Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

(Another) Complete College Football Reorganization Idea

Last week, ragnarok posted an article detailing a plan for a complete restructuring of college football, reorganizing the current 120 Division 1-A teams into 10 conferences of 12 teams each. While it was a good plan, there were some basic objections that I had, such as:

1) The inclusion of non-BCS D-1A teams that never draw big crowds, and never contend for conference championships or at-large BCS bids doesn't make sense to me. Schools such as San Diego State and Idaho seem to serve as nothing more than easy wins for big time programs and even their WAC counterparts. The odds are that they won't ever contend for a championship, and schools that consistently draw crowds in the 15-20,000 range aren't really going to be able to compete with big-time programs.

2) In my opinion and in the opinion of the majority of the country, any new system implemented in college football needs to be based around a playoff. 12-team conferences aren't playoff friendly at all, because a 12 team conference needs two 6-team divisions, meaning that not all of the teams in the conference will play each other over the course of any given season. This means that a conference championship game at the end of the year would be necessary to determine which team represents that conference in the playoffs- which would push back the start of the college football playoffs a week, into the holidays, into finals, and possibly even into the NFL playoffs. 10 team conferences make it very clear who the champion is and allow every team to play every team, while leaving room for 3 OOC games. 

3) 10 divisions doesn't really fit well into a playoff system. You would need to have six teams that receive a bye into the 2nd round and have a 4 team first round. In short, the playoffs would be the length of a 16-team playoff (4 weeks) even though there would only be 10 teams involved. 

So, with these issues in mind, I designed an 80 team, 8 conference system that allows for each conference to send 1 representative to the NCAA playoffs (or 2, if the NCAA decides to go with a 16-team playoff system). The conference layout is as follows:

Here's a list of each conference and each team within it:

 

Pacific Coast Conference

 

  1. California
  2. Stanford
  3. Hawaii
  4. Fresno St.
  5. Oregon
  6. Oregon State
  7. Washington
  8. Washington St.
  9. USC
  10. UCLA

The PCC, the blue conference on the far left, is basically the Pac-10 minus the Arizona schools. It preserves the regional rivalries currently present in the Pac-10, and adds two WAC teams in Hawaii and Fresno St., which already is somewhat of a rivalry. Besides, I wouldn't exactly mind going to Honolulu every other year. 

Western Conference

  1. Boise St.
  2. Utah
  3. BYU
  4. Nevada
  5. UNLV
  6. Arizona
  7. Arizona St.
  8. New Mexico
  9. Colorado
  10. Colorado St.

 

 

This conference is a mix of the best of the MWC, WAC, and some middle-of-the-pack Big XII and Pac-10 teams (it's the red conference on the above map). I chose to add UNLV and Nevada instead of San Jose and San Diego State because 1) They draw better crowds, 2) It's already a pretty heated rivalry, and 3) I think 7 teams in California is a little much and doesn't really represent the number of high-caliber teams there are in the state. 

Midwestern Conference

 

  1. Nebraska
  2. Kansas
  3. Kansas St.
  4. Missouri
  5. Illinois
  6. Northwestern
  7. Iowa
  8. Iowa St.
  9. Wisconsin
  10. Minnesota

The Midwestern Conference, the light green conference on the map, is a blend of 5 Big 10 teams and 5 Big XII teams. The conference unites Iowa and Iowa St., keeps the Kansas-KSU and Kansas-Mizzou rivalries intact, and well as the Illinois-Northwestern and Wisconsin-Minnesota rivalries from the Big 10. All 10 teams a very close to each other as well, which is weird because I don't exactly think of Kansas and Wisconsin being close to each other. All of the distances are pretty much driveable, which should improve attendance throughout the conference.

Gulf Coast Conference

 

  1. Texas
  2. Texas Tech
  3. Texas A&M
  4. Baylor
  5. TCU
  6. SMU
  7. UTEP
  8. Oklahoma
  9. Oklahoma St.
  10. Louisiana St.

This conference is a powerhouse, plain and simple. There are at least 3 perennial national championship contenders in here (LSU, Texas, Oklahoma). The GCC is basically the best of the Big XII + some other teams in Texas + LSU. Granted, LSU is a little removed from the rest of the conference, but I couldn't really find another place for them to go. Also, I tried to keep LSU out of the Deep South Conference (coming up next) just to avoid having one conference totally stacked with teams that always seem to be in the top 15. 

