California Golden Blogs: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

President's Day DBD: CGB Lawyers Unite!

On today, the holiest of holidays, we have another case to solve, this time to save the public image of a beloved son. Twist would like to speak on the matter (and he will later), but he's currently disposed on watching the final episode of the Hills.

1209757660_f_medium

via spd.fotologs.net

"I believe you have an excellent case!"

Here are all the details that have been released.

Buffalo Bills running back Marshawn Lynch was arrested on February 11 and charged with felony possession of a concealed firearm.  Lynch was released on $35,000 bond.  The case will be submitted to California's District Attorney's office for for "filing consideration".

The news has been known for about 36 hours at this point, but Mike Florio at Pro Football Talk has confirmed the story.

Lynch won't have to deal with mere firearm charges, either.  As a repeat offender of the NFL's personal conduct policy, it's unlikely that Lynch will receive a reprieve from league commissioner Roger Goodell.

 

 

 

...

Culver City police did not immediately return a phone message seeking information about why officers approached Lynch and his companions.

Lynch’s lawyer, M. Gerald Schwartzbach, said his client was not involved in a traffic incident. Schwartzbach said the player was in California to visit friends.

 

 

I also believe there was a report somewhere that the firearm was in the trunk, NFL Network?

This is the California Statute concerning concealment of weapon in vehicle.

 

§ 12025. Carrying weapon concealed within vehicle or on person; offense; arms in holster or sheath

(a) A person is guilty of carrying a concealed firearm when he or she does any of the following:

(1) Carries concealed within any vehicle which is under his or her control or direction any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.

(2) Carries concealed upon his or her person any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.

(3) Causes to be carried concealed within any vehicle in which he or she is an occupant any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.

(b) Carrying a concealed firearm in violation of this section is punishable, as follows:

(1) Where the person previously has been convicted of any felony, or of any crime made punishable by this chapter, as a felony.

(2) Where the firearm is stolen and the person knew or had reasonable cause to believe that it was stolen, as a felony.

(3) Where the person is an active participant in a criminal street gang, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 186.22, under the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 186.20) of Title 7 of Part 1), as a felony.

(4) Where the person is not in lawful possession of the firearm, as defined in this section, or the person is within a class of persons prohibited from possessing or acquiring a firearm pursuant to Section 12021 or 12021.1 of this code or Section 8100 or 8103 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, as a felony.

(5) Where the person has been convicted of a crime against a person or property, or of a narcotics or dangerous drug violation, by imprisonment in the state prison, or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine.

(6) By imprisonment in the state prison, or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment if both of the following conditions are met:

(A) Both the pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person and the unexpended ammunition capable of being discharged from that firearm are either in the immediate possession of the person or readily accessible to that person, or the pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person is loaded as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 12031.

(B) The person is not listed with the Department of Justice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision © of Section 11106, as the registered owner of that pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.

(7) In all cases other than those specified in paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine.

© A peace officer may arrest a person for a violation of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) if the peace officer has probable cause to believe that the person is not listed with the Department of Justice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision © of Section 11106 as the registered owner of the pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person, and one or more of the conditions in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) is met.

(d)(1) Every person convicted under this section who previously has been convicted of a misdemeanor offense enumerated in Section 12001.6 shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for at least three months and not exceeding six months, or, if granted probation, or if the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, it shall be a condition thereof that he or she be imprisoned in a county jail for at least three months.

(2) Every person convicted under this section who has previously been convicted of any felony, or of any crime made punishable by this chapter, if probation is granted, or if the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, it shall be a condition thereof that he or she be imprisoned in a county jail for not less than three months.

(e) The court shall apply the three-month minimum sentence as specified in subdivision (d), except in unusual cases where the interests of justice would best be served by granting probation or suspending the imposition or execution of sentence without the minimum imprisonment required in subdivision (d) or by granting probation or suspending the imposition or execution of sentence with conditions other than those set forth in subdivision (d), in which case, the court shall specify on the record and shall enter on the minutes the circumstances indicating that the interests of justice would best be served by that disposition.

