Jerome Randle Stars, Team Effort Downs Huskies
As Jerome Randle goes, so do the Bears.
A month ago in Seattle, the Bears were blown out of Hec Ed, a dismal Saturday morning performance in which the Bears looked lost, flustered by UW's pressure, impotent on offense and on their heels on defense. Jerome Randle, injured late the previous Thursday night at the end of a 39-point clinic at Washington State, limped around the court, lacking the necessary quickness to either get by defenders and into the lane or to slow down UW's lightning-quick transition offense. Only a slew of Husky fouls allowed the Bears to keep the final score somewhat respectable; the truth is, they were never in that game.
Last night, as the venue switched to Berkeley, so did the fortunes of the Cal Basketball team. A healthy Jerome Randle may not have dominated Isaiah Thomas (Thomas still managed 25 points, many of them late), but neither was Thomas much of a hindrance to Randle, who showed off all the moves that make him such a dominating player, hitting big threes from deep, driving to the basket for easy layups, and even one circus shot where Randle basically shovel-passed a prayer from outside the left side of the line only to watch it go in off the glass. We may be getting used to those kind of ridiculous shots from Jerome, but the smile on his face after it went in betrayed even his incredulity; he probably hasn't made that shot since he was 13, on a playground somewhere in Chicago.
(Editor's note: this post was written jointly by myself and CBKWit after the game at Raleigh's Manny's Tap Room. If you were there last night and saw two nerdy guys punching away at a laptop in a room full of drunk college students, that was us.)
For as great as the offense was last night (and it was), that was nothing unusual for our Bears. What I want to note instead was the yeoman's work the Bears did in the half court defense; if Cal could slow down UW's transition offense (and that wasn't always the case -- the Huskies managed to score a transition bucket after a MADE basket by the Bears), the Huskies were pretty invariably left with a tough shot and no rebound. The Bears came out and made it a team mission to rebound the basketball, and that, as much as anything else, is what helped them build the first half lead that would never really be in jeopardy.
via imgs.sfgate.com
One thing that puzzled both of us was UW's lack of pressure defense. UW started using a full court press with about 7 or 8 minutes left in the game (while down 17 - at that point, what do you have to lose?) with moderate success. UW created a few turnovers but Cal was able to get a few easy buckets as well. The pressure did speed up the game, which was the only way UW was going to have a chance at winning.
More curious than the lack of full court pressure was the lack of the hyper-aggressive man defense by the Huskies. This created all kinds of problems for Cal in Seattle, but the Huskies did not remotely duplicate their defensive intensity from a month ago. Maybe UW didn't want Cal shooting 50 free throws again, figuring that the Bears would hit their freebies this time (they did). Maybe they were afraid of a healthy Randle breaking down the defense, and rightfully so - Randle penetrated a sagging Husky defense seemingly at will. For whatever reason, UW did not take their defense to the Bears like they did last time, and Cal's offense, which was abysmal in Seattle, looked fantastic.
UW wins games (at home - 355 days without a true road win and counting) by getting out in transition and hitting the offensive glass. The Bears did a much better job slowing down UW's transition offense than they did a month ago - it's a lot easier to stop transition offense when you don't turn the ball over, and the Bears only had 13 turnovers at Haas, compared to 21 in Seattle. A lot of that falls to Randle, who had 8 turnovers in a miserable game in Seattle but just 2 while completing dominating last night. In addition to limiting transition opportunities, the Bears did a much better job getting back when the Huskies were on the break.
The Bears' transition defense was critical, but their defensive rebounding was even more important. UW has better athletes than Cal in their front court - witness two spectacularly athletic blocks by the Huskies, which were correctly called goaltending - and these athletes crash the offensive glass hard. Cal did a fantastic job grabbing defensive rebounds and keeping Pondexter and Co. from creating second chance opportunities. Meanwhile, with Cal's best (by far) offensive rebounder Omondi Amoke on the bench with 2 fouls, the Bears somehow came up with a bevy of their own offensive rebounds. UW eventually closed the gap in the offensive rebounding battle (11 for the Bears, 8 for the Huskies), as they picked up several in the last ten minutes of the game as they were selling out to mount a comeback, but Cal did a better job rebounding on both ends of the floor while the game was in question.
via imgs.sfgate.com
Jamal Boykin deserves much of the credit. If Randle was the Maestro perfectly controlling Cal's offense and systematically destroying the Huskies (I'm pretty sure I saw Randle give (#22 Justin Holiday??) a chinese balm during the post game handshakes after burning him all game), then Boykin was the principal violinist, performing his role at a very high level. Boykin shot a great percentage from the floor and made 8 of 9 free throws to boot. He scored on jumpers and a variety of double and triple moves around the hoop. He was a monster on the boards. Randle gets the game ball, but Boykin was second in line.
