Golden Spotlight: USC Trojans & Lane Kiffin's West Coast Offense
Last season: 9-4
This season: 4-2 (wins at Hawaii, vs. Virginia, at Minnesota and Wazzu, losses to the Furd and Washington)
Previous matchups with Cal: Headlined by the USC defense grinding Cal's offense to a halt. The Bears put up 3, 3, 17, 9, and 10 (that last touchdown was in extended garbage time) points in their previous five meetings with the Trojans, and they haven't scored in the second half in the Coliseum since Pac-10 champion quarterback Aaron Rodgers was torching the greatest team to ever win a title, then lose it. Bob Gregory's units generally handled the Trojans well, giving up 23 (7 points came courtesy of Alamar), 17, 24, 23, and 35 points in those contests. In the end, it came down to the Golden Bear quarterbacks (Joe Ayoob, Nate Longshore, Kevin Riley) not being able to step up and deliver.
The average performance of the Cal quarterback vs. the USC defense? 45.3 completion rate, 2 combined touchdowns and 10 interceptions, 168.8 yards per game, 5.24 yards/attempt, 88 passer rating. Pesticide doesn't kill roses as effectively as performances like that do.
Glass half-full view: For all the ire that's been directed at Lane Kiffin for the last two weeks, there's nothing wrong with the way his Trojan offense has been humming. This team ranks in the top 30 in scoring (24th), rushing (22nd), rushing YPA (5th), passing (29th), passing efficiency (14th), 3rd down conversions (6th), red zone conversions (14th), touchdown conversions in the red zone (2nd), long scrimmage plays of 10+ yards (10th). For a team that had been complaining about offensive production during the last years of Pete Carroll, the Trojans seem to be back on the uptick, led by quarterback Matt Barkley, a veteran offensive line, senior Allan Bradford plugging it in at tailback, and Ronald Johnson and Robert Woods being the playmakers at wideouts.
Glass half-empty view: The USC defense is as horrid as the USC offense is indomitable. They've never recovered from losing nearly all their front seven from their 2008 squad, which was penetrable only by hobbits with dreads. With their entire secondary now decimated by departing seniors, the Trojan backline has been picked on by everyone from Hawaii to Wazzu, and Andrew Luck and Jake Locker could have set up target practice back there. The Trojan pass defense is currently ranked near the bottom of every significant category: passing yards given up (116th), passer rating (92nd), passing touchdowns (tied for 108th), passing yards per attempt (94th), 3rd down conversions (101st), red zone conversions (85th). USC has given up two game-winning drives in the final two minutes in consecutive games, the Cardinal needing barely 45 seconds to march 60 yards.
This post will cover the big matchup of the game, the USC offense vs. the Cal defense (never thought I'd ever say that ...) . Tomorrow we focus on the USC defense vs the Cal offense.
For those who want more of a primer on the Trojan offense, read last year's take from the ever insightful Art at Trojan Football Analysis. It hasn't changed much since 2005. It seems like it never will.
The basic USC offense philosophy in reality has not changed all that much the past few years despite the changes in coordinators. Success of course has varied depending upon the personnel and execution. So far in 2009 USC has been pretty conservative the first four games of the season with new quarterbacks in the back field. There has been a lot more use so far of 12 personnel packages and Twin / Pro Wing Single Back alignments. Chris Brown did a pretty thorough job on the USC passing game on Yahoo! Rivals a while back, and I’d suggest that readers go to that piece as a starting point on the passing game. USC employs a mix of 3 step quick game concepts (slant flat, double slants, curl flat, etc.), 5 step intermediate stuff (Smash routes, 4 Verticals, etc.), drop back play action, and then roll out plays off the IZ/OZ run action to confuse the defense. The USC vs. Cal game in 2008 shows some of the quick game concepts as well.
For those who want videos so they can hear the USC fight song a hundred times, here's the tape from the Washington and Furd games (exclusively offense, because the defense was that bad). Videos are courtesy of Trojan Wire.
Allen Bradford, Matt Barkley, Robert Woods vs. Washington 2010 (via CaliforniasGold)
USC Offense vs. Stanford 2010 (via CaliforniasGold)
USC Passing Offense
Matt Barkley is a capable quarterback, although I'm still not quite sure if he's reached the level of acclaim that TV pundits laud on him. Oh, he's definitely good. It seems he can take advantage of out-of-position cornerbacks or defenders running with his receivers. What's most impressive is his timing. He hits receivers in stride, especially on quick-hitting plays. He can go through his progressions, survey the field, and deliver most of his throws quite well.