(f) Firearms carried openly in belt holsters are not concealed within the meaning of this section.

(g) For purposes of this section, "lawful possession of the firearm" means that the person who has possession or custody of the firearm either lawfully owns the firearm or has the permission of the lawful owner or a person who otherwise has apparent authority to possess or have custody of the firearm. A person who takes a firearm without the permission of the lawful owner or without the permission of a person who has lawful custody of the firearm does not have lawful possession of the firearm.

(h)(1) The district attorney of each county shall submit annually a report on or before June 30, to the Attorney General consisting of profiles by race, age, gender, and ethnicity of any person charged with a felony or a misdemeanor under this section and any other offense charged in the same complaint, indictment, or information.

(2) The Attorney General shall submit annually, a report on or before December 31, to the Legislature compiling all of the reports submitted pursuant to paragraph (1).

(3) This subdivision shall remain operative until January 1, 2005, and as of that date shall be repealed.

Beast Mode, a fellow Bills fans, has already talked about it in detail, but for those with short attention spans, here are his preliminary thoughts.

Without question if that is the only reason they stopped the vehicle, the discovery of the firearm is going to be suppressed. Nothing there indicates a traffic violation, a warrant, etc. We also have no idea why the officers asked the men inside to step out of the vehicle. If they had a reason to stop the vehicle and in approaching the car they saw the firearm in plain view then fine. If they had a reason to stop the vehicle and when they approached they smelled marijuana, then they could perform a search. The key here is justifying the stop and justifying the search. I am also extremely unclear as to how they determined the firearm belonged to Marshawn. Presumably it was legally purchased and registered in his name. Barring that, unless there was some sort of confession, I have no clue how they determined it belong to him.

 

Laywers, please sort out this depressing case before we move on to the happier matter of Stanford chokejobs (men's basketball and Michelle Wie alike). After you've come to an amiable solution, go ahead and dump away.

Poll
Did Beast Mode get a fair shake?
Yeah; strike two for him, he needs to start cleaning up his act
6 votes
Hell no; the system was out to get him, no Applebees in Culver City!
17 votes
I'm going to wait until due process sorts itself out
15 votes
I'm just here to read TwistNHook's chick flick reviews
5 votes

43 votes | Poll has closed

The opinions expressed in a FanPost are, in every way, reflective of the opinions of every California Golden Blogs Marshawnthusiast. Moreover, they are reflective of every employee of SBNation, including Tyler "Blez" Bleszinski.

0 recs  |  Comment 61 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Do you work tomorrow, Bears Necessity?

TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Feb 15, 2009 9:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Do I work today?

by BearsNecessity on Feb 15, 2009 9:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you work on 2.16.09?

TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Feb 15, 2009 9:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is that today?

by BearsNecessity on Feb 15, 2009 9:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you even have a job? What do you do all day?

TYRANNICAL KING OF UC EUGENE! BRING ME THE HEAD OF SEATTLE QUACKER!

www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com

by TwistNHook on Feb 15, 2009 10:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s a really good question.

by BearsNecessity on Feb 15, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not a lawyer, but I was watching Matlock in the bar for the last 20 minutes. The sound was off, but I think I got the gist of it.

by LeonPowe on Feb 15, 2009 9:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It was the cop’s gun???

by BearsNecessity on Feb 15, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well your honor

Well, Your Honor. We’ve plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.

by LeonPowe on Feb 15, 2009 10:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Another boost for Men’s RPI. They’re up to 23rd now.

"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.

by Berkelium97 on Feb 15, 2009 10:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Instead of Saying Lawyers "Unite"

You should tell us to “engage” or “retain”. Those verbs get us much more excited. Or you could just say “free food” and we’ll get equally excited and grabby.