Theo Robertson struggled on offense, missing a wide open three and turning the ball over 3 or 4 times, but he did a nice job defensively on Quincy Pondexter. Pondexter has (finally) developed a nice offensive game and Robertson did not make it easy for him.
Christopher also had a tough defensive assignment, drawing Isaiah Thomas for much of the game. Thomas got his points eventually but was generally out of sync. And while Christopher also didn't do a ton offensively, he again put the exclamation point on the victory with an alley-oop from Randle with two minutes to go. When Cal is up at the end of games, teams will over play Randle to try to get a steal. When Randle gets around these defenders into the lane, the wing defenders will rotate to stop him, leaving Christopher open with a running start from the corner. Randle and Christopher look for the alley-oop in this situation, and it absolutely brought the house down tonight.
Speaking of the crowd, it seems like people read Ragnarok's plea a couple days ago, because Haas was better than it's been all year. It's still not nearly good enough - there are a lot of empty seats in the upper rows at the south end - but there were more people, and there was more energy from those that did show. Like UW, WSU is also a young team, and Cal will have a serious advantage on Saturday when we show up. So show up and be loud, people!
---
I don't know who's going to win the Pac-10 this year, but it ain't gonna be Washington.
Is it premature to sound the death knell for the Huskies? Perhaps. But Washington, still winless on the road this season, are now two games back of Cal with just six to play, and with likelihood of Cal dropping more than two games down the stretch while UW runs the table (they have four more games on the road, BTW) just seems slimmer and slimmer. Moreover, the best teams left on Cal's schedule are the Arizona schools, who besides a trip to Haas both have a very favorable stretch run. So even if Cal does stumble, the Huskies still need both Arizona schools to lose another game or two each. Realistically, if Washington is going to win the Pac-10, Husky fans better are going to have to do something distasteful and root hard for Oregon -- the Ducks visit ASU this Saturday, and host Cal next weekend.
For my money, the conference title is going to come down to Cal, Arizona and Arizona State, which means that it's going to come down to both of the Arizona school's visits to Haas Pavilion in two weeks. Not that other teams *can't* win it, but pretty much everyone else is going to need a good deal of help. 13 wins should be enough to win this conference, and 12 might even be enough.
But for the Bears, none of that matters if they don't take care of Washington State on Saturday. So, to reiterate, get your butt out to Haas and make some noise -- and this time, drag a couple friends along with you!
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m going to be sad when Theo and Boykin are gone. I love watching them play – they just know how to play good basketball. By the way, next time you guys are on national tv, I think you should note it big and bold in the game preview (in the headline, maybe?) – I wouldn’t have realized the game was on ESPN2 so I could watch it if my roommate hadn’t happened to scroll over the channel in our guide right before it started.
I guess it is mentioned in the Dawgpound Q&A, but I didn’t look at that, and you should obviously be taking my needs into consideration. :)
by Missing Barry on Feb 12, 2010 8:24 AM PST up reply actions
I’m going to be sad when all the seniors are gone. Jorge will step up and assume a leadership position, which seems natural given his charisma.
I’m really happy for Randle, given his patience over his career. He has really turned out to be quite the basketball player under Montgomery.
I am a proud member of LB Chris Martin's fan group: the Martinis
by dballisloose on Feb 12, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions
And last night was a GREAT highlight reel for him
National TV, a reasonable East Coast start time, against the team considered by many to be the most athletic in the (pathetic) Pac-10, and he pulls out that behind the back move. Fantastic, Jerome.
Thanks for being a Bear and good luck at the next level, wherever it is.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
GO BEARS!
Awesome game! Great post!
