Cal Basketball: Good Defense, Bad Offense, Ugly Schedule
Mike Montgomery wasn't kidding when he said his California Golden Bears would have a lot of growing up to do. Their offense has been scattershot, so you can see four to five minute stretches without field goals. They embrace contact, so their games often turn into free throw shooting contests. The hard physical matchups make many fans wonder if they're playing at Memorial Stadium rather than Haas Pavilion. The result has been an aesthetically unpleasing 7-5 basketball team that is going to test the patience of Cal fans everywhere, growing pains or no growing pains.
So let's look at this team point-by-point.
Cal has played the second toughest strength of schedule of any team from a major conference this season.
Only Tennessee drew a tougher opening slate than Cal, who currently clocks in at fifth overall among all teams. Of Cal's five losses, two have come against undefeated teams (the third ranked Kansas Jayhawks at 11-0 and the seventh ranked San Diego St. Aztecs at 14-0), another against the fifteenth-ranked Notre Dame Fighting Irish at 11-1, and another against a team hovering outside the top 25 in the 10-2 Boston College Eagles. Their fifth loss came to a 9-2 Southern Mississippi Eagles squad that's about their equal. In short, Cal has lost to five teams that have lost a combined five games this season. And have won 55 by extension.
(To discuss the bowl games, scroll down.)
This is a schedule fit for a masochist, and isn't too far off the insane schedule that crippled our team's chances at a deep tournament run last season. So it's not just Cal looking bad, it's the strength of other teams making us look worse than we actually are.
And lest we forget, Cal has quality wins on their resume. They've beaten a ranked team (the 25th ranked Temple Owls at 9-2), and notched two big wins against the 10-2 Iowa St. Cyclones and the 10-2 New Mexico Lobos. It might not be pretty, but the Bears have shown the mettle to beat quality teams too.
Cal is expending most of their energy and execution on the defensive side of the ball. It seems pretty clear when you look at the numbers. Cal's defense is giving up 89.6 points per 100 possessions, good for 30th in the country. Having two defensive-minded guys like Jorge Gutierrez and Harper Kamp leading the way is certainly helpful, and sets the tone for the rest of the team.
It's even more impressive when you realize they've played Boston College (4th best adjusted offense), Kansas (6th), Notre Dame (11th), San Diego State (17th), and New Mexico (35th). Cal shut all those offenses down for long stretches of the game or generally contained them, but just didn't have enough offensively to take advantage except against the Lobos.
You can also see that Cal doesn't go for offensive rebounds much (perhaps to prevent any transition baskets when extra guys crash the boards), or gamble for steals. Nope, it's just pure hustle and effort, keeping their men in front of them and forcing as many tough shots as possible to lengthen the probability our team has a chance to win at the end. Cal's opponents are shooting under 44 percent from two point land and around 31 percent from three point land.
That bodes well down the line for this group, because defensive effort is hard for guys to embrace at the collegiate level, particularly in the man-to-man schemes Mike Montgomery favors (lots of teams laze into an easier-going zone defense). Gotta love it.
This is an excellent team rebounding group. Remember how good Patrick Christopher, Theo Robertson, Omondi Amoke and Jamal Boykin were at making sure our opponents went one-and-done on their possessions? Markhuri Sanders-Frison, Allen Crabbe (who's been a very strong rebounder), Kamp, Gutierrez, even Bak Bak and Richard Solomon off the bench are performing at an equally impressive rate. Our length has been a deceptive advantage in ensuring smaller teams have no chance at garnering second-chance points
Our opponents recognize we commit to the defensive glass, so they have to be very solid in their halfcourt offense. Only four teams in the conference (Washington in particular, but also Arizona, UCLA and Furd) are solid offensive rebounding teams, so this could be a distinct advantage if we can ensure no extra possessions by our opponents.
Offense still offensive. Cal has the worst offense in the Pac-10, behind even the terrible Oregon schools. They're the next-to-last best shooting team, besting only Oregon. They turnover the ball every fourth or fifth possession (again, last place), which makes their defensive efficiency all the more impressive (Cal has been a very savvy fullcourt defense team this year). After being the best three point shooting team in the conference two years running, other than Gutierrez and occasionally Nigel Carter, there's no outside threat for opponents to fear--Gary Franklin and Allen Crabbe are shooting a combined 26.7% from downtown.
It'll probably stay that way all year. Other than Gutierrez [and in a couple of games, Brandon Smith[, no one can really create a shot off their own dribble, and with Jorge, the shot he creates resembles a "Choose Your Own Adventure" storybook. Last year we had four guys who could do that. Gary Franklin is clearly a year away (at the moment he's a jump shooter); while Crabbe's shooting motion is smooth, he only shows his slashing ability in spurts. When your wings are struggling to dribble and drive, and then can't shoot outside either, everything goes into the mud. Brandon Smith is probably going to have to see more time, since he's at least a better defender and passer (if not a capable offensive playmaker).
The biggest underrated problem is the passing of the perimeter guys. The entry passes to Kamp and Sanders-Frison will probably be a work in progress all season, but also the ball reversal doesn't always happen and guys simply force passes.
Bad offense, good defense. And you thought football season was over.
It's the sign of a young team. And just to remind you...Cal was the 18th most experienced team in the country last season. This year? 304th. We'll see more rookie mistakes than savvy veteran decisions, so let's rein in our expectations for what this team can accomplish offensively. This is a defensive team first and foremost, meaning...
