Golden Nuggets: Sandy Barbour Addresses Various Questions/Concerns
At Wednesday's Tiny Bates Award banquet Sandy Barbour addressed some questions from the crowd. Here are some tidbits of information JO obtained. Also, check out the transcript from yesterday's live chat with SB. She addresses issues such as basketball attendance, Pac-10 expansion, the Memorial Stadium upgrade, the Witter Field situation, and more
- She said the school is still considering bids from the Oakland Coliseum, Candlestick Park and AT&T Park to host home games in 2011 while Memorial Stadium is being renovated. Meetings should be wrapped up by next week so a decision could be made soon. A few concerns are the smaller capacity of AT&T Park and the fact that both the A’s and Raiders call the Coliseum home, which could cause scheduling headaches.
- On possible Pac-10 expansion, Barbour said: "It’s a wise thing for us to look at. Is there some number of other schools that will bring value to our conference? Are there schools that are fits for our conference that would bring more value in then they would take away by having to divvy up the pie by 12 or 14 instead of 10? That is what the decision will be made on. We’re going to look at it. We’d be stupid not to. But we’re not going to expand just to expand."
- Barbour said the season-opener against UC Davis came about after she discussed it with UCD athletic director Greg Warzecka, a Cal graduate and former Cal assistant baseball coach. Warzecka told Barbour that they are going to be paying someone to come to Memorial Stadium, they might as well keep that money in the state. Barbour said "You know what? You’re absolutely right. Let’s do it."
- Barbour said Cal and Stanford will continue to try to make the Big Game the final game of the year but every few years or so it’s not possible because the weekend falls during Stanford final exams.
- Barbour said she does not favor a playoff system in college football. "I don’t think a playoff solves anything," she said. "I think it prolongs the season, which I don’t think is in the best interest of the student-athletes. I think the bowl system is special. I think it’s unique in college athletics."
After the jump we take a look at Cal's new D coordinator, Ted Miller looks for three things to watch during spring practice, Kiper talks about Cal's draft prospects, baseball looks ahead to the start of the season, and men's bball loses its third of last four games against OSU while the women won their eighth straight against the Beavs.
Cal Football
- In his spring practice preview, Ted Miller says Cal's developments to watch are QB play, the new defense, and the competition for backup RB.
- Cal officially announces the arrival of new DC Clancy Pendergast. He says the three keys to his defense are to be "smart, tough, and aggressive." ProFootballCentral talks about the pros and cons of Clancy Pendergast defense. So far, it's the most in-depth look at his defense I could find, but it's no HydroTech post. Keep in mind, the link is from the 2008 preseason.
- ESPN's draft guru Mel Kiper talks about Cal's NFL prospects. On the eve of the combine Kiper thinks Best and Alualu will go in the second round, with Syd going between the fifth and seventh rounds. He has liked Alualu all year, but cites concerns about Best's recovery and Syd's size.
Cal Basketball
- Nothing went right for the Bears in their loss to OSU. Monty blames turnovers, poor rebounding, and bad defense for OSU's easy win. Theo said it's tough to be confident against a defensive scheme that Cal still hasn't figured out.
- Faraudo goes over some interesting number from that ugly loss.
- Although the men's team has lost three of its last four to OSU, the Cal women beat OSU for the eighth straight time with a 66-62 win.
- Wilner speculates that the Pac-10 may not get an at-large birth for the first time since the 64-team NCAA tourney was introduced.
- Despite a strong group of pitchers, Cal's tough OOC schedule and some question marks in the lineup stand in the way of an NCAA tournament bid this year.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
keep it east bay
it would just be ghey to play games in the city … PLEASE work something out with oaktown
regardless, does this mean we get to buy beer at the games!?!
I admit, the tailgating/amtrak/BART option at the Coliseum is quite tempting and very East Bay. The epic parking lot pre-game scene could be something this Bear Fan would like. I do enjoy the drunken bus rides down to Memorial, especially when the bus driver has a fantastic open carry policy.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
If we do not get QB pressure we do not get turnovers. If we do not get turnovers this D does not work. I think Clancy’s schemes more than our player’s ability is at fault here. He either needs to adapt or move over after 2 years of potential without consistent success. The offense’s high risks put unnecessary pressure on the defense and special teams often last year.
For some reason Tedford seems to have gone after Gregory 2.0 ….
I get excited when I see a LB/DL drop into coverage and make the play! Not so fantastic when they give up so many catches it makes your eyes hurt. When opposing teams play better with less talent it falls on Clancy P. and Whiz for keeping him. That is the fancy Clancy mystery, we are getting tore up in the short passing game and it’s a lot about scheme. 08 is show or go for DC Clancy P.
I’m getting a little worried.
bee tee dizzle… both quotes from the profootballcentral links
by EchoOfSilence on Feb 19, 2010 6:24 PM PST up reply actions
Not too surprised. People make too big a deal about DCs anyway, most of them don’t really differ that much in strategy.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Feb 19, 2010 6:25 PM PST up reply actions
so what would you say sets them apart?
by EchoOfSilence on Feb 19, 2010 6:31 PM PST up reply actions
There are some DCs in college who are really good recruiting great talent and letting that dictate their scheme (Carroll, who was USC’s de facto coordinator, Muschamp, who is a fantastic recruiter, Gregory did find some real gems himself)…and there are some DCs who are very good at coaching lesser heralded players up to fit into their own schemes (Banker at Oregon St., Mark Stoops at Arizona, now FSU, Wilcox at Boise). From what I see here, it feels like Clancy would fall into the first category.
