Cal Pass Protection Vs. UCLA Caused Kevin Riley's First Half Struggles
At first glance, Kevin Riley didn't have a good day against the Bruins. But upon further review? Still isn't that great a game, but it doesn't look as bad, especially when you take into consideration the other factors that influenced his performance.
1) There appeared to be a concerted effort by the UCLA defense to take away the deep vertical passing game, and a concerted effort by Riley and the Cal offense to play away from the secondary (particularly Rahim Moore) and avoid making mistakes downfield. Besides, when you're running the ball so effectively, why would you want to try to force passes?
2) Akeem Ayers playing the role of disrupting the offense the way Brian Price did last year.
3) Inconsistent line play, particularly along the right side (Richard Fisher, Justin Cheadle, Matt Summers-Gavin, Anthony Miller) but also by left tackle Mitchell Schwartz, who had a rough day in pass protection. I'd say of all the problems we have on offense, our ability to protect the quarterback remains the biggest concern, even more so than quarterback play itself. They're better than last year's disaster (and the two years before that weren't peaches either), but still hardly consistent enough to get the offense humming against the big boys.
After the jump, a breakdown of Cal passing plays in the first half versus the Bruins.
[SHOT] indicates play from shotgun.
1st drive, 1st quarter
Couldn't find video. Riley went 3 for 3 for 9 yards.
2nd drive, 1st quarter
C 1-10 C48 [SHOT], 8:30, 13-Riley, Kevin sacked for loss of 3 yards to the CAL45 (94-Odighizuwa, O.).
Cal with trips left, tight end right. UCLA with 4-3 under, although Akeem Ayers moves out of his down stance and shifts back, then moves to the middle. Owa pushes Mitchell Schwartz back on the left side and blocks Riley's view of his receivers to the left. Keenan Graham also pushes Anthony Miller around off the edge and gets to Riley, forcing him into the pocket and Owa takes him down.
C 3-9 C49 [SHOT], 7:12, 13-Riley, Kevin RR pass incomplete to 1-Jones, Marvin (22-Price, Sheldon).
Cal with 4 wide receivers set (3 left, 1 right) with Vereen in the backfield. UCLA in nickel formation and four down linemen, Ayers lined up as a down linemen, Westgate coming in on the other side in two stance. Vereen picks up Westgate and Schwartz picks up Ayers handily. But Riley doesn't maintain proper footwork and his feet are set too far apart, causing a high throw. He hesitates once too much and Marvin Jones gets crowded by Sheldon Price.
4th drive, 1st quarter
C 2-9 C21, 2:08, 13-Riley, Kevin sacked for loss of 9 yards to the CAL12 (91-Stokes, Reggie).
Cal in single back, two TE set, two WRs, signals Marvin Jones into supposedly block. UCLA in a 4-3 with the Sam and Will linebackers. They set up a playaction bootleg where the weakside tight end (Spencer Ladner) rolls as the middle option, Marvin Jones as the short option, and Keenan Allen running a deep vertical.
UCLA isn't fooled by the run play. Blocking errors on the right side break down this play, as does good recognition by the linebackers. Matt Summers-Gavin whiffs on a cutblock to Nate Chandler and Justin Cheadle only manages a weak stiff-arm of Justin Edison, and both get quickly to Riley, with Stokes cleaning it up. Also Ayers shadows Riley and makes it tough for him to get an angle on the deeper options of Ladner and Allen. You can see a lot of Bruins running with the quarterback here.
5th drive, 2nd quarter
C 1-10 C44 [SHOT], 10:16 left, 13-Riley, Kevin RF pass complete to 34-Vereen, Shane for 16 yards to the UCLA40, 1ST DOWN CAL (26-Abbott, Andrew).
Empty set, trips left, Vereen lined out right with Jones in the slot. Riley fakes the screen to Michael Calvin, then goes back the other way, backpedals, and lifts it over Owa's outstretched hand (he was giving Summers-Gavin a battle on the right side) to make sure Shane Vereen got the ball. Thankfully, the defense gets baited by the pump fake and are playing too far off to blow up the high throw.
Downfield blocking is ok. Richard Fisher gets away with a hold, Marvin Jones holds up Sean Westgate long enough, and Dominic Galas executes a good cutblock downfield on Pat Larimore. Most of the yards on the play are generated by the Submarine, who makes men miss, slips off tackles, and scrambles for all the additional yardage. Poor angle taken by Sheldon Price.
