California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Shattered: Wisconsin's home winning streak ends

Roll On: Watch the Cal Offensive Line Versus EWU


Pop quiz! Which runs above were opened up by power run/man blocking, and which ones were opened up by zone blocking? Leave your answers in the comments.

I thought about using the same moniker as last week, but the question of "How Cal Should Beat Eastern Washington" is a lot easier to answer: DON'T TURNOVER THE BALL. And then the article would've been over.

I figured you wouldn't be really interested in that sort of yeoman analysis. So let's focus on what you should be watching.

Against an opponent like Eastern Washington (let's admit they're decent for an FCS school), don't expect amazing playcalling that'll blow your doors off. Expect a standard Tedford playbook of establishing the run, passing the ball at the opportune time, then settling into a second half groove of running clock with the second-stringers. And if you thought Cal's defense played it safe against Maryland, expect them to be super safe against Eastern Washington, at least until the Bears are up double digits.

We saw some of what Cal's O-linemen would do in the season opener, but it probably was secondary to most of you to what the skill players were doing. It's totally understandable. In sports, we follow the ball.  However what happens off the ball in football is about 80 percent of the game, so we'd recommend taking this week to look at what Cal's less-heralded players do to perform.

So this week, get to know your O-linemen and the run blocking strategies they execute. They are the key to Jahvid Best, Kevin Riley, and the success of the 2009 Cal offense. Without them, Cal won't be able to run, and concurrently will have a tough time passing. It's been the key to every Tedford offense since he's gotten here, so it's definitely worth your time to watch how they open up holes for everyone else.

I spoke with The Bear Will Not Quit on the subject before the season, and his thoughts on what we'll see from the O-line in establishing the run are after the jump.

Star-divide

With a more experienced unit in place this season, what type of run block schemes do you think Cal will run this year with new offensive coordinators and offensive line coaches?

TBWNQ: You know how I said you could do a whole post, heck a whole book, on QB mechanics?  Well, you could teach a semester on blocking schemes.  To me, this is really the the most cerebral part of football, along with picking apart zone defenses in the passing game. 

The other thing going on here is that things could really unfold in any number of ways.  Ludwig's roots are more in the traditional Tedford mold, but his last two jobs have been in spread concept offenses.  But he also did incorporate some of his prior background into his spread offenses at both schools.  At Cal, there have been sort of four approaches or models: the Cortez years, the Dunbar year, the Tedford year, and the Cignetti year.  Among all those offenses, Ludwig and Tedford (and Marshall) could dream up a lot of combinations from the things that worked well.

There are two other factors: Marshall, and the available personnel.  Marshall will definitely have some thoughts that I think both Ludwig and Tedford will be interested in incorporating.  And you can't block a play in a way that doesn't work for your personnel.  For example, if Cameron Morrah is your TE and Terrell Suggs is the DE, you don't call a play where TE takes on DE one-on-one at the point of attack (unless your offensive coordinator is Doug Cosbie).  You have to block it a different way if you still want to attack that gap.   

Considering all those things, I think we are going to see a little bit of everything (how's that for committal?), in particular early on until the coaches see what works against different defenses.  That's actually a fourth variable - the opponent.  In other words, expect variety.

Basic2backpowerplayconcept_medium

via i109.photobucket.com

In terms of specific examples, I think we'll see the old "power" schemes with a pulling guard and fullback.  I think we'll see other gap or zone blocking to get numbers and allow Best to pick a seam in space and go, especially on the edge where Best excels.  I think we'll see weakside counters, counter treys and trap blocks to take advantage of what I am almost certain will be aggressive front 7s trying to disrupt our blocking and shut down Best. 

But the thing I really hope we see, and I have a feeling Marshall may incorporate, is a more sophisticated level of deception.  One example would be pulling guards the opposite way of the run.  This is a scheme some NFL teams use, though it requires a lot of practice and skill players that can block well.  But if done properly, it can be devastating to a defense. 

Why?  Because LBs, particularly ILBs, are taught to read the guards as their keys , especially in the college game.  They are taught often to follow pulling guards because they will take you to the ball.  And in many pulling situations, that's exactly what happens.  But if the guard goes the wrong way and the LB follows, he's just taken a LB out of the play.  When done well, it's a thing of beauty to behold.

Basic2backrailpowerplayconcept_medium

via i109.photobucket.com

Basic2backarcpowerplayconcept_medium

via i109.photobucket.com

Will they be similar to the power run rail and arc schemes we ran with great success earlier in the decade (note: videos of the old Cal rush offense at the bottom of this link? Or do you think we'll see something new?