As to the substance of the issue, Beast Mode may have some good arguments that may defeat or mitigate the criminal charges, but I don’t think the NFL will care too much — it will be “did he have a gun illegally or not?” After Plaxicogate, I fear a suspension is in order to set an example to other players. Sigh. Bad things happening to good Beastmodes.

50% of Defacto Ohio Cal Alumni Club

by CALumbus Bear on Feb 16, 2009 9:25 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree. This is actually really serious. A felony, for carrying a concealed weapon?

The problem with criminal codes is that they vary from state to state. Marshawn probably had no idea it was illegal, but he shouldnt have been carrying a weapon anyways. I guess the streets of culver city are a lot meaner then Oakland.

Im all about the Syd Pro Quo

by Dmart on Feb 16, 2009 10:26 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Some National Exposure

Rivals put together a list of the 10 most explosive players in college football. Guess who was number one, with feature and all

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=912852

Thread Killer

by chowder on Feb 16, 2009 10:08 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Too many unanswered questions about Lynch

to give an opinion about what might happen.

Honestly, none of the articles about the story are very informative. I gather the following: Lynch and homies were in a car which was parked, not driving. Lynch and buddies were asked out of the car. The gun was in the trunk? The gun was found to be Lynch’s. That’s just not enough info to state whether or not I think the gun charge will be dismissed or not. There are too many unanswered questions.

Who’s car was it? Was there large amount of smoke coming out of the car? Was the search of the car consensual or not? If consensual, who gave permission for the search? The owner of the car or someone with authority? How did the cops find out the gun was Lynch’s? Is the gun licensed by Lynch (permit)? Did cops confiscate and then conduct a permit search or was there illegal communication with Lynch or friends (no Miranda warning)? Even if illegal communication led to knowledge of ownership, the cops probably inevitably discover ownership IF there’s a permit. So for me there are far too many unanswered questions.

But let me speculate: say Lynch and buddies were smoking up a fat one with large amounts of smoke in the car or coming out of the windows. Cop sees the smoke. That is reasonable suspicion to approach the car and probably even conduct a search for drugs within the car and on each person (depending on the judge). That is probably not enough to conduct a search of the trunk. So maybe someone gave permission to search the trunk, maybe not. If not, then Lynch has a fighting chance of suppressing the gun evidence. In any case, courts/judges in general have been very unreliable in protecting the rights of criminal defendants, especially in the post-9/11 era, regardless of whether its a Patriot Act case or not. Also, regardless of the outcome of the criminal case, Goodell may very well suspend Lynch or at least put him on probation. On a separate note, putting aside my disdain for cops and the criminal legal system, what the fuck was Lynch thinking? I know he’s young but he’s just stupid IF he was sitting there smoking a fat one in parked car on a public street. DUMB IF that’s what happened.

I got lost in cyberspace.

by oaktownmario on Feb 16, 2009 10:33 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn’t he have been hit with some sort of drug possession charge too if he was smoking? You would think the media would be all over it if he was getting high as well… I haven’t seen anything about drugs in any of the articles I read

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I woul think

I just saw something in a blog (the Bill’s blog) or article about him smoking up (maybe it was just a comment?) But that’s my problem with the reports. We have way too little info to know what was going on.

But maybe he wasn’t in possession of anything either, so no drug charge . . .

I got lost in cyberspace.

by oaktownmario on Feb 16, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But he could still be charged with misdemeanor under the influence of a controlled substance, which he was not charged with.

I had the same impulse as you, that the officers smelled something. But that is going to be really hard to justify if none of them are charged with being under the influence and no drugs are found.

An officer can approach anyone really and ask questions, but they cannot detain those individuals and search them without reasonable suspicion. If these guys voluntarily talked and voluntarily allowed them to search and voluntarily said the gun was Marshawn’s, then, fine. Is that likely? No.

