More On UCLA Debacle: Podcast + Gamefilm on Cal Defensive Lapses
![]()
Start off with the podcast, where CBKWit is in fine form. We (we as in CBKWit, Twist, norcalnick, and a random idiot you shouldn't pay attention to) discuss more about what went wrong in the horrifying UCLA loss, and look a little ahead to USC and briefly pass our verdicts on the canning of Pete Alamar.
Nuss, the hoops smarty over at CougCenter, had this to say about our defeat.
By the way, for all the pub that the cold shooting has gotten, the real culprit for the Bears was the numerous defensive breakdowns down the stretch of regulation and in overtime. When you're not scoring a ton of points, a team simply has to be able to rely on its defense. Cal couldn't last night. My guess is this will be an enormous teachable moment for Mike Montgomery.
So let's take a look at some of these breakdowns. We'll get to the first play of the game, and then show how UCLA exploited Cal's defensive weaknesses in this one. Big thanks to Telemachus at Bruins Nation for uploading his highlights yesterday so we could break down the tape and share in misery together.
Here are some of the particular plays and strategies UCLA used to beat Cal offensively.
Pick and roll
Simple pick and roll play. Lee dishes the ball off to Roll, and you'll see Nelson coming up to the angle to set the pick. MSF follows Nelson out onto the perimeter.
Here you'll see Dragovic come out, drawing Boykin to the perimeter, leaving the two bigs out of the paint. Nelson sets the pick and gets ready to cut.
MSF gets caught in no man's land as no one switches to the roller, and Randle is left guarding the interior as Dragovic gets the ball...
...and finds the rolling Nelson for what leads to an easy lay-in. Notice how big the passing lane is for Drago to find Nelson...a very well-executed play, exploiting the slowness of the Cal big to rotate from outside to inside and making sure there was no one big guarding the paint.
Note: This scenario would happen AGAIN in overtime with Boykin and Randle playing the handler and letting the roller (Nelson) run uncontested to the basket, turning into and AND-1 for Nelson as Brandon Smith was the one underneath the basket. Inexcusable errors in rotation, especially letting bigs roll to the basket without anyone putting a body on them. You'll see this near the end of the 2nd half video in the Bruins Nation link above, around 3:00.
Note #2: MSF got picked on a lot in this game. For humanitarian purposes, I'll only include gamefilm of this play.
Transition D
The Bears were caught sleeping several times on the fastbreak, even when they had all their men back. Here's one particular example (Bears identified by position in navy blue, ditto for the Bruins in baby blue).
In a man-to-man defense, it's important for the Bears to keep close to their guys. See an issue here?
Here you see the jump shooting 4 Dragovic being totally left alone by Boykin, way too far away to contest any pullup 3.
This leads to a wide open triple for the retarded cousin of Ivan Drago that cuts the lead to 6. It's the responsibility of the defender to know where his man is at all times, and more importantly know what type of player he is. Boykin seemed to fall asleep on this one, or mistook him for the real Ivan Drago ("I will go into paint and break you with dunk instead of settle for jumping with ball.").
Note: There was another huge 3 given up by Cal in transition, but it was 4 on 3 and I don't know exactly what happened on the offensive side. Probably MSF being slow again.
Pick and pop
A little different from the pick and roll--with pick and pop, the player setting the pick moves for the open jump shot instead of rolling to the basket.
Great googly moogly. This is just horrifying defense by everyone involved. Amoke overcommits to Lee, Randle doesn't switch, and NO ONE even comes close to recognizing all Drago likes to do is take threes.
Take a look at where Drago is when he's about to receive the pass. Take a look at where the nearest Bear is. Poor poor recognition and rotation.
MSF finally recognizes that he should close out about an hour too late. Do I even have to tell you whether retarded Drago's shot goes in?
MSF looking silly
Okay, one last error by the poor Cal big. Late in the second half, MSF gets caught staring at the ball handler and forgets about where his man (Nelson) is. Hell, he's already getting ready for the rebound before the ball has left Roll's hands.
Sanders-Frison might be better defensively next year, but right now he seems pretty lost on the court on plays like these.
Summary
UCLA does take advantage a lot of the incompetent officiating (using a lot of semi-moving screens that almost always free up their shooters and don't leave bigs time to reach out and defend the shot, etc.), but the fact is lazy and uninspired defense like what was illustrated above won't work against well-coached teams like Ben Howland's Bruins. Three particular weaknesses...
- Exploiting the slow rotations of the bigs (MSF and Max especially) with picks by the Bruin bigs, bringing the lumbering Cal defenders out and giving UCLA good looks with pick and roll and pick and pop, or the aforementioned barely legal screening for wide open 3s.
- Not identifying their man in a man-on-man defensive scheme.
- Running men out to the three point line, contest the three.
...were exploited repeatedly; in tandem with tentative Cal offense and the aforementioned poor shooting came the horrifying upset at Haas. It was the perfect storm for a Golden FAIL.