But he still has his flaws. He has a slow windup and throws a distinctly high fade routes. Watch some of these fades hang, then ponder how he's only thrown four picks this season. He sometimes isn't on the same page with his receivers and misses easy throws. Nevertheless, he has a solid understanding of the offense, a good ability to fit all the throws in, a pretty good pocket passer who runs the bootleg capably. A 65% completion percentage, a 162 passer rating and a 4:1 TD:INT ratio is a daydream for most college offenses. But his arm is only superbly accurate from around 10 to 15 yards, so if a defense can shut him down in that intermediate range (like Virginia's did), then they have a chance to shut down the offense.
Cal's defense will be in for a real test. Nick Foles is probably the only truly tested pocket passer the Bears have faced all year--although Cal's defense held him down, Foles range was very limited beyond 10-15 yards and didn't really test the defense vertically. Barkley can stretch the field and keep the Bears scrambling if he gets into a rhythm and his experienced offensive line picks up the blitzes up front.
It helps to have an experienced offensive line in front of him. All five of the Trojans starters have seen plenty of time and have handled their duties superbly. They've only allowed six sacks all season and have kept the USC offense moving all year.
Ideally, USC's staff wants senior center Kristofer O'Dowd to be flanked on the right by sophomore guard Khaled Holmes and junior tackle Tyron Smith. Senior guard Butch Lewis and sophomore tackle Matt Kalil would start on the left side.
...
O'Dowd had off-season shoulder surgery but appears to be regaining the form that made him a first-team All-Pacific 10 Conference selection two years ago.
Lewis, who plays all positions except center, is rounding into shape after sitting out most of training camp because of a groin injury.
Holmes, a backup in three games last season, remains limited while nursing a neck condition.
Kalil was slowed by minor injuries early in camp but has locked down the spot where he started last December in the Emerald Bowl.
And trust me, Cal's secondary has never seen anything this season the likes of Robert Woods. Woods is already showing he's a Desean Jackson-caliber athlete, returning kicks and racking up the all-scrimmage yards.
R Woods vs Stanford (via artoftroy) (courtesy of TFA)
Woods cannot be treated lightly as a gamebreaker, nor can his more experienced companion Ronald Johnson as a reliable option. Both will be relied on a lot. For a change of pace, we could see tight end Jordan Cameron down the middle or Stanley Havili wreaking his usual havoc.
USC Rushing Offense
Some background from the same interview with TFA last year. The Trojan run blocking is almost purely zone, with a little of everything else mixed in.
Let’s start with the running game which is somewhat simpler to explain. Since 2002 the USC rushing offense has increasingly relied upon the inside zone (IZ) and outside zone (OZ) stretch plays for 70-80% of its rush attack. Other plays include standard one and two back power plays, toss sweep, and a few lead isolation or draw type plays. The inside zone attack is a downhill in the play side A & B gaps (or offer cutback opportunities on the backside) with linemen executing blocks according to "covered" vs. "uncovered" rules. USC can run inside zone leaving the backside defensive end unblocked like a lot of option teams do. However since the USC QB is not a threat to run usually they instead utilize a fullback or H-back across on the play to secure the back side. This motion importantly also ties into the passing game as well since those same two players often leak out into the passing game thus putting the DE into a bind….Should he try and run down the IZ play from behind, pressure the QB if it is a pass, or disrupt the FB or HB leaking out into the flats?
...
The outside zone game is a more perimeter oriented play attacking the play side C & D gaps. The run two plays complement one another. Running the inside zone with success eventually pulls defenders a couple of feet closer to the center of the play. This in turn opens up a little more space on the perimeter plays. The outside zone concept is basically to stretch out the defensive line and linebackers horizontal to the line of scrimmage and create bigger running gaps. If the LB’s in particular over pursue on the play the back can often cut up on the play and head more north – south. Otherwise they press the zone outside the tackle / tight end area and try to make it to the perimeter for a few yards.
Allen Bradford is the current #1. He's shown promise, although he's looking to recover from his atrocious Furd performance.
"There were a few times when I could have cut back and other times when I should have stayed on track," he said Wednesday. "I've got to be a little more patient on some runs and explode on others."
USC faces a Cal defense that ranks first in the Pacific 10 Conference and eighth in the nation. The Golden Bears are giving up 106 yards rushing per game.
With freshman Dillon Baxter sidelined because of a foot injury, the Trojans will play Cal with three healthy tailbacks: Bradford, junior Marc Tyler and senior C.J. Gable.