Deep South Conference

 

  1. Arkansas
  2. Mississippi
  3. Mississippi St.
  4. Alabama
  5. Auburn
  6. Florida St.
  7. Tennessee
  8. Vanderbilt
  9. Kentucky
  10. Memphis

OK, OK, I realize that this is basically the SEC. However, 3 of the best SEC teams (in Georgia, Florida, and LSU) are gone, which I hoped would level out the playing field for the rest of the conferences. However, any conference with Mississippi, Auburn, Alabama, Florida St., and Tennessee in it isn't exactly going to be weak. It preserves most SEC rivalries (I had to break up Bama-Florida for the same reason as I removed LSU from the conference). Considering that there's only one playoff berth per conference, it didn't seem fair to have UGa, Florida, Bama, Tennessee, and LSU battle it out for one spot when 3 of those teams probably deserve a bid in any given year. 

Southeastern Conference

 

 

  1. Florida
  2. South Florida
  3. Miami
  4. Georgia
  5. Georgia Tech
  6. South Carolina
  7. Clemson
  8. Duke
  9. East Carolina
  10. Wake Forest

This SEC is even more southeastern than the current SEC, and is a combination of ACC and SEC schools (plus one non-BCS school in ECU). I originally wanted to put North Carolina and NCSU in this conference, but it seemed that that would make the conference a little too strong considering that Florida, Clemson, and Georgia are already in it. So I switched in 2 other Carolina schools in Wake and ECU, hoping that those two would be a little less successful than the former. Duke and UNC will just have to schedule each other OOC, I guess. But Ga. Tech and UGa are in the same conference, so it kinda evens out.

Great Lakes Conference

 

  1. Michigan
  2. Michigan St.
  3. Ohio St.
  4. Cincinnati
  5. Indiana
  6. Purdue
  7. Notre Dame
  8. Pittsburgh
  9. Louisville
  10. Syracuse

Yay, ND finally joined a conference! And half of the Big East and the rest of the Big 10 come together to form the GLC. The Michigan-OSU and Michigan-MSU rivalries are kept intact, along with having all 3 Indiana schools finally in the same conference. Every single GLC city is probably within a 7-hour drive of the furthest one, so the geography pretty much works out perfectly. With the exception of Syracuse. The alternative to having Syracuse in the GLC was to switch in West Virginia from the Eastern Conference, but somehow I just felt that Michigan and WVU don't belong in the same conference. 

 

East Coast Conference

  1. Penn St.
  2. North Carolina
  3. North Carolina St.
  4. Maryland
  5. West Virginia
  6. Virginia
  7. Virginia Tech
  8. Boston College
  9. Connecticut
  10. Rutgers
The ECC is basically a collection of the untaken teams from the Big East, ACC, and Penn St. This conference is pretty powerful as well, but the locations of the teams in the Northeast doesn't really work out well. That's kind of unavoidable anyways since there aren't enough teams in the northeast to put together an entire conference, but I think that this particular arrangement of teams is about as close as it's gonna get. 
So, know that there are 8 conferences with 10 teams each, creating a playoff system is incredibly simple. At the end of the season, a rankings committee comes together to determine which of the 8 conference champions will be seeded #'s 1-8. 8 plays 1, 7 plays 2, and so on. The first round would be played at the home of the higher seed, and the second round could be played at a neutral site. The National Championship could be played at a different site every year, not even necessarily one of the current 4 in the rotation. And, if the NCAA ever decided to expand the playoffs to 16 teams, the top 2 teams from every conference could go to the playoffs, with the first 2 rounds being played at the home of the higher seed. 
And if worst comes to worst and the NCAA can't come up with a playoff system, well, the current BCS system would work just as well. Take the #1 and #2 teams from the rankings and put them in the national championship game, and send the other conference champions to BCS bowl just like today. 
Any thoughts? Ideas? Suggestions?

 


 

 

 

Star-divide

 

 

Poll
Which is a better conference layout?
120 teams total, 10 12-team conferences
0 votes
120 teams total, 12 10-team conferences
6 votes
96 teams total, 8 12-team conferences
2 votes
80 teams total, 8 10-team conferences
10 votes

18 votes | Poll has closed

The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.

Comment 23 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I like the rationale for dropping down to 80 teams and using 10 team conferences. I like the grouping of the schools too. Which schools were your fringe schools? Meaning which schools were you really debating whether to include them or not, and why did you include/exclude them?

