Coach Tedford the Playcaller, Part II
by Avinash Kunnath on May 7, 2009 3:00 AM PDT
in California Golden Bears Football
Email
Print
People might remember about a decade or so ago, Hydro and I started a discussion about playcalling versus USC. I contended that Coach Tedford tries to keep it close and win the game in the 4th quarter rather than going for it early. Hydro disagreed somewhat. Take a look at the link above if you've forgotten what that was all about. The discussion was based off this article from Smart Football.
We continue this discussion, now turning our attention to the run/pass balance.
Hydro: In the 2008 Cal vs. USC game, Cal attempted 31 passes for a 4.5 yard average. Cal rushed the ball 20 times for a 3.0 yard average (excluding negative rush yards from QB sacks on pass plays). In terms of achieving an equilibrium of pass attempt yardage and rush attempt yardage, Cal did pretty well. Perhaps a few more passes would have been statistically beneficial but otherwise I think the run/pass ratio was fairly acceptable. Had Cal's pass attempt average been something like 5.5 yards per attempt, and Cal's rush average been around 2.0 yards per attempt, then yes, I would say Cal should pass more.
Hydro: As for mixing up plays to keep USC on their heels, I think Cal attempts to do that. That gets hard when you're facing longer conversion downs like 3rd and 15 and 2nd and 12 or whatever.
One of the ancient strategies of warfare is when you're a weaker opponent, you have to appear strong in order to prevent the other side from trying to crush you from the outset. It's a sign of the respect that Carroll has for Tedford that he and USC's coordinators usually design the most conservative gameplans for our matchups. They know Cal is strong enough to topple them if they make mistakes whereas they have leeway with others. Carroll has no such compunction against other coaches like Bellotti or Erickson.
So I'm not certain if we need totally unconventional plays, like what the Furd did in their upset, because that's totally out of our character; we're not a huge underdog and probably won't be for some time. What we need are plays that are conventional in the style of offense we run but also unconventional in terms when and where we run them. If that makes sense.
What do you guys think?
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I voted for balance with deception
I don’t think you beat USC by being one dimensional. And no matter whom we play, run/pass balance is generally a good idea. Against a team like SC, though, we not only have to execute impeccably, but we prolly have to keep them off balance. Maybe it’s mixing it up contrary to our tendencies, maybe it’s running more on throwing downs or vice versa, or maybe it’s just adding wrinkles to what we’ve got in our arsenal. If that’s “deception,” then fine. It’s what we gotta do.
A play from last year’s game comes to mind that might fall under the “new wrinkle” category. Recall the play where we scored the TD pass to Vereen that got called back by a penalty that some of us haven’t completely figured out to this day. The WR lined up on the right side (Tucker, I think) acted as if it was a bubble screen. The play wasn’t blocked that way, but I suspect that Tucker’s action, combined with our tendency to screen a lot, made the SC safety bite on the screen. Meanwhile, Vereen ran a pattern in the right flat, ran right past the safety who bit on the Tucker screen look, and was wide open for the TD pass from Riley. I thought it was a beautifully designed play. Not being a game film analyst extraordinnaire like Hydro, I don’t remember if we used this wrinkle before that game.
Marshawnthusiastic Jahvidtician and member of the PRileytariat.
I agree about that play
Superb call, totally blew everyone out of the water, surprised everyone. Very much the type of play you’d like to reserve for a big game like USC.
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 7, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Seconded
Recall how much trouble the Pryor/Boeckmann innovation gave USC that first series? Yeah, well, USC had adjusted for it by their second defensive series. Now, that wasn’t one-dimensional in the sense of majority run or majority pass. But it had the same predictable quality that a preponderance in either of those dimensions would have. Not having any wrinkles beyond that killed OSU, not that they wouldn’t have lost anyway. USC just doesn’t lose those games.
Especially this year, with any kind of consistency at QB, Cal will be able to unleash the big guns from both the backfield and at WR. With Jones, Lagemann, Tucker, Boateng, and that stud JC WR, creative but balanced seems like a surer bet for victory.
I would absolutely save 5-10 plays for U$C each year
At least until we beat them twice in a row or something. You just have to bring more to the table at this point. I think it’s totally worth the risk of losing big – if we won SOMETIMES. And by occasionally training players for a ‘special’ day against U$C, that helps remind them the discipline they have to have in the rest of their games, where they don’t go nuts – they follow the plan against weaker opponents and don’t make mistakes.
The other thing is if we ran more trick plays early in the season, every Pac-10 coach would hear about, worry about it, and would have to remind their defense to ‘keep an eye out for that s*it’. That tends to open up the run a little – which is exactly what you want.