With respect to "power run rail and arc schemes," a clarification is in order.  "Power" in the Tedford parlance refers to a concept or package of blocking schemes predicated on creating downhill angles of advantage, typically with pulling lineman and a kickout-lead combo at the point of attack, i.e. one guy kicks out, one guy leads up through the gap.  "Rail and arc" in the Tedford parlance refers to blocking options within the "power" scheme that are designed to deal with matchup problems or alignment problems, for example an outmanned TE at the point of attack or a wide DE.  It is therefore technically possible to see a "power" concept without a "rail" or "arc" block.

In terms of whether we'll see these concepts and blocks, I think we will.  I think it's a safe bet that power will be a staple of the Tedford offense forever, albeit in varying amounts.  It's a Tedford trademark. 

And for good reason.  It's an extremely effective, sound model if your players can execute it.  It doesn't require one guy to physically dominate his opponent straight up.  It allows guys to blow up the defenders and plow the field in a dominating, downhill fashion, through the use of angles, without having to out-muscle them.  And the Tedford model of the power concept in particular is predicated on simple techniques that can be applied to several different formations.  This allows great interchangeability without overwhelming the players with dozens of different blocking schemes. 

In fact, they ran it a bit last year with some success early on (except MD, who absolutely blew it up, exposing the unit's lack of experience).  But as the season wore on, they seemed to go away from it in favor of Cignetti's run scheme (which they had some nice success with later in the season). 

Part of the reason I think we saw it less last year was because it requires three things this team really didn't have last season: (1) quick, agile guards who can make reads and adjust blocks on the run, (2) TEs who can handle DEs one on one, and (3) tackles who can read and peel off quickly.  Other than Guarnero and Schwartz, the rest of the group really didn't fit the bill (Malele was a bit dinged up).

The main question with this year's group is the guards.  Tepper and Schwartz can handle it.  Cheadle and MSG are touted as being pretty athletic, so we'll see.

The other critical component to power schemes is a dominant blocking fullback, something Cal has had the past two years.  Whereas there are upgrades on the line, it'll be interesting to see how this year's fullbacks handle the job.  That might affect how the team blocks power concepts, and how often they use the concept.

In sum, as I said, with Ludwig's and Marshall's backgrounds, I could see them developing a nice mix of power, zone, trap and perhaps some 'deception' schemes.  Maybe I'm being too optimistic - this is college football, not the NFL.  And it depends on the players' ability to absorb it all.  But I will say this: I am more excited about what we're going to see offensively than I have been in a while.  I strongly suggest watching the o-line this season to get a flavor for what these new coaches are all about.

Click on the image above for examples of zone running schemes

***

 

Some other notes on the O-line from Cal.
  • Hydrotech sent me these notes on run blocking versus Maryland: There was plenty of zone blocking.  Off the top of my head I don't remember weakside counters, but i haven't rewatched the entire game yet or charted the game.  Definitely no counter treys.  No traps I'm pretty sure either. No guards pulling the opposite way of the run.  
  • Hydro, in terms of zone blocking against the Terps: In 2008, Cal pretty much stopped using it's classic power run game with the backside guard pulling playside and became practically pure zone running team.  However, against Maryland in 2009, Cal used both zone running and used some of its classic power running game too.  The amount of zone runs and power run plays were roughly equal so I suspect that Cal will be a more balanced run team in 2009 with respect to whether they are using zone or man blocking. Again, check out danzig's highlight reel and tell us which runs were opened by man or zone blocking.
  • For a great explanation of the power run schemes Cal has run since the Cortez years, check out this thorough dissection of the schemes from Trojan Football Analysis, complete with video of Pete Alamar explaining the concepts via 2004-2005 Cal running clips to various regional football coaches. The post is from 2006, and obviously Cal doesn't run this run scheme exclusively, but this is the first step into the world of run blocking. The photos from above are also from that post.
  • CBKWit noted the performances of Cheadle and Schwartz on the right side in opening up holes for Best and Vereen, and even mentioned how rotating Teofilo and Edwards into the lineup didn't prevent the O-line from missing a beat. Very promising sign, especially in keeping big men like Tepper and Guarnero healthy for the tougher games ahead.
  • Also, in Hydro's post-game thoughts, he mentioned how the Bears used plenty of two tight end formation sets and made sure Holley was an essential part of Cal's attack, which is more typical of old Tedford. So you could see plenty of the rail and arc scheme this season, albiet modified to reflect Ludwig's vision of how he wants Cal's offense running.
  • To refresh your memory on who goes where in the offensive line, take a look at the position preview I wrote a few weeks before the game.

So focus on how the Bears run the ball. If everything goes according to plan, they're going to be doing plenty of that Saturday, and it'll be critical to understanding how well Cal performs in successive Saturdays.

