What classes and professors did you like and dislike at Cal?
Some of my friends and I were having this discussion last week as we reflected upon our time here at Cal and I thought it would be great to ask here as well.
The question is simply, what professor(s) and/or class(es) at Cal did you really like or was inspired or motivated by? And the opposite, which professor(s) and/or class(es) did you dislike. And by professor I mean actual professors, lecturers, GSIs, TAs, advisors, etc. Anyone who could've "taught" you something.
For me I'd have to say I really the class CS61C (it's a computer science class) taught by Dan Garcia. Now I'm controversial in this because many people I know HATED this class and really do not like Dan. But I believe otherwise. First of all I took this during my second semester at Cal and my first semester was an unmitigated disaster. I royally effed up my classes, had a low GPA, didn't have fun and definitely did not enjoy my classes. My only major related class I took was CS61A which for those who are not computer nerds like myself, is a very pure theory class. Now-a-days I happen to love CS theory, but back then I was so close to changing my major from EECS to something else (possibly History). And then I took 61C and the class just got me to love the major, love what I could learn (and did learn!), and most importantly saved my GPA from death. And it helped that Dan just oozed enthusiasm.
For best professor it has to be Professor David Wagner for CS170 that I took just this semester. The only time I actually saw a standing ovation by most of the class lasting for more than a few minutes! Not only was he pretty easy (at least his midterms were... damn me for getting too cocky with finals), and gave us some really nice homeworks and projects, he was just enthusiastic, had lame "oh my god why am I laughing" jokes and more. And most importantly he really cared (or at least that was what it looked like) that all of us learned. Whenever we asked him a question he'd go really in depth and make sure we understood. And when we asked a question in the newsgroup (sort of a message board that most of EECS folks use) he'd write an essay with diagrams and everything explaining until all of us understood. He'd even do this at 1AM, whereas most of my other professors barely answered or not at all. Honorable mention goes to Professor James O'Brien for rickrolling the class by pretending he had footage from Portal 2.
As for worst class and professor it would be Math 53 taught by Professor Givental. This class is the one that killed my freshman 1st semester's GPA. I guess I wasn't ready for the class as I had skipped your basic Calculus classes using AP stuff but still it shouldn't have been this bad. And it wouldn't have been if it weren't for Givental. Givental is a russian professor who had a really thick accent and terrible handwriting. That by itself isn't so bad, but he lectured every day about the THEORY of multivariable calculus and then expected us to write MATH ESSAYS (about the theory) for midterms and finals. These accounted for a large percentage of the grade unfortunately. To make matters worse he forgot that he was lecturing lower division kids and undergrads and would really just not help us understand anything. And for the final and midterms he'd give us math problems (after the essays) that we had never learned to solve!
Well that's my story.
The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.
76 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
looking back i dont think i have ever had a professor or GSI that truly inspired me. To be honest, even in my favorite classes I have trouble paying attention in lecture for more than 5 minutes at a time. For this reason my favorite professors tend not to be particularly adept lecturers. I prefer instructors that give challenging homework problems that highlight interesting concepts (that’s how i learn), but much more basic exam questions. That being said, here are a few of my favorites:
-vaughan jones, math 53: easy midterms and a tough but fair final. Actually this guy was a pretty good speaker and a Fields medalist.
- jan liphardt, physics 7B: i thought he really had a good sense of what was reasonable to expect from his students without being too easy.
-bill miller, chem 120A: has a stream of consciousness style of lecture which is hard to follow, but the homework problems were very rewarding and exams focused on fundamentals. I’m taking 221A with him next semester.
charles harris, chem 122/222: truthfully, lectures were impossible to follow and largely a waste of time. but the class was awesome and i give him credit for that
lek-heng lim, math 110: was very organized. gave very difficult/rewarding homeworks and easy exams
michael klass, math 104: lectures were impossible to follow, but he was an extremely interesting person. chatted with him a few times about nonmath stuff. homeworks were hard and exams were fair.
and some of my least favorite:
andrew charman, physics 7A: had a very distorted sense of what to expect of students. midterm exams each took about 4 hours. his questions generally took up a full page in 10 pt font and were mostly filled with useless details- very frustrating.
