Cal 2009 Position Previews: Receivers and Tight Ends
Read the previous position previews: Quarterback, running backs, offensive line.
Here was Hydrotech after spring practice.
Who are Cal's top 3 WRs? This is a fairly important question. Cal's top 3 WRs get the majority of the snaps on the field - perhaps upward of 90%.
So who is it going to be? Tucker, Ross, and Boateng have the most experience so you might think it'd be them. However, we all saw sophomore Alex Lagemann blow up in spring ball. Right now he's penciled in at the #1 slot position. When Cal goes to its 3 WR sets (11 personnel), if we assume the top players at each WR position see the field then the top three will be Boateng, Jones, and Lagemann. That leaves out experienced WRs Jeremy Ross, and Verran Tucker - and puts the more inexperienced Jones and Lagemann on the field. Do we want more inexperienced WRs on the field again another year?
Several months later, we are reaching a resolution. Whether it's one that puts us at ease is an unresolved answer.
Which wideouts will Cal depend on this season? If you were to rank our receivers in terms of their depth chart position, where would they go?
More about the receivers and tight ends after the jump.
The problem with Cal receivers is that last season their touches were too few and far between. You couldn't really get a feel to each player's individual game. Here's what we can discern:
1) Route running was inconsistent (could this be a symptom of the shifting between OCs?).
2) Receivers greased their gloves and dropped the ball hundreds of times.
3) No clear number one, two, or three was established.
4) Inconsistency at the quarterback position also kept receivers from getting into any sort of groove.
That last part is crucial, because the last time that happened for Cal was in 2005, which feels like the closest Tedford-equivalent to last season (phenomenal running game, haywire passing attack). The next two seasons would be some of the healthiest for the Cal passing game.
The similarity between those two seasons diverge from there. In 2005 the Bears had three clear rising stars who were the top three wide receivers (and they would go onto replicate those performances the next two seasons). 2008, by contrast, will not be as clear-cut. The top six receivers were separated by a total of 13 receptions, and not one Cal receiver exceeded 30 catches. So while the Bears's receivers might be deeper than in 2006, production on that level is not a certainty, as the competition is expected to be fierce for every spot. You could argue that reliance on too few bodies cost us games we could've won.
Depth will not be a problem this time. The issue will be consistency. Will there be a defined pecking order as to who the top receiver is, who will move into the slot, and who can come off the bench and provide capable catches? Who will go where?
via grfx.cstv.com
Tight ends: The Tad Smith injury means Anthony Miller will be starting this season. However, Tedford seems optimistic that the Bears can overcome Smith's absence.
Cal coach Jeff Tedford seemed optimistic that Cal still has enough depth at tight end to make up for the loss of Smith.
"It’s nice getting Spencer back," he said. "Skylar has really stepped up in this camp, thankfully. You have Anthony (Miller), you have Skylar, you have Spencer, you have (Jarrett) Sparks and you have (Garry) Graffort. All those guys are in the mix, and they’ve all done pretty well."
Nevertheless, there is a lack of playing time for each of these guys, no matter who ends up in the one spot long-term. We only know Miller because he caught a prayer throw from Longshore at the end of the Emerald Bowl, and everyone behind him has close to zero experience. In almost every case, this will be Cal's weakest position this season.
So at least here, we'll have to concede the advantage to the Furd.
via graphics.fansonly.com
Coach Daft stepping up? One weakness last season was coaching experience in that particular field, but Kevin Daft seems more comfortable leading Cal's wideouts.
"We know the game now," Cal receiver Jeremy Ross said. "Even Coach Daft is telling us to put a little style in our routes, a little flavor. We can now because we know the game. Out there running routes, we're able to put our twist on things. We're out there confident and ready to get after it."
And just what kind of flavor is Ross adding to his route-running this season?
"You know, a little salt over here, a little pepper over here, a little Cajun seasoning," he said. "You'll see all the ingredients on Sept. 5."
Not many of us have been comforted by Daft's first season, but it wasn't exactly favorable circumstances for him to thrive. Let's see how this season goes before passing judgment on his worth.
The battle of the weight room: Onto the receivers. Nyan Boateng and Jeremy Ross seem to be the two incumbents staying in place. Boateng certainly looked like the most talented receiver last season, in terms of making his cuts and finding his place (it's no surprise that he soon became the favorite target of the precise Nate Longshore). But, like seemingly every receiver for the Bears, he dropped the ball far too much. Ross, while performing pure athletic acrobatics (remember the leaps!), didn't have enough experience to be anything more than semi-reliable.