Cal this year=less extreme version of USC last year. If you remember, USC was a hard watch last season, because they were abominable on offense but so tough on defense. Mike Montgomery hasn't committed so firmly to the defensive side of the ball as Kevin O'Neill did, but it's clear that this is our calling card this season.
The Washington Huskies and Arizona Wildcats are better than us at both offense and defense, so they should be able to best us. The UCLA Bruins and Washington St. Cougars are strong offensive teams, so their games against us should resemble the painful Cal-USC games we had to bear last year. The USC Trojans have seen a slight dropoff in their defense but a better offense to boot, so our matchups should resemble attrition warfare.
Finally, Arizona St, Stanford, and the Oregon schools all struggle about as much as us offensively, but other than the Beavers, they don't have bad defenses either. Humanitarian aid might be needed for those ones.
It'll be a rough road this year, but a bearable one for sure. Cal is not a tournament team unless they win the Pac-10 tournament, so the big thing will be to rack up the wins and make an NIT/CBI run.
Our first seven games in conference play will determine the course of our season.
Here's our opening stretech.
at Furd
at Arizona
at ASU
Wazzu
Washington
at UCLA
at USC
So much for things easing up once we got to conference play.
Of that stretch, perhaps only the Furd one is eminently winnable. Cal is expect to win none of those games individually and maybe only one or two collectively. Arguably, a record of 2-5 would be highly satisfactory--anything above that would be exceptional. But 1-6 and 0-7 are very very likely. So despite the tough non-conference slate, our tough roads haven't ended yet. Not until the end of the month (when we get four straight home games) will things start looking up.
Our team has a long way to go. But we have a long road ahead with them, so let's go exploring.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mostly agree with everything, but I think our offensive numbers will come up for 3 reasons:
Franklin had been playing either as a starter or as the first guy off the bench. As Smith starts and begins to play more, franklin’s wild forays into Ricky Davis offensive strategy will be muted on our overall offense.
Crabbe will come around. You can see the talent – hopefully Hartford will be a harbinger of things to come.
Our opponents get worse.
Also I’d like to address the idea that zone defenses are lazy. I agree it’s easier to hide lazy players in a zone, but if played correctly (see Chaney, John or Tarkanian, Jerry) a proper zone is more tiring because of all of the scrambling you need to do.
by LeonPowe on Dec 30, 2010 9:26 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Smith is starting? I thought he only started because Franklin was sick.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Dec 30, 2010 9:40 AM PST up reply actions
Smith rather than Franklin
Elaborating, Smith adds to the team, first and foremost by not providing all the negatives that come with Franklin at this point: frequent poor shot selection (and hence the equivalent of a rash of turnovers), poor defense (often not staying in front of his man), poor ball movement (not that Smith’s is the second coming of Jason Kidd).
Smith is doing about 50% better in points per fga than Franklin.
I would defer to Monty’s judgment, but have a hard time imagining that giving Franklin major minutes helps our chances of winning now. And I doubt Monty wants to lose games now in the hopes of a better future next year.
re: Record over first seven...
No way does Cal only win two games. Other than that one terrible season at Stanford, Monty usually coaches up his squads. And if you can play consistent defense against teams, you’ll win the fifty fifty games. Right now, the frosh are all trying to get their sea legs, and the competition in the Pac 10 is much lower than what we played during non conf. The only troubling thing is that our point guards as out matched by pretty much every PG in the conference. That said, watch for our offensive numbers to get much better, as we pound it inside on a consistent basis. I say that we’ll win at least four games, setting up a nice situation where the majority of our remaining games happen within the friendly confines of Room 100.
Lawrence Ross
Please elaborate!
Alpha:
Please tell me which of these games Cal is going to win
at Furd
at Arizona
at ASU
Wazzu
Washington
at UCLA
at USC
Rather, please rank them for me in terms of BEST CHANCE to WORST CHANCE of winning.
heres my 5 cents (inflation)
we will beat furd, asu, ucla
50/50 beating usc and arizona
losses to washingtons
Don't Tread on Me.
by THESeymoreBear on Dec 30, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions
First seven games
Got to agree that the Bears are the underdog in all 7 match up. What is usually frightening for a tough stretch in the schedule is for the team to get down on itself and lose the mental focus (and throw away chances to win winnable games), but with Monty as the coach, we should be okay in this regard.
What does work for us is that the good team in the Pac-10 this year are also flawed and not dominating (it’s not like we’re playing this year’s Duke team for all 7 games). If we show up with the same intensity as the Kansas game, we might just get a few upsets (which we have been capable of in the the Temple and @Iowa State wins) along the way.
Nevertheless, it’s pivotal that we do well at ’Furd to start the season and set the tone for this tough part of the schedule.
by LEastCoastBears on Dec 30, 2010 12:20 PM PST reply actions
New Mexico Victory
We were the underdog against NM, also.
Sorry...
minor correction
…and notched two big wins against the 10-2 Iowa St. Hawkeyes…
That should be “Cyclones” not “Hawkeyes”
young team = PacX road losses
Nice enthusiasm and optimism but winning 2 of these 7 would be an impressive accomplishment for this young cal team. It’s Very difficult to win on the road in the pac-10 with young players. Furd is probably our best chance since the students are away and there should be a good cal contingent.
My advice is buckle your seatbelt for an 0-7 start, but things should look better after that.

by 


























