ming gu, math 54: kinda in his own world, in lecture and in his exam writing.
peidong yang, chem 104A: used exclusively powerpoint, likely out of laziness, for a class that requires a great deal of problem solving (and thus requires seeing examples for understanding). The class was almost all group theory, but taught in a frustratingly hand-wavy manner- luckily chem 122 filled in the details.
jay groves, chem 120B: everything was taught with applications to biology, which i care little about. homework problems were almost exclusively based on material outside of the text and required a weekly trip to office hours just to know what the hell each question was asking- a huge time burn. i think i would’ve enjoyed this class more i had some statistics background, but the chem dept seems not to think it important. i am taking stat 134 this summer for this reason.
richmond sarpong, chem 112B: an awesome, approachable guy. lectures were very well-organized. his tests were just brutal- consistently the lowest test averages in any class i have taken. luckily the curve was very forgiving.
I am Ted Miller
Prof Yang! good lord...
…I had him for 104A back when I was still a cham major. I could not understand a single thing he said. I’m not being ethnocentric, it’s just that I could only take notes based on what he wrote on the board, because I literally could not understand anything he said. This was…1998, apparently before he started using Powerpoint.
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
I don’t remember the names of 90% of the professors that I had. I think I had Kenneth Train for something (PS2?), (Stephen?) Fish for another Poli Sci class, that really crazy old guy for another Poli Sci class, and Forgarty or something for another. You can see they all left huge impressions on me. And despite the fact that I also double majored in Econ, I don’t remember a single Econ professor I had.
Still holding out hope that Ryan Anderson will capitulate and grant him that interview he's been asking for for months now.
by yellow fever on May 29, 2009 7:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Givental: I took him for Math 53 my first semester as well. What a nightmare! I swear I didn’t learn a thing in that class. The final scarred me. He had word problems!!! About multivariable calculus!! I’ve never turned in so many blank pages in my life. Everything I know about multivariable calculus was taught to me in my physics E&M class. No thanks Givental!
Still have a year to go but I have to say my favorite professor has been Damon English for Physics 137B. He is one of the few professors that has both talent and the enthusiasm to teach. He tried to learn all our names and relate to us as individuals, gave us problems that were hard but somehow fun to solve, and he would stop what he was doing and come help us whenever we would ask anytime during the day. Very dedicated to his students.
The Hits
Rhetoric 1B I can’t remember her name (at Colgate now) but she was very passionate. Bitch of a GSI but my prof wouldn’t let the GSI grade my writing.
Classics 10A Intro to Greek Civilization Griffiths
Classics 10B Intro to Roman Civilization Trevor Murphy. Best Class I Took at Cal. The one class that changed my view of the world the most. Professor Murphy attacked the class. The reading was endless. Wow.
Classics 28 Classic Myths Professor Bullock is on autopilot but the plane lands in Athens.
Spanish Cervantes Goddess of a professor and a pretty good book too.
EE120 Linear Systems Ramchandran Best Engineering Class I took at Cal. Great prof with an incredible amount of work. At the 3 hour midterm, no one left early and the GSIs said to keep working. Tough HW sets.
PoliSci 2 Comparative Politics with Chibber.
EE192 Mechatronics Fearing. My engineering project class. I lived in the lab.
CS61C Dan Garcia. Dan was on crack most of the time. That’s the only explanation.
The Misses
Rhet 10 Good reading, good lectures, multiple choice tests that I finished in 10 minutes. Only easy A I ever got.
Rhet 103A Cohen I sooo wanted to take this but a shitty prof and a shitty GSI convinced me to drop.
EE40 weak prof, great course.
EE117 extremely nice prof who couldn’t lecture. Hostile GSI. Drop.
Math 54. Ming Gu. Kinda useless prof but a beautiful course (I ended up taking someone else).
Advisor
I only met my useless adviser twice. He was playing Worlds of Warcraft and didn’t want to be bothered.
My real adviser was Professor Fearing who I also took for EE 192 Mechatronics, the car class. I was on campus a week ago visiting a buddy in Cory Hall. Suddenly someone said my name. It was Professor Fearing. I about melted. It was such an honor to be remembered by him.