I rec people.
www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by HydroTech on Feb 16, 2009 8:31 PM PST reply actions  

Well, to name a few that didn’t make it: Tulsa, Central Florida, New Mexico St., Rice, Marshall, and Buffalo I just couldn’t find a way to fit Tulsa into a conference, try as I did. I didn’t cut any current BCS teams, but if I had, they would have been along the lines of Baylor, Syracuse, UConn, and Duke. The main reason for a team being included or not included was geography. I wanted to include Central Florida but I couldn’t. Same with New Mexico St. and Marshall.

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 16, 2009 10:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Greg Robinson was only at Syracuse for 4 years...

… don’t consign the Orange to the dregs of college football based on the GRob era. I mean, it’s not too long ago that Donovan McNabb and Marvin Harrison were playing on top-15 Syracuse teams.

by drothgery on Feb 19, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I’d switch Arkansas and LSU. Arkansas was originally part of the SWC with the Texas schools, so they have the least congruence with the SEC and are the easiest to excise. LSU has too many rivalries in the SEC to keep them out. And for all the hating West Coast people give it, I like the SEC for the most part as is, so I’d switch Florida and Georgia with Memphis and Florida State.

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 9:07 PM PST reply actions  

The thing is, I specifically switched out LSU, Georgia, and Florida from the “ex-SEC” conference so that all conferences were equal. One thing that bothers me about the BCS system is that the Big XII had 3 teams that were better than the best team in the Big 10, yet 2 schools from each conference got a BCS bid. I wanted to make it so that if a high-caliber team didn’t get included in the playoffs, that high caliber team wasn’t any better than any of the teams that did make the playoffs. This year, Va. Tech played Cincy in the Orange Bowl. Texas Tech, Oklahoma St., Ole Miss, and probably a few other teams that didn’t make the BCS would beat either of those teams by 20. That’s why I had to break up the SEC. Divide and conquer, kind of.

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 16, 2009 10:06 PM PST up reply actions  

they made a BCS bowl. Tech didn’t.

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 17, 2009 8:12 PM PST up reply actions  

so what? Cincy and Va Tech made BCS bowls too. TTech got trounced by an Ole Miss team that lost to Wake Forrest.

Tedford...if you're reading this...I'LL WORK FOR FREE! I'll fill out your Coach's Poll!

by carp on Feb 18, 2009 7:27 AM PST up reply actions  

What I’m saying is that neither Tech nor Cincy deserved a BCS bid when teams like TTU could beat them by 20 but still found themselves in a 2nd-tier bowl. That’s what this system is designed to avoid.

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 18, 2009 8:54 PM PST up reply actions  

actually, I don’t think any of those teams deserved to be a BCS bowl. Maybe that’s a smidge harsh, but the Big 12 proved to be a joke in the Bowl season.

I still don’t think Oregon is THAT good. But they beat up Okie St so they must be awesome.

Tedford...if you're reading this...I'LL WORK FOR FREE! I'll fill out your Coach's Poll!

by carp on Feb 19, 2009 7:49 AM PST up reply actions  

And so was Ohio State, for that matter

Yes, the Buckeyes lost to Texas, and Tech beat them, but I think home field may have mattered just a bit in Lubbock.

by drothgery on Feb 19, 2009 2:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I assumed this was designed with a playoff in mind

But this is really the whole problem; the southern bloc won’t agree to a conference realignment unless the core of the SEC is maintained. The rest of the conferences are fairly new, but I’d imagine strong resistance from the Big 10 (which gets halved) and the SEC.

by BearsNecessity on Feb 17, 2009 12:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Which one of the 11 teams in the big 10 has to be cut in half?

This is my last game, I don't care about my body.

by rollonubears on Feb 17, 2009 12:54 AM PST up reply actions  

One of the poll options should be:

‘Hell if I know which one’s better, but they’re all better than what we have now.’ Well done, and Rec’d for being interesting and well thought out.

by norcalnick on Feb 16, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions  

Upon further review

I think I’d put Air Force in the Western Conference ahead of UNLV, Nevada or New Mexico. I think they’ve generally been better, at least recently, plus military academies are cool. I would want Navy involved if possible, and I’d almost like to make an argument for Army, even though they clearly aren’t good enough.

by norcalnick on Feb 16, 2009 9:26 PM PST reply actions  

Well, I actually tried to stay away from Military Academies. I guess Air Force would be alright, but Army and Navy don’t deserve to be D-1A just the same way Ivy League schools don’t deserve to be D-1A. Besides, if I put one in, I kinda have to put the other two in, don’t I? Who would Army and Navy replace?