Next-to-last drive of first half
C 1-10 U25, 8:47 left, 13-Riley, Kevin sacked for loss of 2 yards to the UCLA27 (94-Odighizuwa, O.).
2 WRs right, 2 TEs left, Ladner behind the scrimmage going in motion to the right, single tailback is Vereen. UCLA in a 4-3 under, and at the snap the linebackers drop back.
UCLA only rushes four, but it's more than effective. Owa gets the sack, but his compatriots on the right side deserve credit for collapsing the pocket. Fisher gets blown back by Cassius Marsh on the inside (hey, that name sounds familiar) and Matt Summers-Gavin completely gives up the edge to Damien Holmes. This forces Riley to step up before he's ready to deliver the throw. Odighizuwa fights Schwartz backwards on the bull rush, eventually pushing him back enough to get a clear angle on Riley.
C 3-9 U10 [SHOT], 13-Riley, Kevin EZ pass complete to 21-Allen, Keenan for 10 yards to the UCLA0, 1ST DOWN CAL, TOUCHDOWN, clock 06:04
Three wide receiver set, two to the right, 1 TE, Vereen in the backfield. UCLA is in their nickel defense.
This is Riley's best play of the game, and the sort of play that endeared many Golden Bears to him as a freshman. This was a designed wheel route, with Jones hoping to bite the two defenders on his side of the field onto him and opening the sideline for Vereen to score easily (similar to the Jahvid Best play Cal ran in Pasadena last season). Riley steps up back into the pocket, sees that the safety is running toward Vereen, occupying the left side of the field.
So he improvises. With Summers-Gavin clearing out his defender and the entire pocket now facing the left sideline, Riley takes off to the now open right. He now has great vision on that side of the field and doesn't have to worry about any real pass rush. The receivers adjust pretty well on the fly and give Riley throwing options.
Keenan Allen does a nice job shaking off his defender, spinning back and running with his quarterback, and he catches the ball in stride for six.
C 1-10 U40, 3:45 left, 13-Riley, Kevin slant pass complete to 34-Vereen, Shane for 31 yards to the UCLA9, 1ST DOWN CAL, out-of-bounds (11-Westgate, Sean).
I-formation, TE and WRs set to the right. Calvin comes in motion to the left and lines up left. UCLA looks like they're still in their standard 4-3. This is a playfake all the way, and they're going back to the same wheel route, albeit from a different formation.
There's a little adjustment from last time though. John Tyndall comes in and runs right into the weakside linebacker Westgate. You might think that this is to open the hole for Vereen, but it's really to slow the linebacker down. This allows Vereen to wheel out to the edge while the wide receivers take the secondary out of the play. Riley takes some air off the ball to ensure a completion, and with Westgate out of the play he can afford to throw it behind rather than ahead.
We've run this play several times this season, and the timing still doesn't seem to be quite right between Riley and Vereen. There's been one off-balance touchdown, an incompletion, at least another high throw. As Hydro mentioned, this play here should have been a touchdown if this ball is thrown ahead and in front rather than behind and over-the-shoulder. I'm probably nitpicking.
C 1-G U09 , 3:18 left, 13-Riley, Kevin EZ pass incomplete to 21-Allen, Keenan.
Singleback, two tight ends to the left, two WRs right. UCLA lined up in the 4-3.
This play is trouble from the start. The two tight ends stay back to pass protect against four down linemen (huh?), leaving only Vereen leaking out and Jones and Allen to try and break zone coverage by seven Bruin defenders. Still, Allen does get into the hole in the middle, but two things probably keep Riley from throwing this ball: (1) the linebacker sagging back into the middle of that zone, and (2) Ayers driving back Edwards and crowding Riley's field of vision. He does miss the dumpoff to Vereen, as it looks like Riley wants to make it to the end zone. He has to escape from the pocket and eventually throw it away.
C 3-G U07 [SHOT], 2:23 left, 13-Riley, Kevin EZ pass incomplete to 1A-Calvin, Michael, PENALTY UCLA pass interference (21-Hester,Aaron) 5 yards to the UCLA2, 1ST DOWN CAL, NO PLAY.
Sofele lined left, Miller and Calvin to the left, Jones and Allen to the right. Bruins have six linemen on the line of scrimmage, four down, two linebackers on the edge.
This would've been an incompletion even without the pass interference and the offside, but again poor pass protection on the left side. Sofele picks up the blitzing linebacker off the edge, but Brian Schwenke gets battered back by Nate Chandler and has to push him toward the sidelines. That opens the middle, and Damien Holmes gets inside on Mitchell Schwartz and eventually escapes his grasp. Riley HAS to throw it high or that ball would have been batted harmlessly to the ground.