I'll analyze more of this game for the next UCLA matchup, but those were three of the biggest deficiencies I saw, and we'll see if other Pac-10 opponents will try similar strategies to exploit the Bears.
2 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
The first play was just great execution by the Bruins to take advantage of a slow Cal big. Throughout each step of the play each Cal defender is actually in proper position, and UCLA just has great spacing and executes the play exactly how it’s supposed to be executed. A quicker big will probably prevent that pass from being so open…but the truth is, MSF is just too slow to do anything about it. Sometimes you just gotta tip your hat to the offense for having a quality gameplan and executing it. If Randle is prepared he may be able to make a play – but then UCLA counters it by picking down on Randle’s guy who pops open for an open wing jumper.
The screenshots from the second play don’t show exactly where Eurotrash shot the ball, but that looks like it’s setting up for a really, really deep 3. With Boykin’s quickness he looks in position to close out a regular 3…if PF’s are taking that kind of shot in transition and hitting it…well, letting it happen once is excusable in my book. Not many players out there hit, or even take, that shot, especially PF’s (assuming it’s as deep as it looks to me like it’s going to be)….
Third play is again good spacing by UCLA, but there’s no reason for Amoke to hedge as aggressively as he does given the ballhandlers position on the floor. They aren’t looking to switch that – rather to hedge and recover, but Cal has to read the play properly and they didn’t do that. First, the UCLA screener doesn’t set a good screen – he doesn’t wait long enough, nor does he set up at the proper angle. The on ball defender should easily get around the screen without being affected, so there’s no need to hedge aggressively. Even if the screener was angled properly, the on ball guy should be going under without an aggressive hedge because the ball is so far outside – the ballhandler isn’t a real threat to shoot it, so again, it’s completely on Amoke for not reading the play correctly. With the spacing the weakside guys aren’t responsible for that – they have to give help on the roll, but they can’t be expected to close out the pop, so it just comes down to Amoke not being in position to recover, which he should have been.
The last one is obviously just MSF dropping the ball. First, he gets into good rebounding position, but didn’t even attempt to box out his man, so there’s one mistake. Losing his guy kind of goes hand in hand with that. This is all set up by his positioning in the first frame – if you notice, he’s facing the wrong way. He should be facing away from the basket, not towards. If he’s in between his guy and the ball, facing the correct way, he probably sees the cutter coming and reacts quicker. Notice Theo’s positioning – correct, no surprise there, he’s the most fundamentally sound player on the team, by far. Can’t have breakdowns like that last one, though, you’re basically giving them free points.
by Missing Barry on Jan 8, 2010 7:42 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Good summary
Yeah the first pick & roll wasn’t too bad. Probably should’ve gone with the more egregious D in OT, where Boykin totally abandons everyone in order to hedge the angle.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash on Jan 8, 2010 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t watch the game, so not sure what UCLA was doing offensively, but my guess is that’s one of those plays that have ready, knowing they can work it for a basket a couple times a game against Cal, because MSF just can’t guard it. They can’t run it often, though, because if Cal recognizes when it’s coming, the counter is to deny the swing pass up top (at least that’s what I would do if I was coaching). It doesn’t even have to be an aggressive deny – just delay the play enough to disrupt the timing so when he does get it, the roll has already happened and MSF has recovered. At that point UCLA’s ballhandler is the one that has to make the play happen, and based on the angle he took, I’m guessing he’s probably not athletic/enough of a ballhandler/PG enough to be effective in that position.
by Missing Barry on Jan 8, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh that norcalnick sounds dreamy on the podcast.
Norcalnick's chick. Go Bears!
by aee07 on Jan 8, 2010 10:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well I’ll just chime in again to say I really enjoyed the post and appreciate your effort. I would enjoy more posts like this in the future, and like contributing/discussing them. Apparently I’m the only one. :(
by Missing Barry on Jan 8, 2010 4:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah kinda disappointing…I guess all the Cal hoops fans went into hibernation after that loss. I’ll try another one after a win.
Email: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash on Jan 8, 2010 4:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I read it and loved the insight. Don’t have much of anything to add because I don’t know a whole lot about basketball plays.
by GBB4188 on Jan 8, 2010 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well I hope there are lots more like you out there!
by Missing Barry on Jan 8, 2010 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
misuse of the word retarded
This leads to a wide open triple for the retarded cousin of Ivan Drago….
wow….was it really necessary to mock people with special needs with this offensive comment? shameful.
by missionmom on Jan 9, 2010 8:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
So, you’re saying that comparing mentally disabled people to Dragovic is an insult to the mentally disabled? I guess I could see how it would be unfair to them to be compared to someone so douchy.
by atomsareenough on Jan 9, 2010 1:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs























