This Week In The Pac: Sense - This Makes None
The Team A > Team B > Team C > Team A paradox is one of the yearly quirks that makes college football so interesting. In a sport built upon the necessity for supposedly impartial arbiters to judge teams nationwide that share few, if any common opponents, these frequent loops make trying to understand an inherently confusing sport even more perplexing.
USC beat Washington St., 50-16. Washington St. beat Oregon St., 31-14. Oregon St. beat USC, 36-7.
Three games, three teams, three games that ranged from not-close to blow-out. Sure, if you want you can try to make sense of it all. Washington St. got blown out early in the year when their players were younger and less experienced. USC lost Matt Barkley halfway through the OSU game (even though USC was already down 20-0). Whatever. All this really is is another in a long line of data points illustrating how utterly unpredictable college football is, which can either be endearing or maddening, depending on your point of view. All I know is that with the possible exception of Big Game 2009 Cal hasn't been on the right side of a jaw dropping, head scratching win since 2003. Send a little bit of serendipity our way, Gods of College Football!
Oregon St. 36, USC 7
Usually when a score makes absolutely no sense turnovers and special teams played a prominent role in the outcome, and that was certainly the case for OSU. USC had two turnovers on downs deep in OSU territory and Matt Barkley threw one Kevin-Riley-versus-Nevada-esque interception that was returned for a touchdown. Building The Dam finds the bright side in everything:
It might be that the embarrasing 31-14 loss to Washington St. was the best thing that could have happened. Oregon St. could and possibly should have won both the one point double overtime loss at Washington, and the UCLA game that was won on a field goal as time ran out. Coming close can allow problems to be under-appreciated, or overlooked all together. But there was no missing things in the Cougar contest, and doubtless there were some private minutes of self reflection when 'Quizz issued a public apology, for issues largely on others.
Conquest Chronicles wants more from Matt Barkley:
Can we now stop all the great talk about Barkley's game. He looks no better than Rob Johnson right now. I am sure he will improve but its time to be realistic. Barkley continues to struggle. I don't have an answer for it. His throws lacked confidence or they looked liked wounded ducks. And there were a number of throws that went into coverage...obvious coverage that anyone could see and then there was the Pick 6. The DB was spying that play from the moment it started.
If Matt Barkley can't go against UCLA what chance do you give the Bruins to pull the upset?
Does this surprising win convince you to give Oregon St. a fighting chance in their last two games @ Stanford and vs. Oregon?
Washington 24, UCLA 7
I missed the first half of this game, so I suppose it's possible that the first half was filled with vaguely competent offensive play stifled by better defense. But that's not what I saw in a bad, bad second half filled with poor quarterbacking, bad blocking, mind numbing penalties and general sloppy football. The quarterback position continues to be cursed for the Bruins as an ineffective Richard Brehaut was removed with an apparent concussion in favor of players clearly not ready for FBS football. Meanwhile Jake Locker continued to torpedo his draft stock, if anybody was paying attention. UW Dawg Pound is just happy to get a win:
This was a game that could have gone either way in the fourth quarter. Washington was dominating play but they weren't putting points on the scoreboard. You could sense that the first team to make a critical mistake was going to lose this ballgame. UCLA made it when Quinton Richardson intercepted the ball and returned it for a touchdown. Hats off to the defense tonight. They took advantage of what was out there and won the game. This was a game Washington had to win and they did. Wiping the taste of losing away is always a good thing.
Bruins Nation is getting increasingly frustrated with the Neuheisel regime:
The whole team imploded once again on national TV embarrassing themselves and embarrassing the four letters. Yes, there are injury issues with this team. Yes, we are young (an excuse that seems to be in play in Westwood every year). Yes, we went to a back up. Yet, there are just no justification for how clueless, how out of sync, how unprepared and undisciplined this team looked with the season on the line. This was not the first time we experienced this kind of implosion this season and it is very difficult to take. We have said since the Oregon game the careers of the entire coaching staff are going to be in line for this season. Tonight's game was a huge test and needless to say everyone FAILED in spectacular fashion.
How many more seasons would you give Rick Neuheisel to turn things around?
Am I the only person annoyed by the trend of teams declaring that black is their third color and then having a contrived 'black out?'
Next Week
All games Pacific Standard Time
Friday
UCLA @ Arizona St., 12:30 pm, FSN
Arizona @ Oregon, 4:00 pm ESPN
Saturday
Washington @ Cal, 12:30 pm, CSNCA
Oregon St. @ Stanford, 4:30 pm, Versus
Notre Dame @ USC, 5:00 pm, ABC
The Pac-10 again trots out a weekday clunker as UCLA tries to hold onto the last vestiges of a bowl bid against ASU - but thankfully this one isn't on national TV. Meanwhile the Oregon coronation looks to continue unharmed, Washington and Cal will play in a game I'll struggle to care about, I'll become a huge Oregon St. fan for one week and USC and Notre Dame play a rivalry game dying a slow death. Get your picks in early!