Conclusions from the first half
Just not a strong effort from the Cal offensive line. I can't absolve Riley of all the blame (he lost good footwork on at least one throw, underthrew another pass, and didn't recognize coverage on one occasion), but it doesn't look like he's getting the help he needs from his men up front to make good decisions with the ball. It's a worrying sign, especially with good to great pass rushing teams like USC, Oregon and the Furd on the radar. (The caveat is that UCLA might be as good at getting to the quarterback as any of those schools, so maybe this will be some of the best pressure we've faced all year).
32 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thx for taking the time Avi! QB play is never quite as cut and dry as some would like to believe. We’ve definitely been down this road before (is it the OL or Riley?). That being said, Riley would get a lot of people off his back if he didn’t miss the “easy” throws. Underthrowing a screen pass, for example, just induces facepalms among the audience. I known I would take increased ball security at the loss of downfield throws, but he HAS to be able to hit the staple routs: slants, flats, screens, and outs. Otherwise we’re screwed.
I’m not so down on Riley for missing the easy throws in this one. You’ll see why in the second half post.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
The question I have then, is why was Tedford so hard on Riley after this game?
Yeah, I saw some plays where all of the receivers were covered. And, I saw a few where you have to give credit to ucla’s D (especially Ayers) just blowing things up.
But, I also saw plays where the line held up, formed a decent pocket, and it just seemed like he held the ball too long. Coverage sack or indecision? Missed reads? Hard to say without the actual game film.
In the past, it seems like Tedford has excused Riley’s stats with coach-speak lines like “we have to protect him better,” etc. But this time, he was pretty blunt with calling Riley out even after reviewing the game tape.
Old Toothwrangler
I'm going to guess that
he was supposed to audible to something else on some of the ones that turned into bad plays/bad throws. That sort of decision making.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Oct 13, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions
People are reading too much into it
It was pretty much what Tedford said. Some bad footwork. Leaping when he throws. He held onto the ball a little too long instead of fitting balls into windows. He wasn’t comfortable throwing into seven man coverage. Mistiming with his receivers. He didn’t run with the ball when he could’ve picked up a first down. I’m guessing Tedford was upset because these are the easy things we shouldn’t be messing up.
That being said, I’m not sure if all of it’s on Riley. He talks about the passing game, which means the quarterback, the receivers, the pass protection, the playcalling. All of that is up for criticism. Tried to be critical of all aspects as best as I could.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, some of these things are easy, the footwork part especially. I can understand why Tedford is upset with this regression in mechanics.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions
No, you were fair. I didn’t have time to re-watch each of the plays over and over to see what was happening. In previous games, I could usually find reasons for Riley’s miscues. (pass pro, receivers covered, etc.) Even though the play would be unsuccessful, he would look more polished in his execution.
In this game, he just didn’t look like a senior QB on more than one occasion. Like you said, it’s multi-factorial and it’s not fair to put it all on him. However, for his part of the equation, he certainly wasn’t sharp.
Probably not too far-fetched to assume that the sore hammy contributed to the footwork issues and messed with his head.
Thanks for another excellent write-up.
Old Toothwrangler
I think part of the reason Tedford is upset is that some of those sacks probably could have been avoided.
I can’t remember the actual plays, but there were two instances I recall where Riley had plenty of time to dump off the ball, but held on to it either to look for a running lane or (it seemed to me) to wait for either the receiver to get open or to find someone else.
This is okay if there is time, but it also goes back to the troubling things about Riley holding on to the ball too long … as if he want’s to make certain the receiver is open before throwing it to avoid an INT. At some point he needs to actually trust that his receivers will make the play.
Hey, Ucla -
1. Get your own colors
2. Get your own fight song
3. GET A REAL BEAR!
Nice summary!
when I watched the download, it really looked like he was rushed a lot.
and the lame-0 announcers commented that the ucla D-line and Ayers were doing a good job. Though they spend so much time fellating Chow and Newhizzle there wasn’t much room for analysis.
Go Bears Go
I just don't know if he's a great football player.
You’re talking about a football player who doesn’t do what football players should do. That’s just what I think man, I want to see more PASSION. We need to hire Herm Edwards because he knows how football players think and that football players should play to win the game.
