Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

The Tales of Two Losses: Pac-10 Tournaments Recap

Postgame interviews can be found here.

5ec78e92-3394-4b9f-9fce-2e9122dbcb78_medium

via a.espncdn.com

We've all had our say about what went down at the end of the women's semifinal, whether it was wrong or stupid, or incompetent or criminal. If you want the official NCAA rule, you can look at it here.

In any period, when the game clock displays 10ths of seconds and play is to be resumed by a throw-in or a free throw when 3/10 (.3) of a second or less remains on the game clock, a player may not gain possession of the ball and try for a field goal. Such player can only score a field goal by means of a tap of the pass or of a missed free throw.

 

Now you can argue that it's a stupid rule, that the Trojan coach lobbied and berated and influenced the refs,  and that USC should be punished for putting a freaking guard on Ashley Walker so that the ball could be perfectly lobbed to her. However, that was the rule at the time, and they chose to interpret it as such. We can't control that.

Nevertheless, it's best it happened here and not a week later, and thus suffering a repeat of last season's fate. And it gives Coach Boyle and her team a chance to look inwards and figure out why it needed to come down to the final play in the first place.

For one, despite the final outcome, Cal did not play very well, again. The Bears ran a very methodical halfcourt set for much of the game, yet USC sent three, four bodies in the paint to body up Devanei Hampton and Walker (do illegal defenses get called in college?) and dared Cal to shoot from the outside. Which they did. With limited success (probably less than 20% of their points came from the outside). 

But the real lapses were on defense. Several times in the second half Cal would score and USC would cherry pick for a wide open 3 a few seconds later. USC didn't have their center, so they played small ball, ran all over the half court, forced Cal's larger but slower defenders to keep on rotating to keep up with the change of pace. For the first thirty minutes, they had limited success.

Eventually they found plenty of easy shots either in the paint or uncontested from outside. These not only widened the margin but tired out the Bears more.  They eventually had to go to a zone using the bigger lineup they had, leading to more wide open jumpers, drives and layups.

I was a little surprised Coach Boyle didn't try to incorporate a little small ball herself and put a smaller lineup on the floor for some period to not only keep up with the speedy USC guards, but also spread out the floor on defense. USC tried to shut down Walker and Hampton as much as they could--they still combined for 47 points and 28 rebounds, but it was a hard 47-28.

Notice that once the game sped up and Cal was able to get quick cuts into the lane or get crisp ball movement, the Bears fought their way back into the game. It made you wonder where the urgency was for most of the game, and where it's been for the past three weeks, where a once top 5 Cal team now will struggle to hold onto a 3/4 seed on Selection Monday.

I'm not going to get too critical of Joanne Boyle's coaching, but I get the sense that she didn't have a Plan B when Plan A was sputtering. She was set on the Bears winning on the shoulders of Walker and Hampton, and you have the feeling that this is going to be her blueprint going forward. What many Cal fans should be wondering going into the Big Dance is does she have the ability to adjust when Plan A fails?

Some brief thoughts about the men after the jump.

Star-divide

Just like the women, the Cal men came out sloppy, got outhustled and outworked. Obviously the Bears have been undermanned for most of the season, but to give up 23 offensive rebounds displayed the deficiences this team will face for the rest of the tourney. Their lack of presence inside forced the Bears to rely almost entirely on the perimeter, and when their jump shots didn't fall they got torched. It didn't hurt that they drew a talented USC team that punched its own ticket to the dance and might be the most dangerous team in the conference heading to the tourney.

So just like the women, the men had to grit and come back. And there was one huge positive that emerged out of the defeat: The player of the night, Jorge Guiterrez. 

Ba-85274246rm106_0499901963_medium

via imgs.sfgate.com

Without him we never tie that game. He's slowly emerging into a bona fide defender in the Bruce Bowen mold: scrappy, fearless, and someone that all opposing teams hate to deal with. It's always fun to have a player other teams hate. And we have plenty of more games to enjoy him.

Jerome Randle, Theo Robertson, and Patrick Christopher remain our nucleus going into the tournament of 64, and our success will ride heavily on their hot hands. The Bears will have to hope they can nail their jumpers and break down opposing zones with their driving capabilities, because the first team that stifles them will be sending them back to the Bay Area.