Stanfurd Delendum Est.
Classics 10B Intro to Roman Civilization Trevor Murphy. Best Class I Took at Cal.
Trevor Murphy was awesome. I loved that class.
I was a little disappointed during the meltdown of 2007 that Coach Tedford didn’t employ decimation.
It worked for the Romans.
Stanfurd Delendum Est.
He’s a decent teacher I’ll agree but I didn’t like him as a person. He always seemed a little too pompous. Case in point: he sits in a damn throne-like chair in his office!
In other words, Go Bears!
Isn’t Harvey a Marxist?
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 29, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I remember his teachings
Were akin to what Marxism was supposed to be like in a classroom. Or something.
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 29, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Mark Griffith is insanely awesome!
Any chance you get to take one his classes, you take it. I had him for 10A (awesome) and then for an upper-div theatre/classics course. He truly enjoys teaching, his classes are fun, he’s got that dry British sense of humor, he’s brilliant, you’ll learn a ton. He’s very approachable, and if you get to talk to him long enough, you’ll find out he’s a huge A’s fan. Took me by surprise, him being from England and all, but talking A’s baseball with Griffith is awesome, he knows his stuff.
One of the things that was nice about being a TDPS* major is that you get to spend more time with your profs because it’s such a small major. Plus, it’s just a more informal setting (calling profs by their first name, etc.) – just the nature of performing arts, I think. But yeah, you get to spend a bit more down time with them, so get to know them better – whereas when I was a chem major, I never actually spoke to any profs outside of office hours. All this to say that Griffith is a cool guy on top of being a great teacher.
*Theater, Dance and Performance Studies
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
I have a hard time remembering Professor Griffith. Was it Professor Griffith or was it Michael Palin? I kind of mix the two up. In addition to having a great prof, I had a hot GSI for 10A and that always helps. So I had absolutely no trouble going to lecture or discussion. I smoked the paper and Professor Griffith graded it personally. And he quoted it in class. Yeah, I had a freaky ass big head for weeks after that.
If I hadn’t fooled around in Rhetoric, I probably could have pulled out a minor in Classics. But I spread myself too thin. Rhetoric had some great and some not so great teachers. Critical Theory. Meh. On the other hand, Classics had a murderers row of awesome profs (as did Cory Hall). I’m still in awe.
Stanfurd Delendum Est.
Man, it was so long, I cant remember any of their names and barely any of their mannerisms.
I was a Spring Admit back in 2000 and so I did Extension in 99. My philsophy teacher had a thing where he hated it if people were late. And, if so, hed immediately stop everything once they entered and wait until they were seated. It was hilarious in a painfully awkward sort of way.
I taught a DeCal class. I know there is at least one reader here who took it. Hopefully, they remember good things about that.
I am the Tyrant Boy King Of UC Eugene! An endless cavalcade of worthless inanities is my currency!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
wow…really? I’ve found you remember the important major classes you took, but the minor or GE stuff were rather easy to forget.
Heaps and Hinder...come on down!
The two best lecturers I had were Gary Black for Arch 150 (intro to structures), he had a great sense of giving students just the right amount of information in a lecture to absorb, without overloading them or short-changing the subject matter. The other was Ananya Roy (both ED 100 the far better course and CP 115), I’m not a part of her cult following, but she does deliver a good lecture.
I can’t remember the professor’s name, but he was an old dude from the city and regional planning department. The dude would just rant about current events for an hour and a half every lecture, and he would talk about the same current events every lecture. Therefore the entire course could have been summed up in a 2 hour lecture. He also took attendance everyday, and he was a preacher rather than a teacher. Also, he didn’t actually have class assignments, instead he wanted us to do 2 days of community service. WTF!?!?! I’m not going into debt with student loans to receive a 2 hour lecture and perform community service, it was a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME! I learned nothing. He is the reason teacher tenure can be a bad thing.
We all dream of being a child again, even the worst of us, the worst... perhaps... most of all.