I can’t believe I let you two sit at my table nerding it up. There was free beer tasting and college shenanigans all around us, and then there was you. :)
by BearBallCarrier on Feb 12, 2010 9:47 AM PST reply actions
Great game Bears!!!
Slowly my fears of Cal blowing a lead in the 2nd half are fading… Hopefully they keep closing teams out!!! Great win, now on to the Cougs and then redemption vs. AZ
Keep it up Bears!!!!
Things to Remember: Girls usually don't like it when you yell out "Beast Mode!" when switching to doggy style. - TFLN
Great game, but I probably should have enjoyed it more
I wasted a lot of angst watching this game. Thinking back on it, we were in pretty good control for most of the game, but I was never really comfortable until the last 3 minutes or so.
After UW cut our lead to 29-25 in the 1st half, we went on a run to take a 14-point lead into halftime. After that, UW got no closer than 9 points in the 2nd half. Yet, I felt uneasy, waiting and waiting for UW to make a significant run. As it turned out, I didn’t have time to get that nervous. After UW cut it to 74-65, Randle hit that 3 that put us up by double digits again and UW never got it back to single digits again. We really did a good job of stifling UW’s rallies in the 2nd half.
I am a Vereenian.
My gf and I were watching highlights before watching Lost on demand
She was astounded when I told her J-Rand was slightly shorter than her.
by CalLadLal on Feb 12, 2010 11:24 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Did anyone hear the two students heckling the entire game?
I was standing right in front of them (unfortunately got some spittle). They were pretty clever. They kept calling Holiday bug-eyes and I think it got to him at one point.
TwistNHook in motion?
[to the music of Swan Lake]

I am a proud member of LB Chris Martin's fan group: the Martinis
I saw the picture, then I looked at your username
…and I must say, it makes for a pretty great caption. haha
by EchoOfSilence on Feb 12, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
Cal fan report card
I had a great time watching Randle, Boykin and the rest of the Bears put the pedal to the floor and take the Huskies to the woodshed. I didn’t have such a great time watching Jorge and Jerome get manhandled down the stretch, but that’s another matter. It was the kind of energy/hustle game I expect to see out of a team with such competitive senior leadership. Here is my completely subjective report card for various fan groups for last night’s game:
Chairbacks – C
The bluehairs showed up for this one despite potential conflicts with earlybird dinner specials. They didn’t make a whole lot of noise as usual, but did manage to stand up for a few ovations after particularly solid stretches of play. By showing up they didn’t hurt the Bears, but they certainly didn’t do anything to help us win.
Cheapseats – B-
The cheap seats were a little more populous than usual, and there were faint rumblings that almost sounded like cheering and crowd noise. Some folks could even be heard participating in cheers!
The Bench – B-
The Bench was actually full for this game. Perhaps the kiddies heard that the Bears are actually in first place. The first row and center court sections of the Bench were getting after it pretty well throughout the game. Solid effort. The rest of the Bench area though was middling at best, and could often be seen turned to the side conversing, or just staring blankly at the game in front of them. Folks, this is your chance to yell things about the players (e.g. lack of academic progres, lack of skill on the court, past legal transgressions, overall moral character, mother’s sexual proclivities). These things get in their heads and distract them from their already difficult job of trying to stay in front of Randle or boxing out Amoke.
Cal Band – A
The Band would earn an A most nights, but last night especially so since they occupied far more than their allotted section. Good job and good effort as always.
Rally Comm – D
The reason the Band was able to bring so many extra members to the game was due to the rather conspicuous absence of the Rally Comm? Where are you guys? Don’t get me wrong, I have a high level of appreciation for Rally Comm – they go to all the sporting events nobody else does, paint the big C, guard the campus during Big Game week, etc. – but wow, is that all you can muster? Is membership way down this year?
Student section behind the Band – C
For the first time all year this section was full to the point that they didn’t let non-students sit in it. I was very glad to see the students finally show up. I don’t know what the marketing people had to do to make it happen, but keep doing it. That said, if not for the shirtless painted dudes in the front row, who were standing and cheering the whole game, I would have given this section a C- or even D+. These people looked on as if they were collectively in the midst of a bout of mono. They stared, texted, goofed around with balloons, and couldn’t even muster the occasional GO! BEARS! cheer. Hell, there were even a couple of dingleberries with bright red shirts on and nobody said squat about it! If you can’t get into college hoops what can you get into?! When I was a student I stood in the front row for an entire game while running a 102deg fever. Sure it was stupid, but that’s what this team means to me. I practically had to be carried off like MJ getting carried off the court by Scottie Pippen (that pretty much sums up all my similarities to MJ). Anyway, point is….well, I’m not sure what my point is.