Poll
What do you primarily follow in the game?
The ball (quarterback and skill players).
128 votes
The trenches (offensive line versus defensive line).
12 votes
The receiver routes and the secondary.
7 votes
I try to follow a little of each.
104 votes
I'm following something else.
7 votes

258 votes | Poll has closed

3 recs  |  Comment 35 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I usually TRY to follow the receivers and their routes

But normal camera shots are useless for doing that. It’s nice to see after the fact how route combinations are set up, but impossible to see in real-time from the camera angles used.

No longer wanting an interview with Ryan Anderson.

by yellow fever on Sep 10, 2009 6:32 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Just noticed your signature, yellow fever. LOL!

Praise be to Tedford!

by Ohio Bear on Sep 10, 2009 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was it just me...

…or was the screen pass TD to Vereen in the 4th Q particularly well executed? It seemed to me that the linemen really sold it extra well, holding their blocks more “genuinely,” if you will, before releasing downfield.

Praise be to Tedford!

by Ohio Bear on Sep 10, 2009 6:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes agreed

Also, Vereen did a good job by masking the location of the play. If you look, he releases up the gut and then cuts left in time to receive the pass in stride.

In all the years of football I’ve watched, I never realized that the field switches at the quarters and not the half. So, Cal played in one direction in Q1 and Q4, and in the other Q2 and Q3. And to think, if I hadn’t had DVR and trying to find JB’s 2nd long run of the night (and what should have been his 3rd TD), I wouldn’t have ever known.

by Nashville on Sep 10, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I usually focus

on the ball. I TRY to pay attention to other aspects of the game, but after years of playing water polo, every instinct I have tells me to keep my eye on the ball. It’s just a habit now.

Alright, fine, I admit it! "Hydration Technician" really DOES just mean "water boy!"

by giantfan5 on Sep 10, 2009 8:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, nice pickup. Totally didn’t notice that.

Contact if you want to chat: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash on Sep 10, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ball carriers usually do that – they move the ball so that it is on the sideline side of their body.

by CGK on Sep 13, 2009 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Best backfield in Cal history?

We all had high hopes when Best and Vereen were recruited together a few years back, and they are well on their way to fulfilling and maybe even exceeding expectations. Now, with what appears to be a renewed focus on the fullback position, the combo of Holley and Kapp look like they might be very worthy complements. If Kevin Riley can continue to improve, this backfield has a chance to rival the Roth-Muncie, Pawlawski-White/Wallace, and Rodgers-Arrington/Lynch combos.

Still early days, but it’s hard not to like what we’ve seen so far. If the line and tight ends can stay healthy, there’s a ton of potential here.

Go Bears!

by California Pete on Sep 10, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It is really early. And that Arrington-Lynch combo was one of the deadliest in modern football history. As much as I like Vereen, he’s not at Beast Mode status, and even Jahvid isn’t tearing up Ds at the rate JJ was.

Contact if you want to chat: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash on Sep 10, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted for the ball

but truth be told, until the QB releases it, I’m watching the OLine to see what kind of pressure he’s getting.

On running plays, the angle of the camera makes it more difficult to tell anything of substance about the size of the hole, so I mainly end up watching the RB. That and I also don’t know that much about the OL beyond what I’ve learned on this website.

by Nashville on Sep 10, 2009 9:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Football would be so much easier to watch with a “behind-the-quarterback” camera angle. Then you could much more clearly see what the O-line is doing.

Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!

by Berkelium97 on Sep 10, 2009 9:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that would be more informative, but the vast majority of people would have no idea what the hell was going on. Besides, I think the XFL tried that.

No longer wanting an interview with Ryan Anderson.

by yellow fever on Sep 10, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’d be nice if the NFL Network installed them for like “special channel viewing” for game of the week, but I doubt anyone other than O-line junkies and Madden aficionados would be happy with this change.

Contact if you want to chat: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash on Sep 10, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice write up!

i think we’ll see lots of pressure/overpursuing defenses as teams will try to make Riley beat them. if we are able to massage our run blocking schemes to take advantage of that stuff, (with good zone, and deception), we don’t put any one player in the position of having to win the game for us. we take advantage of our skills from everyone.

Go Bears Go

by Rocksanddirt on Sep 10, 2009 9:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

after a quick look....

bests long run looked like a zone right play that we blew up the point of attack, so there was not the usual cutback sort of line. Best’s second td is hard to tell…as it’s a special thing.

Vereen’s first half run looked like a man play.