Favorites:
Kinch Hoekstra, PS112B (History of European Political Theory)
This class was great in part because of the reading we got to do: Erasmus, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. It was also great because Hoekstra is incredibly knowledgeable (Dude speaks 4 or 5 languages), but he didn’t really lecture in a way I was expecting; he basically led the class like a big discussion section, guiding us through the major topics and concepts from each thinker. I learned an incredible amount in this class, despite the fact that it was being taught by a new professor.
Thomas Dandalet, History C157 (Renaissance and Reformation)
I loved the topic and the reading for this class, and professor Dandalet is the most amazing lecturer I have ever had. He brings powerpoint slides of the important art from the period, but he never uses notes or anything. He just stands up and lectures for an hour, in a way that is extremely easy to follow and take notes on. He is so thorough on everything he covers that there are virtually never questions. He just answers them before anyone asks. Again, a great class that I learned a lot from.
Least Favorite:
PS3- This is the statistics/polysci class that all polysci majors have to take, and it just sucks. I don’t think it matters who is teaching it, I have met very few people with good things to say about it. Most of us got into political science because we wanted to avoid math, not have more of it.
Alright, fine, I admit it! "Hydration Technician" really DOES just mean "water boy!"
I suppose I’m the rare Econ/Poli Sci major who likes econometrics, but I didn’t hate PS3 at all. I didn’t actually learn anything from it because I’d already taken econometrics and statistics by the time I took it, but it didn’t bother me.
Still holding out hope that Ryan Anderson will capitulate and grant him that interview he's been asking for for months now.
by yellow fever on May 29, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I liked the unit on opinion polls in PS3 but that course is on my least favorite list too. My professor was seriously boring and the discussion sections consisted of the increasingly frustrated GSI trying to explain the same basic statistics concepts to math-avoiding Polisci students, over and over, all semester long.
I loved Alex Filippenko for Astronomy (10, I think, although I took a 2nd course w/him). I ate that stuff up and competed to win the trip to Lick Observatory (I won and went even though I had a fever that night — but dangit I was looking through the world’s 2nd largest optical telescope!!).
Alan Dundes for Folklore (maybe it was in Sociology or something). Fun lectures.
Stephen Booth for an English seminar on poetry asthetics. Tough but changed the way I thought. I wrote a 5 pager on the first couple lines of “Little Boy Blue” and he thought it was great (albeit too wordy!).
Driver of the Cal Um Bus
The best professor I had at Cal was Klein for California History. 127AC I think?
He was a really enthusiastic person, and lectured very well. I took the class to satisfy the AC requirement, but was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the class.
Another prof. I enjoyed was Neu for math (multivariable calc). He’s not necessarily a great teacher, but his insanity was fun to watch.
My AC class was something like Rhetoric of Gangster Literature. We The Godfather, Bodega Dreams (a rewrite of Gatsby set in Spanish Harlem), Trick Baby (crap), Monster (worse crap). It was Summer Session and we also watched The Sopranos, Godfather I+II and Scarface with Pacino.
The lecturer sucked but the reading was awesome.
Stanfurd Delendum Est.
I had Klien too!
127AC it was! He was a pretty damn good professor and it helped that the papers were easy as hell
In other words, Go Bears!
I tend to forget the bad profs.
My favs were Ellman for chem 3b, Chang for chem 103, and Saykally for 4b. In Saykally’s class we blew up, in sequence, a nitrogen balloon, hydrogen balloon, and acetylene balloon. The acetylene balloon went off randomly in class due to static electricity and scared the shit out of everyone. On top of that we did a thermite reaction with a donut that the lab assistant couldn’t let go of, so it reacted too long and blew up the vessel it was in.
We weren’t allowed to do any more demos after that.
CGB: Our points are reliable. Our logic is infallible. Our past records are illogical. And our ham is dynamite!
I like Ellman and Chang. Did you know that Bertozzi and Keasling came out of the closet recently at a major conference? They are definitely being major pioneers and are putting their sexual orientation above their careers.
Heathcock is The Man, but he’s been retired for a few years.
I can’t believe they did an acetylene balloon. There’s a line with explosive balloons and that’s right up there with “should we be doing this…ahh fuck it.”
