Emerald Bowl Review: Part I: Miami Blitzes the A-Gap
Brief Intro Note from HydroTech:
First of all, I would like to apologize for the tardiness of these posts. I had hoped to begin these in at the start of June, just like I did with the Armed Forces Bowl Review series last year. Unfortunately, I have had much less time this summer than I expected.
When I did start working on this series, I noticed a disappointing trend in my drafts. The plays I wanted to write about were not good plays, but bad plays. Plays where Cal's offensive players made mistakes, and the team paid for those individual mistakes. While football is a team game, it's a team game made up of small individual battles all over the field. These individual battles make up the team. A team can only be as strong as it's weakest link. If all the players aren't weak, and execute to perfection, then the team should prevail over the other team. But if merely one player loses his individual battle, the entire team can fail. Unfortunately, I saw a lot of that during this game. The more I watched the game, more lucky I felt that the Cal offense was so lucky to have such a great defense to help them keep the game manageable. Similarly, I felt like the entire team was incredibly lucky for having a 1st Round NFL talent at runningback who could take the rock to the house when everything did go right on the field. I think that without the defense holding down Miami's offense throughout most of the game, I don't think Cal's offense could have scored enough to match Miami. Likewise, if it wasn't for Best's home run ability, the Cal offense would have been forced to sustain methodical drives which isn't desirable (in most situations), and something the Cal offense might not have been able to do.
Anyways, the purpose of this series is to just show the casual fans some things which they might have missed when they watched the Emerald Bowl on TV, or from the stands, or even after the 528th viewing. I think this series will be a little less technical than last year's series, but I hope you still find it worth reading.
***************************
In this first part of a twelve post analysis, we're going to look at Miami's defensive strategy on passing downs.
Here is the pre-snap look below:

This is the second play of the game. Cal is facing a 2nd and 10. Cal has 11 personnel on the field (3 WRs, 1 TE, 1 RB). The QB is in shotgun. Cal appears to be showing that they are going to pass on this down because the QB is in shotgun, and Cal has 3 WRs on the field (Cal has a very heavy tendency to pass when 3 WRs are on the field).

Above is the post-snap picture. Miami is pass-rushing with their four defensive linemen, a defensive back off the off the edge (on the offense's left), and a linebacker (who is circled). The linebacker is attacking the A-gap. The A-gap is the space between the center and the guard. In this case, the linebacker is attacking through the left A-gap, meaning the gap between the center and the left guard. Because the center, Alex Mack, is already pre-occupied with his assignment and the left guard, Boskovich, is pre-occupied with his assignment the Miami linebacker is going unblocked into the backfield.

In this case, the play is actually a run play. Specifically the play is a draw - a run play that starts off looking like a pass play to fool the defense into thinking it's pass to open up running lanes. Unfortunately, Miami's defense and Cal's offense playcall are a recipe for disaster (for Cal) and allows a Miami defender into the backfield untouched (circled above).