We do have an ace up our sleeve though: A wizard coach who's been here, and knows how to take his teams deep. Hopefully Monty can conjure up some March magic in our first trip back in years. We're going to need every bit of help we can get...starting with our draw.

(Just a note: Selection Sunday Open Thread coming about an hour before the show!)

So we have one team with a talented frontcourt, another team with a talented backcourt. Based on what you've seen from the two teams this year, who do you think will have the greater success going forward? And of course leave any of your own thoughts about the games, the teams, the players and the coaches.

 

Poll
Who will have more success in their tournament?
The Cal women
68 votes
The Cal men
17 votes

85 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If you're asking who's going deeper into the tournament, that's easy

but the question of “success” is a more nuanced one, since it implies some level of expected performance. Given that, I’m going with the men’s team. Hey, Montgomery hasn’t lost in the first round in forever, right?

I think a win in the first round, with the experience and exposure it will bring, is success for the men’s team. Actually, just making it is success to some extent, because the experience will be a big help for next season.

Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"

by PaulThomas on Mar 15, 2009 12:46 AM PDT reply actions  

You're right PaulThomas

What I was getting at is that success isn’t just absolute based on where each team finishes, but relative to the expectations placed on each squad. The Cal men will be underdogs perhaps as early as the first round, certainly by the second and beyond. The Cal women, on the other hand, would probably have to get to at least the Sweet 16, if not the Elite 8 to appease most of their fans.

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 15, 2009 1:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

And it is impossible to compare because the men’s game is a lot deeper talent wise and upsets are far more common.

by Tedfordisgod on Mar 15, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

The better question is: Based on the expectations of each team, who is more likely to meet them?

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 15, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is no illegal defense in college. You can play as much zone as you want, and keep big centers in the middle of the paint as long as you want on defense.

Yao Ming would’ve been a defensive monster in college.

by LeonPowe on Mar 15, 2009 2:07 AM PDT reply actions  

I’m confused. That video was a serious of highlight dunks slash blocks by shaq. Yet you are saying shaq didnt do much in the tourney during college?

TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Mar 15, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Shaq ever made it to the Sweet 16. Probably because they straight out zoned his teams up or put two three bodies on him.

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 15, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

That was just to evidence that if they could only play him straight up, he could have averaged 40 and 20. But they could stake out the center in the paint, double and triple team him with impunity.

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 15, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the clarification. And you are saying that similar things are happening with Ashley Walker?

TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Mar 15, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Both Walker and Hampton get clogged by bodies in the paint. Last night USC put three or four inside and they had to take a bunch of shots in traffic, sometimes turning the ball over, sometimes missing the basket entirely. If our perimeter shooting doesn’t get going we could be in big trouble.

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 15, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Man, weird to remember when Shaq was super athletic. Too bad he couldn’t stay that size his whole career.

by Tedfordisgod on Mar 15, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

There’s some goaltending there.

by CaliforniaCMB on Mar 15, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

The team of my youth was Shaq’s Magic. He was a 7 foot monster. Who couldn’t make his damned free throws.

If he had even put effort into that part of his game, he’d have been the most dominant NBA player ever.

by Avinash Kunnath on Mar 16, 2009 1:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar700_small
DBD 2.1.12: Memorial Stadium=Happiness
Avatar700_small
DBD 1.28.12: Pac-12 Streets

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

More great SB Nation Blogs

Pac-12 On SBN

Pacific Takes (Pac-12)

Pacifictakes-165x74_medium

NORTH

AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)

UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)

CougCenter: (Washington State)

BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)

Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)

CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)

 

SOUTH

BruinsNation: (UCLA)

ConquestChronicles: (USC)

HouseOfSparky: (ASU)

Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)

TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)

Block U: (Utah)


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

Cstcst3644_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Avinash4_small Avinash Kunnath

Jahvidtician

Bear__small norcalnick

Monty_in_cal_gear_small Ohio Bear

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Ajoceywcalhatpic_small Kodiak

Mbc_small ManBearCal

Members Of The Follettariat

Sofele20squarecal_stanford2011_small solarise

Rugby_split_small RugbyVet

The Hit Squad

1129748640_small LeonPowe

Atom_small atomsareenough

Basketball_desktop_small CALumbus Bear

Humpty_dance_1_small Cugel