Heaps and Hinder...come on down!
Yeah I knew about Keasling (he’s a major adviser for the company I work for) but not Bertozzi…crazy.
CGB: Our points are reliable. Our logic is infallible. Our past records are illogical. And our ham is dynamite!
by Spazzy Mcgee on May 29, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Heathcock is the man?
I had him for 112B – I was not a huge fan. Maybe it was because he hadn’t taught the class in a while and had it thrust on him unexpectedly, but he was rough, man. I mean, I’ve had way worse profs, but dude was old-school tough.
First lecture quiz – average is 3/10. Second lecture quiz – average is 4/10. After the second one, he goes medieval on the class. “I lower my standards for you people, and this is what you give me?” Yipes. Someone was worried about the bright future chemists of tomorrow :-p
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
yeah, not sure how hew was a teacher, but as a researcher he hasn’t been matched…and that’s what pays the bills at research universities.
Nobel laureate EJ Corey was rumored to be a horrible teacher despite being one of the finest chemists and an author of a seminal textbook.
Heaps and Hinder...come on down!
Yeah, I was only talking about his teaching, not his career. I’ve heard awesome things about his career, and I’m sure he’s a nice man, just rusty on the teaching part. And being taught by the guy whose name is on the textbook is interesting too.
It’s a shame there isn’t more space or money for those who just want to teach. Back in the late 90’s, there were lecturers in the Physics department – Dr. Andy Elby and Dr. Bruce Birkett – who were the two most brilliant science teachers I’ve ever had. Young, energetic, and absolutely unparalled in creating lesson plans and exercises that made physics make sense. I didn’t know anyone they taught who didn’t rave about them. Elby’s book supplemental workbook, “The Portable TA”, is still offered for people taking the 7 series, I believe. Also just found out Elby and Birkett recently published a physics textbook. I have no doubt it should become the standard – this is how affective they are.
Cal being a research university, of course, lecturers have a shorter and shorter shelf life around here, so neither of them have been at Cal for several years. A real loss for the students at Cal, in my opinion.
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
it is, and these comments highlight the importance of “research” vs “teaching” universities. The former typically come with the most praise since it’s relatively easy to quantify research efforts by publications, national awards, impact factor of publications, grants, and grant money. But this has nothing to do with how well your professor will actually teach. It’s also impossible to quantify, “Jeez, she’s a really good teacher?” In our example, Heathcock was considered untouchable as a prof becuase of his research career. He may even have been mailing it in so that he could get out of his teaching responsibilities and concentrate on research.
My former graduate student friend is now a professor at Cal Poly where her department actually oversees curriculum and lecture development. Without the word of mouth “Cal Poly has really great teachers” motto, they don’t have teaching or research at their university. Her reward? A sub-$50,000 salary.
You have to have a teaching certificate to teach K-12. All you need is a Ph.D. to teach in college…in some cases, only a masters. To earn a Ph.D. or masters the teaching requirement is fairly minimal and pointless. When I TA’d, overseeing the Ochem lab experiments that had been repeated 6 × 10^23 times was the equivalent of babysitting.
Heaps and Hinder...come on down!
I love Avogadro. It's high in fat, but so tasty!
Moley-moley-moley-mole. Mole.
I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.
i had ellman for 112A
liked him a lot. as an advisor though ive heard less favorable things (several members of my research group are joint ellman students). desk clearing tantrums and point-blank “fuck you”s apparently are somewhat commonplace with him.
I am Ted Miller
Favorite Classes
MCB 62 – Drugs And The Brain w/ David Presti – Fantastic class, although it did make me want to try a lot of the drugs we were studying.
Music 128R – The History of Jazz – Every day I would go to lecture and listen to jazz, all of it good. Then some discussion. At the end I had to write one paper, but it was no big deal. Super-fun.
Philosophy 132 – The Philosophy Of Mind w/ John Searle – Really, really interesting stuff. I wasn’t even enrolled in this class (didn’t want to pay the summer registration fees), but I went to every lecture, and even took the final for fun.
CS61A – The Structure And Interpretation Of Computer Programs w/ Brian Harvey. I really like Scheme. That makes me weird, doesn’t it?