As for Marshawn’s judgment, let’s what until all the facts come out. But, he needs to start understanding that he can’t put himself in these sort of situations anymore.

It'll be just you, me, and Peter Nincompoop.

by BeastMode on Feb 16, 2009 11:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

but do you know if smoking was an issue?

If there was a lot of smoke in the car or coming out the windows, a judge may find that was reasonable suspicion for a brief detention and asking of questions. And if in fact some or all the occupants were high then it’s possible that someone gave consent. Have u ever watched “Cops?” It’s amazing how many people give consent to search and then get caught with something when all they have to do is say “NO. I don’t give you permission to search my car.” But for whatever reason – fear, influence of drugs, lack of knowledge of rights – so many people consent to searches. It’s just fucking intimidating being questioned by a cop, especially on some dark LA street or wherever you happen to be.

But let’s find out what the hell happened first . . .

I got lost in cyberspace.

by oaktownmario on Feb 16, 2009 12:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I am not sure smoke is enough unless it smells to them that the smoke is from marijuana. And, if there is smoke emanating from marijuana, the controlled substance should be somewhere in the car.

As for consent, yeah, it’s amazing how many people consent to searches. They think if they consent, that shows their innocence and they gamble hoping the police won’t find anything. Stupid.

It'll be just you, me, and Peter Nincompoop.

by BeastMode on Feb 16, 2009 12:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

rec’d!

Go Bears!

by RollOnYouBears667 on Feb 16, 2009 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The actual link on EDSBS was disappointing

I just assumed they were making fun of Harbaugh’s obvious but failed dream of getting a head coaching job better than Stanford’s…which would pretty much be anything

by norcalnick on Feb 16, 2009 11:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why is Betty Boop speaking Italian...?

Just wondering.

I haven't seen that many tear-stained dollar bills since my dad hired a stripper for my uncle's funeral.

by BearStage on Feb 16, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

She, like me, gets Spanish and Italian confused?

by zoonews on Feb 16, 2009 5:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Judging by the lack of comments

I’m guessing few, if any, of our employers hate George Washington and America enough to make us come in on President’s Day.

"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.

by Berkelium97 on Feb 16, 2009 12:30 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I love days off

This is my last game, I don't care about my body.

by rollonubears on Feb 16, 2009 12:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Days off?

What the heck are days off?

I got lost in cyberspace.

by oaktownmario on Feb 16, 2009 12:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The University of Texas hates America. No Veteran’s Day, No President’s Day.

by Tedfordisgod on Feb 16, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Its ok Cal hates the university of Texas

Im all about the Syd Pro Quo

by Dmart on Feb 16, 2009 1:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thoroughbred

Can you look up Shawn Grant on rivals and tell me what it says? He goes to my school and hes an absolute monster. Doesn’t have a star rating but is getting recruited. I would appreciate it very much.

This is my last game, I don't care about my body.

by rollonubears on Feb 16, 2009 12:37 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

His profile:
http://norcalpreps.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?Sport=2&pr_key=82751

Colorado is the only major school giving him interest. It seems like he took official visits to Colorado and UCSB (which may be where he ends up). The site doesn’t go into much more detail than that.

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It says Davidson is recruiting him

If Stephen Curry stays for his senior year then I hope Grant goes there, because I’m sure Davidson would have one or two nationally televised games.

Thanks for looking.

This is my last game, I don't care about my body.

by rollonubears on Feb 16, 2009 1:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He is one of the cases where if he was 3 inches taller he would be highly sought after.

This is my last game, I don't care about my body.

by rollonubears on Feb 16, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

New Men’s BBall rankings. A sweep of the Oregon teams would likely have Cal back in the top-25. Like Cal, Arizona is on the verge of entering the top-25.

"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.

by Berkelium97 on Feb 16, 2009 12:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Cal up to a No. 6 seed in the latest Bracketology, facing San Diego State in Minneapolis.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 1:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

6 would be fantastic

getting out of the 7/10 and 8/9 game is huge.