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 16, 2009 9:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I sorta worked something up like this myself, and I came up with much the same plan. This leads me to believe that either we’re both biased towards the same schools (possible), or we’re both really on to something.

As for the minor differences: I had Army and Navy instead of Connecticut and East Carolina. I also had Southern Miss instead of Memphis, and Tulsa instead of SMU. I also left out both Nevada and UNLV, opting for Air Force and Central Florida instead. UTEP slid West and there was some rearrangement on the East Coast. Minor, minor differences, though. I really like your plan.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 17, 2009 8:44 PM PST up reply actions  

First of all, thanks. Second, about East Carolina/UConn Vs. Army/Navy, ECU had an average attendance of 42,000 last year and spent several weeks in the top 25, not to mention the fact that they played in a bowl game. I think we’ve already talked about Connecticut. Average attendance just under 40000. As for army and navy, each averaged less than 35,000 people per game. Now, I understand that this isn’t all about attendance, but I just don’t see any way that Army and Navy can compete for a BCS game. Almost every team is at least remotely competitive. I don’t think there is a single team in the 80 teams above that I look at and say, “Wow, that team won’t make a BCS bowl in the next 50 years”. I don’t know whether or not I’m alone when I think that about Army and Navy.

The last time Army played (played!) a ranked team was in 2003! And the team they played was TCU, who was presently #19 in the AP poll. Army lost 27-0. In the last 6 season, Navy has played 3 top 25 teams. Their record is 1-2 against those teams.

In comparison, East Carolina played 2 ranked teams in 2008 alone. Both were in the top 17. ECU won both games. I can’t make a convincing argument for Connecticut, their SOS in the past 5 years has been terrible. However, I think I made my case against Army. And including army and not navy would be like demoting Stanfurd to 1-AA. The rivalry would suck.

I’m glad that our plans are basically the same, though.

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 17, 2009 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

nice fanpost…rec’d! Makes a lot of sense…but I’m not sure geography makes the most amount of sense for deciding who should be in the Top 80. Some schools are locks…others, like UTEP, etc. are not. Perhaps these schools – with a more defined IA league – will improve and be competitive.

Tedford...if you're reading this...I'LL WORK FOR FREE! I'll fill out your Coach's Poll!

by carp on Feb 17, 2009 11:43 AM PST reply actions  

No need to break up Pac 10 by removing Arizonas

And this is a non-starter for me as you don’t address the National Championship issue which is the driver of any and all discussions that people have about the subject.

  1. issue in discussing NCAA football: how to resolve the NC issue.

by concordtom on Feb 17, 2009 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

I bet you want a way that lets your Trojans win it every year, comptontom™.

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 17, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

jeez. why you hecklin' me, TB?

although, that IS kinda funny how you put the TM thing there…
But please. Don’t associate me with Compton, or the Trojans.
Didn’t you get my msg?

by concordtom on Feb 17, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

NO I GOT NO SUCH MESSAGE

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 17, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ and Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar700_small
DBD 2.1.12: Memorial Stadium=Happiness
Avatar700_small
DBD 1.28.12: Pac-12 Streets

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

More great SB Nation Blogs

Pac-12 On SBN

Pacific Takes (Pac-12)

Pacifictakes-165x74_medium

NORTH

AddictedToQuack: (Oregon)

UW Dawg Pound: (Washington)

CougCenter: (Washington State)

BuildingTheDam: (Oregon State)

Rule Of Tree: (Stanford)

CaliforniaGoldenBlogs: (Cal)

 

SOUTH

BruinsNation: (UCLA)

ConquestChronicles: (USC)

HouseOfSparky: (ASU)

Arizona Desert Swarm: (Arizona)

TheRalphieReport: (Colorado)

Block U: (Utah)


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

Cstcst3644_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Avinash4_small Avinash Kunnath

Jahvidtician

Bear__small norcalnick

Monty_in_cal_gear_small Ohio Bear

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Ajoceywcalhatpic_small Kodiak

Mbc_small ManBearCal

Members Of The Follettariat

Sofele20squarecal_stanford2011_small solarise

Rugby_split_small RugbyVet

The Hit Squad

1129748640_small LeonPowe

Atom_small atomsareenough

Basketball_desktop_small CALumbus Bear

Humpty_dance_1_small Cugel