Mic men –
I’m not going to rank these guys. I hate to crack on these guys. They have a hard job, and they put in a lot of effort to help our teams and really to help the players and fans enjoy the games more. That said, when you have a section of students in front of you who aren’t making noise and aren’t paying attention, you have to do what you can to get them going and get them involved. I didn’t see a lot of that and I think there’s room for improvement.
I’m looking forward to watching the Golden Bears kick some Cougar tail tomorrow. It was great to see Haas (semi-) rockin’ again and I hope to see more fans get behind this team as the season winds down. GO BEARS!
by harmonpreservationsociety on Feb 12, 2010 3:47 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
All three of the mic men were new. I saw one veteran mic man (Ian) at the beginning of the game but he wasn’t in the blue-shirt-and-tie uniform, and I never saw him after that. We really needed him because the newbies were pretty bad. Hopefully they’ll get better with experience though. Those two hecklers behind me did a better job of helping me make noise.
Here's the recap from my blog:
Cal needed a win to stay on top of the conference. If they had lost, then they would have slid into the masses of second place teams. Instead, they impressively defeated the Huskies 93-81.
The Huskies kept it even early on, as they led 15-14 with 13:45 left in the first half. Cal would proceed to go on a 8-0 run to take a 22-15 lead, and they would extend it all the way to 29-17. The Huskies would close to 29-25, before the Bears blitzed them to take a 48-34 halftime lead.
In the second half, the Huskies would never come from within 9. As a matter of fact, they didn’t come that close from the 5:02 mark on. But the most encouraging sign was the fact that Cal held a lead for the whole second half and never blew it. The Golden Bears were not willing to lose this game.
Jerome Randle did it all for the Bears. He scored 33 points, shot 63% and only had 2 turnovers despite playing 39 minutes. Jerome scored 21 of his 33 in the first half. He also did an admirable job defensively on Huskie star Isaiah Thomas, holding the talented sophomore to 43% shooting and not letting him bring his team back into the game.
Jamal Boykin turned in the game the Bears need if they are to go deep in the tourney. Boykin scored 20 points and nabbed 11 rebounds in one of his best games on the year. While Randle may be Player of the Game, Boykin definitely deserves an honorable mention.
For the Bears, 86 of their 93 points came from the starting lineups. And this was with Theo Robertson shooting 2-7 from the field. The bench didn’t play too well, but we still pulled out a W.
Defensive intensity was the key to the win. The Bears were able to shoot 51.7% from the field, and 37.5 from 3. While it wasn’t a great defensive performance, they still held UW to 43.3% shooting and 25% from 3.
Go Bears!
"But it only takes five future unabombers to take what should be a 400-comment thread and turn it into a 1,200-comment one full of anger… anger I suspect has more to do with the fact that they can’t land the hot chick rather than the fact that we signed Aubrey Huff instead of gave Garko a chance after dealing away a supposedly valuable prospect for him." -mlb22
It's new, I made it earlier this week
The URL is http://since59.blogspot.com/.
"But it only takes five future unabombers to take what should be a 400-comment thread and turn it into a 1,200-comment one full of anger… anger I suspect has more to do with the fact that they can’t land the hot chick rather than the fact that we signed Aubrey Huff instead of gave Garko a chance after dealing away a supposedly valuable prospect for him." -mlb22
Thanks
I enjoy writing it, so hopefully I’ll be able to keep it going for awhile(:
"But it only takes five future unabombers to take what should be a 400-comment thread and turn it into a 1,200-comment one full of anger… anger I suspect has more to do with the fact that they can’t land the hot chick rather than the fact that we signed Aubrey Huff instead of gave Garko a chance after dealing away a supposedly valuable prospect for him." -mlb22

by 



















