Still, just talking about any NCAA bid is exciting.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Feb 16, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

11 seeds often populated by teams that got hot to end the season… Would you want to play ’Zona right now???

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 1:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you want to play Davidson and then UConn if you win?

We’ve lost to Pitt in Pittsburgh, Oklahoma in Oklahoma City, and would have lost to Texas in Dallas had we beaten NC State. I’ll take my chances in the 3/6 regional.

www.californiagoldenblogs.com

by CBKWit on Feb 16, 2009 1:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to play Davidson… but I’d REALLY like to get a 5 seed, which is reasonable at this point.

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 1:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Playing Duke as a 3 seed would get us some pub from the Kidd matchup though

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

God, polls are stupid

UCLA loses two extremely difficult road games, and they drop from #6 to #20?

(They were also #6 in the Pomeroy rankings before those two games, and dropped all the way to… #7.)

Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"

by PaulThomas on Feb 16, 2009 3:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the same thing happens with football polls, except that at this point in the season, we’ve had a much larger sample size than a football pollster ever gets, so the changes from week to week should be less dramatic.

basically, i don’t even pay attention to the basketball polls. they don’t seem interesting or useful in any way except as a programming guide for ESPN.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 3:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But just as in football, How will we know who is Good?

Im all about the Syd Pro Quo

by Dmart on Feb 16, 2009 3:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Vegas betting lines.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Other difference: Thank God, the basketball polls are meaningless

It becomes instantly obvious, when you look at how the polls work, that the people voting in them do not understand college basketball at all.

What’s really amazing is that this is true of college basketball coaches, too… it’s like, “Haven’t you figured out that it’s really difficult to win road games? Do you really think that a team losing two road games to good teams reflects that badly on them?”

Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"

by PaulThomas on Feb 16, 2009 6:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Holy crap: Jahvid Best feature!!!

LINK

Best is the definition of an explosive player. Yet, he doesn’t want the term “explosive player” to define him.

“You could take something negative from that,” he said. "Most of the time an explosive player makes big plays, but if he’s not making big, plays he’s not that productive. You have to make sure that if you’re labeled as an ‘explosive player,’ you’ll still be there on every down.

“I’m trying to become a complete player and just work on my all-around game. Obviously, hitting home runs and making big plays are my strong points. But getting yardage on every down is something I have trouble with sometimes. I want to be consistent the whole season.”

When he gets off the crutches, he wants to add strength and power. In some instances, getting the first down on third-and-1 can be more difficult than ripping off a 20-yard gain. He wants to prove he can be counted on to get the tough yards, too.

“I’m always expecting a big play,” Best said. “If the opportunity presents itself you have to be ready, so it’s in the back of my mind to be ready to make a big play. But sometimes the situation calls to just get the first down.”

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 2:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

BLOCKQUOTE FAIL
Best is the definition of an explosive player. Yet, he doesn’t want the term “explosive player” to define him.

“You could take something negative from that,” he said. "Most of the time an explosive player makes big plays, but if he’s not making big, plays he’s not that productive. You have to make sure that if you’re labeled as an ‘explosive player,’ you’ll still be there on every down.

“I’m trying to become a complete player and just work on my all-around game. Obviously, hitting home runs and making big plays are my strong points. But getting yardage on every down is something I have trouble with sometimes. I want to be consistent the whole season.”

When he gets off the crutches, he wants to add strength and power. In some instances, getting the first down on third-and-1 can be more difficult than ripping off a 20-yard gain. He wants to prove he can be counted on to get the tough yards, too.

“I’m always expecting a big play,” Best said. “If the opportunity presents itself you have to be ready, so it’s in the back of my mind to be ready to make a big play. But sometimes the situation calls to just get the first down.”

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This has been posted, noob.

I’m still mad at you for what you did to Marshawn.