/messageboarder
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks Avinash
I had the same reaction. Riley certainly wasn’t sharp on a number of throws, and Tedford’s willingness to call out Riley does cut against some of the hypothesis here, but I think your assessment is pretty fair.
Riley holds on the ball for like 7-10 seconds how is that on the o line he can’t read a blitz for anything he steps into the pressure he is like an Alex Smith clone how many times we see wild open recievers and they don’t get the ball Riley never hits recievers in stride
and can I just add that . ? . . ; , . . .
CGB: Come join the LOLigarchy
by Spazzy Mcgee on Oct 13, 2010 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Nice analysis but...
just because other guys aren’t playing great doesn’t mean Riley didn’t play poorly. If everyone on the team played every play perfectly and Riley was the only one to cause the play to fail, then Riley would be horrible. I don’t think anyone (who is reasonable) is trying to say that he’s horrible. On the other hand, good players can make plays even when some of their teammates don’t play ideally. Good players should at least be able to mitigate losses on bad plays by teammates. It seems clear that we shouldn’t expect that much from Riley.
(Caveat: I haven’t read too much on the blogs or boards about Riley’s play, so I don’t know how extreme the criticism is getting but he definitely deserves some)
The funny thing about all this is that Riley use to excel at this part of the game. Making something out of broken or just well-defended plays. Now, he struggles with it as much as he does in making the easy plays.
Read my post before you comment next time. I’m not absolving Riley of blame. I’m saying the pass protection was poor and the coverage was good. Very hard for any quarterback to do anything with that (how’d Andrew Luck perform against eight man coverage in the Big Game last year?). I saw several mistakes, but nothing that isn’t fixable. The sample size is simply too small from UCLA to draw any real conclusions.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions
And the criticism I’ve heard of him this past week is excessive. Yes he didn’t play a great game, but he doesn’t deserve to be benched. He had a rough game, but he wasn’t being asked to light it up with the defensive sets the Bruins put out there.
And that includes me. So I’m very annoyed with myself for being irritated with his performance.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow, that seems a little harsh. I did read your post. I misspoke if I said you were absolving Riley of blame. It just seems that you can always point to the many different factors that can make it difficult for the QB to play well.
In the end, the question is still, did he play well or not. Sure, in any individual play, if the play around him sucked, you can easily excuse a bad play but at some point, you’d like your senior QB to make a play on some of those (which I think he did in the 2nd half on some of those scramble plays).
I guess I’ll be a little more careful if I decide to comment in the future.
Didn't meant to be harsh
But I have to disagree. Up by multiple touchdowns, the only thing I want my QB to do is NOT risk turning over the ball and give momentum back to the opposition. Making a play would be nice, but I’d rather see Riley not make plays and live to fight for the next down.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 3:26 AM PDT up reply actions
*not make plays and take too many risks
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 3:26 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree. Makes sense. I guess my concept of “making a play” included throwing the ball away. Sometimes the pass pro was bad enough that it required cat-like reflexes just to do that. However, especially on 1st and 2nd down, there can be a huge difference between a sack and an incomplete pass so it would be nice to just get it out. I guess I just pine for the halcyon days of never-take-a-sack-Longshore (I know the o-line was better at that time too).
However, it is true that Riley at least pushed up in the pocket enough on most of the plays so that the sacks were low yardage.
I agree he was hurried at times and I also agree he’d be a helluva WAC/Mtn West QB. Well, maybe “heckuva.”
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
I also agree he’d be a helluva WAC/Mtn West QB
Who are you agreeing with again?
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 13, 2010 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I rewatched the first 2.5 quarters…two first half sacks (the one where OO sacked him after he stepped up and the other where he rolled right into a sack) were on him (throw it away!), the hi ball to Marv on 3rd down was on him, and I think he airmailed Keenan Allen when running/rolling to the left (also on him). The touchdown throw to Allen was unbelievable in that it didn’t bounce and it wasn’t picked (coverage was very heavy). That was a great play by Riley and a nice catch by Allen. Other Bear WR’s with inferior talent over the years (tucker, boateng, loggy, ross) would not have had that or been open.
And Vereen = mini BeastMode
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
It’s a lot easier to throw it away when you have a bigger pocket. The reason he took those sacks was (a) the coverage downfield could’ve picked it off, (b) he was in the pocket and would’ve taken a grounding penalty if he just threw it out of bounds.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Oct 14, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions

by 
































