The people who can do both of these things…well, they usually get NFL jobs.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Feb 19, 2010 6:38 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed. A lot of Cal fans are so fixated on BBDB. I think the scheme by itself isn’t necessarily bad, but Gregory’s execution I found lacking. Playing 8 yards off your man and an inability to make in-game adjustments are not the scheme’s fault.
by BeareatsTacos on Feb 19, 2010 9:01 PM PST up reply actions
What in-game adjustments did Gregory fail to make?
I always hear people saying he doesn’t make in-game adjustments, and I’ve been begging people to put up a fanshot enlightening the rest of us about how he doesn’t but nobody has done it.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
As always I’m not one to question your attention to detail, but if I remember correctly the Oregon game and Oregon State games from 2009 left a particularly large hole in short passes (~10 yards) over the middle for opposing TEs (see Ed Dickson and Joe Halahuni). I also remember Oregon 2009 being full of swing passes and screens from Masoli for short yardage gain, easily gaining yardage on us, except instead of allowing the dink and dunk to bend, we broke on their TD drives. Unfortunately I have neither game on hand so I can’t confirm, but if you can pull out the game tape and see if Gregory actually did anything to attempt to correct this, I’d be happy to hear it.
by BeareatsTacos on Feb 22, 2010 6:52 PM PST up reply actions
Well, all these things you point out are illustrating how Oregon and Oregon State utilized their offense against us, but do not illustrate how Gregory failed to adjust to these offensive tactics. Merely the fact that the opponent offenses were successful against us does not mean that Gregory did not adjust. He could have been adjusting yet the adjustments still failed to work, or the players just failed to execute and win their position battles.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
I like the idea of keeping the $ not only within the state, but within the UC system. Nice move Warzecka and Barbour!
I remain curious to see how UCD fans show up for this game.
I believe they played Boise St fairly tough last year…and of course we remember their epic performance against Stanfraid.

"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Sweet uniforms. The Aggies’ version of gold is too Bruin-esque for our Bears, but I otherwise like the classic look.
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Feb 20, 2010 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
KenCraw has a theory on Gregory’s departure and also discusses potential candidates.
My guess is that Tedford told Gregory that he wanted to make a change at DC but that he liked him too much to fire him and asked him to go find a new job. Gregory started shaking the trees and found less interest than he would like. But, instead of insulting his old friend by not leaving, he took a demotion to a position that’ll give him a big upside down the road.
In other words, as always, the Cal coaching staff acted with class.
I thought the 3-4 Steeler’s approach would have been a neat (and quite possibly revered) approach:
Some NFL Linebacker coach like Steeler’s Keith Butler or Charger’s John Pagano: I’m not a big fan of NFL coaches going to the college ranks if they don’t already have college coaching experience. I’ll site Charlie Weis. The level of skill that NFL guys expect their players already have and don’t need to be coached is so high, they often overlook the simple things like tackling. The best defensive scheme in the world won’t work if the guys can’t do the fundamentals. But if you’re going to go with an NFL position coach, I think the LB coach is the way to go as it’s the heart of the 3-4 defense. Luckily Butler has college experience at Memphis and since the Cal 3-4 is modeled after the Steeler’s 3-4, it would be one of the better hires. Pagano has no such experience so not so much, even though they run the 3-4 in San Diego.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Don’t know about Ken’s theory: “Bob, I like you too much to fire you, but, well, you’re fired. I’ll just keep you on the payroll until you can find another job.”
Really? Maybe I’m being naive, but I take Tedford and Gregory’s public story at face value. After the season, Tedford sent a clear message to everyone that last season’s results weren’t acceptable and that he was expecting everyone—from the fans to the hydrotechs to the players to his coaches—to crank up their effort in 2010. I suspect that as Spring practice approached, Gregory came to the realization that he and his family just weren’t prepared for the workaholic atmosphere that’s going to surround Strawberry Canyon this year, hence his desire to take a position where he could put his career on hold without actually quitting/retiring.
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Feb 20, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions
yeah, both options (the face value version and Ken’s version) seem plausible to me. The timing (late Feb) suggests the face value option is the more likelier of the two. Otherwise, why wouldn’t he have gotten rid of Gregory with Alamar (late Dec)? I suppose they could have had a falling out of sorts, in regards to the future and how much time that would take. That would make it a little of both…
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Regarding the move in 2011
For what its worth some months ago an indvidual in the postion to know for sure(not inside Cal, but from the venue) told me that the Bears would not be going to the Coliseum…for the obvious reasons of schedule conflicts with baseball and football…same deal really with ATT and baseball there…get ready for the stick…the good news is that for the first time we can really do some serious tailgating albeit in a somewhat forlorn location…psyched though because I can at last use our RV for home games…GO BEARS
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Feb 21, 2010 8:25 AM PST reply actions
What about Stanford Stadium?
Shane Vereen and Co. did demonstrate in November, after all, that the new SS is Our House Domicile!
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Feb 21, 2010 9:13 AM PST up reply actions
bingo
…and I like the party in vibe in the groves…don’t even think they would notice we were there
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Feb 21, 2010 9:43 AM PST up reply actions

by 























