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
as someone who watched the unwatchable
as you rightly surmise, this was not the case:
so I suppose it’s possible that the first half was filled with vaguely competent offensive play stifled by better defense
First half offense consisted of one long (92 yard) drive for UCLA based on running the ball as much as possible against a porous defense; with no adaptation (or execution) once UW started loading the box and shutting down the run game. On the other side, it consisted of UW trying to get Locker’s arm going without much luck, allowing UCLA’s weak 3-man pass rush to get a little bit of pressure on Locker while covering the receivers, and shooting themselves in the foot with stupid penalties; and one TD drive following a turnover. UW adapted in the second half (“oh, right, these guys can’t stop the run”), while UCLA didn’t (“why aren’t these run plays working, Norm? Any ideas for plan B?”).
And I know not many teams have elite 3rd- and 4th-string QBs, but you are absolutely right in your assessment of what we put onto the field when Brehaut was knocked out with a cheap headshot.
OSU-Stanfurd is a win-win
I would love to see OSU bowl-ineligible, but also seeing Stanfurd knocked out of the Rose Bowl would be fun too (as long as Luck still leaves).
So true, so true
I think I’d prefer the no-Rose-Bowl scenario a bit more though.
Seeing a deserving Stanford knocked out of the Rose Bowl because their fan base can’t mobilize for Pasadena better than the fans of Boise State or TCU sounds even sweeter to me. (“Well, coach Harbaugh, your team is really, really good. But you don’t have any fans, so we’re going to pick someone else. Sorry.”)
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Nov 22, 2010 11:29 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
that would be nice
But I think that’s very unlikely to happen.
Life would be good if this were to happen.
:D
LOS ANGELES ANGELS . . . ANAHEIM DUCKS . . . CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
FUCK STANFURD.
by AndyHogan14 on Nov 22, 2010 12:19 PM PST up reply actions
If we could guarantee that outcome, it would bring the maximum lulz. But I’d rather not take the chance that they actually do get selected for the Rose Bowl.
by atomsareenough on Nov 22, 2010 12:55 PM PST up reply actions
Stanford Doesn't Control its Own Destiny
If Oregon and Auburn both win out, Stanford will be blocked out of the Rose Bowl not because of their lack of fans or TV appeal, but by RULE.
The BCS REQUIRES that the rose bowl take a Non-AQ team if (a)the rose bowl loses the big 10 or pac 10 champ to the title game and (b) that a non-aq team does not play for the title
by The Red Mamba on Nov 22, 2010 8:14 PM PST up reply actions
If Matt Barkley can’t go against UCLA what chance do you give the Bruins to pull the upset?
With Matt Barkley, it would have been 5-10%. Without Barkley, it probably moves it the chance up to about 20-25%.
Does this surprising win convince you to give Oregon St. a fighting chance in their last two games @ Stanford and vs. Oregon?
I think they’ve got a fighting chance, absolutely! In fact, I’m hoping that they win them both, oddly enough.
How many more seasons would you give Rick Neuheisel to turn things around?
If I were a UCLA fan? Probably one more year. Maybe two if I were in a really charitable mood, but that’s it. Maybe a mid-season dismissal in year two if it was clear they weren’t progressing by then.
Am I the only person annoyed by the trend of teams declaring that black is their third color and then having a contrived ‘black out?’
You’re not the only one, but it doesn’t really bother me that much. As you said, it’s contrived. And in this case they ended up looking more like TCU than like Washington, but eh, whatever. At least Cal isn’t doing it.
oops, shoulda hit the preview button.
by atomsareenough on Nov 22, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions
I’d save those wishes for OSU – Stanford…..
Oregon going to and, potentially, winning a national championship is REALLY good for the Pac-10. ESPECIALLY if it’s against a Cam Newton-QBed SEC team. I’m SO freakin’ tired of the bullsh*t the SEC puts up about how they are better than the Pac, blah, blah, blah. The irony is that if this happens it goes down WITHOUT a Pac-10 Championship game, the (assumed necessary) catalyst for giving top-tier teams the BCS moxy to be ranked in the top 2.
I’m rooting for the Ducks from here on out, realizing Cal played them better than anyone else this year.
I'd like to smell the Roses before I die.
Can we now stop all the great talk about Barkley’s game. He looks no better than Rob Johnson right now.
Spoiled brats. At least Rob Johnson went to the freakin’ pros.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
Yeah, and he kinda sucked there. I had to watch him for three years up close. I died inside.
College Rob Johnson though? I’d gladly take him.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Nov 23, 2010 3:02 AM PST up reply actions


























































