Golden Nuggets: "We Have That Immediate Need For Him to Contribute"
As Cal's only JC recruit, Coleman Edmond is expected to make an immediate impact on offense. Unlike out-of-high-school WRs, Tedford believes Edmond will require minimal development to become an impact player.
University of California-Berkeley football coach Jeff Tedford hopes Edmond, who played quarterback and running back for Kingston in 2005, can exploit Pac-10 defenses like that for the next two seasons.
"We're very excited about bringing Coleman in," Tedford said. "I feel he brings a lot of play-making ability. What we saw on film, his skills, his speed, he's something we are excited about in this offense. What he can do after the catch is eye-opening. There is no question he can make plays at a high level."
Edmond, a wide receiver and kickoff returner, signed a letter of intent to play for Cal last week. He played for Pierce Community College outside Los Angeles last year and was named the Southern California Association offensive player of the year. Edmond made 37 catches for Pierce, including nine for touchdowns, putting up 1,584 all-purpose yards. He also returned a kickoff and a punt for touchdowns.
Tedford, 67-35 with five bowl wins in eight seasons at Cal, expects Edmond to be one of the four receivers he rotates in his pro style offense this fall. Edmond, who is 6-foot-1, 210 pounds, will also compete for the starting kickoff returner job.
"If Coleman performs, he will see a lot of playing time," said Tedford, who could not talk about Edmond until after he signed because of NCAA rules. "We feel he can be effective in any part of the passing game. Coleman is our only junior college recruit. So we have that immediate need for him to contribute. We are not going to need the time we might with a high school recruit."
As for Edmond, he's ready to make lots of big plays for his new coach.
"That's all I ever think about, hitting the home run, the big play," Edmond said. "I get over- confident and want to get 400 all-purpose yards on one play. I have to realize it's one play at a time. I just want to keep working hard and be in top shape for the season."
After the jump, the Santa Rosa Press Democrat tries its hand at comedy, PC angers Juju on the eve of a crucial road trip, and more.
Cal Football
- Santa Rosa's Press Democrat looks at the Bay Area's best and worst coaches. Monty was number two on the list, but Tedford was named as a "middle tier" coach who is "on the way down."
Cal Basketball
- Rob Calonge talks about Randle's much-deserved Pac-10 Player of the Week award.
- Cal's seniors have one final trip up to The Pit this weekend, possibly the most important road trip of their careers. PC already predicts a sweep (stop antagonizing Juju, PC).
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Edmond, who played quarterback and running back for Kingston in 2005
I want to see at least ONE trick play this year where somone is passed the ball behind the LoS, and he passes the ball to a wide open receiver downfield for a huge gain.
I don’t think we should depend on trick plays all the time or anything, but I remember that Tedford used to whip one out every now and then, and I thought it kept opposing teams off-balance just a bit. Now it seems he barely ever does it.
double passes?!
yes, that would be awesome. also stick him in the wildbear instead of vereen, please.
I wouldn’t mind a few plays a la Boise St.
by EchoOfSilence on Feb 16, 2010 5:37 PM PST up reply actions
We’ve been very judicious in our use of the double pass trickeration plays. The last 2 double passes I can remember us calling were the first play of the Minnesota game in 2009 (Vereen opted to run instead of throw) and the Oregon State game in 2008 (touchdown pass from Ross to Boateng).
I am a Vereenian.
I don’t think we should use the exact same trick play all the time, obviously. But we used to do more trick plays in general, and while I agree that they should be used sparingly, they are still a valuable tool in the arsenal and I think we could stand to use them a little more often than we currently seem to.
by atomsareenough on Feb 16, 2010 9:05 PM PST up reply actions
But we used to do more trick plays in general
That is my sense of things, and I think it’s a view shared by a lot of Cal fans. It would be interesting, though, to do a breakdown of the offensive plays we’ve run over the years to see if that is actually the case.
The perception might also be affected by what the definition of “trick play” is. Clearly, the hook and lateral to Best in the 2008 Big Game or the double pass out of the diamond formation in the 2008 Oregon State game would be “trick plays.” I also think the potentially disastrous creative pass attempt by Vereen out of the Wildbear in the red zone vs. ASU in 2009 is properly categorized as a “trick play.” But what about the flea flicker (which we’ve run maybe 3 or 4 times in last 2 years)? Or the double reverse?
In general, atoms, I think we’re on the same page on this issue. I wish I had the time (and access to game tape!) to do an analysis of our “trick play” frequency.
I am a Vereenian.
I wish you (or someone) had the time and game tape to do an analysis of trick plays, too! :)
Again, relying only on my own perception and fuzzy memories, I also feel like the trick plays we HAVE run in the past couple of years, especially the double reverse kinds of plays, haven’t been particularly successful; I don’t know if it’s because we haven’t been executing them well, or if there’s a giveaway in our formation somewhere that defenses can key on and read the reverse in advance, but opposing teams haven’t seemed to be biting as well on them.
Maybe that cuts against my argument that we should use a few more trick plays during the season, because they haven’t been working lately, but I think if they’re executed well they will work on balance, and the fact that defenses have added wrinkles to think about will also help us.
by atomsareenough on Feb 17, 2010 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
Also, PC can’t affect Juju. Athletes are supposed to be confident. Juju raison d’etre is only to torment the fans for their hubris.
sometimes i just don’t feel high-brow enough to be on this blog.
"It’s not a good car and not a good boat, but it’s the best car-boat ever made"
nevermind, its just hard to understand the locals sometimes. maybe some day i’ll catch on.
"It’s not a good car and not a good boat, but it’s the best car-boat ever made"
Holy analysis, Batman!
He is a disappointment because he once was so good — wow, was he good! — and he’s not so good anymore.
Submitted without comment: Here’s an old fire joe morgan post about the author of the above article
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Bringing it back full circle
Re: today’s earlier topic: the linked article begins with a fairly decent argument against tearing into other bloggers/unpaid writers for other sites (something carp and others were complaining about):
Usually we don’t cover blogs, because everyone knows they’re written by clinically obese, pimply-faced, wheelchair-bound agoraphobics with Oedipus complexes. Or Mike Pagliarulo. But I’m making an exception for Lowell Cohn, who writes! professionally! for something called the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, and who apparently is award! winning! as the blog description tells us:
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
…Except the rest of the FJM piece is a fantastic argument for why it can be awesome to tear into other people’s shoddy work.
by atomsareenough on Feb 17, 2010 6:47 AM PST up reply actions
Lowell Cohn’s take on Harbaugh:
Jim Harbaugh: People overrate him because he improved Stanford football quickly and dramatically, and because he has crazy eyes, and crazy eyes give the impression of brilliance, and because rumors always surface he’s leaving Stanford to coach the Raiders or to rule the world and rumors like those enhance a coach’s reputation beyond what he actually accomplished.
Last season, he lost Big Game and the Sun Bowl. He is a man filled with promise and potential and may turn out to be special but it is too soon — way too soon — to anoint him to anything. I put him at the bottom of my top-tier list or the top of my middle-tier list. (Emphasis added because that was the most important part.)
And an interesting take on Johnny Dawkins:
(Side note: I don’t include Stanford’s Johnny Dawkins in this list. I simply don’t know what to make of him, which isn’t exactly a vote of confidence.)
Another side note: even though he ranks Tara Vanderveer as the Bay Area’s best coach, he doesn’t include Joanne Boyle anywhere in his evaluation of coaches. And (unlike with Dawkins or the San Jose Sharks) with no explanation for the omission.
I am a Vereenian.

by 

























