EECS150 – Components And Design Techniques For Digital Systems. I was really surprised how interesting I found this class. I spent more lab time on this class than any other, and really liked it.
CS169 – Software Engineering. In my last semester, I finally got to do a big, big project from start to finish. I led a team of 6 writing a blackjack card counter piece of software.
English102(?) – The History Of The English Language. I find this kind of stuff fascinating.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Yes you are weird for liking Scheme :p
I took 169 last semester and it was a nice class but my group was a bit dysfunctional. Still got a A though :p. Who’d you take the class with? I took it with Brewer.
In other words, Go Bears!
Oh I toads forget my fav class. The jazz theory course with Dana Christy or Christy Dana, whatever her name is. Wed just get together and jam. The tests were weird, because shed play a scale on the piano and we had to name it. That was an interesting thing, definitely.
I am the Tyrant Boy King Of UC Eugene! An endless cavalcade of worthless inanities is my currency!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
And a couple notable duds
Math 53 – I hated this class, and I never used anything I learned here, even in other classes. My lowest grade at Cal.
Math 55 – Liked the subject, actually, but I couldn’t understand what the professor (don’t remember his name) was saying. Stopped going to lecture after the first midterm.
CS188 – Artificial Intelligence. The most disappointing class I took at Cal. I thought this would be interesting, but it really, really wasn’t.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Then I can assume you’ve read Gödel, Escher, Bach. That’s what I wanted CS188 to be. It wasn’t.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Yes I've read that
188 is not like that so I can see why you’re disappointed. I took it with Malik (the CS Dean a few years back) and while it was really math-focused it was a great class. Otherwise Klien teaches it and he has some damn interesting projects
In other words, Go Bears!
I don't think I had either of them
but that was, like, 7 years ago.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
Professors I loved:
Richard Walker (Geography of California and Economic Geography). He was hilarious and engaging and definitely changed how I saw the world. I knew nothing about California history, and his class convinced me to major in geography.
Gillian Hart: A South African expatriate who was the master of development studies and perhaps the most challenging teacher I had. She absolutely refused to ever simplify any discussion because that’s how the real world is – complicated and interrelated. I learned the most in her classes and still felt like I only got a very small percentage of the understanding she could have imparted on me.
Professors I did not like:
Whichever ‘professor’ that taught me Calc 1A in the extension program. I already had made a huge mistake taking the class, but I knew I could do calc with a good professor. He was not a good professor, and I nearly flunked.
The #1 greatest threat to America: BEARS
MCB 61 – Brain, Mind, and Behavior, David Presti — we wrote haikus as an assignment! Mine was chosen and printed on the final.
MCB 62 – Drugs And The Brain w/ David Presti (he’s just awesome)
History 127 — History of California — Kerwin Klein — this was just a really interesting class, we learned about the city water sources, the history of hollywood, how Disneyland and Yosemite are the same, and it was generally great except for his love of Los Angeles :)
Social Cognition with John Kihlstrom. Really cool, if you dig that.
My winning haiku:
O wonderous brain,
So squishy and strange,
I want to poke you
Honk if you think Rags is great!
I’ve also heard great things about Ananya Roy, in the department of City and Regional Planning.
Honk if you think Rags is great!
My wife took a class from the econ prof who is like Obamas main woman now on the econ stuff. I wonder if she liked it.
I am the Tyrant Boy King Of UC Eugene! An endless cavalcade of worthless inanities is my currency!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
Are you and your wife not allowed to ask each other questions?
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 29, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions
No, Im pretty sure she told me her thoughts on it. I just wasnt paying attention or, in the alternative, I paid attention long enough to make it look like I was paying attention and then promptly forgot. Im leaning towards the latter.
I am the Tyrant Boy King Of UC Eugene! An endless cavalcade of worthless inanities is my currency!
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
My least favorite is easy
Sociology something-or-other with Dr. Harry Edwards. The highlight was when he brought Harris Barton in to talk about what it’s really like to be a football player. Other than that, every lecture was about the systematic enslavement of blacks in America (even today) and the fact that Edwards was the greatest man to ever walk this earth.