However, both have shown a great deal of extroverted confidence during practice, and their work ethic in the gym has been impeccable. Who can bench more, sadly, has yet to be resolved.
Charging from the back: Verran Tucker is going to have a tough time catching up with the rest of the flock. Although he performed well in relief for the injured Calvin and inconsistent Young and Cunningham, according to Okanes he was pacing behind his counterparts this spring.
The JC transfer was the Bears’ second-leading pass-catcher among wide receivers last season, but he didn’t practice in the spring to focus on academics. With Jones and Alex Lagemann coming on, and with Michael Calvin expected to be fully recovered from a knee injury by the fall, Tucker’s status as a starter could be in jeopardy.
Speaking of Calvin, there was definitely a lot of great stuff he showed during the early part of the season, as he established himself as one of Kevin Riley's favorite targets. However, he is coming back from a torn ACL, a traditionally difficult injury to overcome for a receiver. So we'd have to expect that like Tucker, he will be coming on the rebound going against the healthier competition. At the moment though, he seems to be progressing better than Tucker.
via grfx.cstv.com
via grfx.cstv.com
The new faces: Marvin Jones and Alex Lagemann are expected to make huge splashes this season. Of all the receivers on this list, Jones is the most highly touted. Desean Jackson was a huge factor in Jones caming to Cal, and he appears to possess similar potential to the Eagles' rising star.
"Marvin Jones. The sophomore-to-be emerged as the Bears’ top receiver in the spring. This really doesn’t come as a surprise. The argument could be made that Jones was the most talented receiver on the roster last season, but a knee injury limited his true freshman season. Jones is healthy now and looked sharp in the spring. Despite the fact Cal has its top three receivers back from last year, Jones should enter fall camp as the team’s top pass-catching threat."
While both Jones and Lagemann have shown promise that could carry them far, Hydro does offer the warning of giving Jones and Lagemann too much of a prominent role while consigning the veterans to the sidelines:
When Cal goes to its 3 WR sets (11 personnel), if we assume the top players at each WR position see the field then the top three will be Boateng, Jones, and Lagemann. That leaves out experienced WRs Jeremy Ross, and Verran Tucker - and puts the more inexperienced Jones and Lagemann on the field. Do we want more inexperienced WRs on the field again another year? Is the talent that Jones and Lagemann bring to the field worth more than the experience that Ross and Tucker bring? Cal could have a Rose Bowl season next year if its passing game comes together (and assuming the running game stays dominant and the same goes for the defense). I'm not exactly sure that having more inexperienced players on the field is the greatest way to get that passing to improve.
Riley says...Ultimately though, the receiver's value is measured the best by the person throwing the balls to him We give our leading QB the last word:
Riley said Jones has just continued to do what he did during the spring while Calvin, who is coming back from a torn ACL, is getting more and more healthy. "Every week as the summer has progressed, he’s gotten a little more comfortable with his route running," Riley said. "Coming back from an injury like that, you’re going to be a little scared at first on your break. Every week, he’s running routes better. He’s always caught the ball well. Hopefully he can continue to get better. He can be a guy who can really makes plays for us." Riley said Lagemann, like Jones, also continues to build off his spring, although he has been slowed by a toe injury during the offseason."
Of all the analysis above, we can bet this endorsement means the most of all.
29 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Noted for the future
In this case, in order, it’s Boateng, Miller, Daft, Jones, Lagemann.
Contact me: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 24, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
We only know Miller because he caught a prayer throw from Longshore at the end of the Emerald Bowl,
Actually, I thought it was a very-well thrown pass into a tight space. Certainly nothing prayer-like about it.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
I’m still not sure if that pass was intended for Morrah or Miller. I don’t think we’ll ever know.
Contact me: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 24, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
It was intended for Morriller. I think that solves that.
by DavidsonBear on Aug 24, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Cameron Jordan recovered Harris’ fumble and returned it to the Miami 2, where Longshore connected with Miller. He was on the field for just three offensive snaps in the Emerald Bowl, and he could remember only four or five occasions when he was on the field for that play all season long.
“I was just there in case it got tipped, or it went over” Cameron Morrah, the play’s primary receiver, Miller said.
http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/recaps/122808aaa.html
Sounds like the play was for Morrah, but Longshore saw Miller open…?
