Golden Nuggets: Does Playing EWU Have an Upside?
In today's Daily Cal, writer Matt Kawahara calls this weekend's game against EWU a "low risk-no reward" game. While the team will benefit from experience in a game environment, he says the benefits stop there.
But from a national perspective-and eventually that will matter-the answer is no, it doesn't help the Bears at all.
Saturday is one of those games that's like an escalator on the top floor: no upside. Cal is expected to win, and win big. If it does, the game will quickly be forgotten. Even if the Bears win but don't dominate, their image could take a short-lived hit.
The only way that Saturday would make a splash would be if Cal somehow came out flat, fell behind and couldn't rally.
I'm not convinced. Give the players some gametime experience and move on before heading into the toughest five weeks of the year: that's the purpose of this game. That's the purpose of playing the C opponent in the A-B-C out-of-conference schedule. Game experience and a win on the record is enough of an upside for me. While wins against such teams may be forgotten, voters are reminded of the outcome every time they look at Cal's record. Even if you play a bunch of patsies and win twelve times in a row the voters will notice. Look at Ball St from last year. They shot up the rankings despite playing teams like Northeastern, Akron, and Central Michigan. The only team I even recognize on their schedule is Navy. Despite all that, they rose to 12th (before, thankfully, they were knocked out of BCS contention). For many voters (especially ones whose closest connection to Cal is checking the scores Sunday morning), a win is a win. Just ask any Big10/SEC team who schedules four OOC cupcakes.
After the jump we have more EWU coverage, news about Giorgio holding onto kickoff duties, some unusual quotes from members of the Maryland team, basketball predictions, and more.
- The EWU Eagles are very excited to play Cal. With seniors who have experience playing teams like Texas Tech, BYU, West Virginia, Oregon St, and Colorado, EWU does not back down from a challenge. The article says expected turnout is going to be about 70,000, but I have a very hard time believing that figure. Don't be surprised to see the second and third team play extensively this weekend. That's right, the Party Yacht will be riding the seas and Beau Sweeney's Cajun family-style eatery will be open for business. Maybe we'll see Beau throw (or run for) his first ever touchdown.
- Giorgio Tavecchio has refined his stride mechanics and retained his kickoff role. This should help him kick off between the goal line and the 5, like he was doing in practice.
- After his breakout performance Saturday, Ernie Owusu might see his parents make the trip from Nashville, TN to Berkeley more often, since his playing time will surely increase. Mychal Kendricks tells us that despite the impressive performance from the linebackers Saturday, we "haven't seen anything yet" and promises improvement.
- Shane Vereen embraces his role as backup where he can keep defenses on their heels while giving Best some much-deserved rest.
- While watching tape of last week's 52-13 defeat some Maryland players believed that they could have won had they executed better on a few plays. LB Alex Wujciak said he didn't feel like "they were that much better than we were."
- The Athlon Sports College Basketball annual picks Cal basketball to win the Pac-10 and advance to the sweet sixteen. Jerome Randle and Pat Christopher make Athlon's all-conference team and, respectively, are named that nation's second-best shooter and sixth-best scorer. PC is 13th on Fox Sports' list of players whose names you will know by the end of the season.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Ball State was never in BCS contention in any realistic sense, since they were at their peak still only the 4th ranked mid-major in the polls.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
Concur wholly.
If there’s one thing we’ve learned in the last few years, watching the likes of Ball State and South Florida climbing the charts and the massive affection for a Boise State team that takes on maybe two BCS-conf teams a year, it’s that strength of schedule is not taken seriously. As long as your record ends “-and-O,” nobody seems to care who you played to get there. I daresay that U$C’s OOC scheduling is, by those lights, insane (until they got around to playing SJSU instead of Auburn or Va Tech or what have you).
Hell, Cal should schedule Vanderbilt. It’s a likely win over an SEC rival. The downside is that the wife would never stop ragging me about it for the rest of time.
I cannot endorse this last recommendation
The dissonance over which team to root for would potentially cause my head to explode
As much as I respect USC
For playing 12 BCS conference opponents in 2004, 2006, and 2008, I think there are clear upsides to scheduling an FCS team. It’s not so much what the win itself gives you as it is what it allows you to do otherwise.
It is not an accident that Urban Meyer puts an FCS team the week before he plays Florida St. Someone (a hydro technician perhaps) with better knowledge of the program can chime in here, but I doubt there is a full week of game prep on the coaches end for I-AA opponents. In fact, I bet the Sun-Tues of that week is devoted to studying game tape of the next FBS opponent. The problem is that Sun Belt teams aren’t much better than FCS teams whereas MWC teams are.
FCS double standard
Inasmuch as the teams still have to play the game, the only immediate downside for Cal would be a loss of a key player or a freak loss of the game.
The larger picture is that SEC teams and to a lesser extent Big 12 teams can get away with FCS OOC games because the stereotype is that it’s a warmup for the manly brutality of their in-conference schedule, but not so much the Pac 10. Whether it’s accurate or not, the Pac 10 doesn’t enjoy the same reputation for being hard to win top to bottom, and that’s where FCS opponents can be counterproductive for rankings purposes.
Should Cal win out, it won’t matter at all, as VandyImport suggests above. Given the strong similarity between polls and beauty contests, though, even a one loss Cal team could find themselves being penalized for playing an FCS team. It’s stupid, but there you are.
by DC Trojan on Sep 11, 2009 8:16 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Ring ring
Hey, it’s 2004 calling. They say we should take our chances scheduling teams actually worth playing.
"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.
It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
by AERose on Sep 11, 2009 10:08 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
well played, sir!
Can’t rec’. On mobile.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Sep 12, 2009 6:15 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions

by 



