Tyler is currently the #2 and is a good pick to be the starter next season. Interestingly, he's done a lot of his damage recently from the Wildcat formation, similar to what Isi Sofele did last week against UCLA. He nearly threw a clutch touchdown out of this formation.
Tailbacks Marc Tyler and Dillon Baxter took shotgun snaps from center Kristofer O'Dowd, with quarterback Matt Barkley splitting out wide.
The Trojans ran Wildcat plays seven times in the first half, gaining 34 yards. Tyler had 35 of those yards on six attempts, including a 6-yard touchdown run that gave USC a 21-17 lead late in the second quarter. USC didn't use it as much in the second half and eventually lost to UW, 32-31.
Baxter, who played quarterback in a similar formation in high school, lost a yard on his lone attempt in the first half. It was the only time he touched the ball.
"I guess the coaches had something planned in their heads and went with it," Baxter said. "I'm behind them 100 percent."
Baxter provides the future look. He's careless with the ball though (watch the way he carries it in games), and he dropped it on the ground last week against the Furd. Depending on how healthy he is, he could make Cal's run defense have to work a lot harder to plug up the Trojans offense, because he definitely brings the speed.
Here are the running performances this season by the Trojans:
| Date | Opponent | Surface | Result | Att | Yards | Avg. | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/10 | @ Hawaii | Turf | W 49-36 | 35 | 246 | 7.03 | 1 |
| 09/11/10 | Virginia | Grass | W 17-14 | 33 | 127 | 3.85 | 0 |
| 09/18/10 | @ Minnesota | Turf | W 32-21 | 38 | 216 | 5.68 | 2 |
| 09/25/10 | @ Washington St. | Turf | W 50-16 | 39 | 285 | 7.31 | 2 |
| 10/02/10 | Washington | Grass | L 31-32 | 39 | 298 | 7.64 | 4 |
| 10/09/10 | @ 14 Stanford | Grass | L 35-37 | 28 | 108 | 3.86 | 2 |
| Totals | 212 | 1280 | 6.04 | 11 | |||
Caveat: Here are the running defenses they've faced: Furd (73rd), Hawaii (85th), Minnesota (100th), Washington (106th), Virginia (109th), Wazzu (last). (Cal is currently ranked 21st by the way. I'm sure that number will drop about 30 spots after we get torched by the heirs to Joe McKnight.)
Something will have to give in this one.
Quick hits for the Cal defense
This is where it begins. People have been high on the Golden Bear defense, but I still want to see how they perform against quality opponents down the Pac-10 road. The first two Pac-10 performances were promising signs, but its correlation on how we perform the rest of the season is dubious. Every offense provides a new look and it's never a certainty that a defensive scheme will properly prepare the players to attack the offense in the best way. USC's offense rarely differs though, so it might prepare Clancy Pendergast a little for what's coming his defense's way.
Don't bite too aggressively on either run or pass. This isn't a joke. In the past two games, we've looked fine against a team that exclusively ran the ball (UCLA) and exclusively passes the ball (Arizona), but now we've got a team that does both extremely well. Discipline will be key. Linebackers Michael Mohamed, D.J. Holt, Mychal Kendricks, Keith Browner and Jarred Price have to be ready to cover their gaps and not give up big gains, but also drop back and defend the tight ends (Cameron and Blake Ayles) and stay up to check the dump off options (Havili). Rotations and gap control will be critical. Overaggression against an efficient offense like Cal will end up getting us burned (like the Furd were last week in Palo Alto, to the tune of nearly 400 passing yards).
Watch the flats and the wheel route. So far no team has really tested us with spreading out the field (Oregon will do it in a few weeks), but if Pendergast is aggressive and sends the blitz, then defenders on the outside have to be ready to break through receiver blocks and make plays on the ball. Extra men inside means fewer men outside, and more responsbiilty will be placed on Darian Hagan and Marc Anthony (particularly Anthony, and probably Bryant Nnabuife if he's brought in, who has a tendency to overrun defenders) to slip blockers and make open field tackles, particularly on bubble and jailbreak screens. The secondary has been very impressive all season. They're going to have to be ready to pursue the pass options like they did against Arizona and not allow any gaps to open up in downfield coverage.
Defensive line needs to be careful not to penetrate too much this week. Remember the Trojans love to use misdirection. If the Bears decide to plug up the gaps with their linemen, Barkley could simply roll out to avoid the overpursuit, and have an open field to survey, leading to a series of many Trojan bootlegs. Hopefully we'll try something creative in place to deal with misdirection calls, because they have been the bread and butter of the USC passing game for nearly a half-decade. Cameron Jordan, Derrick Hill and Ernest Owusu have to be prepared for misdirection and get good pursuit on the quarterback whenever they can.
What new defensive looks will we see this week? Against Colorado it was OLBs lined up as DEs applying the pressure outside. Against Arizona we saw the extra safety lined up in a linebacker position to give Cal the semblance of a dime package with the flexibility to provide solid run support. Against UCLA we brought the cornerback blitz. USC is definitely the biggest pro-style team in the conference other than Cal, so what will Pendergast try to do to trip up the Trojans? Having viewed the tape, I can't see any discernible weaknesses that the Bears can easily exploit. It should be interesting to see what he comes up with and whether it backfires or not.
Tomorrow we look more indepth at the Tampa 2 defense of Monte Kiffin.
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What's up with this trick question?
I’m not concerned about anything related to our defense. Everyone knows this game is solely going to be decided on Kevin Riley and whether or not he can take advantage of this bad USC pass D. USC will get their points. We just need to get ours.
this
"It's on the ROOF, oh yeah, one hundred PROOF, oh yeah....."
by TKE Prytanis 79 on Oct 14, 2010 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Eventually, Riley will have to take the game on his shoulders and win it. My short memory eludes any such performance. He’s had some almosts, and some good performances, but he needs to have that signature win where he is the lifting force.
Armed Forces Bowl
We had to completely ruin the knee of Air Force’s QB, but Riley had a sick comeback
by Another Failed Tedford QB on Oct 14, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I must be becoming a better fan. My memory is getting shorter and shorter. Yes, the Air Force game was a great performance, but I’m talking more about throwing a TD on the last drive to come from behind. ASU can also be put in that category, but driving down for a FG is still not quite. Of course, he hasn’t had that many opportunities to do this (or fail), but I think he needs one of those last minute heroic moments.
The Foles drive against us would be a perfect example. Even though it wasn’t all him (great catch, good pass protection, right call against the right defense), it goes down as his drive.
Air Force 2007, Mich St 08, ASU 2009, UCLA 09.
Not quite the leader but still a very important contribution: Furd 09
Almost there: Oregon St 07
In other words, Go Bears!
Almost there: Oregon St 07
That game didn’t happen.
by atomsareenough on Oct 14, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
This post covers the USC O v. Cal D. From the post:
Tomorrow we focus on the USC defense vs the Cal offense.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
That's fixin' to be a depressing post
I’ve never seen us do ANYTHING against $C ever since Rodgers left us…
by Another Failed Tedford QB on Oct 14, 2010 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn't be dismissive of this side at all.
This is a tough test for Cal’s defense this season. They’ve been good, yes, but they’ve only played one strong passing opponent. There are weaknesses to the aggressive schemes we’ve seen that could be exploited this week if Barkley can take advantage of them.
Every weekend is different in college football. To assume that the defense will just shut down USC is a mistake.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Special teams
Our coverage team needs to improve and help win the field position battle. I am confident that J Ross will stop fumbling and Tavecchio is gonna hit his field goal tries but the way UCLA gashed our coverage was unbearable to watch.
If we can pin the vaulted $C offense back and gain a few turnovers, that might just provide enough margin of error for our offense to work with. Go Bears!
http://twitter.com/solariseCGB
"I am confident that...Tavecchio is gonna hit his field goal tries"
Seriously? I have no faith in this clown whatsoever. I’m starting to think we should just go for it on every 4th down.
by Another Failed Tedford QB on Oct 14, 2010 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
I have no interest in reading a post by a “fan” who calls one of our players a “clown”.
by abaddon on Oct 14, 2010 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Hahaha
typical Cal fans…losing is ok as long as the poor kid tried!
You guys forget the Arizona game so quickly.
Seriously, what has Georgio ever done to give any of us confidence?
by Another Failed Tedford QB on Oct 14, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
You’re not going to get far on this site calling our players clowns.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
And with that handle, too.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on Oct 14, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Phil Steele thinks this will be upset of the week...
http://philsteele.com/Blogs/2010/Oct10/DBOct14.html
California over U$C
Last week Cal held a UCLA run game that was avg 321 ypg rush (5.9) to just 26 yds (1.0) while USC fell victim to a game-winning FG on the last play for a 2nd consecutive week in the loss to Stanford even though they had the yardage (499-484) and TO (3-1) edge. While the Trojans have dominated the Golden Bears the L/2 years by a combined 47-6 score USC HC Kiffin may have a difficult time keeping his units focused as his “Us Against the World” mantra is harder to preach after an upset loss to UW and an emotionally draining loss to Stanford. Cal makes it 3 straight losses for the Trojans.
by Redonkulous Bear on Oct 14, 2010 10:04 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Phil is a bit of a sunshine pumper, imo.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Oct 14, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions
Ted Miller
is also choosing Cal victory.
is everybody back on the bandwagon again?
this worries me that same thing will happen again this week.