You ain't got it like Marshawn got it

by Thoroughbred on Feb 16, 2009 2:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t pull him over and search his car!!!

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure.

It'll be just you, me, and Peter Nincompoop.

by BeastMode on Feb 16, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hey Avi, are you using IE?

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm, ok

i’m trying to get a handle on exactly what causes the blockquote bug, but i haven’t been able to reproduce it.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 3:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No worries. My blockquoute woes are half the DBD funny.

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me know if this doesn't make complete sense to you

You have to have a blank line of space between the last line of text and the beginning of the blockquote (basically, hit enter twice). For example:
pre-blockquote text
-blockquote-text text text

(new paragraph) text/-blockquote-

will look like this:
pre-blockquote text

text text text

(new paragraph)text

But, if I put a paragraph space between the pre-blockquote text and the blockquote text…
pre-blockquote text
[space]
-blockquote-text text text

(new paragraph) text /-blockquote-

…then it will look like this:

pre-blockquote text

text text text

(new paragraph) text

"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.

by Berkelium97 on Feb 16, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Basically, the blockquote bug often occurs because we tend to put the blockquote immediately below the link. If we did this:
link
[paragraph space]
blockquote…

then we would not see this issue anymore.

"After review, it has been determined that the previous play was not reviewable"
The Pac-10: where quality officiating happens.

by Berkelium97 on Feb 16, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That sounds about right.

by BearsNecessity on Feb 16, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

got it
i'm trying to put together a FAQ, will probably just dump this info in there.

So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!

by ragnarok on Feb 16, 2009 6:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The California Sports Website that's .....different from all the rest.

GoldenBlogs' FAQ
Start posting about the Golden Bears »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small
DBD 3/19/10: Fair-weather Asshats
Cal_2_small
And You Thought Pac-10 Refs Couldn't Get Any Worse
Cms_small
Cal Pro Day
Jones_1_squared_small
Spring Practice Preview

Recent FanPosts

Calflag_small
Golden Recruiting Thread: March 2010
P1_marshawn_small
DBD 3.18.10 Time To Vote For Daily Cal's Best Of Berkeley
Boosmall_small
Cal Baseball Runs Out of Runs, Houston Wins 12-9
Cms_small
"Study" Claims Cal has Zero Graduation Rate in Basketball
Calflag_small
DBD 3.17.10 CGB Market Research--Fill Out A Form!
Small
Will Cal beat Duke?
Small
RemorsefulBruinBabe Enters The Ring.  Again.
800px-ucmp_triceratops_right_small
DBD 3.16.10 You ever seen a grown man naked?
Small
Cal Basketball Tourney Viewing Parties

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

New Mexico forward Roman Martinez, left, pulls down a rebound against Montana center Brian Qvale, right, as New Mexico guard Darington Hobson, bottom right, looks on during the first half of an NCAA first-round college basketball tournament game in San Jose, Calif., Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

New Mexico Edges Montana, 62-57, For First Tournament Win Since 1999

Tennessee's Wayne Chism celebrates a dunk over San Diego State's Chase Tapley (22) and Tennessee's Melvin Goins (21) during the second half of an NCAA first-round college basketball game in Providence, R.I., Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Goins Helps Tennessee Keep Going In Midwest Region

Wake Forest guard Ishmael Smith (10) is congratulated by guard L.D. Williams (42) after making a shot during an NCAA college basketball game against Texas in New Orleans, Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Smith's Last-Second Shot Caps Furious Rally As Wake Forest Wins In OT, 81-80

More from SBNation.com >


Marshawnthusiasts!

Bear_small ragnarok

Script_cal_small HydroTech

Cal_football_2005_09_16_roll_07_012_small CBKWit

P1_marshawn_small TwistNHook

1262541127_small yellow fever

Jahvidtician

Giorgiorope_small Berkelium97

Calflag_small Avinash

Member Of The Follettariat

Bear__small norcalnick

Official Partner of CBS Sports