Longshore said he threw it to Miller in a post-game interview. I don’t have the link, but he made it very clear it wasn’t an “oops… YAY” play. Miller as the intended target of the pass, although Morrah is the first read.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Well, I really don’t understand everyone’s suspicion about all this. Longshore WAS throwing to Miller. He said so himself (of course he could be lying, but I’m willing to believe him). Morrah was CLEARLY covered. I mean, if you watched the replay from the endzone cam to see Longshore’s point of view, it’s quite obvious that any pass to Morrah would have been defended. However, Miller was INCREDIBLY wide open. Despite Miller saying “I was just there to catch an overthrow or a tipped ball” or whatever he said, that doesn’t mean the ONLY receiver on the play was Morrah. Miller is an option too! In other words, there are two receivers on the play, not just one. As I said earlier, Morrah might have been the first read, but Miller can be an intended receiver and was the intended receiver.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Morrah covered
…wouldn’t really stop Longshore from throwing to him. If you remember last year, Morrah was Longshore’s target 85% of the time. This included the his first INT in the Michigan St. game.
We may never know his true intended target…but we do know that he threw in the air…time went by…and Miller came down with it.
by DavidsonBear on Aug 25, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Looks to me like he learned from his mistakes…
Some say his powerade gives you infrared vision...and that his sweat towels wipe away sin. All we know is he's called giantfan5.
by Spazzy Mcgee on Aug 25, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Where’s this 85% coming from?
Frankly I find your reasoning very unpersuasive. You are saying this: Longshore is going to throw it Morrah regardless of the coverage because 85% of his pass attempts are to Morrah.
The QB passes the ball to whomever is open. He’s not going to pass the ball to a covered receiver unless: (1) he doesn’t see the defender(s); or (2) he makes a serious mis-judgment in the “openness” of the receiver. As bad as some people might think Longshore was as a QB, even he knows he’s not supposed to throw the ball if he thinks the receiver is covered. So for you to conclude that because Longshore has thrown passes in the past which have been into coverage means that Longshore is making the passes while wholly disregarding the coverage/defense, completely deprives Longshore of any benefit of the doubt. I am willing to give Longshore benefit of the doubt, because it’s the basic rule of quarterbacking to not throw to covered receivers – a rule which you seem to think Longshore completely ignores. However, having seen how Tedford teaches the QBs with my own eyes, I know that if Longshore truly throws passes regardless of the coverage (as you seem to think), that he would have NEVER started last year at all (aside from Riley being injured).
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Morriller Millah
I meant Morriller Millah. Say that 3 times fast.
Off topic, Seahawk seem to draft a lot of west coast players. Last preseason game, I noticed Cam Morrah, Justin Forsett and Nick Reed all getting playing time and fighting for a roster spot.
Thats quite the roster spot they all musta been fighting for!
ALL HAIL SUPREME LEADER AVINASH!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
I hear it was their new Tazer position they are trying out up North
Things to remember: Girls don't appreciate it when you yell "Beast Mode!" when switching to doggy style
If we give it a new, cool name, it’s got to work, right? right? guys…?
by DavidsonBear on Aug 25, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Cal receivers: a whole bunch of good but no great. It is a very frustrating position to be in as a fan (same thing is going on with Canucks forwards right now). Nobody is bad enough that you can justify not playing them, yet nobody is good enough that you can justify playing them over the others.
All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!
If Cal is in a frustrating position, where does that leave four or five of the other Pac-10 teams with almost no receivers at all?
Contact me: bearsnecessities@gmail.com
by Avinash Kunnath on Aug 24, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Well I don’t have any rooting interest in them, so that fact is a positive.
All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!
by rollonubears on Aug 24, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Looks like Cal needs a good goalie.
All aboard the Jahvid Best rickshaw!
by rollonubears on Aug 25, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions
New Receiver, New Start, lets get going
i am very excited about Jones, Lagemann as well as Calvin once he returns.
Both Jones and Calvin were more highly touted than any of our current receivers. It was a shame they were injured last year. Lagemann.. that guy was solid during practice.
and they can’t possibly drop as many balls as our starting receivers did last year.. that was a pain to see.
get off me bandwagoners!
http://blog.cleancutmedia.com

by 





























