It's a pick'em really
The weakness of their team goes up against the weakness of our team, and the strength of their team goes up against the strength of our team. Should be real exciting to watch.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
Home team is usually spotted 3 points. The spread, at USC – 2.5, implies that its indeed a pick’em game, a coin toss.
Drinking the Kool-Aid. Pumping the sunshine. Livin' the dream. Go Bears!
by dballisloose on Oct 14, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m hoping that Riley will step up big, like vs. ASU, UCLA, and Stanfeit last year. However, I kind of think he’s done (mentally).
How bad will Riley have to play to get the hook at halftime? Will there be at-fault picks & sacks or will it be a combo of that and inaccurate passes to open receivers? An effective “game manager” at QB could really get this team to run the table.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Seems like baseless conjecture on your part
The only way Tedford would hook Riley is if he was (a) injured or (b) totally lost on the field.
So far this season I’ve seen nothing of the sort. Indecisive perhaps, but he never gives up on the field, even when his performances aren’t that great. He helps in other ways (rushing on the option for a score, recovering Vereen’s fumble, going out to block out Ayers on Marvin’s score).
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
sure he’ll keep trying, but he’ll revert to happy feet, jump throws, watching the pass rush, staring down the primary receiver, numnut penalties/mistakes (which have been improving of late), taking sacks instead of throwing it away/scrambling, etc. This is the kind of thing that were the root behind Tedford’s comments regarding the play of his 5th year senior.
Imagine a first half where USC stacks 42 5-star recruits in the box and keeps Vereen to something like 12 carries for 35 yards. Then Riley gets in 2nd and 3rd and longs out of the shotgun…and Riley plays like the 40% completion guy with your garden variety of errors/mistakes. Yet, Cal’s defense keeps the game to something like 7-0 going in at the half.
What would Tedford do with the QB the rest of the game, knowing that his defense can’t sustain another half of grueling football and his offense is shutdown? I think he might give Riley another series or two and then he yanks ’em.
And if this scenario doesn’t happen this week, I believe it will in the 2010 season.
Since this is playing out a bit like the 2008 USC game, what was the deal then? Was Longshore nicked? I thought I remember Tedford saying something like “he liked Riley’s elusiveness in the pocket?”
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Imagine a first half where USC stacks 42 5-star recruits in the box and keeps Vereen to something like 12 carries for 35 yards.
Sure, I imagined it. Except USC doesn’t have “42 5-star recruits in the box”. They have a thin front seven that’s alright.
Do you really think the Trojans can afford to stack the box when their pass defense has been so terrible in regular schemes? You’re extrapolating last year’s USC defense onto this one. And let me say that last year’s defense isn’t close to as bad as this one’s.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Their pass defense has only been horrible because they’ve played against good-to-great passers who have exposed holes in their schemes. Because their DEs and LBs have been depleted by injuries, they will stack the box against us with whoever they have, also with safeties cheating up to support the second level….until we prove we can pass it deep.
Drinking the Kool-Aid. Pumping the sunshine. Livin' the dream. Go Bears!
by dballisloose on Oct 14, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions
until we prove we can pass it deep.
Which requires good pass protection, Riley not looking at the rush, Riley not getting happy feet, and for the ball to be placed accurately.
I don’t think we can say we’ve seen enough in 2010 to suggest that Cal’s offense is capable of pulling this off more than once vs a good/talented defense.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Hawaii is actually a very good passing team.
The bigger indictments seem to be Wazzu and Minny. Decent passing squads, but USC in the past would’ve contained them well.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I would love to be wrong.
What happened longshore in 2008 vs USC? I really can’t remember if it was ineffectiveness or if he was hurt. I thought he was actually playing fairly well.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
What, that 20 play, 70 yard field goal drive? Longshore threw two picks on that drive that were negated by questionable penalties. He looked “ok”, although Riley was hardly better.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions
that was the weird ‘covered up’ penalty that negated a TD by Vereen, iirc.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
No, Riley threw that.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Do you really think the Trojans can afford to stack the box when their pass defense has been so terrible in regular schemes?
Yes?