Stand the whole game, stay to the end, and start yelling while they're still in the huddle. GO BEARS
by JerrottWillard45 on May 7, 2009 9:43 AM PDT reply actions
So you're think that there should be more trick plays earlier in the season?
That way it’ll open up new opportunities on the offensive end in our bigger games? I like how this sounds.
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 7, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
It has always seemed like execution is our downfall against SC…
CGB: Our points are reliable. Our logic is infallible. Our past records are illogical. And our ham is dynamite!
Perhaps. You don’t think playcalling has anything to do with it?
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 7, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
false starts are not due to playcalling
holding is not due to play calling.
Go Bears Go
I feel oddly confident about this year’s USC game. They no longer have what may well have been the greatest D in college football history. That means that Jahvid Best may, y’know, get more than 0.1 YPC. It really should have been 10-10 last year. But oh well.
I'm old enough to understand. Jerks.
by the time we play them
they will have their shit together.
Go Bears Go
Oh don’t mistake that for me saying the game will be easy. It will definitely go down to the wire. They will have their shit together. But I don’t think they can match last year’s D, which gives us a chance.
I'm old enough to understand. Jerks.
Also we probably can’t match our own offensive ineptitude.
Talking about balance seems to be beside the point when neither aspect of our offense actually works. There’s no correct balance when your passing and rushing YPA are both under 5.
I hope Ludwig and Tedford unleash a shitstorm of wrinkles, misdirection, and trickery in October, but really I’d just settle for fewer offsides, holding, and false start penalties.
This year
When I blow out my candles, I’m going to wish for a Cal victory by greater than a possession. Because of all USC’s stats, the one thing that really blows me away is that in the 9 or so losses they have since 2002, not a single one came by more than a possession, e.g. 7 points. Florida, Georgia, LSU, tOSU, Texas, OU, each of USC’s peers have gotten spanked at least a couple times in that period. But realistically speaking, since 2002, there isn’t a single game that USC hasn’t had a chance to win.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Recent FanShots
About Us
• About the Golden Bloggers
• Our previous site @ Blogsome
• Avinash @ Bears Necessity
• Best of the Golden Blogs
• Golden Blogs Interviews
• HydroTech's Cal Football Analyses
• Ron Fimrite's Anatomy Of A Miracle
• CGB Weekly Guides
• GoldenBlogs' Community Guidelines
• GoldenBlogs' FAQ
• CGB GIF Army
Learn More About The California Golden Blogs Clothing Store
Pac-12 On SBN
Pacific Takes (Pac-12) NORTH AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)
UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)
CougCenter: (Washington State)
BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)
Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)
CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)
SOUTH
BruinsNation: (UCLA)
ConquestChronicles: (USC)
HouseOfSparky: (ASU)
Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)
TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)
Block U: (Utah)
Golden Bears Football Schedule
| Fresno St. | Sat 09/03 | W 36 - 21 |
@
Colorado
|
Sat 09/10 | W 36 - 33 |
| Presbyterian | Sat 09/17 | W 63 - 12 |
|
@
Washington
|
Sat 09/24 | L 23 - 31 |
|
@
Oregon
|
Thu 10/06 | L 15 - 43 |
|
USC
|
Thu 10/13 | L 9 - 30 |
|
Utah
|
Sat 10/22 | W 34 - 10 |
|
@
UCLA
|
Sat 10/29 | L 14 - 31 |
|
Washington St.
|
Sat 11/05 | W 30 - 7 |
|
Oregon St.
|
Sat 11/12 | W 23 - 6 |
|
@
Stanford
|
Sat 11/19 | L 28 - 31 |
|
@
Arizona St.
|
Fri 11/25 | W 47 - 38 |
|
@
Texas
|
Wed 12/28 | L 10 - 21 |
Pacific-12 Conference Standings
(updated 1.2.2012 at 11:12 PM PST)
| North | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
Oregon Ducks
|
8 | 1 | 12 | 2 |
|
Stanford Cardinal
|
8 | 1 | 11 | 2 |
|
Washington Huskies
|
5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
|
California Golden Bears
|
4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
|
Oregon St. Beavers
|
3 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
|
Washington St. Cougars
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| South | Conf | Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | L | W | L | |
|
USC Trojans
|
7 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
|
UCLA Bruins
|
5 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|
Utah Utes
|
4 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
|
Arizona St. Sun Devils
|
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
Arizona Wildcats
|
2 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
|
Colorado Buffaloes
|
2 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