Go Bears Go

by Rocksanddirt on Sep 10, 2009 9:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought he cut back

On his 73-yard TD, I thought he cut back. His 2 yard run was pretty interesting. He jumped up and floated over into the endzone…it didn’t look like most jumps…he looked like a shooting rocket…

by DavidsonBear on Sep 10, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do believe you’re right about the Best play. Cal O-line opens up multiple holes and Best gets his pick of where to go. That’s a great sign of how confident the Bears are in Jahvid’s ability to find the right seam.

Usually at the goal-line (or in short yardage situations), it’s totally man-blocking situations since it’s way tougher to open up multiple holes or go downfield because of the presence of more defenders. You see occasional double teams of big defenders too, but the idea is still man blocking since the running back has no holes available to him.

Contact if you want to chat: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash on Sep 10, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to fall for the fake

Especially play action where the QB isn’t just jerking his hand at the HB

In other words, Go Bears!

by royrules22 on Sep 10, 2009 10:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you fall for fakes where the RB has already gone into pass protection?

No longer wanting an interview with Ryan Anderson.

by yellow fever on Sep 10, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

In other words, Go Bears!

by royrules22 on Sep 10, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just checking.

No longer wanting an interview with Ryan Anderson.

by yellow fever on Sep 10, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do.

I often fall for fakes where the RB has already finished blocking and the play is over.

ALL HAIL SUPREME LEADER AVINASH!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 10, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!

by Berkelium97 on Sep 10, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh man I’ve been waiting for that all week.

"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.

It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0

by AERose on Sep 10, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wish I could get a clearer still for it, but that will have to do for now.

Whose domicile? OUR DOMICILE!

by Berkelium97 on Sep 10, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

??? Is it the shadows?

ALL HAIL SUPREME LEADER AVINASH!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Sep 10, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It was a mix up

Supposed to be play action, and either Riley or Vereen broke the wrong way.

by ohmangoAs on Sep 10, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love playfakes, for some reason I always pick it up, esp. in college (not necessarily before the snap, but usually when I see receivers streaking or faking or the O-line backing up into oblivion).

It’s kind of like how Hydro is with every Cal offensive play!

Contact if you want to chat: bearsnecessities@gmail.com

by Avinash on Sep 10, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to fall for the fake

Alamar, is that you?

All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!

by rollonubears on Sep 10, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to impugn the mighty DANZIG, but the math at the end is wrong. Return yardage counts towards special teams, not offense, so the percentage of offense Best and Vereen provided would only include their rushing and receiving yards. Best and Vereen had 254 yards rushing and receiving, thus only (lol, only) accounting for 46% of Cal’s offensive yards.

"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.

It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0

by AERose on Sep 10, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Don’t feel uncomfortable pointing these things out to me. I really appreciate it. I’ll fix it when I have time. Thanks.

by danzig on Sep 10, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh believe me, I didn’t, but I felt like throwing in a caveat anyway to cover my bases. :)

"Let me tell you a story. I was a political prisoner for two years. The instant I was released I ran to McDonald's. I had a Big Mac and a Coke.

It was fantastic."
-Toyama Koichi, US Presidential candidate from Japan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0

by AERose on Sep 10, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On TV it’s hard not focus on just the ball because the cameras are trained on it and it makes you a lazy spectator. At games I find it much easier to watch ball and routes simultaneously. For me it’s hard to really pay a lot of attention to the line blocking live, so much going on so quickly. It is something I pay attention to when I watch the replay and can pause/rewind/etc.

I am a horrible bruin-bear crossbreed.

by GBB4188 on Sep 10, 2009 1:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The most exciting plays live are throws when half the crowd sees a wide receiver come open, and the QB sees it too, and the only question is if the QB can put the ball on the money. Everybody takes in a big breath…

The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS

by norcalnick on Sep 10, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ
Start posting about the Golden Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Tedford's Early Recruiting Classes- An Objective Re-Evaluation
Cgb1_small
DBD 2.4.10 BAM Competition
Jones_1_squared_small
The 2010 National Signing Day Preview
Calflag_small
California Golden Recruits Thread: Signing Day Week
Trebek_small
Cal Rugby: Whose Scrum Axe?

Recent FanPosts

Calflag_small
DBD 2.10.10 Avatar = Treesitter Propaganda?
Chowder2_small
DBD 2.09.10 Cal Football Crossword Puzzle
Small
Fujita's suggestion pays off
Att0002323_small
DBD 2.8.10 Better know a Bear
Football_small
Free Audio Stream of Super Bowl?
Trebek_small
DBD 2.5.10
Tbc_small
Wunderkind QB to Become the Next Prince of $C
Concord_aerial_1930_small
Depth Charts on Defense - now with stats!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Jahvidtician

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Calflag_small Avinash

Member Of The Follettariat

Bear__small norcalnick

Official Partner of CBS Sports