1 from nick sarkozi on Vimeo.
Lavelle Hawkins Highlights 2 from jamie vades on Vimeo.
Hawk had a rough draw last year with Jack Clark in the second round, but although he again plays the underdog this time he has better potential to advance. This should be a close one to the finish. Vote now!
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hawk was awesome, but... Lexi's a legend.
One of the greatest women’s basketball players Cal’s ever had. What more can be said?
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
You can guess how I voted...
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3
And how I voted as well.
Cal’s WBB program would not have progressed in talent and national reputation without the hard work and athletic chops of AGL.
I think I have to agree...
Might she be something close to what Jason Kidd means to the men’s program?
Not only in terms of what she did on the court, but convincing Hampton to come along too..and that leading to the national recognition that made the program attractive to this year’s freshman class — among the best in the nation — and supposedly another solid one coming in. And how many Cal women’s bballers can say they toppled Stanford?
Not sure how all of that should factor in though…
SwishAppeal.com, women's basketball...covered SBN-style... twitter: @qmccall3
This one is so unfair
I know The Hawk had some dropped balls, but he was the heart of our receivers IMO. He wasn’t that big, but always came through with big catches for a first down over the middle and took some big hits as a result. Plus, that catch vs. SC in 07 was one of the greatest catches I’ve ever seen. AND the one vs. ASU in 06.
Cal Football: I loved them once and they broke my heart. Let that be a lesson to you. Never love anything.
Great Gray-Lawson video from the Arizona game this year - embed this in the post, Avi?
This video shows Lexi doing it all – scoring inside, raining 3’s, taking charges, fast breaks – great all-around game for her. Complete with snippets from Coach Boyle and AGL herself (from the post-game press conference), it’s a great example of what Lexi means to this team, and has meant to Cal overall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W18pMm-YDzI
Thanks for embedding this in the post, Avi (if you have the time).
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
If she advances, I'll embed it in the next post.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Apr 11, 2010 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Lexi vs Hawk
Hawk was one of my favorite players, but he did not have any huge plays that defined his career.
Lexi was one of the players who put Cal on the map (with Ash and Dev) plus put in some monster performances in some big games.
omg
some of you think women’s basketball is a sport
Oh, my, yet another person attempting to be witty about women playing basketball!
These days I can pretty much predict what at least three people will post about any WBB story on the Chron’s website: “’Women’s basketball’? Ha-ha, that’s like watching paint dry, ha-ha!” “Chicks can’t play ball, ha-ha!” “That’s right, chicks can’t even dunk, man, ha-ha!”
Gets old, though.
omg
hyper-sensitive much?
note:
- if it weren’t for remarkable play by the hawk (namely a 4th and looong duck under a tackle for a first … and a long touchdown) in the 2007 osu debacle, then riley would never have been in a position to make that error and become the target of so much hate crime and subsequent;y the scapegoat for cal’s recent football struggles
- the hawk, were it not for the most electric player in cfb (that would be desean jackon for those of you busy playing fantasy wnba), would have been the team’s premier receiver for two years, posted better numbers, and etched a more prominent role into those i-can’t-remember-last-week-let-alone-two-years-ago memories of yours
- because of the proximity to the most recent “women’s basketball season,” this poll suffers an obvious bias … try it again in a few years or during football season, and see how that pans out … the hawk wins
- i guarantee you the hawk can dunk … so a football player that CAN dunk, or a basketball player that CAN’T (props to bearbint for raising that point)
the hawk gets the nod

fact for the day: too much soy intake can unhealthily raise estrogen levels
A few statements.
1. Football is a very popular sport. Women’s basketball is less popular.
2. Lavelle Hawkins was a great player. No doubting that. Moreover, nobody is saying the opposite!
3. They are saying that Alexis Gray-Lawson was better. I, for one, agree. This has nothing to do with proximity to women’s basketball season. Afterall, it was well over a year ago that Lexi dropped 37 to beat one of the best basketball teams in the nation, Stanford. And even though it is true she did just cap a great season with a WNIT Tournament MVP, she was having great games all season long. She broke the Cal single game scoring record.
I mean she was similar to Jerome Randle. Would you put Randle above Hawkins?
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Comparing athletes in different sports, different positions and different eras is inherently problematic and unfair. I loved Lavelle Hawkins. He was an outstanding football player for Cal. But he wasn’t even the best wide receiver on his team. Alexis Gray-Lawson, on the other hand, is arguably the greatest women’s basketball player in Cal history. At most there are only one or two others in her class. She helped put Cal women’s basketball on the map for the first time. That puts her on an entirely different level than Hawkins. Is it fair to compare the two of them? No. But that’s the game that’s being played here.
You are more than entitled to disagree with me. But when you do it by being deliberately obnoxious and insulting to great Cal athletes, it is hardly “hypersensitive” for Cal fans to object. In fact, I’d say the response you got was pretty mild. My first reaction was to point out that your post was something I would expect from someone who was either an ignoramous or a misogynist, or, most likely, both. I refrained from saying that in light of the fact that you are new to CGB. But since you choose to make a point of it . . . here you go.
Exit, Pursued By A Bear
by CalBear81 on Apr 14, 2010 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs

by 




















