The play results in a four yard loss. Although Miami's defense was probably suspecting a pass, the fact that Cal was running the ball does not change the fact that Miami is already showing their hand on how they are going to pressure the QB on passing downs. Miami, as in the play here, is going to blitz the A-gap.
It is not surprising that they are using this strategy. Blitzing the A-gap gets quick pressure on the QB, and even better, gets the pressure directly in his face. Most quarterbacks, when confronted with pressure in their face throw off their back foot leading to weak and lofty passes ripe for the picking (getting intercepted). Cal's quarterback, Longshore, shares this typical flaw. In the past, when Longshore has been presented with pressure from the center of the pocket and in his face, he has been reluctant to step up into the pocket and instead passes off his back foot without stepping into his throws.
As an offensive coordinator, this would be your first big clue into how Miami's defense is going to operate in the future.
20 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can you comment a little bit on how this play would have worked? Was it a playcall that was just set up to fail against that defense regardless of what the offense did, or could Mack or Longshore have identified what was coming and changed assignments to leave one of the outside guys unblocked? I want someone to blame for this 4 yard loss! It was probably Longshore’s fault! (Joke).
Seems to me if they’d picked up the linebacker blitzing up the A gap it would have been ok. But I think the basic premise is that Miami’s defense had the perfect play call on for a draw.
Still holding out hope that Ryan Anderson will capitulate and grant him that interview he's been asking for for months now.
by yellow fever on Jun 24, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions
I think your basic premise is something I should have said in the post itself. yeah, this play is just one of those plays where the defense has a great play dialed up that will counter what the offense called. However, this defensive strategy is something we will also see later on on the game too.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
If the Cal offensive line had picked up the A gap blitzer, I think it would have been a big game. When Jahvid receives the ball in the picture, the next closest Miami defender is 7 yards off of the line of scrimmage, and Cal’s receivers are in good position to block downfield. Perhaps on Jahvid’s many successful runs later in the game, Miami’s linebackers are picked up, or attacking gaps that Jahvid isn’t running through, leading to the many big games for our star runner.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
Pretty much if there wasn’t a linebacker blitzing the A-gap, Best probably would have gotten through for a gain. This is just one of those plays where the defense happens to be in the right defense for the offensive playcall. That’s just bad luck or the defense knew it was coming. It’s probably just bad luck. Since Cal has such a high tendency to pass the ball from shotgun, the defense was probably expecting pass and not the draw.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Yes, look at the hole Mack and Boskovich created—if not for that blitzing linebacker. Now, I suppose, one of the Miami linemen might have tried harder to fill that A gap had their linebacker not been given that assignment. But still, a 4-yard loss easily could have been a big gain but for that one, unaccounted defender.
This is why I so much prefer two-back sets and the power run game—a more “conservative” approach than “trick” run-from-the-shotgun draw plays—so that the ballcarrier has a fullback and/or pulling guard to provide an escort into the second level.
That said, put in the context of an entire gameplan, this play does provide—as you note, Hydro—early evidence of Miami’s defensive gameplan, and maybe (?) showing an early draw play would slow the pass rush for even just a split second in subsequent plays. I’m interested to see if you find this was indeed the case in the Emerald Bowl. Any evidence that Tedford and Co. were able to use any lessons learned from this play later in the game?
Go Bears!
by California Pete on Jun 24, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
That said, put in the context of an entire gameplan, this play does provide—as you note, Hydro—early evidence of Miami’s defensive gameplan, and maybe (?) showing an early draw play would slow the pass rush for even just a split second in subsequent plays. I’m interested to see if you find this was indeed the case in the Emerald Bowl. Any evidence that Tedford and Co. were able to use any lessons learned from this play later in the game?
This play definitely seems to suggest that Miami is going to be very aggressive on defense, in definitely attacking the QB and presumably also in containing Jahvid Best. Offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti appears to take note of this because he calls a screen play right after this play (in order to slow down the pass rush). Also, later on, Cal attempts to take advantage of Miami’s aggressive defense again by using a flea flicker (to take advantage of the defense focusing on Best). So I would say that Cignetti did extract this from play the realization that Miami’s basic defensive ideology was to be aggressive.
However, Cal also passes a lot from shotgun too. And if Miami’s gameplan is to aggressively blitz the A-gap when Cal is in shotgun, then unless the pass play is a quick pass, Cal is playing right into Miami’s hands. So I would have liked to see Cal pass more from under center to get Miami out of their “if Cal is in shotgun then blitz the A-gap” mode. By getting the QB under center, the defense has to worry about the run more. When the Cal offense is in shotgun, the defenses don’t necessarily have to worry about run plays because (1) draw plays are slower to develop; and (2) Cal usually passes from shotgun anyways – like 95% of the time. So in other words, by putting the QB under center, it might have gotten the defense to be less aggressive, and would have increased the uncertainty of whether the play was run or pass by avoiding Cal’s huge formational tendency.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
Yes, look at the hole Mack and Boskovich created—if not for that blitzing linebacker.
The hole’s kind of there because the linebacker ran through it.
Still holding out hope that Ryan Anderson will capitulate and grant him that interview he's been asking for for months now.
by yellow fever on Jun 24, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Does anyone know whether Tedford or any of his OCs script plays to start the game a la Walsh with the 49ers?
Hibernating until next season (mostly).
I’ve asked him this before. He said he does have a list of plays that he’d like to run early on, and of course, they come off the list on third downs.
In other words, it’s like a soft script. Perhaps you don’t necessarily run all the plays in the order on the list but you do want to run them early on.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
So…when it’s a pass, with 4 down linemen and an A-gap blitzing LB, the RB is supposed to pick up the monster, full-steam-ahead LB? Sounds like a favorable defensive matchup!
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
Well, some RBs really are good at picking up blitzing linebackers…though it does seem like most of the star RBs in college aren’t given that task much. That’s how you end up with a lot of guys who ran for big yardage in school unable to see the field in the NFL, because their blocking isn’t up to snuff.
Still holding out hope that Ryan Anderson will capitulate and grant him that interview he's been asking for for months now.
by yellow fever on Jun 24, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions
in cals normal passing offense, the rb
assigned to block that guy only has to slow him down, as the throw usually is very quick.
the rb’s job is to slow the guy enough that the qb can step into the throw and hit either the slant from the inside wr, or the deeper ball to the outside guy, or the hook to the te.
Go Bears Go
by Rocksanddirt on Jun 24, 2009 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions
A Gap
possibly a quick release from the TE undeneath would work well for a short pass, or a flip naked sweep to the outside to Best could also change Miami’s D focus
Thanks for the analysis
I have all the games from last year on my DVR and watch them whenever my football craving is high. Last night, coincidentally, I watched this game again. Of course, I watch the whole game in 30 minutes. I appreciate your analysis as much of the detail is lost on me.
I will say that it was appalling how incapable we were of completing a forward pass. If Troy Taylor, or Aaron Rogers had Jahvid Best and that defense (Cameron Jordan), along with Geoff McArther and Tony Gonzalez.. OK, not an All Star team, but basically competent receivers. We would have won that game 42 to 14 and gone to the Rose Bowl.
I am hoping beyond all reason that our defense is near the same level, and our team learns to pitch and catch, because we’ll be outstanding in 09 if that happens.
Yeah, we did have a hard time completing passes. Not so great pass blocking was a problem on a few plays, other times it was an inaccurate pass, on a few plays the players slipped on the grass. All in all, the Cal’s air attack looked pretty weak.
I do agree that if we had a decent passing attack during the game, we probably would have completely rolled Miami to the tune of 42-14 or so.
And yeah, if the defense stays just as good next year, and if we can get together even just a decent passing game, the team can do some serious damage to opponents.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com
typically, the running back will look to pick up the blitz. since it was a draw its up to the running back to read the linebackers. this play was screwed from the start; their defensive coordinator called it right.
by WeHaveCrabsAndVD on Jun 26, 2009 4:34 PM PDT reply actions

by 























