You’re extrapolating last year’s USC defense
No, we’re extrapolating 2007-2010 Riley.
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 15, 2010 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions
carp, how’s Tosh Jr doing?
I don’t agree that Riley’s done mentally. I don’t see much to suggest he’s thrown in the towel, nor have the coaches thrown in the towel on him. He doesn’t need a big day either, he just needs to throw the ball effectively to exploit the aggressiveness of the USC defense blitzing schemes.
Drinking the Kool-Aid. Pumping the sunshine. Livin' the dream. Go Bears!
by dballisloose on Oct 14, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
He’s doing well!
I’m not saying he’s a quitter, hell no. In fact, that’s one thing I love about him. I would say his confidence and swagger aren’t at the levels that he needs to be at and, at this point, I’m not sure it’s re-obtainable.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
He's pretty resilient
I’ve never seen Riley down on himself after a poor performance. Remember he rebounded from that USC game by torching UCLA last year, and took apart the Furd after struggling against Zona and OSU. I’m not worried about him crumbling.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Reaction VI: In addition to improving his footwork, Riley may want to work on his body language. The bent-over, clutching-his-helmet reaction to incomplete passes and INTs doesn’t give off the best of vibes.
Kinda nitpicky, but I think he’s closer to ‘unconfident’ then ‘confident.’
Here’s hoping he has plenty of time to throw and can get in a groove to boost that confidence.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I think there’s a near zero chance that Riley gets pulled, barring injury or blowout. I find it very very unlikely that any other QB will give a better us a better chance to win the game than Riley.
Especially in your scenario, where Riley is not playing well but the defense is keeping it tight, would you really want Sweeney to see his first meaningful action in a close game at USC where he’s expected to outperform Riley to get us a win? That’s just asking for disaster.
Replacing Riley at this point would not be about winning now, but about getting experience for the future. Tedford doesn’t really have a history of throwing in the towel on a year just to get some young guys game experience.
by jali on Oct 14, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I agree with a lot of what you’re saying, I just think the passing offense could get to a point where Riley (must pass out of shotgun, losing confidence, wild throws, watching pass rush, taking sacks) would give Cal a worse chance to win where another guy (and I’m not sure that’s on the depth chart cuz Tedford never plays the backups) could mitigate some of Kevin’s shortfalls.
Others have said Cal can’t compete for the Pac10 crown without an all-conference QB. I disagree after watching this defense and running game. They need your accurate passer that sells the run, doesn’t turn the ball over or take dumb penalties, and gets out of pressure situations by either throwing it away or scrambling. Something like a Jeff Garcia.
Miller, Jones, Ross, Allen, Vereen, and Ladner are nice targets to have in the passing game. We just have to get these guys the ball…
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I fear to know how you deal with chemical bonds that aren’t holding as strong as you want.
CGB's Jimmy Carter
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
First, I think you’re underselling Jeff Garcia. He was pretty dang good, he just had to deal with comparisons to the pre-salary cap teams of Montana and Young.
Second, I agree that the team could do quite well with just a “game manager” QB. However, like you said, I’m not sure that’s on the depth chart. It takes skill to be a good game manager and I would still guess that despite his struggles, Riley is the best we have in that regard as well.
most accurate statement you've made all year:
I think this about sums it up: Don’t bite too aggressively on either run or pass. This isn’t a joke. In the past two games, we’ve looked fine against a team that exclusively ran the ball (UCLA) and exclusively passes the ball (Arizona), but now we’ve got a team that does both extremely well. Discipline will be key.
This
Drinking the Kool-Aid. Pumping the sunshine. Livin' the dream. Go Bears!
First time in a long time, Playaction doesn't worry me.
For the first time in a long time, playaction isn’t scaring me atm. Our press corners and safties are really doing a great job on the outside. We are bring pressure from the edges really really good. If SC thinks they’re just going to roll Barkley and hit the flats, I think they’re gonna be hurting. I’m more concerned with the run game. With our aggressive edge defense, off tackle runs are VERY dangerous. We’ll have to be careful there, force SC to start using Playaction on 1st down. Get them in good down/distance and then bring it.
by Minotstatebeav on Oct 15, 2010 12:49 AM PDT reply actions
Play action always worries me because IF the run game gets going and the linebackers bite on the off-tackle run, that’ll open up the tight end to feast down the middle.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 15, 2010 3:03 AM PDT up reply actions

by 


























