I think my favorite was probably whatever class I took where I learned linear programming. Dr. Godwin Wong – maybe not the absolute best professor, but fun to learn from and really cared if you learned. He also taught a database development class in which a classmate of mine wrote a system to buy and sell used textbooks via a bulletin board system… damnit if in 1990 we hadn’t friggin’ invented eBay / Half.com.
How can you not love a team that does this?
ah, linear programming, what kid doesn’t grow up to dream of that!?
Honk if you think Rags is great!
I know - I can't believe how much I loved it!!
A true geek at heart…
How can you not love a team that does this?
My Favorites
Forms of Folklore with Alan Dundes. Dundes was the best public speaker out of all the professors I’ve ever had. Really an extraordinary storyteller.
Sex, Reproduction and the Law with Joan Hollinger. This is one of the few topics that I have continued to follow after the class ended.
Museum Studies with Rosemary Joyce. My favorite of the three courses I took from her. It was fun visiting the museums and the discussions were thought-provoking.
RIP
I don’t know him, but did anyone take a course with Takaki? Seems well-loved by Cal alum.
Bork bork bork!
by Avinash Kunnath on May 30, 2009 4:32 PM PDT reply actions
I thought Ron Takaki
was a UCLA prof? Weird. I had no idea he was at Cal . .. and I read Strangers from a Different Shore in Asian Am Scam (er. . .Asian American Studies 10) as well as Iron Cages and A Different Mirror later in life.
Easy choice for me
Ananya Roy. I had the unfortunate mistake of taking her course my first year, because everything after that paled in comparison (and sort of made my academic experience anti-climatic). She embodies everything that a professor should be: is truly there for the students, caring, great researcher, a mentor, dedicated, understanding, has legitimate concern for the future of the world, lives by her action and not simply her word. I took Environmental Design 100: The City, Theories and Methods of Urban Studies with her spring 2006. Every single lecture was captivating, challenging. Every single lecture received a loud ovation. Perhaps her greatest quality is the art of inspiration. She made everyone around her better.
She was the faculty sponsor of this kid who established diabetes micro-clinics in the West Bank as a student: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/students/2005/palestine/palestine_about.shtml
She was one of those who offered a recommendation to the winner of this year’s University Medal: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/05/12_medalist.shtml
And note that both these individuals are undergraduates: I thought professors at Cal only cared for grad students!
BTW: royrules22, where did you hear that she was leaving? I wonder if there’s such a thing as putting a “franchise tag” on a professor, because she’s a tremendous asset to the university. (She also started the Urban Studies major, the first new department at Cal in over three decades, and is prominent in the newly-formed Global Poverty & Practices minor, one of the fastest growing minors in the university.)
Incidentally, me least favorite professor is Roy’s mentor, Nezar Al-Sayyad. Oh boy, got to channel some Simon Cowell: annoying, self-indulgent, rude, authoritative, arrogant, and pretty much a bonafide prick. In a dimly-lit lecture class of 150 students, he takes attendance every class (your grade is actually 1/3 attendance!), but if you come in late, he literally (not kidding) stops the class, calls you out, and will not continue lecture until you leave. He believes that coming into lecture late is an affront to him, and he even acknowledge as much. Loves his graduate students (his legacy of all legacies), hates undergraduates.
GSIs.
Best: Stefan Al. Cool, understated but intelligent, would rather have beer than teach his discussion. Even before he came to Cal for his ph.d in Architecture/Urban Studies, he had a hand in designing what will briefly become the tallest skyscraper in the world in China. Since then, he is now the lead student designer for a brand new, revolutionarly town called the “nanocity” in India. Even though I never really talked to him outside of class, he always says “hi” to me whenever we pass one another in Wurster.
Hottest: Sylvia Nam.
Worst: Justin Underhill. White guy from the ‘hood who’s become an understudy for old-money New Englander Professor Margaretta Lovell, who spends her time researching Newport, RI 18th century cabinetry and silver. Lethal combination.




















































